Apollo

Just discovered this, which seems like a possible diamond, http://capgemini.github.io/devops/apollo/ I'll be trying to find some spare time to see if it's possible to get running on CloudStack with a reasonable CloudStack, but would love to hear from anyone doing the same. -- Erik

Re: Staging NFS to Swift traffic?

Yes, for that matter - I place question for any S3 style storage :) Just need some integration guidelines... Thx On May 8, 2015 2:58 AM, "Marcus" wrote: > Not entirely sure, but is there anything about the other object stores(S3)? > They should all work the same with NFS staging. > On May 7, 20

Re: Cloustack packaging

Sorry it took me a few days to get back to you on this.. but here's my first proposal to fix a few of those issues, plus a few others :) https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:56 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > On Apr 26, 2015, at 4:34 PM, Rafael Fonseca wrote: > > > H

Re: [4.5] Build Failing

Unfortunately, no - it seems that dependency has never been cached before. On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Marcus wrote: > Does mvn -o fix it? Looks like it is unable to fetch a dependency, if you > have it cached locally then -o should help. > On May 7, 2015 5:24 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" > > wrote: > >

Re: Staging NFS to Swift traffic?

Not entirely sure, but is there anything about the other object stores(S3)? They should all work the same with NFS staging. On May 7, 2015 4:00 AM, "Andrija Panic" wrote: > Hi guys, > > I cant find any docs on this topic, so...posting a question here. > > We are going to use Swift as region wide

Re: [4.5] Build Failing

Does mvn -o fix it? Looks like it is unable to fetch a dependency, if you have it cached locally then -o should help. On May 7, 2015 5:24 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having trouble building the latest from 4.5. Am I missing something > here? > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Build and create tomcat, fix several othe...

GitHub user rsafonseca opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238 Build and create tomcat, fix several other issues with management server Hi guys, This PR has the following goodies: - Tomcat built by maven project (currently set to 8.0.22)

[4.5] Build Failing

Hi, I'm having trouble building the latest from 4.5. Am I missing something here? [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) on project cloud-maven-standard: Execution cloudstack-checkstyle of goal org.apache.maven.plugins:ma

Re: master branch wasn't building

Nice try Daan, but you still own us a beer ;) Cheers, Le jeudi 7 mai 2015, Daan Hoogland a écrit : > I will never admit to anything again and as a matter of fact I was only > joking! > > Op do 7 mei 2015 om 23:08 schreef Mike Tutkowski < > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com >: > > > OK, I guess Daan

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

I was waiting on some quotes, will share the draft with placeholders for quotes tomorrow. > On 08-May-2015, at 12:42 am, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > k, how are you on the announce? you asked for help but I didn't see a draft. > > Op vr 8 mei 2015 om 00:29 schreef Rohit Yadav : > >> Thanks to everyo

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

k, how are you on the announce? you asked for help but I didn't see a draft. Op vr 8 mei 2015 om 00:29 schreef Rohit Yadav : > Thanks to everyone who tested and voted. Just realised I forgot to remove > the “Z" from the template, it should have read: > > After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.

Re: VPC not restarting

Back on list So it is a bit late so I am going to crash after this. It looks like there is a vif that has an empty mac on your router: String lmac = vif.getMAC(conn); if (lmac.trim().equals(mac)) { this is from the last version before the 25th of august. The second line is

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

Thanks to everyone who tested and voted. Just realised I forgot to remove the “Z" from the template, it should have read: After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.1 *passes* with 5 PMC and 3 non-PMC votes. > On 08-May-2015, at 12:17 am, Nux! wrote: > > Thanks for flying with it, Rohit. :) >

Re: VPC not restarting

Ok, maybe you have the code base that you are running? please look at that line and post it back Op vr 8 mei 2015 om 00:20 schreef Francois Gaudreault < fgaudrea...@cloudops.com>: > I can try to get this from jenkins, but Ill most likely won't find it. > > FG > On May 7, 2015 6:14 PM, "Daan Hoogl

Re: VPC not restarting

I can try to get this from jenkins, but Ill most likely won't find it. FG On May 7, 2015 6:14 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > Do you have an commit ID? > > Op do 7 mei 2015 om 23:58 schreef Francois Gaudreault < > fgaudrea...@cloudops.com>: > >> Right, sorry for the confusion,it's a custom 4.4.1 (n

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

Thanks for flying with it, Rohit. :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Rohit Yadav" > To: "dev" > Sent: Thursday, 7 May, 2015 14:27:20 > Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1 > Hi all, > > After 72 hours, th

Re: VPC not restarting

Do you have an commit ID? Op do 7 mei 2015 om 23:58 schreef Francois Gaudreault < fgaudrea...@cloudops.com>: > Right, sorry for the confusion,it's a custom 4.4.1 (non GA). Might want to > look in the 4.4.0 code. > > Also this looks like it happened when I deleted a private gateway when the > VR w

Re: VPC not restarting

Right, sorry for the confusion,it's a custom 4.4.1 (non GA). Might want to look in the 4.4.0 code. Also this looks like it happened when I deleted a private gateway when the VR was stopped. FG On May 7, 2015 5:46 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > I am a bit confused Francois, > > I checked out GA-4.

Re: VPC not restarting

I am a bit confused Francois, I checked out GA-4.4.1 The line com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.getVifByMac(CitrixResourceBase.java:3887) contains protected VIF getVifByMac(Connection conn, VM router, String mac) throws XmlRpcException, XenAPIException { which means it is no

Re: master branch wasn't building

I will never admit to anything again and as a matter of fact I was only joking! Op do 7 mei 2015 om 23:08 schreef Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>: > OK, I guess Daan is buying beers for the entire dev community then in > order to > rectify his egregious error. ;) > > On Thursday, M

Re: master branch wasn't building

OK, I guess Daan is buying beers for the entire dev community then in order to rectify his egregious error. ;) On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Daan Hoogland wrote: > my bad, probably. i pushed the merge without building the second time > around, sorry. > > Op do 7 mei 2015 om 22:08 schreef Mike Tutkow

Re: master branch wasn't building

my bad, probably. i pushed the merge without building the second time around, sorry. Op do 7 mei 2015 om 22:08 schreef Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>: > Hi everyone, > > Just a friendly reminder to perform a full build before checking code in. > > I noticed today that master wasn'

master branch wasn't building

Hi everyone, Just a friendly reminder to perform a full build before checking code in. I noticed today that master wasn't building after I did a fetch and rebase. It turns out there were several duplicate imports that a full build was catching. I went ahead and fixed the issues: https://git-wi

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: UI localization - hu

Github user K0zka closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/224 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.5 hu

GitHub user K0zka opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/237 4.5 hu Hungarian l10n You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/K0zka/cloudstack 4.5_hu Alternatively you can review and apply these cha

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.5 hu

Github user K0zka closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/236 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.5 hu

Github user K0zka commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/236#issuecomment-99973511 oh, not against master... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

VPC not restarting

Anybody seen this before with XenServer? Trying to restart a VPC, and getting a NPE. We are on 4.4.1: 2015-05-07 14:13:11,325 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-225:ctx-22776ed8) Plug Nic failed due to java.lang.NullPointerException java.lang.NullPointerException at com.c

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.5 hu

GitHub user K0zka opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/236 4.5 hu Hungarian l10n You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/K0zka/cloudstack 4.5_hu Alternatively you can review and apply these cha

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-jdk18 #26

See Changes: [Rohit Yadav] build: fix replace.properties path -- [...truncated 1226 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO

Re: [ANNOUNCE][PROPOSAL] merge of 4.5 code in master

s/sytem/system VM/ On Thu, 7 May 2015 17:38 Daan Hoogland wrote: > No, we want to configure the system version instead of the hard coded > one. I fixed it in master but didn't back port. > > On Thu, 7 May 2015 17:35 Rohit Yadav wrote: > >> Hi Daan, >> >> > On 07-May-2015, at 5:21 pm, Daan Hoog

Re: [ANNOUNCE][PROPOSAL] merge of 4.5 code in master

No, we want to configure the system version instead of the hard coded one. I fixed it in master but didn't back port. On Thu, 7 May 2015 17:35 Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Daan, > > > On 07-May-2015, at 5:21 pm, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > > I spoke with Remi, we want a fix in 4.4 and 4.5 so 4.4.4

Re: [ANNOUNCE][PROPOSAL] merge of 4.5 code in master

> On 07-May-2015, at 5:11 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > went so fast I did not have time to vote. You’re a busy man :) We were able to gather consensus in last 72+ hours with no -1s or blockers, so at the end of the window I moved ahead with the release but please do test and share your r

Re: [ANNOUNCE][PROPOSAL] merge of 4.5 code in master

Hi Daan, > On 07-May-2015, at 5:21 pm, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > I spoke with Remi, we want a fix in 4.4 and 4.5 so 4.4.4 and 4.5.2 :) What’s the issue you found? Is it a blocker/critical? Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bh

Re: [ANNOUNCE][PROPOSAL] merge of 4.5 code in master

I spoke with Remi, we want a fix in 4.4 and 4.5 so 4.4.4 and 4.5.2 :) Op do 7 mei 2015 om 17:14 schreef Sebastien Goasguen : > > > On May 7, 2015, at 2:45 PM, Rohit Yadav > wrote: > > > > The current 4.5.1 candidate has no -1s and enough votes to pass, I was > waiting for others who have not vot

Re: [ANNOUNCE][PROPOSAL] merge of 4.5 code in master

> On May 7, 2015, at 2:45 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > The current 4.5.1 candidate has no -1s and enough votes to pass, I was > waiting for others who have not votes to share their results but since, the > voting window is over I’ll tally and share results in next two hours. > went so fast I d

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-jdk18 #25

See Changes: [min.chen] CLOUDSTACK-8093:Not able to list shared templates by passing id. [Pierre-Luc Dion] CLOUDSTACK-8089: Fixed test_explicit_dedication.py test case and moved to maint folder for it is to be run separately [j

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

THx Rohit. On 7 May 2015 at 15:42, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi, > > > On 07-May-2015, at 3:30 pm, Andrija Panic > wrote: > > > > Dont want to hijack thread - can you point me to some VR template > building > > guide or something - where we could possibly alter VR template...or I > guess > > this is

Re: [ANNOUNCE][PROPOSAL] merge of 4.5 code in master

all, I justdid and pushed the merge. I suppose due to the release and removal of awsapi it had some conflicts this time around. be aware that we now need to be disciplined at stabalizing master and no longer commit directly. Let's find at least 6 release managers and agree that only merges that t

[DISCUSS] 4.5.1 announcement draft

Hi all, The ACS 4.5.1 candidate has passed, I’ve shared the voting result, pushed the 4.5.1 tag and moved the source tarballs to release site for the mirrors to catchup. Meanwhile I'm working on the announcement email and release notes and I would like your help. For this, I would like to welc

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Hi, > On 07-May-2015, at 3:30 pm, Andrija Panic wrote: > > Dont want to hijack thread - can you point me to some VR template building > guide or something - where we could possibly alter VR template...or I guess > this is possibly on MGMT code side...? This is a very old wiki: https://cwiki.apa

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/libvirt resource

Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233#issuecomment-99867216 Thanks, @bhaisaab and @K0zka :) Yep, "linbvirt" is a typo. :( When I apply the annotations (after the merge) I will rename it. :) Cheers,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Hi Rohit,if this is by design, I think we really need to change it :) ASAP Thx for confirmation Dont want to hijack thread - can you point me to some VR template building guide or something - where we could possibly alter VR template...or I guess this is possibly on MGMT code side...? On 7 May 20

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Hi Rohit On 07.05.2015 15:09, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Rene, > > The issue you had reported is reproducible when you have a 4.2.1 or 4.3.2 > cloud database but a 4.5.1 or 4.5.0 cloud_usage database, and you try to > upgrade to ACS 4.5.1 that fails for cloud_usage database (since it’s already >

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1

Hi all, After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.1 [1] *passes* with Z PMC + Z non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) 5 person (Lucian, Rohit, David, Marcus, Daan) +1 (non binding) 3 person (Wilder, Geoff, Abhi) 0 none -1 none Thank you everyone for participating. Hope 4.5.1 will be a solid one

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Hi Andrija, > On 07-May-2015, at 3:08 pm, Andrija Panic wrote: > > While not voting (do I have reputation to do that ?)… You and anyone in the community are welcome to vote and discuss issues. > ... we do have serious VPC bug, which I also encountered wth previous > releases also (4.3.x): > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Hi Rene, The issue you had reported is reproducible when you have a 4.2.1 or 4.3.2 cloud database but a 4.5.1 or 4.5.0 cloud_usage database, and you try to upgrade to ACS 4.5.1 that fails for cloud_usage database (since it’s already 4.5.1). This could probably be the case in your environment as

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

While not voting (do I have reputation to do that ?)... ... we do have serious VPC bug, which I also encountered wth previous releases also (4.3.x): Just created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8451 After you configure Port Forwarding or Static NAT on VPC, do "netstat" on VM

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/libvirt resource

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233#issuecomment-99857670 Looks good, I guess Travis is sort of green (with on failing test due to timeout). I will help test it tonight or tomorrow. --- If your project is set up for it, yo

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

+1 with the following testing Upgrade of 4.3.1 and 4.4 2 systems, both Adv Zones running XenServer 6.2 Hypervisors Manual Tests via UI included Upgrade System VM as Root Admin Restart Network with Clean Up as User to upgrade VR Restart VPC as User to upgrade VPC VR VM Lifecycle events (cr

Re: [ANNOUNCE][PROPOSAL] merge of 4.5 code in master

The current 4.5.1 candidate has no -1s and enough votes to pass, I was waiting for others who have not votes to share their results but since, the voting window is over I’ll tally and share results in next two hours. Regards. > On 07-May-2015, at 1:57 pm, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > ok, we agree

Re: [ANNOUNCE][PROPOSAL] merge of 4.5 code in master

ok, we agree I was going to wait on Rohit's ping and then re-merge and push Op do 7 mei 2015 om 12:42 schreef Abhinandan Prateek < abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com>: > Daan, > > I was thinking voting will be concluded today ( looks like I confused it > with GA). > Anyhow it can be done now, in

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/libvirt resource

Github user K0zka commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233#issuecomment-99825704 looks nice :+1: --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/libvirt resource

Github user K0zka commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233#discussion_r29843511 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/wrapper/LibvirtRequestWrapper.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@ +// +// Licensed t

Staging NFS to Swift traffic?

Hi guys, I cant find any docs on this topic, so...posting a question here. We are going to use Swift as region wide Secondary Storage. My understadning: KVM hosts will still move i.e. templates from Primary Storage to Secondary NFS Staging storage - and then this template needs to be moved to Sw

Re: [ANNOUNCE][PROPOSAL] merge of 4.5 code in master

Daan, I was thinking voting will be concluded today ( looks like I confused it with GA). Anyhow it can be done now, in case there are issues they can be merged as and when there are relevant commits. > On 07-May-2015, at 3:50 pm, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > why not before Abhi? as we have an R

Re: [PROPOSAL] iSCSI and HA support in Hyper-V

Daan, Its using existing framework. Its similar to VMware in implementation for HA of VMs and for CSV its using the existing PreSetup storage type. It has mainly the agent side changes which are specific to Hyper-V. Regards, Anshul On 07-May-2015, at 2:28 pm, Daan Hoogland mailto:daan.hoogl...

Re: [ANNOUNCE][PROPOSAL] merge of 4.5 code in master

why not before Abhi? as we have an RC we could merge now. Op do 7 mei 2015 om 11:59 schreef Abhinandan Prateek < abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com>: > +1 > > Lets merge as soon as we have 4.5 GA. > > > On 07-May-2015, at 2:47 pm, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > > LS, > > > > announce part: As we ha

Re: [ANNOUNCE][PROPOSAL] merge of 4.5 code in master

+1 Lets merge as soon as we have 4.5 GA. > On 07-May-2015, at 2:47 pm, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > LS, > > announce part: As we have an rc that did not get any -1 yet I want to merge > 4.5 in master now. It will result in 389 commits being merged without > conflicts detectable by git. That is not a

[ANNOUNCE][PROPOSAL] merge of 4.5 code in master

LS, announce part: As we have an rc that did not get any -1 yet I want to merge 4.5 in master now. It will result in 389 commits being merged without conflicts detectable by git. That is not an fool proof guarantee of a working system of course, hence this heads up. proposal part: I would like to

Re: Checksum of uploaded volumes

trying to word this with as much respect as possible to my favorite project: the use of checksums on volumes is either half baked or degraded. A more strict check or at more places could be concocted but I guess no one has a good enough use case for it to actually go do it. I don't know the use cas

Re: [PROPOSAL] iSCSI and HA support in Hyper-V

Anshul, Good thing to work on. Can you include parallels and references to other hypervisors. I would not like to see this implemented in every hypervisor in a different way. We are creating or rather extending technical debt if we don't unify the way this is implemented across hypervisors. cc'in

Checksum of uploaded volumes

Hi, I'm seeing that md5sum is being run for every volume upload, even if no checksum is specified during upload. The checksum value in volume_store_ref is null but "md5sum -c --status" seems to run for every upload on SSVM. No checksum seems to be written to the table afterwards either but it see

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8450: Fix method calls in test...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/235 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8450: Fix method calls in test...

GitHub user gauravaradhye opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/235 CLOUDSTACK-8450: Fix method calls in test_escalations_hosts.py Number of arguments in method definition and method call are mismatched in this test suite. Did not test this. Only

[PROPOSAL] iSCSI and HA support in Hyper-V

Hi, I would like to propose the iSCSI and HA support in Hyper-V feature. With this feature we will be adding support for Failover clustering in Hyper-V which will enable us to utilize the native HA and CSV support provided by the Hyper-V. With addition of CSV we can support any storage option i

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/libvirt resource

Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233#issuecomment-99761689 Thanks, guys. Would be really nice to test it ASAP so we avoid another rebase. Most of the changes are purely structural, I tried my best to k

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

+1 with following testing: Manual Testing: Zone with a cluster of Xenserver 6.5 VM lifecycle, Recovering a destroyed VM, Reinstall VM VM Migration Affinity groups - anti affinity VM consoles VM and volume snapshots Template from volume snapshot, Download Template, Vm from template cre

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/libvirt resource

Yes, big changes indeed, I'll definitely want to test. Thanks Wilder! -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Daan Hoogland" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "Mike Tutkowski" > , "Nux Ro" , "Andrija > Panic" , "Wido den Holla

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/libvirt resource

this to explicitly invite them to look. Op do 7 mei 2015 om 00:57 schreef mlsorensen : > Github user mlsorensen commented on the pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233#issuecomment-99635718 > > Yeah, I think this is a big enough change that we should give all KVM

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8449: Include zoneid parameter...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/234 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is