Re: Review Request 22510: [Windows] Can not create Template from ROOT snapshot. Fixed the same by adding pathSeparator to the DataStoreTO.java

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22510/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 6:50 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su, Ko

Re: Review Request 20316: CLOUDSTACK-1466: Adding automation test cases for Primary Storage Limits

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/#review46043 --- Commit a0f19d4bd5d7bec6613aa8130b3da9ecffc71d0b in cloudstack's bran

Re: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me

Prachi, Mike, I appreciate your comments. I think it is a bug that there is a difference between filter logic of ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator and that of ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator (ex. allocator skip iSCSI type storage pool or not when a volume is a RootDisk), I will unify by implementing i

Review Request 22717: refactor StoragePoolAllocator#filter logic

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Mike Tutkowski and Prachi Damle. Repository: clo

Re: [API]How to check how many IPs are available in guest network

Or is it that the client doesn’t care about the network (since all networks are reachable from one-another) and just wants to run a VM. This is called a basic zone :) Some higher level portal could achieve this logic for an advanced zone, I guess. From: Chiradeep Vittal mailto:chiradeep.vit...@

Re: [API]How to check how many IPs are available in guest network

Not sure I understand. Would this be a single network encompassing several vlans and ip ranges? From: ilya musayev mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 at 6:3

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-install pull request: corrected the java version t...

GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/15 corrected the java version to 1.7 changed java package and JAVA_HOME to 1.7 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/karu

Re: Anybody addressing this bug ? Overlaping IP subnets across different vlans

Anthony, Thanks for response While i see your point, i believe its a corner case. Consider this scenario: I have a network 192.168.1.2 - 10 assigned as management network I have a network 192.168.1.11 - 200 assigned to guests. The router VM will get two IPs in this case 192.168.1.2 and 192.16

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Congrats Saksham !! -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:18 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Saksham Srivastava

Re: [ACS 4.4] cherry-pick

Hi Daan, The conflicts resolved looks fine. You can ignore my patch. Thanks, Jayapal On 17-Jun-2014, at 5:50 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I don't think I was clear. I don't need a new patch. I did resolve the > conflict. I need you to check if I did the right thing in branch 4.4 > in EventTypes

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

Thanks again :) -Original Message- From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:43 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer I am too late to wish you on ML. Congrats Welcome aboard,

RE: [ACS431][QUESTION] db upgrace

4.3.1 -> 4.4.0 upgrade also needs to be handled. -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 17 June 2014 9:16 PM To: dev Subject: [ACS431][QUESTION] db upgrace In my simple mind it seems we only need to create a Upgrade430to431.java file and d

Re: Unscribe me!

Instructions for how to unsubscribe: http://cloudstack.apache.org/mailing-lists.html On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:38 PM, abhisek basu wrote: > > -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses

Re: Review Request 20316: CLOUDSTACK-1466: Adding automation test cases for Primary Storage Limits

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 9:36 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilam

Unscribe me!

Managing individual ESXi instances

Hi all, I've sent this mail to the users list but this one looks as the better destination. I'm new to the CloudStack platform and I'm wondering why the platform does need the vCenter API and can not use ESXi directly, Can anyone elaborate on this? Are there any proposals for adding ESXi integ

Re: Review Request 20316: CLOUDSTACK-1466: Adding automation test cases for Primary Storage Limits

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 8:53 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilam

Review Request 22614: CLOUDSTACK-6887: Code enhancement to ensure better cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22614/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6887 h

Review Request 22627: CLOUDSTACK-6906: Fixed volume resize BVT failure

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22627/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6906 h

Review Request 22713: This Test suite has test cases for deploying Virtual Machine using impersonation (passing account and domainId parameters) for shared network

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22713/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla. R

Review Request 22712: This Test suite has test cases relating to acess checks for deleteNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regular users

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22712/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla. R

Review Request 22709: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for createNetwork(), deploying VM in an isolated network and restartNetwork() for Admin, domain admin and regular us

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla. R

Re: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me

I can comment on the IOPS part. The IOPS are currently only relevant when using managed storage (which is currently only applicable at the zone level). That being the case, no cluster (or local) storage takes advantage of counting IOPS that have been handed out. Of course this logic might be expa

Re: Review Request 22707: Test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listSnapshot() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain ad

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22707/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 1:16 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Pra

Review Request 22707: Test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listSnapshot() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain admin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22707/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla. R

Re: Review Request 22706: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listVolume() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22706/ --- (Updated June 18, 2014, 1:06 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Pra

Review Request 22706: This test suite contains test cases relating to access checks for listVolume() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain adm

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22706/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla. R

Review Request 22705: Test cases relating to access checks for listVirtualMachine() with parameters - id, listall, isrecursive, account and domainid executed as ROOT admin, domain admin and regular us

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22705/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla. R

Re: [API]How to check how many IPs are available in guest network

Chiradeep, So i did a little more digging in your example, I also realized you code has assumption that i have /24 entirely dedicated to CloudStack :) Welcome to enterprise madness where IP space, while being internal and free - is close guarded and restricted. Do we have a concept of IP P

[GSoC] [CLOUDSTACK-6114] Progress update

Hi All, This week the project was tested by Sebastien, Rohit and Leo. All successfully got a cloud up which is good news. I've separated the project out a bit and the documentation has been updated thanks to Rohit and suggestions from Leo. The main repository can be found at: https://github.com

Re: Review Request 22695: Stress Test to test multiple Remote Access VPN Connections to VPC

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/ --- (Updated June 17, 2014, 9 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar

Re: Review Request 22695: Stress Test to test multiple Remote Access VPN Connections to VPC

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/ --- (Updated June 17, 2014, 8:53 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilam

Re: Review Request 22695: Stress Test to test multiple Remote Access VPN Connections to VPC

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/ --- (Updated June 17, 2014, 8:51 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilam

RE: ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me

>Why ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator implements "filter" method (and doesn't call >that of base class) rather than just using that of base class? >ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter method seems doesn't care "avoid" >parameter, doesn't skip iSCSI type storage pool even if a volume is a RootDisk. T

ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me

Hi, ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me. ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator and ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator are allocator classes to select storage pool. They extends AbstractStoragePoolAllocator class, which provides "filter" method to exclude unavailable storage pools. Why Zo

Review Request 22695: Stress Test to test multiple Remote Access VPN Connections to VPC

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar, Raja Pullela, sangeetha harihar

Review Request 22693: Added VirtualRouterElements, InternalLoadBalancerElements classes to base.py- Extended methods in DiskOffering, StoragePool and Physical Network classes to accept more parameters

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22693/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar, Raja Pullela, sangeetha harihar

Re: Review Request 22692: Test Suite for Testing Remote Access VPN on VPC

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/ --- (Updated June 17, 2014, 7:24 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilam

Re: Review Request 22692: Test Suite for Testing Remote Access VPN on VPC

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/ --- (Updated June 17, 2014, 7:14 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilam

Review Request 22692: Test Suite for Testing Remote Access VPN on VPC

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar, Raja Pullela, sanjeev n, Santho

Re: Can't build codebase

Kept failing for me yesterday too. Thanks, Amogh On 6/17/14 9:44 AM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >This morning, when I ran that URL, it returned that the service was >unavailable (which is consistent with what Maven said). > >Now, as you pointed out, it returns a 404. > >It all seems to work now, b

Re: Xen Project support and state of APIs

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Tim, > > Thanks for replying, let me clean up everything and re-setup my test infra > after my $dayjob hours and get back to you. The test cases in the design > doc does not discuss Xen Project so I thought I should ask if ACS works > with Xen

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer

I am too late to wish you on ML. Congrats Welcome aboard, and don't forget to drive the BLR Meetup group..:-) -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:48 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as commi

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Amogh Vasekar as committer

Congrats Amogh. (too late though!) -Original Message- From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 11:14 AM To: Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Amogh Vasekar as committer The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Amogh Vasekar to become a

Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (Core Changes)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20099/#review45955 --- One more comment regarding spring-server-core-managers-context.xml.

Re: Can't build codebase

This morning, when I ran that URL, it returned that the service was unavailable (which is consistent with what Maven said). Now, as you pointed out, it returns a 404. It all seems to work now, but before it was failing on both my Mac OS X and Ubuntu environments. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:31 A

Re: Can't build codebase

http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/net/juniper/contrail/juniper-contrail-api/1.0-SNAPSHOT/juniper-contrail-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom returns a 404. Searching on apache's nexus also returns nothing for juniper or contrail https://repository.apache.org/index.html I'd imagine you are working from .m2

Re: Can't build codebase

This failed twice this morning, but seems to be OK for me now. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Is anyone else seeing this issue when trying to build the codebase under > either 4.4 or master? > > Thanks! > > [ERROR] Failed to execu

Re: Can't build codebase

Mike, This seems like an issue with repository.apache.org. Might be a job for infra? On 17 June 2014 16:48, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > Is anyone else seeing this issue when trying to build the codebase under > either 4.4 or master? > > Thanks! > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.apa

Re: Review Request 22631: supporting nfs protocol and resize feature for managed storage in xenserver.

> On June 16, 2014, 3:30 p.m., Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > I was curious about the resizing of the VDI to take up all of the space of > > the SR. > > > > This is actually what I initially did in 4.2; however, it later dawned on > > me that - if you want to take hypervisor snapshots - then you ne

Can't build codebase

Hi, Is anyone else seeing this issue when trying to build the codebase under either 4.4 or master? Thanks! [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) on project cloud-client-ui: Error resolving project artifact: Could not transfer

[ACS431][QUESTION] db upgrace

In my simple mind it seems we only need to create a Upgrade430to431.java file and don't need any sql files. Is this going to fly? AFAICT the only thing to go in there is the vlan fixup in the vlan table, which is a data migration and not a schema change. Can anyone point out to me the error in my

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.3.1

Wunderbar, thanks! -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: "sebgoa" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 17 June, 2014 3:43:45 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 4.3.1 On Jun 17, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Nux! wrote: > Hi, > > Can yo

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.3.1

On Jun 17, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Nux! wrote: > Hi, > > Can you guys confirm this will make it into 4.3? Fixes an ipset related bug. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6240 yes, I confirm: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.3 > > Lucian > > -- > Sent from the Delta

RE: coverity scan report

As well, there are two defect densities displayed at links below. Is the first one, an overall\all projects density metric, and other for individual cloudstack project ? https://scan.coverity.com/dashboard https://scan.coverity.com/projects/943?tab=overview Regards, Santhosh ___

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.3.1

Hi, Can you guys confirm this will make it into 4.3? Fixes an ipset related bug. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6240 Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: "sebgoa" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: mu

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.3.1

On Jun 13, 2014, at 2:55 AM, ilya musayev wrote: > Sebastian, > > Please cherry-pick following commits: > Cherry-picked the next three. keep them coming > CLOUDSTACK-5891.[VMware] If a template has been registered and > "cpu.corespersocket... > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=clo

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #536

See

[ACS44] cherry-pick request

Daan, please cherry-pick below commit in 4.4-forward into 4.4 commit 8ca8a7217ec155a37b24e3d9cfc3d5fc67adef2d CLOUDSTACK-6925: [OVS] get rid custom logic to create bridges on hosts in the XenServer pool for GRE tunnel networks Fix uses XenServer recommended way Network.other_con

Re: [ACS44] cherry-pick request

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Murali Reddy wrote: > 8ca8a7217ec155a37b24e3d9cfc3d5fc67adef2d is in -- Daan

Re: [ACS 4.4] cherry-pick

I don't think I was clear. I don't need a new patch. I did resolve the conflict. I need you to check if I did the right thing in branch 4.4 in EventTypes near line 550 your new patch doesn't apply to 4.4 or 4.4-forward > git am -s > ~/Downloads/0001-CLOUDSTACK-6922-Updated-events-for-firewall-in

RE: [ACS44] Cherry Pick Request

Sure. From: Daan Hoogland [daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 7:55 AM To: dev Subject: Re: [ACS44] Cherry Pick Request applied and pushed, I have one remark; when fixing issues I would like to see a ref to the issue (in this case no jira

Re: Review Request 22677: coverity issues: fixed conflicts in 4.4

> On June 17, 2014, 12:05 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > Ship It! CommitId: 61cf175f1c2a45f237d20ab7b729876c072f9e89 - Santhosh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22677/#revi

Re: Review Request 22677: coverity issues: fixed conflicts in 4.4

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22677/#review45932 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Santhosh Edukulla On June 17, 2014, 11:15 a.

Re: [ACS44] Cherry Pick Request

applied and pushed, I have one remark; when fixing issues I would like to see a ref to the issue (in this case no jira issue but 'coverity:') and a description of what was solved. your style of commit comments requires a lot of contextual knowledge. Can you try to make sure someone reading your co

Re: Review Request 19779: Fixed[CLOUDSTACK-5150]:-Creating template from a VM in Simulator results in incorrect size

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19779/#review45931 --- Commit 5cc5483a7895e7876e336349323a5ea5598d5137 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 19779: Fixed[CLOUDSTACK-5150]:-Creating template from a VM in Simulator results in incorrect size

> On June 17, 2014, 11:42 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > 883d8f11196e9ca55324bcf075880e077a2d3df3 in 4.4-forward 591148c4641fd079d7b9b85d30e0c297212984e1 on master - daan --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: h

Re: Review Request 19779: Fixed[CLOUDSTACK-5150]:-Creating template from a VM in Simulator results in incorrect size

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19779/#review45929 --- Commit 591148c4641fd079d7b9b85d30e0c297212984e1 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 19779: Fixed[CLOUDSTACK-5150]:-Creating template from a VM in Simulator results in incorrect size

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19779/#review45928 --- Ship it! 883d8f11196e9ca55324bcf075880e077a2d3df3 in 4.4-forward -

Re: Review Request 19779: Fixed[CLOUDSTACK-5150]:-Creating template from a VM in Simulator results in incorrect size

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19779/#review45927 --- Commit 883d8f11196e9ca55324bcf075880e077a2d3df3 in cloudstack's bran

Re: [ACS 4.4] cherry-pick

Hi Daan, Resolved the conflicts and uploaded patch in review board. https://reviews.apache.org/r/22679/ Thanks, Jayapal On 17-Jun-2014, at 4:52 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi > wrote: >> 2214bd2502a34ee8e671eb6b4efe8cd26e29ac5a > > > I had c

Review Request 22679: Updated events for firewall ingress and egress API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22679/ --- Review request for cloudstack and daan Hoogland. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6922 http

Re: Review Request 22631: supporting nfs protocol and resize feature for managed storage in xenserver.

> On June 16, 2014, 9:28 p.m., Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java, > > line 1963 > > > > > > It looks like in VolumeOrchestrato

Re: Xen Project support and state of APIs

Tim, Thanks for replying, let me clean up everything and re-setup my test infra after my $dayjob hours and get back to you. The test cases in the design doc does not discuss Xen Project so I thought I should ask if ACS works with Xen Project 4.x. The Xen/XenProject/XenServer/XAPI/XCP is confusing

RE: [ACS44] Cherry Pick Request

Resolved the conflicts for the mentioned commit. https://reviews.apache.org/r/22677/ Santhosh From: Daan Hoogland [daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 12:09 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [ACS44] Cherry Pick Request On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:28

Re: [ACS 4.4] cherry-pick

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > 2214bd2502a34ee8e671eb6b4efe8cd26e29ac5a I had conflicts. Can you have a look near line 550? I resolved by changing IpAddress to PublicIpAddress. regards -- Daan

Review Request 22677: coverity issues: fixed conflicts in 4.4

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22677/ --- Review request for cloudstack and daan Hoogland. Repository: cloudstack-git D

Re: Xen Project support and state of APIs

Rohit, We've only supported xapi so far, so I'm curious if you had Xen Project 4.4 working before with xapi and if that is now broken. Nothing I did should have impacted that, but it wasn't in my test suite so anything is possible On Jun 17, 2014 11:21 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: > Hi, > > Xen Proj

[ACS 4.4] cherry-pick

Hi Daan, Please cherry pick the following commit into 4.4 commit b0d726a872e2859a56ee677c15079cc3a59ab894 CLOUDSTACK-6923: updated listLBStickinessPolicies API to list using stickiness policy id Thanks, Jayapal

Xen Project support and state of APIs

Hi, Xen Project (previously xen.org xenserver) is widely accessible in several Linux distributions such as Arch, Fedora etc. Therefore, people may want to use it instead of XenServer (6.2 or later). The ACS 4.5 design doc [1] explains about XenServer and how it should be tested etc. but what about

Re: Review Request 20316: CLOUDSTACK-1466: Adding automation test cases for Primary Storage Limits

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/#review45925 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Girish Shilamkar On June 6, 2014, 9:40 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 21771: Cosmetic fixes in cloud-early-config script

> On June 12, 2014, 1:11 p.m., Rajesh Battala wrote: > > systemvm/patches/debian/config/etc/init.d/cloud-early-config, line 33 > > > > > > This daemon will be installed in the base image itself. Hi Rajesh, I don't know

Re: Review Request 22631: supporting nfs protocol and resize feature for managed storage in xenserver.

> On June 16, 2014, 9 p.m., Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > I was curious about the resizing of the VDI to take up all of the space of > > the SR. > > > > This is actually what I initially did in 4.2; however, it later dawned on > > me that - if you want to take hypervisor snapshots - then you need

Re: Review Request 19779: Fixed[CLOUDSTACK-5150]:-Creating template from a VM in Simulator results in incorrect size

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19779/ --- (Updated June 17, 2014, 9:37 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland

Re: Review Request 22631: supporting nfs protocol and resize feature for managed storage in xenserver.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22631/ --- (Updated June 17, 2014, 2:58 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, amit kumar da

coverity scan report

Is there any change in the coverity scan project settings?? the dashboard says Last Analyzed on Jun 09, 2014 https://scan.coverity.com/projects/943?tab=overview while jenkins job is successful http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-master-twiceweekly-coverity/lastBuild/ ~Rajani

Review Request 22674: CLOUDSTACK-1466: Automation - Secondary Storage Test Cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22674/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-1466 h

Re: Review Request 22672: CLOUDSTACK-6914: Fixed the mentioned issue for vgpu cases along with tagging

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22672/#review45920 --- Commit 7c15f148daf9ebb28a8945296db6a967fcfb19f7 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22672: CLOUDSTACK-6914: Fixed the mentioned issue for vgpu cases along with tagging

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22672/#review45919 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On June 17, 2014, 5:01 a.

Re: Review Request 22631: supporting nfs protocol and resize feature for managed storage in xenserver.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22631/ --- (Updated June 17, 2014, 1:35 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, amit kumar da

Re: [EVENT] One week left for CCC Budapest CFP

On Jun 17, 2014, at 9:48 AM, ilya musayev wrote: > Can i submit a tentative proposal? yes > > If stars align (as they seem to align so far), I will try to present @ CCC > Budapest. > > On 6/16/14, 11:51 PM, sebgoa wrote: >> Morning Boys and Girls, >> >> There is one week left to submit you

Re: [EVENT] One week left for CCC Budapest CFP

Can i submit a tentative proposal? If stars align (as they seem to align so far), I will try to present @ CCC Budapest. On 6/16/14, 11:51 PM, sebgoa wrote: Morning Boys and Girls, There is one week left to submit your papers for CCC Budapest Nov 19-21: http://events.linuxfoundation.org/event

Re: Blogs

On Jun 16, 2014, at 4:34 PM, David Nalley wrote: > http://planet.apache.org/cloudstack > added to website on About section > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:24 AM, sebgoa wrote: >> The website points to our blog at: >> >> https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/ >> >> I am pretty sure we used to ag