Re: cyclic package dependncy in KVM hypervisor plugin

2018-06-21 Thread Rohit Yadav
Yes, I'm bothered by this as well Daan. But I can live with this pattern. - Rohit From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 4:57:18 PM To: dev Subject: cyclic package dependncy in KVM hypervisor plugin Devs, I just noti

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

2018-06-21 Thread Rohit Yadav
Good idea, but a lot of things supported in advanced zone with KVM may not be supported in case of VMware, XenServer etc. The larger refactoring will need to account for how in various places checks exists how behaviors are enforced when the zone is basic or not, and what kind of impact will it

Re: Working with a 'PendingReleaseNotes' file

2018-06-21 Thread Rohit Yadav
Looks like a good idea, +1. - Rohit From: Wido den Hollander Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 12:13:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Daan Hoogland Cc: Rafael Weingärtner Subject: Re: Working with a 'PendingReleaseNotes' file

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.1.0 LTS [RC3]

2018-06-21 Thread Rohit Yadav
+1 (binding) based on smoketests results [1] and manual tests on building and testing in a local env. [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2376#issuecomment-399059806 For reference, the tarball artifacts only had the signature file missing, I've added the asc file now and verified lo

Re: Working with a 'PendingReleaseNotes' file

2018-06-21 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 06/21/2018 05:13 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Wido, I like the idea that we can generate from git what has happened since > last time. I also recognise that we don't do that properly all the time. True. But a bunch of commits don't akways tell the exact story. Well, they do, but not for the en

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.1.0 LTS [RC3]

2018-06-21 Thread Paul Angus
Hi All, I've created a 4.11.1.0 release (RC3), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: The changes since RC2 are listed at the end of this email. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.1.0-RC20180621T1552

Re: Open Summit CFP anyone ?

2018-06-21 Thread Stephan Seitz
Hey! I'm also interested :) Actually planning a talk abount attaching active/active iSCSI targets w/ TCQ and ALUA capability to a ceph cluster. Am Donnerstag, den 21.06.2018, 15:43 + schrieb Tutkowski, Mike: > I am interested. > > > > > On Jun 21, 2018, at 2:38 AM, Giles Sirett > > wrote

Re: Open Summit CFP anyone ?

2018-06-21 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
I am interested. > On Jun 21, 2018, at 2:38 AM, Giles Sirett wrote: > > Hi Andrija > - yes I think it would be a great idea for Cloudstack to have some talks > there. > > Open source summit appears to be Linux Foundations replacement for > Linuxcon/cloudopen - people from this community have

Re: Working with a 'PendingReleaseNotes' file

2018-06-21 Thread Daan Hoogland
Wido, I like the idea that we can generate from git what has happened since last time. I also recognise that we don't do that properly all the time. What this comes down to is discipline, however we implement it. Deciding if a change is big enough would be up to both the author and the reviewer and

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

2018-06-21 Thread Wido den Hollander
For now I've created a Pull Request so we can have a discussion about it there: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2720 Wido On 06/21/2018 02:34 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote: > +1 > > We have an empty page regarding 5.0 [1] in the Design documents section > [2]. It might be a good spo

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

2018-06-21 Thread Gabriel Beims Bräscher
+1 We have an empty page regarding 5.0 [1] in the Design documents section [2]. It might be a good spot to sort out CloudStack 5.0 plans. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/5.0+Design+Documents [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Design 2018-06-21 5

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

2018-06-21 Thread Daan Hoogland
well, that one is a good one to update, but there was a dedicated 5.0 page at some time. I think we can just use this from here on in and merge anything else in it when we find it ;) On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > This one [1]? > > [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

2018-06-21 Thread Rafael Weingärtner
This one [1]? [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Roadmap On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Wido, there used to be a page on cwiki with plans for 5.0, I can not find > it anymore but this should be added to it. > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:42 PM, i

Re: [DISCUSS] Blocking the creation of new Basic Networking zones

2018-06-21 Thread Daan Hoogland
Wido, there used to be a page on cwiki with plans for 5.0, I can not find it anymore but this should be added to it. On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:42 PM, ilya musayev wrote: > I think the simplicity of Basic Zone was - you can get away with 1 VLAN > for everything (great for POC setup) where as Adva

RE: Open Summit CFP anyone ?

2018-06-21 Thread Giles Sirett
Hi Andrija - yes I think it would be a great idea for Cloudstack to have some talks there. Open source summit appears to be Linux Foundations replacement for Linuxcon/cloudopen - people from this community have spoken at these before and had good attendance Lets coordinate on here some submiss