Thanks for the feedback, Will!
I agree with the approach you outlined.
Thanks for being so involved in the process! Let’s chat with Giles once he’s
back to see if we can get your questions answered.
> On Mar 31, 2018, at 10:14 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
>
> In the past the committee was chosen a
In the past the committee was chosen as a relatively small group in order
to make it easier to manage feedback. In order to make it fair to everyone
in the community, I would suggest that instead of doing it with a small
group, we do it out in the open on a scheduled call.
We will have to get a l
Hi Ron,
I am definitely open to working this however makes the most sense.
It looks like Will’s e-mail indicates that the process I suggested has been
followed in the past (which is how I recall, as well).
Let’s make sure I understood Will correctly.
Will – Are you, in fact, indicating that wh
Problem to register ISO in all zones
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10349
Regards
Marcelo
Ya Mike, this is the way we have done it in the past and it works well.
Anyone interested can join us, and we will setup a call to review the talks
on a specific date. Then go from there.
Do we know what the second day will be yet? I have to try to figure out a
venue (hackathon?) for a third day,
I am not sure about your concern in that case.
I am not sure why people not interested in Cloudstack would volunteer as
reviewers and want to pick bad presentations.
I would be more worried that there are not enough good presentations
proposed rather than some meritorious presentation will get
Hi Ron,
From what I understand, the CloudStack proposals will be mixed in with all of
the ApacheCon proposals.
In the past when I’ve participated in these CloudStack panels to review
proposals, we had to compare each proposal against the others to arrive at a
balance of topics (i.e. not all ne
Is this a real concern?
Why would a large number of Apache contributors who are not interested
in Cloudstack (enough to outvote those "part of the Cloudstack
community") get involved as reviewers
Reviewing involves some commitment of time so I am hard pressed to guess
why some Apache contribu