Github user rashmidixit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1884
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user rashmidixit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1884
Closing this based on the new PR #1944.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
you are in.
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On March 14, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Pavan Kumar Aravapalli
(pavankuma...@persistent.com) wrote:
Hi,
I am unable to edit/add pages for the cwiki link
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.9+Design+Documents.
Can some one hel
Disable with a maven profile to enable? mvn –P withThisOrThat
Delete but only after a time span. A number of releases is not any kind of
promise in our case.
On 15/03/17 04:40, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote:
Disable, then delete works for me, too.
On 3/14/17, 7:49 PM, "Simon Weller" wr
GitHub user harikrishna-patnala opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2006
CLOUDSTACK-9833: Move configuration parameters from Config.java to use
configdepot
Following parameters are moved from config.java to configdepot.
This will make the management
Hi Jeromy,
Thanks for the proposal. It will good if you can create a FS in cwiki for the
same. I saw your comment about force stopping VMs affected by primary storage
outage. If this can be done without any issues then it can be leveraged to
improve the current behavior of Cloudstack as well. C
Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
@ustcweizhou does it look good to you now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user bvbharatk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r106089352
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/alert/AlertManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -767,7 +767,9 @@ public void sendAlert(AlertType alertType, long
dataCenterId, Long p
Github user bvbharatk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r106088915
--- Diff: engine/components-api/src/com/cloud/agent/AgentManager.java ---
@@ -141,7 +142,7 @@
public void pullAgentOutMaintenance(long ho
Github user bvbharatk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r106088086
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/host/ReconnectHostCmd.java ---
@@ -100,17 +103,18 @@ public Long getInstanceId() {
@
Github user bvbharatk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r106088129
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/AgentManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -986,33 +986,28 @@ public Answer easySend(final Long hostId, fi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1923
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
@rafaelweingartner stop start destroy etc all methods related to virtual
router code have these parameters? Questions there is why are they not removed
in the first place when they CallContex
Github user cloudsadhu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813#discussion_r106085688
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py ---
@@ -114,7 +114,13 @@ def test_00_deploy_vm_root_resize(self):
# 2. roo
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 468
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=105
Failed=0
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Disable, then delete works for me, too.
On 3/14/17, 7:49 PM, "Simon Weller" wrote:
I agree with Sergey and Will. Let's disable it first.
Simon Weller/615-312-6068
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Weingärtner [rafaelweingart...@gmail.com]
Received: Tuesday, 14
I agree with Sergey and Will. Let's disable it first.
Simon Weller/615-312-6068
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Weingärtner [rafaelweingart...@gmail.com]
Received: Tuesday, 14 Mar 2017, 9:10PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org [dev@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: [DISCUSS] Retirement of midon
I think we approach these with a disable, then delete approach. Disable for
one or two releases and if no one steps in to revive it in that period, we
delete it.
On Mar 14, 2017 9:10 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner"
wrote:
Dear ACS fellows,
Recently there have been two threads asking and discussing the
I am for:
(i) disable the build for the plugin for the next 2 major release followed by
(ii) remove everything in ACS 4.12 if no one express regrets by then
Dear ACS fellows,
Recently there have been two threads asking and discussing the “midonet”
integration with Apache CloudStack (ACS) [1-2].
After quite some discussions, we noticed that despite having some people
willing to use it, the plugin has never been fully developed by its vendor
(Midokura).
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 467
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=102
Failed=3
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1988
Trillian test result (tid-955)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 30862 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
Ya, I am not sure where the problem is stemming from. The fact that my
code is not defensive around this problem is a problem. That is for sure. But
given my understanding of the moving parts h
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@borisstoyanov what's the last commit in your code ?
could you check how many nics attached to the VR in database, select * from
nics where instance_id= ?
---
If your project is set up
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
it seems nicDevId is not set correctly in java code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
This is why I suggested a discussion and then a vote. I know the idea of
removing a plugin may seem ignorant, but in my opinion, a code that does
not work, no one maintains, and we hear that never worked 100%, is not a
code worth to have in the code base. My specific problem with this is that
it g
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
yes, agree with you @swill, it seems eth3 is duplicated eth2. The VR we're
trying to bring up isn't supposed to have eth3 at all...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
the ips.json is very very weird
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
I think removing the plugin build is friendly to the daring and won’t hinder
the ignorant. Good call. However; less code always gets my vote as well.
Conclusion I’m +/- 0 on this.
On 14/03/17 19:43, "Rafael Weingärtner" wrote:
So, should we move to other thread to discuss and vote its remo
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
@anshul1886 what method that is called in multiple places are you talking
about?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r106002237
--- Diff:
engine/schema/test/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/db/PrimaryDataStoreDaoImplTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+// Licensed to the
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Shanika Ediriweera
Undergraduate
Dept. of Computer Science & Eng.
University of Moratuwa
On 14 March 2017 at 09:52, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> You(shanika) should have access to the edit the wiki now.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
>
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
So... Looking at this with a different perspective. If there is a bug
elsewhere which would cause an IP to be duplicated in the `dbag`, the old
implementation would have cleaned up this bug and
Jeromy I already experienced a similar problem. A host had a problem of
connectivity with a storage, ACS did not know (I think it does check this
right now) and it was kind of odd. Because some VMs could not be started,
because of their last host id was the host with the connectivity problem.
I be
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r105998903
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +92,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
This `ips.json` file confuses the hell out of me. From what I can tell
both `eth2` and `eth3` both have the ip `10.1.35.83` twice for each (for a
total of the IP being configured 4 times over two
So, should we move to other thread to discuss and vote its removal or
disable its plugin build?
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Well, if Midokura is not willing to put in effort, ... Not sure what to
> put on the dots.
>
> On 14/03/17 15:08, "Simon Weller" wrote:
>
>
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r105993059
--- Diff:
engine/schema/test/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/db/PrimaryDataStoreDaoImplTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+// Licens
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r105992559
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +92,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r105992671
--- Diff:
engine/schema/test/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImplTest.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r105990460
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +90,68 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r105989477
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +90,68 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@borisstoyanov I have a suspicion that the ip_association.json is a
transient file which may be short lived. I am not sure because I have not seen
it either, but it was the file being processed wh
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@ustcweizhou no VPC
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@swill thanks, I found the ips.json, but I couldn't find the
ip_association.json on the VR. I guess it's not processed yet. Can you advise
how to force it to generate? Hope this helps.
If all networking is lost, then obviously there is a bigger problem there. The
monitor is designed to do a true read/write test to the storage and report back
a pass/fail. Through this discussion, there was a ping suggestion, which I
think we will include.
The way this came about was that o
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1879
@sureshanaparti I pulled the latest code and repeated the first test
scenario, got the same failure: `Message: The setting of vmConfig is invalid
for cluster CLD100.`. I attach the full [manage
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1760
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 466
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=104
Failed=1
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r105959436
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +90,68 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r105959564
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +90,68 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r105959827
--- Diff:
engine/schema/test/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImplTest.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r105952120
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/alert/AlertManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -767,7 +767,9 @@ public void sendAlert(AlertType alertType, long
dataCenterId
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@borisstoyanov we are still trying to understand how the IP was found when
looping through the `dbag` but it is not associated with the expected dev when
we try to update the index which it was fo
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582
systemvm template is now updated to 4.10
http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/ with pr #1982
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r105942978
--- Diff: engine/components-api/src/com/cloud/agent/AgentManager.java ---
@@ -141,7 +142,7 @@
public void pullAgentOutMaintenance
Hi,
In my continuing quest to merge 4.9.2.0 into our fork, I'm noticing that
the Juniper Contrail plugin has an "EventUtils" class which looks for
methods with @ActionEvent on them and them emits over the event bus. This
does the same thing as the more-standard ActionEventUtils class. Is there a
r
Well, if Midokura is not willing to put in effort, ... Not sure what to put on
the dots.
On 14/03/17 15:08, "Simon Weller" wrote:
We took a look at testing it in the lab back in early 2016 and Midokura
told us that it was a bad idea, probably wouldn't work and we should just
switch to op
Hmm, it seems that there are people who would like to use it in ACS.
However, by Simon`s email, the vendor does not seem to care much.
I am inclined to adopt one of Daan`s email previously:
If we have to lay a burdon of fixing before release on people that
> don't use it, I would say no. You use
Github user serg38 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813#discussion_r105932339
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py ---
@@ -114,7 +114,13 @@ def test_00_deploy_vm_root_resize(self):
# 2. root di
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1918
@jayakarteek from what I understood so far, there will always be a mismatch.
For instance, the way it is implemented so far, if a VM uses a service
offering that provides 1000
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@borisstoyanov are you using vpc ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@swill we're using one IP range for the physical guest public network. I
think we could set this up if required?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
On the Jira ticket, Wei Zhou mentioned that this could potentially happen
if you have two different public IP ranges. So if you associate a public IP
which is in a different range than the source
We took a look at testing it in the lab back in early 2016 and Midokura told
us that it was a bad idea, probably wouldn't work and we should just switch to
openstack.
- Si
From: Erik Weber
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 3:28 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: midonet-cli
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
I have to admit, I am not sure how the IP was found when looping through
the list initially, but then when trying to update the index for the IP that
was found, it is not there. The only way I ca
So a few questions come to mind here.
So if all networking is lost, how are you going to being able reliably fence
the VM on the hosts?
Are you assuming you still have out of band IPMI connectivity?
If you're running bonded interfaces to different switches, what scenario would
occur where the
Sharad Nandwani, please send a mail to dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org
From the page https://cloudstack.apache.org/mailing-lists.html :
“To leave the dev mailing list email dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org.”
On 14/03/17 14:51, "Sharad Nandwani" wrote:
How can I unsubscribe from
How can I unsubscribe from the List. Please remove me from the list as I am not
associated with the product.
Thanks
From: Pavan Kumar Aravapalli
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 7:15 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Reg : Edit Access
Hi,
I am unabl
Hi,
I am unable to edit/add pages for the cwiki link
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.9+Design+Documents.
Can some one help me in doing the same.
Cwiki username: pavan4smile
Thanks & Regards
Pavan Kumar Aravapalli.
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@swill what I mean is , if you do not want to change the logic, do you need
to change 'else:' to 'elif index == -1:' ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@ustcweizhou the `else` case did not change from the original code:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741/files#diff-a7d6f7150cca74029f23c19b72ad0622L49
@karuturi I have updated t
Thanks for your clarification. I see now. You were referring to a networking
problem where one host could not see the storage (but the storage was still up
and running).
On 3/13/17, 10:31 PM, "Jeromy Grimmett" wrote:
I apologize for the delay on the response, let me clarify the points
req
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1988
@DaanHoogland a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1988
@blueorangutan test centos7 kvm-centos7
component/application_clusters/test_application_cluster_life_cycle.py,component/application_clusters/test_application_cluster_provisioning.py,componen
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582
@karuturi @wido @rhtyd @swill @pdion891 @rafaelweingartner
I see the system VMs pointed to are still those in the 4.6 directory on the
download servers. Is that really intended? I thoug
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582
So this PR will be useless as is!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582
Effectively we are due for an updated systemvm for strongswan + jdk8
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1918
@rafaelweingartner
we can retrieve the CPU speed of the host but the utilisation will have
mismatch.
create VM with Medium Instance having 1000 Mhz , and VM is utilising
200Mhz of
Github user sureshanaparti commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837
Code changes LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user sureshanaparti commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r105888712
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/AgentManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1049,7 +1044,13 @@ public boolean executeUserRequest(fina
Github user sarathkouk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1775
[results.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/841130/results.txt)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user sarathkouk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1775
Here is the test result,
Test for checking automatic tag removal on released Public IP ... ===
TestName: test_25_CLOUDSTACK_9606| Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
-
Github user bvbharatk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r105881592
--- Diff: engine/components-api/src/com/cloud/agent/AgentManager.java ---
@@ -141,7 +142,7 @@
public void pullAgentOutMaintenance(long ho
Github user bvbharatk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r105881440
--- Diff:
plugins/network-elements/netscaler/src/com/cloud/network/element/NetscalerElement.java
---
@@ -512,7 +512,11 @@ public void
doInTransaction
Github user bvbharatk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r105881425
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/alert/AlertManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -767,7 +767,9 @@ public void sendAlert(AlertType alertType, long
dataCenterId, Long p
Github user bvbharatk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r105881247
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/AgentManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1049,7 +1044,13 @@ public boolean executeUserRequest(final lon
lets get to the blockers first.
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Haijiao <18602198...@163.com> wrote:
> Hi, Karuturi
>
>
> These PRs below seems ready to be merged too.
>
>
> #1883, CLOUDSTACK-9723: Enable unique mac address across the zones
> #1886,
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1761
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 465
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=105
Failed=0
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582
Hi @DaanHoogland Are you planning to change the url to
download.cloudstack.org?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2005
PEP8 & PyFlakes compliance of our marvin test code:
CloudStack$
CloudStack$ pep8 test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/.py
CloudStack$
CloudStack$ pyflakes test/integration
GitHub user prashanthvarma opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2005
CLOUDSTACK-9450: Network Offering for VPC based on DB flag
Co-Authored-By: Prashanth Manthena prashanth.manth...@nuagenetworks.net
Bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOU
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2004
PEP8 & PyFlakes compliance of our marvin test code:
CloudStack$
CloudStack$ pep8 test/integration/plugins/nuagevsp/.py
CloudStack$
CloudStack$ pyflakes test/integration
GitHub user prashanthvarma opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2004
CLOUDSTACK-9832: Restrict addition of public IP NIC to the VPC VR when the
VPC offering does not contain VpcVirtualRouter as a SourceNat provider
Detail:
When the VPC offering does n
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1775
@priyankparihar thank you for adding this test. Have you run it? Since this
is not part of the smoketestd can you provide any results.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user priyankparihar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1775
@borisstoyanov and @syed Please take a look. Test case is added. If now
everything looks ok then please provide your LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1965
@ustcweizhou
We are saving the password in the user_vm_details explicitly. We are not
checking if ssh key pair is set for this vm or not.
I agree that ideally we should sync the p
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Rafael Weingärtner
wrote:
> I got a reply from Midonet community; they said that midonet-client was
> incorporated by midonet-cluster (
> https://github.com/midonet/midonet/tree/staging/v5.4/midonet-cluster).
>
>
> So, if anyone wants to invest energy on this, it m
It has ended in we are stuck with a to old gson implementation and Wido build a
call based on a newer one.
On 10/03/17 02:01, "Will Stevens" wrote:
I will review. Thanks for digging that up. Haha. You know every issue now
because of your cleanup. :)
On Mar 9, 2017 7:51 PM, "Raf
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1889
Looks good (did not test it)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1889
@rashmidixit thanks for your work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
