LS, I've started https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3267 and let it
run several times. It is still really close to time limits in some jobs, so
i'll probably split even more. Will let you know here but please get
involved on the PR if you feel some tests could be skipped for the initial
vali
+1
Rohit Yadav 于2019年4月15日周一 上午9:45写道：
> All,
>
>
> With CentOS8 around the corner to be released sometime around the summer,
> I would like to propose to deprecate CentOS6 as support management server
> host distro and KVM host distro. Non-systemd enabled Ubuntu releases have
> been already d
I agree that would be a bug Ivan, but please try to confirm what happened
actually through logs ?
Now that I checked, I do recall one similar case actually, where template
seems to be present physically on storage (images itself that is - can you
also confirm your templates are present on SS, besi
Well, we don't remove templates usually, just rename them and reset public,
featured flags.
I'll check, but suppose, that template api removal call shouldn't produce
the case like this? How this could be achieved thru API, when storage_ref
is removed, but template is in place?
The records for cer
Assuming it's not Assange :), perhaps check with teammates if any changes
on these templates were done - are your records completely missing or just
altered in bad way ?
Can you double check the API log for any delete template API calls ?
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 17:39, Ivan Kudryavtsev
wrote:
>
Andrija,
yes, I have the case with missing records in 'template_store_ref'. What I
don't get is how it could happen...
пн, 15 апр. 2019 г. в 11:24, Andrija Panic :
> Hi Ivan,
>
> is it possible that your DB got somehow corrupted or that you are missing
> records in template_store_ref etc - this
Hi Ivan,
is it possible that your DB got somehow corrupted or that you are missing
records in template_store_ref etc - this might be the reason why SSVM is
trying to download templates again - if you check the logs for
non-problematic templates, you will see something like "template already on
st
To follow up. When SSVM boots it tries to redownload all the templates from
original sources this leads to next oucomes:
- if the source is not available, the result is:
No route to host (Host unreachable) - If the template is changed on source:
then it leads to MD5 sum error.
Any ideas, why SSVM
+1.
From: Nux!
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 8:20 AM
To: dev
Cc: users
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Remove support for el6 packaging in 4.13/4.14
+1, EL6 is in its last phase of support.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Or
+1 for the qemu guest agent approach.
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2019 2:32 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Rohit Yadav
Subject: Re: Latest Qemu KVM EV appears to be broken with ACS
On 4/12/19 9:33 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Thanks, I wa
Hello, community.
Today, We've met the problem with ACS SS, which looks like a critical
error. In some point of time, new templates stopped to upload and the old
ones were unable to be removed.
After the SSVM recreation, I've met the situation when some templates are
not activated and have their
+1, EL6 is in its last phase of support.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav"
> To: "dev" , "users"
> Sent: Monday, 15 April, 2019 08:44:58
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Remove support for el6 packaging in 4.13/4.14
>
I agree, it should simplify builds too.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 7:17 AM Andrija Panic
wrote:
> +1
>
> CentOS 6 was a pain to make any newer features works, in regards to ancient
> qemu/libvirt and so on.
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 10:05, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 4/15/19 9:44
+1
CentOS 6 was a pain to make any newer features works, in regards to ancient
qemu/libvirt and so on.
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 10:05, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 4/15/19 9:44 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > All,
> >
> >
> > With CentOS8 around the corner to be released sometime around the
> su
Guys,
I've created a PR to fix the code on the website. I haven't changed the
content other than merging "Project Announcements" and "Latest Announcement"
sections to save space.
This PR is only meant to be a base for any other content changes to be made
from.
Refactor ( content unchanged )
On 4/15/19 9:44 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> All,
>
>
> With CentOS8 around the corner to be released sometime around the summer, I
> would like to propose to deprecate CentOS6 as support management server host
> distro and KVM host distro. Non-systemd enabled Ubuntu releases have been
> alread
All,
With CentOS8 around the corner to be released sometime around the summer, I
would like to propose to deprecate CentOS6 as support management server host
distro and KVM host distro. Non-systemd enabled Ubuntu releases have been
already deprecated [1].
The older CentOS6 version would hold
17 matches
Mail list logo
