Sorry guys, I missed this email.
A couple of weeks ago I replaced many IPs by 127.0.0.1 in the tests. Missed
that one.
Haven’t ran into this issue - not local, remotely or seen any complain on ASF
builds. Reason for not reacting before.
Will fix.
Cheers,
Wilder
On 25 May 2015, at 16:01, Raf
we do not have validation framework for the configs. We only do simple
validation of datatype check ie) if its boolean, parseBoolean etc.
~Rajani
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you have a plug-in that adds a custom config valu
Hi,
Has any one added swift as secondary storage in cloudstack, if yes please
share the instructions for it.
How do we seed systemvm template in this case?
Thanks,Prapul sriram,PSI cloud solutions.
Hi,
If you have a plug-in that adds a custom config value and an admin updates
that config value, is there a way to have custom validation logic invoked?
For example, let's say you want to add a custom config value that's
associated with each and every account (ex. total.miniops). If the admin
ch
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/321#issuecomment-106681254
@wilderrodrigues thank you :)
There isnt any marvin test. But, to test it manually, reduce the cleanup
thread interval to a very low value(may be 10 sec) an
+1 , wait for it.
Best Regards,
Star Guo
===
+2 :)
On 28 May 2015 at 17:21, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> +1 for this
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Logan Barfield"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 28 May, 2015 3:48:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [Feature] Clouds
Hi Pierre,
yes Im aware of that mifration, but we tried to deploy zone from
scratch...anyway, with hacking the DB, it was fine later, but we postoned
S3 testing for some later stage, and will use probably the migration path
as you suggested.
Thx !
On 29 May 2015 at 01:39, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
Andrija,
Can you redeploy using the 4.5.1 systemvm template and an NFS as secondary
Storage, then use this API:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.5/root_admin/updateCloudToUseObjectStore.html
to migrate from NFS to S3 ? Did try that once and had success, you can
refer to "60 Recipes for
". there is reference
to cloud.com repos as well, and this is into the database of CloudStack."
BTW, systemVM 4.5.1 on cloud.com is broken, cat /etc/*release gives version
4.4, and VR fails to start...(we used S3 Secondary Store for testing, so
could not download from apt or shapeblue...
On 29
Hi,
I'm pretty aligned with Rajani concerns, which is why I've always used
apt-get.eu as repo in the docs. Also, recent RCs I've participate, testers
were using systemvm-template from jenkins so systemvm-templates that end up
on apt-get.eu repo are tested one copied from Jenkins. there is referenc
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Erik Weber wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Rohit Yadav
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Erik,
>>
>> > On 28-May-2015, at 9:20 am, Erik Weber wrote:
>> >
>> > The Announcement should be published on blogs.apache.org/cloudstack as
>> > well, to feed the RSS processor on
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> > On 28-May-2015, at 9:20 am, Erik Weber wrote:
> >
> > The Announcement should be published on blogs.apache.org/cloudstack as
> > well, to feed the RSS processor on cloudstack.apache.org.
> >
> > I could've done it if I only kn
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/153#issuecomment-106607317
@gauravaradhye is this something you could take a look at?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/28/2015 04:48 PM, Logan Barfield wrote:
> Hi Star,
>
> I'll +1 this. I would like to see support for RBD snapshots as
> well, and maybe have a method to "backup" the snapshots to
> secondary storage. Right now for large volumes it can take a
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/323
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/323#issuecomment-106591169
LGTM.
@bhaisaab You might want to change this back when/if the testing repo comes
back?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/318#issuecomment-106589140
Thanks for fixing this @wilderrodrigues
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
GitHub user landro opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/323
Fixed yum and apt repo locations used by chef in devcloud4
The testing repos seem to be gone - currently returning HTTP 404. I'm
modified the urls to point at the upstream apache versions
You c
Hello Rohit,
I've tried your process, but my debian7/CS4.51 doesn't work well.
(I have changed in the database, table vm_template, the type USER to
SYSTEM for the sharpeblue systemvm and SYSTEM to USER for the old systemvm)
The Console proxy starts well, but the SSVM started only after 3 manu
Thanks for bringing the topic up. As it’s not related to a specific
vulnerability or something that needs to be discussed in private, I’ll keep the
conversation on dev@. Generally I’m happy to see discussions about security
design happen in public so all can learn. This convo hit my filters so I
The specific comment Marcus made was warning - but it was/is already
commited in 4.5.1 vanila. But it doesnt work as it seems...
Even qemu-img resize worked fine for me on poweredoff VMs/volumes mutiply
times (with DB changes), and later we fix manually partitions/FS inside OS.
But here also live
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/322
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user gauravaradhye opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/322
CLOUDSTACK-8526: Use more memory for HyperV VMs in case SSH is tried to VM
VMs on HyperV are GUI based. They require at least 1 GB memory if SSH to VM
is to be tested.
Other chang
Thanks, Remi. I wasn't personally involved in the case that went wrong (and
that caused Anthony to rethink this), and I couldn't find the original customer
ticket, so I only remember some of the details. I do remember that the previous
CloudStack HA used Pool.emergency_transition_to_master(), wh
+2 :)
On 28 May 2015 at 17:21, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> +1 for this
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Logan Barfield"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 28 May, 2015 3:48:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [Feature] Cloudstack KVM with RBD
>
> Hi Star,
>
> I'll +1 this. I would lik
+1 for this
- Original Message -
From: "Logan Barfield"
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 28 May, 2015 3:48:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Feature] Cloudstack KVM with RBD
Hi Star,
I'll +1 this. I would like to see support for RBD snapshots as well,
and maybe have a method to "b
Marcus reported corrupted volumes due to this, in the pr:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/281#issuecomment-104432629
I am not sure it was due to this code or that it didn't get solved by this
code. As it is in 4.5 and master I will leave it in for now. meaning in
4.4.4.
Op do 28 mei 2015
Not really, volume is still fine (undamaged) :) but resize doesnt work,
seems like code-only issue, since on debug agent in logs, I dont see
anything sent to libvirt etc...confirmed from inside VM.
On 28 May 2015 at 16:58, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> yes, that one is. It doesn't solve the problem, I
yes, that one is. It doesn't solve the problem, I understand. Does it
worsen it?
Op do 28 mei 2015 om 16:56 schreef Andrija Panic :
> Ah...sorry for that, my bad... I understood it's already present on 4.5.1
> vanial..
> But I understood that this commit IS actually already present in 4.5.1:
>
>
Ah...sorry for that, my bad... I understood it's already present on 4.5.1
vanial..
But I understood that this commit IS actually already present in 4.5.1:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/173909e99d85cfcc85b017bc426950f9f16fddf0
?
On 28 May 2015 at 16:33, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Andr
Hi Star,
I'll +1 this. I would like to see support for RBD snapshots as well,
and maybe have a method to "backup" the snapshots to secondary
storage. Right now for large volumes it can take an hour or more to
finish the snapshot.
I have already discussed this with Wido, and was able to determin
Andrija, the code you refer to is post-4.5. it is not in 4.4 or 4.5.So I am
a bit confused by your remark.
How do you mean it generates the error you got?
Did you apply the patch from PR-281 on 4.5.1 and tested?
or did you test a vanilla 4.5.1?
Op do 28 mei 2015 om 16:22 schreef Andrija Panic :
>
Daan - I just tested this (but on 4.5.1), and it doesnt work, at least in
my setup:
2015-05-28 16:14:56,108 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-1:null) Trying to fetch storage pool
8457c284-cf5d-3979-b82e-32ea5efeb97b from libvirt
2015-05-28 16:14:56,257 DEBUG [kvm.reso
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/321
CLOUDSTACK-8525: NPE while updating the state of the volume after deletion
The volume is already deleted (may be by the cleanup thread) and hence
the NPE. Added a not null check for the volu
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/317
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/315
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hi all,
Please, could someone have a look at that?
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/computer/systemvmbuilder/
The slave node is offline. The latest successful SSVM build is from the 4th May.
Cheers,
Wilder
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for getting in touch!
First of all, good to hear we agree that this change wasn't done in a nice
way. For now, I think we should focus on documenting this change properly
so folks are aware they need to change their setup. I wrote some
documentation already that I'll port to 4.
Pretty good read though :) Im glad to see others are using SF with ACS!!
FG
On May 27, 2015 9:13 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
wrote:
> I must make that mistake at least once or twice a year. :/
>
> Sorry for the spam! :(
>
> On Wednesday, May 27, 2015, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> > I am pretty sure M
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/33#issuecomment-106239376
Hi @KarlHarrisSungardAS,
Is there any update on this PR? It is quite behind current master and we're
unable to merge it like this. I think it's probably
Hi Erik,
> On 28-May-2015, at 9:20 am, Erik Weber wrote:
>
> The Announcement should be published on blogs.apache.org/cloudstack as
> well, to feed the RSS processor on cloudstack.apache.org.
>
> I could've done it if I only knew how :-)
I’m not sure how to do it as well. I’ve posted announcemen
+1 on buidling,,,
Also from, https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/
"
Main | Next page »
WEDNESDAY JAN 28, 2015
CloudStack and the "Ghost" glibc vulnerability
...
...
CloudStack community members have built an updated system VM template,
which ShapeBlue is hosting at
http://packages.shapeblue.com/s
Hi All,
Kindly spare sometime to read below blog which is really true where we face
in real time.
I believe ACS and xenserver should work together to bring ACS as best.
http://blog.remibergsma.com/2015/05/23/making-xenserver-and-cloudstack-sing-and-dance-together-again/
Thanks,
Keerthi
The Announcement should be published on blogs.apache.org/cloudstack as
well, to feed the RSS processor on cloudstack.apache.org.
I could've done it if I only knew how :-)
--
Erik
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Done.
>
> > On 09-May-2015, at 3:35 am, ilya wrote:
> >
>
44 matches
Mail list logo
