Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/612#issuecomment-123579225
Keys are being created:
[root@kvm1 ~]# ls -lart ~/.ssh/
total 16
dr-xr-x---. 3 root root 4096 Jul 22 02:37 ..
drwx--. 2 root root 4096
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/609#discussion_r35184816
--- Diff:
plugins/user-authenticators/ldap/src/org/apache/cloudstack/ldap/LdapManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -57,17 +57,22 @@
private LdapContextFacto
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/609#discussion_r35184810
--- Diff:
plugins/user-authenticators/ldap/src/org/apache/cloudstack/ldap/LdapConfiguration.java
---
@@ -43,14 +45,14 @@
private ConfigurationD
On 07/21/2015 06:01 PM, Somesh Naidu wrote:
> +1
>
> Reasons:
> 1. Technically speaking, Apache Cloudstack never had version less than 4.0.
> But even if they are considered they would be EOL'd at some point.
> 2. At some point the feature set disparity between version will make it
> really co
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/612#issuecomment-123571169
Will test it against KVM + Agent.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Lot of work Rajani, I don't understand the spec files in groovy, yet.
How can I verify these are run?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> Can someone please review PR 609? Its an enhancement to LDAP import users
> functionality
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/6
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/609#discussion_r35181833
--- Diff:
plugins/user-authenticators/ldap/src/org/apache/cloudstack/ldap/LdapManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -57,17 +57,22 @@
private LdapContextF
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/609#discussion_r35181750
--- Diff:
plugins/user-authenticators/ldap/src/org/apache/cloudstack/ldap/LdapConfiguration.java
---
@@ -43,14 +45,14 @@
private Configurat
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/334#issuecomment-123562895
@sudhansu7 can you please rebase the changes for master?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Can someone please review PR 609? Its an enhancement to LDAP import users
functionality
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/609
Thanks,
~Rajani
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/606#issuecomment-123554934
yes. copy paste error :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/601#issuecomment-123526526
LGTM, though I've not tested this with a real host
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/611#issuecomment-123526321
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/612#issuecomment-123526216
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/612#issuecomment-123471733
Hey @DaanHoogland
Just the initialiser stuff and the return of the getPreferredCharset()
method.
Cheers,
Wilder
---
If your project i
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/612#issuecomment-123460301
@wilderrodrigues of course, sure you want to wait for that?
And to what extend? we want tests for this initializer but also for the
agent and it's functionin
Thanks very much Rohit,
The plugins section is now displaying, I believe because I removed
plugins.js.gz. I'm using Cloudstack version 4.5.1
Michael
From: Rohit Yadav [rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 12:00 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Su
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/612#issuecomment-123387872
Hey @DaanHoogland
Could you write a test for that, please? :)
Cheers,
Wilder
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
+1
Reasons:
1. Technically speaking, Apache Cloudstack never had version less than 4.0. But
even if they are considered they would be EOL'd at some point.
2. At some point the feature set disparity between version will make it really
complex to have direct upgrade paths.
3. As Daan mentioned, 2.
-1 on dropping old upgrade code.
I prefer skipping old upgrade paths during coverity scan instead of removing
the code altogether.
Even with multi-step upgrade, user will be forced to register system templates
multiple times (once for every step).
Agree with John regarding the need to establi
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/606#issuecomment-123381112
Shouldn't we then pass "params" to the configure method? That seems to be
missing in your example.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
GitHub user DaanHoogland opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/612
CLOUDSTACK-8658: make initializer static instead of default
bad bug: ommision of the static keyword on initializer leaves data
uninitialized :{
You can merge this pull request into a Git r
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/606#issuecomment-123278333
while I agree with the code change based on the current implementations of
getVirtualSize, should we just pass the storage layer in the params so that any
new imple
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/610#issuecomment-123272585
@DaanHoogland Thanks for the information.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Define and include your plugin in the top plugins.js file, also remove any
.js.gz file. Which CloudStack branch are you working against? Make sure to
define correct names and use something like firebug or chrome dev-tools to see
if require.js is missing to load any plugin asset (like js, css, im
Hi,
I’m trying to write a 3rd party UI plugin for cloudstack for a university
project, unfortunately I can’t seem to get the “plugins” section of the UI to
display.
In usr/share/cloudstack-management/webapps/client/plugins
I have two test plugins “testPlugin” and “csMyFirstPlugin” which are fol
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/610#issuecomment-123252820
@koushik-das 'dead local storage' is a source analysis term for 'unused
variable'. Not severe unless it happens a lot, because of memory consumption.
---
If yo
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/610#issuecomment-123232196
Changes look good. Not sure what "dead local store" mean.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/611#issuecomment-123227873
Test browser based incomplete volume upload, followed by SSVM destroy.
Volume should go to UploadAbandoned/Error state and get cleaned up. ... ===
TestName: test
GitHub user koushik-das opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/611
CLOUDSTACK-8655: [Browser Based Upload Volume] Partially uploaded volâ¦
â¦umes are not getting destroyed as part of storage GC
As part of volume sync, that runs during of SSVM star
John,
You wrote this here and on users and I think it is a good proposal.
There is one technical catch and I don't think it is worth bothering
users@ with: our current db installation scheme starts with a 4.0.0
database and performs all upgrade steps from that point onward. This
can be solved in t
31 matches
Mail list logo
