On 12/01/2014 04:12 PM, Nux! wrote:
> Hm, after an upgrade it might be tricky. Perhaps display it here somehow 
> http://img.nux.ro/3hH-callhome.png
> Perhaps some UI/javascript specialist can help us here ...
> 

Good idea. In that Menu we probably need a "Call-Home" link pointing to
http://cloudstack.apache.org/callhome.html (doesn't exist yet!)

Wido

> Lucian
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl>
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 15:05:55
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack
> 
>> On 12/01/2014 04:00 PM, Nux! wrote:
>>> In addition: this should be opt-out, but clearly specified in the release 
>>> notes,
>>> as well as visible in the UI.
>>>
>>
>> But where do we display this in the UI? I don't think we have a
>> mechanism to show a one-time message after a upgrade. Do we?
>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Nux!" <n...@li.nux.ro>
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 13:52:35
>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack
>>>
>>>> +1, good job!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>
>>>> Nux!
>>>> www.nux.ro
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl>
>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>> Sent: Monday, 1 December, 2014 13:08:02
>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Automatic usage reporting / call-home for CloudStack
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight information on
>>>>> about how CloudStack is being used. Surveys tell us a lot, but not
>>>>> everybody fills in the survey, so we still miss a lot of information.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's why I've written the Usage Reporting functionality for the
>>>>> management server which automatically sends back anonymous information
>>>>> about a CloudStack deployment.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's currently in the 'reporter' branch. [0]
>>>>>
>>>>> By default, every 7 days it generates a JSON document with:
>>>>> - Hosts (Number, version, type, hypervisor)
>>>>> - Clusters (Hypervisor en Management type)
>>>>> - Primary storage (Type and provider)
>>>>> - Zones (Network type and providers)
>>>>> - Instances (Number and types)
>>>>>
>>>>> This report is not complete yet, I'd like to add more information, but
>>>>> that will be Management Server information.
>>>>>
>>>>> The code on how this report is generated is obviously 100% Open Source,
>>>>> so end-users can always exactly see how the information was compiled.
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to discuss this new feature for CloudStack and the possible
>>>>> implications it might have.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm opting for a opt-out. So every new or upgraded install to 4.6.0
>>>>> (master) will have this enabled. Yes, we have to be very explicit in the
>>>>> Release Notes that this has been added.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why? It's the small price we as a project ask for using CloudStack. We
>>>>> want a little bit of information on how CloudStack is being used so that
>>>>> we can use this to make CloudStack even better.
>>>>>
>>>>> Turning it off is also just one global setting and it will never turn on
>>>>> again.
>>>>>
>>>>> On the server-side there is a Python flask application [1] (found in the
>>>>> reporter directory) which stores all the incoming information in a
>>>>> ElasticSearch database. From there analytics can be gathered on
>>>>> CloudStack deployments.
>>>>>
>>>>> It currently points to http://cs-report.widodh.nl/report which will NOT
>>>>> be the endpoint when this is merged into master.
>>>>>
>>>>> For 'production' I want to have
>>>>> https://report.cloudstack.apache.org/report where all reports are 
>>>>> submitted.
>>>>>
>>>>> For every setup a unique ID is determined by hashing the first row in
>>>>> the 'version' table. This is the version + timestamp and that is hashed
>>>>> using SHA256. Using this unique ID we can track changes in deployments
>>>>> and see how they grow or shrink.
>>>>>
>>>>> Technically this wasn't that hard to implement, but the politics
>>>>> surrounding it might be the hardest part.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do other have to say about this? Should there be a VOTE for this
>>>>> feature to come into CloudStack? Opt-in, opt-out?
>>>>>
>>>>> Wido
>>>>>
>>>>> [0]:
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/reporter
>>>>> [1]:
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=reporter/usage-report-collector.py;h=500a4d284b5172fd93acea08f5460cfff5520855;hb=reporter

Reply via email to