I am +1 on opening the VOTE for removal of IRC references.
Em sex, 23 de ago de 2019 às 14:33, Andrija Panic
escreveu:
> I'm inline with that Paul - let's then remove the IRC being mentioned on
> main website and any future events. Makes sense?
>
> We can keep Slack as it is now, and then defini
I'm inline with that Paul - let's then remove the IRC being mentioned on
main website and any future events. Makes sense?
We can keep Slack as it is now, and then definitely (in my opinion) NOT
move to ASF Slack, since as someone mentioned it's a pain to move all users.
Does this sounds good to m
I don't think that we should be 'marketing' anything other than the mailing
lists.That is where most people can be found and where previously asked
questions can be searched for.
Having a ready to roll 'chat' tool has many advantages, so I'm cool with having
one in the back pocket.
But perso
Hello folks,
I see no problem with using chat platforms. The mail should stay as the
default communication tool indeed, but several times I used Slack when
helping foes around, raising questions, and pinging folks on private chat.
As far as we have tools and they are being used by the community I
All,
I think email is the more persistent form of communication and it must continue
to be the default communication mechanism for the project dev+user+etc.
For a more real-time/transient communication, IRC or slack are good tools. I
don't have any preference on either, as I'm not an active use
DaanHoogland commented on issue #67: short description of the evolution of LDAP
bindings
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/67#issuecomment-524212505
Not aware of the exact merge reqs for the docs, so please shoot me if I
jumped the gun at this.
DaanHoogland merged pull request #67: short description of the evolution of
LDAP bindings
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/67
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond t
