NFS overprovisioning of 0.5 ???

Hi. wondering if it is possible to set overprovisioning factor to less than 1 ? I have 1 NFS box, 2 x 10GB cards inside, don't want to do bonding, but efectively present this single box as 2 boxes via 2 IP adresses - so in this scenario I need to set overprovisioning factor to less than 1, to i.e

Re: 05bec59c - kvm, qcow, systemvm qemu-img -o compat

Hi Will, While we can use your first solution that checks exit status ($?) but in case some is running the script with a "set -e", the script will simply break when $? is not zero. I think if we know above which qemu-img version we should we the compat option (1.7?) than that's great we should we

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Feature cenik123 vpcvrr 1.1.1

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/33#issuecomment-65192819 Wrong question, I should asked about veewee vs packer. The current systemvm building scripts uses veewee to build systemvms and to export appliances in various image/

Re: WTF: Difference between schemas across branches?

The changes from the commit 0e2e6995 are right, but this is not exactly schema change but view definition changes. This has been fixed in 4.5 through acc9c79 so that any one upgrading to 4.5 do not miss these changes. Do note that this change is idempotent so even if you do or do not make this chan

RE: 05bec59c - kvm, qcow, systemvm qemu-img -o compat

Thanks for that. Does that mean that we prefer to do an if else based on version rather than basically doing a try catch? I have not been involved in previous bash scripting for CS, so I am willing to fall in line with the preferred method. What I proposed was based on how similar problems were so

RE: 05bec59c - kvm, qcow, systemvm qemu-img -o compat

qemu-img |head -n 1|awk '{print $3}' should show the version of qemu-img From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Will Stevens Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 2:17 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Leo Simons; Wilder Rodrigues; Rohit Yadav; Edison Su Subjec

Re:CloudStack Quality Process

Hi Steve, I am now focus on test automation , and I willing to be one of this team. -- Regards, ChunFeng @accesine -- Original -- From: "Steve Wilson"; Date: Tue, Dec 2, 2014 03:12 AM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"; Subject: Clo

Re: Is issue status can only change by owner on jira system ?

Hi Daan, Yes, I need it . Can you authorise my jira account to access issues status ? my user name is : chunfeng -- Regards, ChunFeng -- Original -- From: "Daan Hoogland"; Date: Mon, Dec 1, 2014 07:26 PM To: "dev"; Subject:

static nat fails to apply on KVM host if public interface is tagged

Hi, I wonder if anyone knows whether the following is a known issue. We confirmed that, when the public network is set to untagged on the KVM host, static nat works fine. If its tagged, instead, static nat will fail and the following errors are seen on the management server, as well as on the

Review Request 28579: CLOUDSTACK-7996: Fixed the script "test_tags.py" - Tags and Template should belong to the User Account to test the case

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28579/ --- Review request for cloudstack and sangeetha hariharan. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7996

Re: 05bec59c - kvm, qcow, systemvm qemu-img -o compat

Alright, so far I have found the following: https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/9117b47717ad208b12786ce88eacb013f9b3dd1c Basically, if the qemu-img version is less than 1.7, we should run the non 'compat' option version and if the version is 1.7 or greater, we should run the new command with the '

Re: [ACS450] remove some upgrade path from Release Notes

Actually, here is the best thread to ask the question... Does anyone validate upgrade instruction from 2.x, 3.x. 4.0.x, 4.1.x since 4.3.0 ? Thanks, On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > Well, I've never heard some someone tested upgrading a 2.2.x, 3.x.x, 4.0.x > or 4.1.

Re: [ACS450] remove some upgrade path from Release Notes

Well, I've never heard some someone tested upgrading a 2.2.x, 3.x.x, 4.0.x or 4.1.x since 4.4 as been released. I know for sure those upgrade path have not been tested. I'll ask for 4.5... Thanks, On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Leo Simons wrote: > Hey hey, > > Thinking as an administrator,

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Feature cenik123 vpcvrr 1.1.1

Github user KarlHarrisSungardAS commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/33#issuecomment-65140570 I'm using Packer to build a System VM as well as a Vagrant SystemVM test "box". My Packer code builds as systemVM which can then be used to deploy

Re: 05bec59c - kvm, qcow, systemvm qemu-img -o compat

Hi, If it helps, RHEL 7 ships qemu-img 1.5.3 and by default it does not produce compatible images with older qemu, the compat option needs to be specified. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Will Stevens" >

Re: root resize support in the UI

Matheww, offtopic - keep in mind that hostbill will make milion of computer offerings and everything, so if you login to cloudstack - you will get lost - at least per my latest experience with hostbill. Also we were told that they store credit cards in their database - something you might not want.

Re: 05bec59c - kvm, qcow, systemvm qemu-img -o compat

Edison, According to this page the default compat option is 0.10: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/trusty/man1/qemu-img.1.html Did you find that to not be the case and is that why you had to add the compat option? BTW, in an attempt to get the master system vms building again, I committed a ch

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to ae0cb82

Use source Luke ;-) Apparently there is now an alias on the VR ip called data-server. The Ssh script used it to get the ssh keys if it can't find the dhcp server using the leases file. I didn't invent this feature, just made it work for passwords and cleaned up the code a bit. Hugo Sent from

Review Request 28573: CLOUDSTACK-7995: Added GloboNetwork plugin to help regular (non-admin) users to manage shared network in a simpler way

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28573/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: [ACS450] pick commit from master to 4.5

On 12/01/2014 09:16 PM, Logan Barfield wrote: > Sounds good. I've been running this in production since July without any > issues, so it shouldn't conflict with anything that I'm aware of. > > Wido, if you can respond here once it's in I'd appreciate it. > I see no problem in merging this int

Re: [ACS450] pick commit from master to 4.5

Much appreciated Rohit. Thank You, Logan Barfield Tranquil Hosting On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Logan, > > > On 01-Dec-2014, at 11:57 pm, Logan Barfield > wrote: > > > > 3a52a83faeaa72a8488b2db1253fef6d3308d708 > > Thanks for raising this, looks like it was not mer

Re: [ACS450] pick commit from master to 4.5

Hi Logan, > On 01-Dec-2014, at 11:57 pm, Logan Barfield wrote: > > 3a52a83faeaa72a8488b2db1253fef6d3308d708 Thanks for raising this, looks like it was not merged into 4.5 at all. I’ve cherry-picked this on 4.5; commit 3a36681b6edbf317ef75ca96acb24522ca341556 Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Archi

Re: [ACS450] pick commit from master to 4.5

Sounds good. I've been running this in production since July without any issues, so it shouldn't conflict with anything that I'm aware of. Wido, if you can respond here once it's in I'd appreciate it. Thank You, Logan Barfield Tranquil Hosting On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:08 PM, David Nalley wro

Re: [ACS450] pick commit from master to 4.5

No that worksforme. I'd prefer that Wido move this over, so that he can ensure that it's not going to break anything else. --David On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > mail this list with the tag acs45, kind of how you did it. > > @david Or do you prefer a different approach? >

Re: CloudStack Quality Process

H Steve, As you mentioned one of us at Schuberg Philis will be on it. Without further notice it will be me. regards, Daan On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Steve Wilson wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > It was great to get to see a number of you at the recent CCC in Budapest. > While I was there, I got

Re: [ACS450] pick commit from master to 4.5

mail this list with the tag acs45, kind of how you did it. @david Or do you prefer a different approach? On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Logan Barfield wrote: > I don't know what the current procedure is for this, but I'd like to > get 3a52a83faeaa72a8488b2db1253fef6d3308d708 > from master in th

CloudStack Quality Process

Hi Everyone, It was great to get to see a number of you at the recent CCC in Budapest. While I was there, I got to meet face to face with individuals working for several companies that have a real stake in the commercial success of the CloudStack project. After joining Citrix (and becoming in

[ACS450] pick commit from master to 4.5

I don't know what the current procedure is for this, but I'd like to get 3a52a83faeaa72a8488b2db1253fef6d3308d708 from master in the 4.5 branch if possible.

Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

On 12/01/2014 06:40 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > +1 > > Wido, will the statistics be accessible online for everyone (like > real-time) or will the PMC release aggregated data periodically? > I was thinking to keep the data PMC-only to start with and indeed release aggregated data periodically. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

+1 Wido, will the statistics be accessible online for everyone (like real-time) or will the PMC release aggregated data periodically? On Monday 01 December 2014 06:38 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: Hello, As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on about how CloudStack

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/reporter to 026efd3

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:37 PM, wrote: > Repository: cloudstack > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/reporter [created] 026efd344 > > > Proposal of a Usage Reporter / call-home functionality for CloudStack > > With this commit the Management Server will be default generate a > anonymous Usage > rep

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to ae0cb82

Hi Hugo, On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 7:27 PM, wrote: > Repository: cloudstack > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master ce2b2a1fc -> ae0cb8279 > > > Both scripts should be able to use the data-server introduced in 4.4 > What does this commit fix? Sorry, I've no idea about the data-server introduced

Re: root resize support in the UI

Just chiming in: I un-commented the Root Disk field in the Instance Wizard in our 4.4 deployment. Works fine with KVM / Ceph RBD. The logic we see is: A) If specified size is smaller than template size, throw an alert. B) If specified size is larger than template size then deploy root disk with s

RE: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

1+ from a user -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 10:21 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack On 12/01/2014 04:12 PM, Nux! wrote: > Hm, after an upgra

RE: root resize support in the UI

1+ from me for XenServer root disk resize for template deployments! I'm going with Nux on the single partition scheme and I want my root disk under 2GB as most all of my deployments are minimal systems. This makes the journey from sec storage to primary storage quite a bit faster. I need to depl

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #3886

See

Jenkins build is back to stable : simulator-singlerun #722

See

Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

On 12/01/2014 04:12 PM, Nux! wrote: > Hm, after an upgrade it might be tricky. Perhaps display it here somehow > http://img.nux.ro/3hH-callhome.png > Perhaps some UI/javascript specialist can help us here ... > Good idea. In that Menu we probably need a "Call-Home" link pointing to http://clou

Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

Hm, after an upgrade it might be tricky. Perhaps display it here somehow http://img.nux.ro/3hH-callhome.png Perhaps some UI/javascript specialist can help us here ... Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Wido den Ho

Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

On 12/01/2014 04:00 PM, Nux! wrote: > In addition: this should be opt-out, but clearly specified in the release > notes, as well as visible in the UI. > But where do we display this in the UI? I don't think we have a mechanism to show a one-time message after a upgrade. Do we? > -- > Sent fro

Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

In addition: this should be opt-out, but clearly specified in the release notes, as well as visible in the UI. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Nux!" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 13:

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #3885

See -- [...truncated 2566 lines...] Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.181 sec Running com.cloud.servlet.ConsoleProxyServletTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Error

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7404: Failed to start an insta...

Github user llambiel closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/49 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

+1, good job! -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Wido den Hollander" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 13:08:02 > Subject: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack > H

Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

On 12/01/2014 02:15 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on >> about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not >> everybody fills in the sur

Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

+1 On 1 December 2014 at 14:31, Erik Weber wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Sebastien Goasguen > wrote: > > > > > On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on > > > about how Clou

Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on > > about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not > > everybody fills

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #721

See

Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hello, > > As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on > about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not > everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information. > > That's why I'

[DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack

Hello, As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information. That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the management server

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #3881

See

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use the new build env on Travis

Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/43#discussion_r21085810 --- Diff: .travis.yml --- @@ -16,27 +16,38 @@ # under the License. language: java + +jdk: + - oraclejdk7 + cache:

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7404: Failed to start an insta...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/49#issuecomment-65058250 Hi, I just saw Wei checked in the fix from 4.3/4.4 on master. I've applied the same on 4.5 branch so we don't lose your commit. Since, it's already in all 4.3+ branch

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for cloudstack

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan. 6 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan. 5 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New defect(

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #3880

See Changes: [Rohit Yadav] README: add information about official git repository [w.zhou] CLOUDSTACK-7983: Create Disk/Service Offering for Domain Admin [w.zhou] CLOUDSTACK-7404: Failed to start an instance when originating

Jenkins build is unstable: simulator-singlerun #720

See

Re: root resize support in the UI

Andrija, Absolutely, everyone has their own needs. The single partition works best for us (we also implemented it in physical dedicated servers - makes p2v and v2p easy!) and it also seems to be the choice of others (official fedora/centos/ubuntu templates are like this as well). -- Sent from

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use the new build env on Travis

Github user imduffy15 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/43#issuecomment-65054605 No. It disables sudo usage so it breaks our setup. On 1 Dec 2014 11:48, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: > Ping, should we do anything on this? > > — >

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Feature cenik123 vpcvrr 1.1.1

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/33#issuecomment-65054379 Hi Karl, can you update us on what you're trying to do and how we can benefit from using packer instead of vagrant? Is packer more easy to setup and work with than Va

Re: root resize support in the UI

I would like to see this for XenServer implemented. I get around this by having all my bare bone templates at 100GB...it would be nice not have to change in the DB, then catch it in from the console to expand before CS shuts it down. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Nux! wrote: > Vadim, > > Curre

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use the new build env on Travis

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/43#issuecomment-65054083 Ping, should we do anything on this? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7986 [F5 LB] Failed to execute...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/47#issuecomment-65053922 Our travis does not run noredist builds, can you confirm any build jobs (from Jenkins etc.) so I can help merge it? --- If your project is set up for it, you can rep

Re: root resize support in the UI

ok, Nux, so you suggest, single partition layout, with some predefined usage scenario...that is definitively an option for me. On the other hand, if you have slightly complicated templates - then the only way I see is to only resize the disk qith qemu-img...(not going inside VM)... So we need to d

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7404: Failed to start an insta...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/49#issuecomment-65053557 +1 As soon as travis passes, I'll help merge it. Thanks for sending the PR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your r

Re: root resize support in the UI

Vadim, Currently the ROOT resize feature is not available for hypervisors other than KVM. The developers working with these HVs are not interested in this feature a.t.m. Feel free to request this feature and stress them out. :) Based on this feature I now only use 1 template with 1 single part

Re: Is issue status can only change by owner on jira system ?

ChunFeng, You can close issues once your account has access in jira. You need it? On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:21 AM, ChunFeng wrote: > hi,all > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-519 > > > I recheck the status which 519 mentioned . The issue is not cloudstack bug . > > > My

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-4.5 #185

See

Re: root resize support in the UI

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: > Andrija, > > You did understand me correctly. I wish that for the customer > disk offer could be customizable. And not just for KVM hypervisor. > Particularly now I am interested in Xen and VmWare. > CS admin should not have s

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #1987

See

RE: Cloudstack repos

Thank you all ! Not it is clear Vadim. -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 1:18 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Cloudstack repos Hi ChunFeng, I've updated the repository description here: https://github.

Re: Cloudstack repos

Hi ChunFeng, I've updated the repository description here: https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack I've update on the README file the links to official Repo and something about the Github mirror to avoid confusion, since there are so many Github forks anyone could host CloudStack repo with their

Review Request 28549: CLOUDSTACK-7993: Code enhancement - test_egress_fw_rules.py - Removing unncessary waits

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28549/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-79

RE: root resize support in the UI

Andrija, You did understand me correctly. I wish that for the customer disk offer could be customizable. And not just for KVM hypervisor. Particularly now I am interested in Xen and VmWare. CS admin should not have set of templates that differs only on root partition size. Swap p

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #1986

See Changes: [w.zhou] Add 'View Instances' in template/iso details view -- [...truncated 1712 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-en

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7404: Failed to start an insta...

GitHub user llambiel opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/49 CLOUDSTACK-7404: Failed to start an instance when originating template h... CLOUDSTACK-7404: Failed to start an instance when originating template has been deleted You can merge this pull reque

Re: CloudMonkey 5.3 not starting on Ubuntu 14.10

Hi Erik, You’re missing the point, the email I sent for today is only for Ubuntu 14.04/14.10 users. Please find my reply in-line; > On 01-Dec-2014, at 4:23 pm, Erik Weber wrote: > > Nope, all I've tried is: pip install cloudmonkey > > This was a fresh machine, so no upgrade. Stock CentOS 6.6.

Re: CloudMonkey 5.3 not starting on Ubuntu 14.10

Rohit, I've tried your suggestion and that didn't work for me. Had the same error message. However, I can confirm that running Erik's suggestion fixed my problem. Andrei -- Andrei Mikhailovsky Director Arhont Information Security Web: http://www.arhont.com http://www.wi-foo.com Tel:

Re: Cloudstack repos

Hi Rohit, For end user , even for developers , two repos may raise some mix-up. Could you please modify the README.md file in ShapeBlue's repo by add some statements for explaination ? -- Regards, ChunFeng -- Original -- From:

Re: CloudMonkey 5.3 not starting on Ubuntu 14.10

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Erik Weber wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:50 AM, sebgoa wrote: > >> >> On Dec 1, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Erik Weber wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky > > >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Hi guys, >> >> >> >> I am having issues starting clo

Re: CloudMonkey 5.3 not starting on Ubuntu 14.10

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:50 AM, sebgoa wrote: > > On Dec 1, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Erik Weber wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky > > wrote: > > > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> I am having issues starting cloudmonkey on ubuntu 14.10. I get the > >> following error: > >> > >>

Re: CloudMonkey 5.3 not starting on Ubuntu 14.10

Andrei, I’ve replied to your query in another thread, that tries to publish this issue and its fix for everyone on users@ and dev@. Thanks. Quick solution - remove python-pip and install pip using pip project page. > On 01-Dec-2014, at 4:22 pm, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: > > Erik, > > this is

Re: CloudMonkey 5.3 not starting on Ubuntu 14.10

Erik, this is a clean install, not an upgrade. I don't remember having issues on Ubuntu 14.04. I've also tried the easy_install method shown in the docs and that produced the same error. not really sure what you mean by the virtualenv. Andrei - Original Message - > From: "sebgoa"

Re: CloudMonkey 5.3 not starting on Ubuntu 14.10

On Dec 1, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Erik Weber wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I am having issues starting cloudmonkey on ubuntu 14.10. I get the >> following error: >> >> $ cloudmonkey >> Import error in cloudmonkey.cloudmonkey : No module

[NOTICE] CloudMonkey 5.3 not starting on Ubuntu 14.10

Hi Andrei, Thanks for bringing this to our notice. With Ubuntu 14.04/14.10, the default pip has some issues. To install CloudMonkey or any package dependent on "requests" users simply need to upgrade pip to make it work: 1. Uninstall the default pip: sudo apt-get remove --purge python-pip 2.

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.5 #184

Caused by recent review request merge, I’m on it. > On 01-Dec-2014, at 4:10 pm, jenk...@cloudstack.org wrote: > > See > > Changes: > > [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7903: Decreased minimal usage aggregation range value > > -

Re: Cloudstack repos

On Dec 1, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Andrija Panic wrote: > HI Vadim, > > first repo is official one, second repo is shapeblue's repo, since they > also provide RPMs for convinience and with some patches... > > Anyway, you will go with official one. > Cheers If you want to work via github and submit

Re: CloudMonkey 5.3 not starting on Ubuntu 14.10

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: > Hi guys, > > I am having issues starting cloudmonkey on ubuntu 14.10. I get the > following error: > > $ cloudmonkey > Import error in cloudmonkey.cloudmonkey : No module named packages > > I have the same on CentOS 6.6, cloudmonkey i

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.5 #184

See Changes: [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7903: Decreased minimal usage aggregation range value -- [...truncated 1646 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkst

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #719

See Changes: [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7903: Decreased minimal usage aggregation range value -- [...truncated 1857 lines...] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:

Re: Cloudstack repos

Hi Vadim, The official repository is at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git A mirror is available on Github which is more easy to work with, to get started I would recommend you fork the Github repository, work on it and pull/rebase using the above official repository, and sen

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #1985

See Changes: [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7903: Decreased minimal usage aggregation range value -- [...truncated 1712 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-che

CloudMonkey 5.3 not starting on Ubuntu 14.10

Hi guys, I am having issues starting cloudmonkey on ubuntu 14.10. I get the following error: $ cloudmonkey Import error in cloudmonkey.cloudmonkey : No module named packages I have tried to google for the error, but can't find the solution. I've installed it via pip install cloudmonkey.

Re: Could you review the patch?

Done. On Monday 01 December 2014 03:48 PM, Ilia Shakitko wrote: Dear colleagues, Could you review and submit the patch (if everything is okay)? Very minor change. https://reviews.apache.org/r/27979/ Kind regards, Ilia Shakitko Innovation Engineer LeaseWeb Technologies B.V. T: +31 20 316 02

Re: Review Request 27979: CLOUDSTACK-7903: Decrease minimal usage aggregation range value

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27979/#review63348 --- Ship it! I'm going ahead with the merge on master, 4.5 and 4.4 and

Re: Cloudstack repos

HI Vadim, first repo is official one, second repo is shapeblue's repo, since they also provide RPMs for convinience and with some patches... Anyway, you will go with official one. Cheers On 1 December 2014 at 11:12, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: > Hello Dev-s > > I am looking closer to t

Could you review the patch?

Dear colleagues, Could you review and submit the patch (if everything is okay)? Very minor change. https://reviews.apache.org/r/27979/ Kind regards, Ilia Shakitko Innovation Engineer LeaseWeb Technologies B.V. T: +31 20 316 0235 E: i.shaki...@tech.leaseweb.com W: www.leaseweb.com

Cloudstack repos

Hello Dev-s I am looking closer to the CS development process and if possible wish to contribute. I have found there are at least 2 repos for CS. One, I suppose, is official : git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git another one is https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack.git

Re: root resize support in the UI

Vadim, not sure if I understand corrrectly - but you have i.e. 10GB template. you provision new VM with different size i.e. 50GB, and then after the instance is UP and running - there is just 40GB of additional unalocated space inside VM/disk, so admin need to resize partition and resize FS... ? I

RE: [4.4][CLOUDSTACK][BUG?] - SSH Keypairs listing is missing under the account tab

Sorry for long reply. I am looking at release. And latest branch 4.4 - same bug. No SSH Keypairs selector. Kind regards, Ilia Shakitko Innovation Engineer LeaseWeb Technologies B.V. T: +31 20 316 0235 M: E: i.shaki...@tech.leaseweb.com W: http://www.leaseweb.com Luttenbergweg 8, 1101 EC Amste

RE: root resize support in the UI

But that means user can not create desired volume during instance set-up. If we would like to have, for example, VM with disk offers from 5-100Gb I need to create dozen of same templates that differ only at root size. Vadim. -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...

  1   2   >