Re: Review Request 25734: CLOUDSTACK-7565: Fixes to avoid QEMU issue in attach volume operation by changing test case steps

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25734/#review53806 --- 032bce5b544afe7316651227e593c977430f2cde master - SrikanteswaraRao

Re: Inter-network Communication

Pradeep, You have not mentioned any intern-network communication here. If all departments are independent, you can have isolated network for each account and then configure FireWall Rules for the network individually according to you needs. Another option is you can use security groups in advance

Re: Review Request 25734: CLOUDSTACK-7565: Fixes to avoid QEMU issue in attach volume operation by changing test case steps

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25734/ --- (Updated Sept. 18, 2014, 11:48 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Santhosh Ed

Re: Review Request 25734: CLOUDSTACK-7565: Fixes to avoid QEMU issue in attach volume operation by changing test case steps

> On Sept. 18, 2014, 10:54 a.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote: > > Please fix the below pep8 issues and re-submit the patch. > > > > test/integration/component/test_escalations_volumes.py:128:80: E501 line > > too long (80 > 79 characters) > > test/integration/component/test_escalations_volum

Re: JIRA

thanks, David. On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Thanks, David > > I should look and find out how you do that in JIRA. > > On Wednesday, September 17, 2014, David Nalley wrote: > > > Anyone on the PMC should be able to take care of this. (as

Re: Review Request 25647: enabling the rootdisksize variable for vm creation wrt managed storage

> On Sept. 16, 2014, 12:14 p.m., punith s wrote: > > engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/CloudOrchestrator.java, > > line 200 > > > > > > yes mike, when you create a compute offering wi

Re: Review Request 25734: CLOUDSTACK-7565: Fixes to avoid QEMU issue in attach volume operation by changing test case steps

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25734/#review53799 --- Please fix the below pep8 issues and re-submit the patch. test/inte

Re: Review Request 25734: CLOUDSTACK-7565: Fixes to avoid QEMU issue in attach volume operation by changing test case steps

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25734/#review53798 --- Ship it! This workaround looks good to me w.r.t test. However, we n

Review Request 25768: changing value of cpu/mem.overprovisioning.factor for xen cluster is not affecting total memory at zone level

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25768/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7571 http

Re: Inter-network Communication

I am working on a Proof-Of-Concept for a private cloud setup. Here is the organizational requirement: - Organization has Finance, Engineering and Marketing departments - Each Dept has a Cloudstack account - Each Dept has a separate network to which VMs are attached - Access to the Finance Dept Netw

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #3559

See

4.5.0 - status - looming dates

Hi folks, 4.3.1 is out the door now, so I am trying to get things lined up around 4.5.0. Please consider us in feature freeze right now - and my plan is to branch 4.5.0 this coming weekend. I'd like to see us hit code freeze by end of October. Right now, we have 4 blocker bugs and 63 critical bu

Re: JIRA

Thanks, David I should look and find out how you do that in JIRA. On Wednesday, September 17, 2014, David Nalley wrote: > Anyone on the PMC should be able to take care of this. (assuming they are > listed as being on the PMC in Jira) > > Punith: You should now have karma to assign tickets to yo

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #3558

See Changes: [anthony.xu] in tagCommand, AsyncJobExecutionContext doesn't need to be created if it doesn't exist [anthony.xu] added hypervisor capacity for XS 6.5.0 -- [...truncated

Re: Fwd: JIRA

Anyone on the PMC should be able to take care of this. (assuming they are listed as being on the PMC in Jira)  Punith: You should now have karma to assign tickets to yourself or be assigned tickets.  —David On September 17, 2014 at 7:35:29 PM, Mike Tutkowski (mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com) wr

Fwd: JIRA

Punith was trying to assign a JIRA ticket to himself, but does not seem to have the appropriate authority (and I cannot seem to find his username in the list of people who I can assign tickets to). Does anyone know who can give this to him? Thanks! -- Forwarded message -- From: P

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Future

Hi all, I’ll personally improve monitoring and autoscalability, I believe both systems can be adapted to today’s requirements bringing more accurate results and user-experience. Inline with this proposal, I’d also address the same issues taking into account a new virtualization layer, the LXC c

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #3557

See Changes: [sangeetha.hariharan] CLOUDSTACK-7573 : Fixed the Guest OS Type used for the ISO -- [...truncated 1814 lines...] log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly. lo

Jenkins build is back to normal : simulator-singlerun #388

See

Re: Review Request 25749: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-7573: ISO Guest OS Change

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25749/#review53756 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sangeetha hariharan On Sept. 17, 2014, 7:28

RE: Travis failures

I only checked into my personal branch: pytest, which is converting nose to pytest, so if you run nose against pytest test cases, definitely, it will fail. I think it's ok to fail for travis on my pytest branch at this time, as I haven't start the discussion in the community about how to improve

Re: Upgrade to 4.3.1

Hi, Please set the value to "*.yourdomain.com" (note the asterisk) The management server needs a restarted when you change the global config value. If this was a fresh install - by default console proxy will run on HTTP. When you switch from HTTP to HTTPS or vice versa, you need to destroy the old

RE: [VMWARE SETUP ERROR] Error seeing in brining up System VMs with Vmware setup with CS server

Hi Mike, Sure, it will help to see if you can reproduce the error. I used the system vm template : http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-vmware.ova but http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/ is latest and OVA is to be used. Thanks &

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-simulator #687

See

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-simulator #686

See -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-ac1 (cloudstack-buildslave-centos6) in workspace

Re: [VMWARE SETUP ERROR] Error seeing in brining up System VMs with Vmware setup with CS server

I can set up a VMware cluster hopefully later tonight and see if I can reproduce this. Off hand I'm not sure why the "managed" logic would be causing this, though. In your situation, "managed" should be false and the "standard" logic should run. Is this where I can get the latest system template

Re: Review Request 24090: Externalized the hard-coded strings from JavaScript files to resource bundles.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24090/#review53742 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Federle On Sept. 12, 2014, 9:53 a.m.,

Re: [VMWARE SETUP ERROR] Error seeing in brining up System VMs with Vmware setup with CS server

You're right, Marcus. Now that I think about it, asserts are ignored by default. On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Marcus wrote: > Aren't asserts ignored by default? I think we had an issue with asserts in > the past, and I believe at the time the default config had asserts > disabled. > > > On W

Re: [VMWARE SETUP ERROR] Error seeing in brining up System VMs with Vmware setup with CS server

Aren't asserts ignored by default? I think we had an issue with asserts in the past, and I believe at the time the default config had asserts disabled. On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Ritu Sabharwal wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I updated the master just now and tried the setup. I see the same error o

Re: Review Request 25685: Fixed the test_usage.py script bug - CLOUDSTACK-7555

> On Sept. 16, 2014, 11:26 a.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote: > > It is good to add test results to the patch. Agreed - Chandan --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25685/#revie

RE: [VMWARE SETUP ERROR] Error seeing in brining up System VMs with Vmware setup with CS server

Hi Mike, I updated the master just now and tried the setup. I see the same error on same line number. Thanks & Regards, Ritu S. -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 8:32 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: ilya

Re: Review Request 25685: Fixed the test_usage.py script bug - CLOUDSTACK-7555

> On Sept. 16, 2014, 11:25 a.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_usage.py, line 748 > > > > > > Please change this to self.account.name and self.account.domainid Talluri, account is

Review Request 25749: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-7573: ISO Guest OS Change

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25749/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Amogh Vasekar, sangeetha hariharan, and sanjeev n

Re: Fwd: Re: Upgrade to 4.3.1

Has this worked for you in 4.3.0, before the upgrade to 4.3.1? I've briefly looked through change log from 4.3.0 to 4.3.1, i dont see any changes related to console - but this check was very brief. Regards ilya On 9/17/14, 1:42 AM, Mārtiņš Jakubovičs wrote: Hello, I installed fresh CS 4.3.1

Re: Review Request 24892: passwd_server attempts to start but terminates with the exit code 137

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24892/#review53687 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sheng Yang On Aug. 20, 2014, 2:25 p.m., bhar

RE: [CCCEU14] hackathons

Shall do, but it looks like I don't have wiki edit rights yet. Could you grant them to me? stephen.tur...@citrix.com. Thanks. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2014 14:01 To: dev Subject: Re: [CCCEU14] hackatho

Re: Travis failures

On Sep 17, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > On 17-Sep-2014, at 2:58 pm, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> The checkin by Min was not the problem (Edisons was on his own branch) >> Rohit showed me the travis run on this commit in his travis account. It was >> green. >> >> So our travis setup is

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #1639

See

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #387

See Changes: [Rohit Yadav] CID-1233085: Fix potential NPE in AccountManagerImpl from VpcManagerImpl [Rohit Yadav] CID-1192805: Remove dead local store from OvsNetworkTopologyGuruImpl [Rohit Yadav] CID-1192811: Remove dead lo

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #1638

See Changes: [Rohit Yadav] CID-1192805: Remove dead local store from OvsNetworkTopologyGuruImpl [Rohit Yadav] CID-1192811: Remove dead local store from VolumeJoinDaoImpl [Rohit Yadav] CID-1192812: Remove dead code from DataCenterJo

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Future

Ah, from that POV. Gotchya. I think also making it easier to develop the UI would help. Feels like a big black box to me, and probably to others… On Sep 16, 2014, at 10:37 PM, Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: So, most of the developers of CloudStack don’t use it as a user.

Re: Travis failures

On 17-Sep-2014, at 2:58 pm, Daan Hoogland wrote: > The checkin by Min was not the problem (Edisons was on his own branch) > Rohit showed me the travis run on this commit in his travis account. It was > green. > > So our travis setup is not perfect yet :( We have a hypothesis that all the apache

Review Request 25734: CLOUDSTACK-7565: Fixes to avoid QEMU issue in attach volume operation by changing test case steps

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25734/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Santhosh Edukulla and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.

Re: [CCCEU14] hackathons

We are going to have a launch for organising them. So please add your ideas and find people to join in. I will extend the table on the wiki to include timeslot and leaf room for extra 'contestants' to add their name. On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Rafael Weingartner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com

Re: Travis failures

The checkin by Min was not the problem (Edisons was on his own branch) Rohit showed me the travis run on this commit in his travis account. It was green. So our travis setup is not perfect yet :( On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > If the community wishes we can enable travis-ci

Re: [CCCEU14] hackathons

Are we going to have hackathons in ccceu in Hungary in November the 19th? On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Stephen Turner wrote: > Thanks for the pointer, Daan. I'm interested in the API, but when are we > planning to do this? On the day before the conference starts? > > -- > Stephen Turner > >

Re: Travis failures

If the community wishes we can enable travis-ci to do email alerts. It will email the person who broke the branch. On 17 September 2014 12:33, sebgoa wrote: > Hi folks, > > With Travis tests now passing, it's a good time for everyone to get > familiar with it and understanding the tests that are

Review Request 25732: null IOPS is being processed while creating a vm using third party storage plugins

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25732/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Mike Tutkowski. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7570 htt

Re: Review Request 25647: enabling the rootdisksize variable for vm creation wrt managed storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25647/ --- (Updated Sept. 17, 2014, 5:52 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Mike Tutk

Travis failures

Hi folks, With Travis tests now passing, it's a good time for everyone to get familiar with it and understanding the tests that are being run (advanced zone, simulator, smoke tests). While most builds have been green since yesterday there was two commits (from Edison and Min) that turned out r

Re: Inter-network Communication

Hi Pradeep, In cloudstack create network and launch vm in that to create router. To communicate between the networks depends on the network type in cloudstack. If you want multiple networks with single router use VPC networks/tiers and configure ACL between them. Isolated networks will one rout

RE: [CCCEU14] hackathons

Thanks for the pointer, Daan. I'm interested in the API, but when are we planning to do this? On the day before the conference starts? -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2014 10:26 To: dev Cc: market...@cloudsta

Inter-network Communication

In OpenStack, there is a workflow wherein user can create multiple networks, then create a router and attach to it some of the previously created networks to enable inter-network communication. What is the equivalent workflow in Cloudstack ? -Pradeep

Re: CloudStack Docker and Mesos Support

On Sep 16, 2014, at 7:20 PM, ilya musayev wrote: > Hi all, > > Would you know where we stand with Mesos and Docker? > That's a big question. Mesos is a resource allocator that multiple frameworks can use to run workloads of various sorts. The interest is to mix workloads: big data, long run

[CCCEU14] hackathons

H devs, In the schedule for ccceu there is no hackathon day. The reason is that hackathons have been decreasing in popularity and success. What we do have is; 1. a room for getting together and working on things 2. a planning page for hackathons, which we might hence forth give another name at [1

Re: Review Request 23819: CLOUDSTACK-2251: Automation tests for dedicated public IP addreses per tenant feature

I will check if it applies properly. It is a valid patch in terms of whether it should be added to repo or not. Regards, Gaurav On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:42 PM, SrikanteswaraRao Talluri < srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com> wrote: > > ---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7143: Refactoring of the syste...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/16#issuecomment-55868179 Leo, From the jenkins job log [1] I see that the newly refactored build script is trying to setup ruby [2] and failing because of this. The jenkins job [1] already ha

Re: Review Request 23819: CLOUDSTACK-2251: Automation tests for dedicated public IP addreses per tenant feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23819/#review53670 --- Is this patch still valid? - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Sept. 2,

Re: Review Request 25642: CLOUDSTACK-7547: Brocade Device Data was hard coded, moved it to config file

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25642/#review53669 --- Ship it! 71611da17f082d9d813c89767a69c5b13ba5adf1 master - Srikant

Re: Review Request 25684: CLOUDSTACK-7557: test_vpc_network.py - Fixed wait period of network state check

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25684/#review53667 --- Ship it! 58ea99a9d665b4370651fe867988d597ea16165e master - Srikant

Re: Review Request 25637: CLOUDSTACK-7387: Corrected code related to adding host tags

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25637/#review53664 --- commit 20f9d3dcd8a980e03b651629b510b6e98e411271 Author: Gaurav Aradh

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7143: Refactoring of the syste...

Github user lsimons commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/16#issuecomment-55866128 Hey Rohit, like I thought, a ruby issue.I'm surprised RVM isn't enabled already since the build was already using it (I think...). The fix should be along the line

Fwd: Re: Upgrade to 4.3.1

Hello, I installed fresh CS 4.3.1 and it also don't use "consoleproxy.url.domain" value. This is in console proxy, source: v-2-VMsrc="https://.realhostip.com/ajax?token=1cttHTopOwqQbK_Q9gYmoYMOnzK9fcHUlUv3q6rIUsyVdY3hU7Kmwa7A9RxTz7ZuG4MherlIa0tllGr5XWez73GVyP19iBqxP-c5eCttLrUAotMhMu3GLqPDdEzB