Re: Resize Volume Question

I didn't put this in the ticket, but - historically - when one talks about 1 GB in the persistent-storage world, one means 1,000,000,000 bytes (as opposed to memory, where 1 GB means 1,073,741,824 bytes). Some systems try to clarify this by using, for example, GB versus GiB. On Sat, Jul 12, 2014

Re: End user portal

Well, one of the GUI people might be able to answer this better, but I was under the impression each tab on the left-hand side of the GUI is a separate GUI plug-in and, as such, can be configured to be "in" or "out" of the GUI fairly easily (kind of like how it works if you log in as an admin and s

Re: End user portal

What if several features of the standard CloudStack GUI (user login) are not to be shown to the user? Looking for a simple portal which allows end users to login, select a vm, spinoff that vm with its apps and data, and which allows end user logout. > What about just using the standard Cloud

Re: Resize Volume Question

Oh, by the way, that code documentation is still in my sandbox (i.e. not committed). I am working on updating the resize-volume logic for 4.5. Hopefully I'll have it checked in sometime next week. On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > OK, so, I

Re: Resize Volume Question

OK, so, I did a couple things: 1) I documented the code in the resize-volume area (there were two places that I saw) where we bit shift to convert from GB to bytes. 2) I created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7101 The ticket will probably have to wait until a major release bec

Re: Resize Volume Question

Mike - Would you mind creating a bug for it or better still adding a comment in the code as a //TODO - standardize it if you can't fix it ? I guess currently dev writing new code doesn't have a good reference whether to take it as bytes or in GB. That¹s why you are seeing both varieties. Thanks, -

Re: Resize Volume Question

Sure, that makes sense - thanks. It's too bad we don't really have a standard for our API in terms of how volume sizes are referenced. It seems sometimes we use bytes while other times we use GB. I was thinking the units were bytes here, but they are GB. On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Nitin Me

Re: Review Request 23314: Plugin specific code for the Brocade Network Plugin

> On July 8, 2014, 9:29 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Thanks for make this a separate review, much easier to read. > > > > The licenses are not added to all files and in some files they appear not > > to be complete. A good trick to solve this is to include the > > license-maven-plugin in th

Re: Review Request 23314: Plugin specific code for the Brocade Network Plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23314/ --- (Updated July 11, 2014, 11:44 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes --

RE: [DISCUSS]CLOUDSTACK-6191

+1 Revert now and enable after complete full test in KVM KVM automation blocked more than 7 days due to this defect https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7051 Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 2:49

RE: VM HA on xenserver 6.2

If you set the global setting 'ha.tag' and tag the hosts then those hosts become dedicated HA hosts as you observed. If you want to use all your hosts for regular VM deployments, then you should not ha tag them. Just using 'ha.enabled' service offering while deploying the VMs should be sufficie

Re: Review Request 22863: CLOUDSTACK-6823 : First code drop for Brocade Network plugin to orchestrate Brocade VDX switches for L2 connectivity.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22863/ --- (Updated July 11, 2014, 10:10 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trip

Re: Resize Volume Question

Probably converting from GB to bytes ? I recall doing that for creating volumes from custom disk offering. On 11/07/14 2:07 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >Hi, > >In the resize-volume command, I see this logic: > >if (diskOffering.isCustomized() || >volume.getVolumeType().equals(Volume.

[DISCUSS]CLOUDSTACK-6191

Move the discussion to the list about CloudStack-6191: Automation test is blocked by this bug, we need to find a solution. My suggestion is sort-of-revert-the-patch, but still give admin the opportunity to specify the way to optimize KVM volume creation. The reasons: 1. End user shouldn't

Resize Volume Question

Hi, In the resize-volume command, I see this logic: if (diskOffering.isCustomized() || volume.getVolumeType().equals(Volume.Type.ROOT)) { newSize = cmd.getSize(); if (newSize != null) { newSize = (newSize << 30);

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Implementation of DNS Provider for Bind (for 4.5)

I tend to agree with Erik, flexibility solves the problem for more people, while solution 1 is likely the easiest to implement. I am not sure that it makes sense for most people though - and would really only work for greenfield deployments or clouds that had all of the DNS entries relating to inst

Re: feature : changing volume properties dynamically in 4.5

Just an FYI that I was busy the past week working on building integration tests for SolidFire-related functionality that's executed in CloudStack, but I plan to get back to this resizeVolume API work today. On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: >

Coverity Scan Report: July 11 2014

Hi All, FYI, Current Defect Density :3.58 Newly Detected: 7, below are new defects reported by coverity scan service. A small note, we should not allow adding new defects to the existing reported count, otherwise, current technical debt will never come down. Few of these issues can be equall

Re: Review Request 21685: Fixed Regression Issues for CLOUDSTACK-6708

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21685/#review47652 --- Commit aab6e1222fc75a37f8015ba1d2c7bc923c1cf614 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 23410: Improvised CloudByte Storage Plugin for 4.5 and above. jira id : CLOUDSTACK-7098

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23410/#review47651 --- server/src/com/cloud/configuration/Config.java

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.4.0

Hello, We are waiting for the patch with longingly. Error associated with self-closing of machines causes very serious complications, both from the technical (users need to wait for 10 minutes and check if the machine is not closed automatically) as well as the business side (this problem does no

Re: Review Request 23410: Improvised CloudByte Storage Plugin for 4.5 and above. jira id : CLOUDSTACK-7098

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23410/ --- (Updated July 11, 2014, 6:12 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, amit kumar da

VM HA on xenserver 6.2

Hi, I want to provide HA to VMs, currently i have created service offering with 'HA enable' option. Hence VM is showing 'HA Enable'. but Host is hot HA enable. Also for host If I change global setting 'ha.tag' = 'label' & apply 'label' to host tag it shows 'HA Enable'. but while deploying vm tha

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.4.0

Our beloved VP pointed out that there has not come a vote conclusion yet: The 4.4.0 vote has resulted in a rejection of the present release candidate due to -1 of Marcus and no active voting since. there are three issues pending from this vote thread: - CLOUDSTACK-6036 (Tomasz) - unable to add a

Re: Review Request 23258: CLOUDSTACK-7062: Tagging test case with BugId

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23258/#review47648 --- Commit 5e181acbdb0865c0d26307c4e5359ec9c615f615 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 23258: CLOUDSTACK-7062: Tagging test case with BugId

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23258/#review47647 --- Commit ba389819338a9be23f1cb604b9d586afb5598795 in cloudstack's bran

Review Request 23410: Improvised CloudByte Storage Plugin for 4.5 and above. jira id : CLOUDSTACK-7098

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23410/ --- Review request for cloudstack, amit kumar das, edison su, and Mike Tutkowski. R

RE: "Bug" introduced by part of commit a600d8408ea86782318139c17cf346c8497943d0

Hi Santhosh, Yep looks good! In the meantime I've stumbled across another one that seems to originate either from the NetworksDaoImp.java upon update or allocateVnet, still looking into it, but here's the message: 2014-07-11 11:58:01,646 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator] (Work-Job-Executor

Autostart vms on Xenserver 6.2 With HA

I have all vms HA enabled on ACS 4.3 on xenserver 6.2 . I also want to enable auto start functionality in xen 6.2 for all vms. but i found this http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX133910 So will it be safe to enable auto start on xen6.2 with command line? Regards, Tejas

Re: Cannot release reservation

Hi Punith, I have recreated systemvms & now its in normal state now. Thanks for replay Regards, Tejas On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Punith S wrote: > hi, > > try restarting the MS and see whether agent and MS are in sync. > also check the ssvm by running the health script by logging into

Review Request 23395: CLOUDSTACK-5663 :- Handled the NULL check for network's cidr field to avoid NPE for createNetwork and listNetwork

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23395/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Parth Jagirdar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5663 htt

Re: customize systemVM

Rohit has put up a how-to here http://bhaisaab.org/logs/building-systemvms/ -abhi On 11/07/14 2:27 pm, "Tomasz Zięba" wrote: >Where can I find a tutorial to modify systemVM image or create my own >systemVM template ? > >-- >Regards, >Tomasz Zięba >Twitter: @TZieba >LinkedIn: pl.linkedin.com/pu

customize systemVM

Where can I find a tutorial to modify systemVM image or create my own systemVM template ? -- Regards, Tomasz Zięba Twitter: @TZieba LinkedIn: pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/

Re: How to recreate ssvm & cpvm

Thanks Suresh, It worked perfectly fine. Regards, Tejas On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Suresh Sadhu wrote: > Before destroying the cpvm and ssvm ,please analyse the logs. May be agent > is not up. > Also check below > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templ