LS, I've started https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3267 and let it run several times. It is still really close to time limits in some jobs, so i'll probably split even more. Will let you know here but please get involved on the PR if you feel some tests could be skipped for the initial validation. Or if you feel that is unacceptable!
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 10:51 AM Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, I will see if I can split and/or reduce the Travis test jobs. These > are not covering full regression checks anyway and are just indicators to > the most blatant errors in PRs. We'll need to get to a more minimal set of > functionality to include in such a first scan. > > bilingual spellchecker used, read at your own risk. > > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, 11:59 Nikolaos Dalezios, <dale...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I also have noticed this issue with travis tests. After my first PR travis >> was failing in the first test but all the local mvn tests were passed. >> After a PR update travis is now failing at test 7. Specifically the test >> isn' failing it times out but cannot figure it out >> >> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 14:59 Rafael Weingärtner < >> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > It is probably a concurrency problem on the test side. >> > I had a similar problem a long time ago with >> > "*smoke*/*test_primary_storage*". >> > That is one of the reasons why this test is there on its own. >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 8:54 AM Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > LS, >> > > Lately travis tests show more and more random failures. somtimes these >> > > succeed on stuborn retry but lately these are getting more persistent. >> > > Especially job .7 is hard to get past/passed. I am very irritated and >> > > looking for ways to resolve this without just ignoring. >> > > Is there anybody here that has a clear view on shat is happening? I >> heard >> > > say ubuntu verion and travis traffic increasing. >> > > Does anybody know if splitting the runs further is possible and/or >> > useful? >> > > >> > > thanks and kind regards, >> > > -- >> > > Daan >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Rafael Weingärtner >> > >> > -- Daan
