Review Request 30656: CLOUDSTACK-8214: test_netscaler_nw_off.py - Skip test if enough zones are not present instead of throwing exception

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30656/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-82

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #531

See

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #564

See Changes: [Rohit Yadav] fixed NPE -- [...truncated 945 lines...] [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 26 resour

Review Request 30653: CLOUDSTACK-8213: Fixed typo in test_lb_secondary_ip.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30653/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-82

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: fixed NPE

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/70#issuecomment-73001977 Thanks Lazlo, I've cherry-picked and applied the fix. But since this PR targets 4.4-forward that we no longer use can you please close the PR. --- If your project is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: fixed NPE

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/70#issuecomment-73001870 Fixed on 4.5, 4.4, 4.3; the merge fails on these branches so cherry-picked fix from master. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: fixed NPE

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/70#issuecomment-73001652 LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabl

Re: Videos from CloudStack Collaboration Conference Europe 2014 Available

great! Thanks Mike! --Tuna On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Nux! wrote: > Thanks, watching right now. > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - > > From: "Mike Tutkowski" > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, us...@cloudstac

Re: Videos from CloudStack Collaboration Conference Europe 2014 Available

Thanks, watching right now. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Mike Tutkowski" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, 4 February, 2015 23:47:05 > Subject: Videos from CloudStack Co

Videos from CloudStack Collaboration Conference Europe 2014 Available

Hi everyone, Someone pointed out to me that the videos from the CloudStack Collaboration Conference Europe 2014 are now available: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbzoR-pLrL6ruJrhXZ-jSSYw0m3WfK4ea Thought I'd pass this on. :) -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire I

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #956

See

Re: [32/50] [abbrv] git commit: updated refs/heads/feature/systemvm-persistent-config to 4fe7264

Would be nice if we weren’t setting a static VRRP password... John > On Feb 4, 2015, at 12:28 PM, d...@apache.org wrote: > > Fix router priuority using the same logic as the one for the state > Fix the router state. do not show UNKNOW, but MASTER or BACKUP depending on > the type of router > Im

Templates are no longer available on SSVM/ACS restart when using Swift

We have a very weird situation here. All the templates derived from snapshots are put to "Not Available" upon a ACS/SSVM restart. We use Swift as the secondary storage provider. Basically, the data looks like this prior the restart: data_center_id: NULL data_center_uuid: NULL data_cente

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: fixed NPE

GitHub user K0zka opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/70 fixed NPE You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/K0zka/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-8210 Alternatively you can review and apply these change

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8197 create MinVRVersion confi...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/69 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

refactor of system vm branch pushed

H, I just pushed a branch feature/systemvm-persistent-config to the apache git server. It contains work by some colleagues, notibly Ian Southam and WIlder Rodrigues. We started work on this last summer. We now are closing in to conclusion and want to get feed back. Our prime reason to do this was

Re: Major breakage in GUI after upgrade from 4.3.2 to 4.4.2

Thanks, Daan On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Andrei, Mike, > > Today I noticed that when adding a target to a loadbalancing rule, the > ui frooze. It was an incident as it later succeeded but another issue > was that the added row was not complete until a refresh. > > Doe

Re: Major breakage in GUI after upgrade from 4.3.2 to 4.4.2

Andrei, Mike, Today I noticed that when adding a target to a loadbalancing rule, the ui frooze. It was an incident as it later succeeded but another issue was that the added row was not complete until a refresh. Doesn't sound related but I thought I'd mention. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:05 PM, A

Re: Major breakage in GUI after upgrade from 4.3.2 to 4.4.2

That would be very useful to find out! I am running Ubuntu 14.04 on the management server and hosts and I am running Ubuntu 14.10 on the client that accesses the GUI. Thanks Andrei - Original Message - > From: "Mike Tutkowski" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, 4

Re: Major breakage in GUI after upgrade from 4.3.2 to 4.4.2

Thanks, Andrei I wonder, has anyone else out there had this issue when upgrading from 4.3.2 to 4.4.2? It would be nice to know if this is a shared issue or perhaps something in your environment. What OS is your management server running on and what OS are you running Firefox and Chrome from? Than

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Wilder, > > The issue I shared was relat

Re: Downgrading recommendations from 4.4.2 to 4.3.2

after looking beyond the tip of my nose; this is from the changes file in the repo-branch 4.4: Apache CloudStack CHANGES == Full release notes for each release are located in the project's documentation [website](http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/clou

Re: Downgrading recommendations from 4.4.2 to 4.3.2

There is the git commit log, and Pierre-Luc created a changelog in the release notes, but as 4.4.3 never got release I don't know if it still exists or where @Pierre-Luc: is it still there? On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: > Daan, do you know if there is a changelog for

Re: Downgrading recommendations from 4.4.2 to 4.3.2

Daan, do you know if there is a changelog for the current 4.4.3 branch? Perhaps you are right and some of the issues were fixed. Andrei - Original Message - > From: "Daan Hoogland" > To: "dev" > Sent: Wednesday, 4 February, 2015 4:01:55 PM > Subject: Re: Downgrading recommendations

Re: Downgrading recommendations from 4.4.2 to 4.3.2

Andrei, The 4.4.2 version sysvms report version 4.4.1. Unless you bake your own. I made some custom templates for xen and vmware for internal use. the 4.4.1 version should be fine though. as for fix forward, going to 4.5 is an option but I meant keeping your own branch and cherry-picking fixes th

Re: Downgrading recommendations from 4.4.2 to 4.3.2

hum, actually there is no systemvm-template for 4.4.2. it should be using the one from 4.4.1, are they show as "upgrade required" in cloudstack UI ? if not, then cloudstack would be stock in "Upgrading state" which prevent the new Instance create and it might be in a edgecase that would be a bug? I

Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

notice that all the master branch runs in your travis job fail due to timeout as well. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Daan, > > The cool thing about Travis is that you can create your own Travis job > with your Github ACS repo (from which you created/sent the PR) and > co

Re: Downgrading recommendations from 4.4.2 to 4.3.2

Actually, all my systemvms and VRs are running 4.4.1 eventhough I am sure i've used the latest templates. Could someone running version 4.4.2 please verify the version of their systemvms? Kind regards - Original Message - > From: "Pierre-Luc Dion" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > S

Re: Downgrading recommendations from 4.4.2 to 4.3.2

Pierre, Thanks for the reply and sharing your experience with the downgrading. I have indeed upgraded all of the system vms including ssvm, cpvm and virtual routers. the agents are also upgraded to version 4.4.2. Andrei - Original Message - > From: "Pierre-Luc Dion" > To: dev@clou

Re: Downgrading recommendations from 4.4.2 to 4.3.2

Andrei, I wouldn't recommend to downgrade, I did that in the past when we upgraded to 4.2.1 and I end up with even more issues. For the maintenance mode issue, can you verify that systemvm currently running (including VR) run as 4.4.2 ? I've saw behavior like this when upgrading to 4.4.x where Cl

Re: Downgrading recommendations from 4.4.2 to 4.3.2

Daan, Do you mean that I should wait for the 4.5 branch to be out and try an upgrade hoping that the issues are fixed? Why do you think downgrading the database is a tricky business? Let's say I do the following: 1. Backup existing data base 2. Remove all virtual routers 3. remove the exi

Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

Hi Daan, The cool thing about Travis is that you can create your own Travis job with your Github ACS repo (from which you created/sent the PR) and control its jobs. For example, I created one for our team here: https://travis-ci.org/shapeblue/cloudstack/builds On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:51

Re: [STATUS] Redundant VPC

Great job Wilder and team SBP! On Wednesday 04 February 2015 04:24 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: Hi all, We are currently testing the first big chunk of the Redundant VPC implementation. It will add the following features / fixes * Redundant VPC Offering * Create a VPC using the new offering *

Re: [STATUS] Redundant VPC

Awesome! --- Thanks, Yitao(依涛 姜) jiangyt.github.io On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Wilder Rodrigues < wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We are currently testing the first big chunk of the Redundant VPC > implementation. It will add the following features / fixes > > * Redundan

Review Request 30613: CLOUDSTACK-8211: Correcting expected secondary storage count value by rounding off to floor value and including the physicalsize of snapshot

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30613/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Anshul Gangwar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bug

Re: Downgrading recommendations from 4.4.2 to 4.3.2

Andrei, downgrading the database is your big problem. You don't want to restore at this point. I would go for fix forward but that's having the ability to maintain my own.branch. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: > > > Hello guys, > > I was hoping to get some suggestions

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

Hi there, We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04. Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool. Ch

Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

I noticed that travis doesn't complete anymore as the five jobs take to long to complete. effectively we have nothing at the moment that automatically checks. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:21 AM, David Nalley wrote: > Rajani: > > I signed up to get an initial pass done, but haven't yet had the > cycl

Downgrading recommendations from 4.4.2 to 4.3.2

Hello guys, I was hoping to get some suggestions on how to perform a downgrade from a live 4.4.2 environment back to 4.3.2. After performing an upgrade 4 days ago, I have discovered a bunch of problems with 4.4.2 release, which makes it unusable for me. Problems like CLOUDSTACK-8201, CLOUDST

Re: [DISCUSS] move MinVRVersion from service to orchestration layer

as a response to some comments on other forums I want to add that the last digit is going to be usefule for ci purposes. This is the background of my wish. The current implementation is not the end goal, merely a step in that direction. As Rajani pointed me to my own words [1] there are open point

Re: [STATUS] Redundant VPC

I love you. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Wilder Rodrigues" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: "int-cloud" > Sent: Wednesday, 4 February, 2015 10:54:49 > Subject: [STATUS] Redundant VPC > Hi all, > > We are cur

Re: Review Request 28030: CLOUDSTACK-7911: Automation test cases for Usage test path

> On Feb. 4, 2015, 9:33 a.m., shweta agarwal wrote: > > test/integration/testpaths/testpath_usage.py, line 455 > > > > > > we need to have usage for VM allocation type as well. > > > > and need to check that

[STATUS] Redundant VPC

Hi all, We are currently testing the first big chunk of the Redundant VPC implementation. It will add the following features / fixes * Redundant VPC Offering * Create a VPC using the new offering * 2 routers deployed for a redundant VPC * Restart VPC with clean-up option - destroy both routers a

Re: Review Request 28030: CLOUDSTACK-7911: Automation test cases for Usage test path

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28030/#review70945 --- test/integration/testpaths/testpath_usage.py

Re: Review Request 25885: CLOUDSTACK-7594: Adding automation test cases for Stopped VM test path

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25885/#review70943 --- you didn't remove the below code... as its not required in test03 -

Review Request 30611: Before throwing exception for iso download try one more time

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30611/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Repository: cloudst

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #530

See Changes: [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-8198: Use random local storage UUID [Rohit Yadav] Remove the comparison between GuestOSCategoryVO.CATEGORY_NONE and guestOSCategory.getName() to make OS category of None t

Re: Review Request 28030: CLOUDSTACK-7911: Automation test cases for Usage test path

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28030/#review70936 --- test/integration/testpaths/testpath_usage.py

Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

Rajani: I signed up to get an initial pass done, but haven't yet had the cycles. It's top of my list for next week. We wanted to get something up and try it to have something demonstrable. --David On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > I like github+jenkins approach. In the

Re: Review Request 28030: CLOUDSTACK-7911: Automation test cases for Usage test path

> On Feb. 4, 2015, 8:46 a.m., shweta agarwal wrote: > > test/integration/testpaths/testpath_usage.py, line 289 > > > > > > when uage server is not installed follwoing is the output > > > > service cloudstack-

Re: Review Request 28030: CLOUDSTACK-7911: Automation test cases for Usage test path

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28030/#review70929 --- test/integration/testpaths/testpath_usage.py

Re: Google Summer of Code 2015 is coming

+1 for support of Ceph in Xenserver Andrei - Original Message - > From: "Erik Weber" > To: "dev" > Sent: Wednesday, 4 February, 2015 7:35:39 AM > Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code 2015 is coming > Pure Xen support would be nice :-) > (and Ceph in XenServer, but that's not really a

Re: Google Summer of Code 2015 is coming

Hi, Thanks for the filter Abhi. I've added a few that I found interesting (supporting docker and bhyve, QA/integration cleansing and automation, small tools). I'm really looking forward to mentoring or co-mentoring new developers. On Wednesday 04 February 2015 09:59 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote