Hi Gregor, Agree that it would be nice to have a better UI.
However, I am not a frontend developer. The settings are not set frequently so we think it is good enough. Let's see what we can improve when we have a new cloudstack UI (proposed by Rohit on CCC NA 19). -Wei On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 08:26, Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT) < gregor.ri...@swisstxt.ch> wrote: > Nice! > > I wonder if LB configuration could be put into a dedicated UI. Editing > network and rule tags seems a bit clunky. > The disadvantage would be that the UI has to be adapted whenever support > for new options is added. > Maybe an autogenerated UI from the list of supported tags is possible? > ________________________________ > From: Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> > Sent: 17 September 2019 19:21 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Subject: Re: VR/LB inject others options in haproxy.cfg > > fyi > > That is what we have implemented. > > > https://kb.leaseweb.com/customer-portal/cloudstack/network-cloudstack#Network:CloudStack-ConfiguringaloadbalancerforanIPAddressofanIsolatedNetwork > > We will create pull request later this year. > > -Wei > > On Tuesday, 17 September 2019, Rauklei P. S. Guimarães <rauk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Maibe in Panel/Global Config? > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:17 AM Riepl, Gregor (SWISS TXT) < > > gregor.ri...@swisstxt.ch> wrote: > > > > > > > > > haproxy.cfg is generated by this file > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/core/ > > src/main/java/com/cloud/network/HAProxyConfigurator.java > > > > > > Allowing changes to the HAProxy config via the CloudStack API could be > > > a very useful addition, as the defaults are sometimes a bit limiting. > > > > > > For example, the timeout values don't make much sense for certain use > > > cases. > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > > -- > > ''' > > Rauklei P.S. Guimarães > > -------------------------------- > > ''' > > >
