[PROPOSAL] LDAP Authorisation and multiple LDAP server support

Currently, ACS only does authentication on LDAP server. The user roles have to be configured manually in cloudstack. Also, we don’t support multiple LDAP servers. I am planning to work on adding LDAP authorisation and multiple LDAP server support to CloudStack The proposal is @ https://cwiki.a

[REMINDER]Review Request 19584: CLOUDSTACK-6258: Disable systemvm cloud startup script from logging messages to /var/log/cloud/cloud.out

Hi Rajesh, Any thoughts/suggestions on the changes? Thanks Saurav On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Saurav Lahiri wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/19584/ > -

Re: Unable to deploy systemvms

Hi Dion, Thanks for the clue,I was missing 'cloud traffic label' there. One step ahead Now SSVM and CPVM is UP & running. I am able to ping both private ip but not Public ip from Management server and link local is also pinging from hypervisor . I tried SSVM health check. every thing fine. secsto

[PROPOSAL] Maven integration for windowsfication

Hi, All of you may know we are using Wix Installer to create Windows MSI package for cloud stack. I am trying to integrate Wix tool with maven build process. I found the following 2 plugins for the same. We are using the following commands from wix tool set. 1. Heat - To harvest a direct

RE: RTD documentations

+1 doc release with version number that match code releases -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 8:52 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: RTD documentations On Apr 2, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

No we didn't, it wouldn't matter because the memory would still fill up, the problem is it opens a thread and it fails to close it so whatever you will increase soon or later the memory will fill up (if I understand right) The error in catalina is as follows: SEVERE: The web application [/clien

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

A few other articles also mention setting the initial heap size "-Xms" to the same value as the heap size, to go ahead and fully commit the heap. Have you tried that? One other thing I am curious of is have you fiddled with the Perm Size "XX:Permsize" setting? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1.

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

Believe or not!! We have tried setting them in both formats and still the catalina log produces java heap space error Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 3 April 2014 9:24 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subjec

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

This may be a silly question, but in all of the docs I am reading online in regards to increasing the java heap size, they are specifying it as -Xmx"size""MB" example -Xmx2048m vs -Xmx2g Is it possible that it's not reading the 2g variable as 2GB? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > Fro

RE: Cloud Stack 4.2.1 issue (Unable to start instance due to DB Exception)

Hello, Can anyone please help with the below issue? Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Amin Samir Sent: Tuesday, 1 April 2014 4:18 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Cloud Stack 4.2.1 issue (Unable to start instance due to DB Exception) Hello, We are facing an iss

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

It is 6.0.35 and it still produces this error, even after increasing the Xmx to 4g, we have installed tomcat 6.0.33 and each time we install the cloudstack it does not sense the installed 6.0.33 and attempts to install 6.0.35 as it is dependent on it. Silly solution is that we scheduled a daily

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-slowbuild #508

See

Re: Converting QCOW2 to VHD

I've only ever gone the other way, but I know there's some documentation lingering around about a two-step process for converting to vhd. On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Nux! wrote: > Hello, > > I have used qemu-img to successfully convert a qcow2 image to vpc (vhd, > these names give me head ach

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #507

See -- Started by timer [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-10 (cloudstack-buildslave-centos6) in workspace

Re: Review Request 19917: Improvements on exception handlers (JIRA-6242)

Uploaded a new patch to 19917. Changed the verbosity to debug, and addressed Daan’s comment on providing more distinctive text messages. Sorry that I haven’t split them into smaller patches. Note in a few cases the original code was like: try { pstmt = txn.prepareAutoClose

Converting QCOW2 to VHD

Hello, I have used qemu-img to successfully convert a qcow2 image to vpc (vhd, these names give me head aches). I do have a problem with these converted images, XenServer complains that they were not created by itself and refuses to resize them for example. Can anyone advise if there is anothe

[ANNOUNCE] Better XenServer support in 4.4....

I've talked about this all the way back when we were in Amsterdam and now it's finally done. Tina (Konstantina Chremmou) checked in a patch that removes CloudStack's own copy of XenServerJava source code and submitted a copy of the xen-api.jar into the maven repository. Since xen-api.jar is b

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

So I just checked my tomcat version and we are running 6.0.35 which must be the default that comes with Ubuntu 12.04 out of the box. Our memory settings are as follows: JAVA_OPTS="-Djava.awt.headless=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=45219 -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false

Re: Review Request 19917: Improvements on exception handlers (JIRA-6242)

Thanks all for the quick comments! If i understand the discussion correctly, I will just change all the added log printing statements to debug verbosity. I will upload a new patch for that shortly. Now a bit back story: the reason we are doing this is that we recently did an analysis on many b

Re: Review Request 19922: CLOUDSTACK-6251: Removed XenServer stub code and used xapi.jar from the central repository instead.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19922/#review39358 --- Commit c1c2be423099c786ccfabf960c25f651f4e19928 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 19922: CLOUDSTACK-6251: Removed XenServer stub code and used xapi.jar from the central repository instead.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19922/#review39353 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alex Huang On April 2, 2014, 2:59 p.m., Kons

Re: Review Request 19922: CLOUDSTACK-6251: Removed XenServer stub code and used xapi.jar from the central repository instead.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19922/#review39351 --- Please resubmit the patch for master. It doesn't apply on master.

Re: API doc build failure in 4.4

I can say that I did not see that yesterday when I cloned and checked out 4.4 in a fresh dev environment. I'm unfamiliar with all of the dependencies, but this is the procedure that worked for me: mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install cd tools easy_install marvin/dist/Marvin-0.1.0.tar.gz On Wed

Validating check-ins for your local changes, using Simulator

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Validating+check-ins+for+your+local+changes%2C+using+Simulator Thanks! Santhosh

RE: API doc build failure in 4.4

Any help highly appreciated; I am unable to create new marvin from 4.4 branch and automation testing blocking with 4.4 marvin. I didn't face this issue with master; is there any change related to api doc in 4.4 ? Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:

Re: Review Request 19917: Improvements on exception handlers (JIRA-6242)

Ding Yuan, Any objections to that? On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > > > On 4/2/14, 1:27 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > >>I think we agree indeed. Doesn't mean we should start this discuss >>thread or write a arch guideline on the wiki somewhere. Maybe Ding >>Yuan wants

Re: Review Request 19917: Improvements on exception handlers (JIRA-6242)

On 4/2/14, 1:27 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >I think we agree indeed. Doesn't mean we should start this discuss >thread or write a arch guideline on the wiki somewhere. Maybe Ding >Yuan wants to do a preliminary version of it? Wiki guide would be useful indeed. > >In the meantime I don't thin

Re: Review Request 19917: Improvements on exception handlers (JIRA-6242)

I think we agree indeed. Doesn't mean we should start this discuss thread or write a arch guideline on the wiki somewhere. Maybe Ding Yuan wants to do a preliminary version of it? In the meantime I don't think that it hurts for the present patch to do everything in debug and decide about higher le

Re: Review Request 19917: Improvements on exception handlers (JIRA-6242)

Daan, Correct me if I¹m wrong, but all of the logging added by Ding, fall under "to go with it or to indicate passing a certain code path². I¹ve just noticed that some of them were added with DEBUG, and some with WARN level, and wanted to correct that. So we should: 1) For sure: never print them

Re: Review Request 19917: Improvements on exception handlers (JIRA-6242)

Alena, What I read in your comment is a description of INFO vs WARN. Debug would be only for outputting stacktraces to go with it or to indicate passing a certain code path. Agree? On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > > -

Re: Review Request 19917: Improvements on exception handlers (JIRA-6242)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19917/#review39324 --- Is there a reason why logs for some exceptions are being logged in D

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/#review39322 --- Lazlo, I just tested your changes and everything looks good to me.

Re: Review Request 19917: Improvements on exception handlers (JIRA-6242)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19917/#review39320 --- +1 nice work! - Laszlo Hornyak On April 2, 2014, 1:55 p.m., Ding

Re: Review Request 19917: Improvements on exception handlers (JIRA-6242)

> On April 2, 2014, 4:41 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > Ding Yuan, I like your work and explanation why it should be done. I would > > like to see more distinct messages in the log statement. To often exactly > > the same line is logged from different locations, not indicating the reason > > f

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist #55

See

Re: 4.4 Automation blocked - CLOUDSTACK-6324

Yes, this is fixed by 2 commits: 43ce83202d9370f49c389fd06e7d258df057dc9d 3ee55cd17b941b1fdb1e0bb150bebfb8ece8155d Sorry for the blocking error. Prachi > On Apr 2, 2014, at 9:44 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk" > wrote: > > I believe Prachi fixed it yesterday. Prachi? > > -Alena. > > On 4/1/14, 10:

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #106

See

Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Oh, yea, I’ve mistaken it for some other bug - when new hypervisor wasn’t inserted to the global config variable. Florin, can you please provide the db upgrade statements you’ve executed to fix the problem, for the reference? In case other people are blocked by the same bug. Thanks! Alena. On 4/

Re: 4.4 Automation blocked - CLOUDSTACK-6324

I believe Prachi fixed it yesterday. Prachi? -Alena. On 4/1/14, 10:42 PM, "Rayees Namathponnan" wrote: >Hi All, > >Delete account operation failing with "class cast exception" in latest >4.4 build, and automation blocked. > >Defect https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6324 created

Re: Review Request 19917: Improvements on exception handlers (JIRA-6242)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19917/#review39284 --- Ding Yuan, I like your work and explanation why it should be done. I

Review Request 19941: Add signatureversion and expiring datetime to cloudmonkey/requester.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19941/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal and Rohit Yadav. Repository: cl

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #105

See Changes: [aprateek] CLOUDSTACK-6286: added FinishAggregationCommand and StartAggregationCommand to simulator -- [...truncated 1211 lines...] Tests run: 33, Failures: 0, Errors

Re: RTD documentations

On Apr 2, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > Hi, > > I was reviewing how to use RTD for CloudStack documentation and look like > we could use git branches to match product and doc version. This way we > could provide documentation update while and keep the documentation match > the pro

Re: Review Request 19922: CLOUDSTACK-6251: Removed XenServer stub code and used xapi.jar from the central repository instead.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19922/ --- (Updated April 2, 2014, 2:59 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Alex Huang

Review Request 19922: CLOUDSTACK-6251: Removed XenServer stub code and used xapi.jar from the central repository instead.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19922/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Alex Huang. Repository: cloudstack-git Desc

Review Request 19921: CLOUDSTACK-6251: Remove XenServer stub code and use xapi.jar from central repository instead

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19921/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Alex Huang. Repository: cloudstack-git Desc

RTD documentations

Hi, I was reviewing how to use RTD for CloudStack documentation and look like we could use git branches to match product and doc version. This way we could provide documentation update while and keep the documentation match the product version. it should also be possible to define the default ("la

API doc build failure in 4.4

Hi All, API doc build failure in 4.4; I am getting below error, anyone noticed this issue ? + mvn -Pdeveloper -Dnoredist -pl :cloud-apidoc clean install [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache

Review Request 19917: Improvements on exception handlers (JIRA-6242)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19917/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: Unable to deploy systemvms

Tejas, Did you add the network label names in Cloudstack ? You need to specify the network label name in Cloudstack that are configured in XenServer. I'm suspecting that the current issue is that CloudStack cannot map the Storage Network from is config in XenServer so xenserver cannot reach the s

Review Request 19916: Updated listLoadBalancerRuleInstances, removeFromLoadBalancerRule APIs for VM secondary ip addresses

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19916/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Chiradeep Vittal, and Murali

Re: Review Request 19916: Updated listLoadBalancerRuleInstances, removeFromLoadBalancerRule APIs for VM secondary ip addresses

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19916/ --- (Updated April 2, 2014, 1:06 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

Re: Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

Raised defect : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6328 Thanks Saurav On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Saurav Lahiri wrote: > Hi, > > The console proxy supporting scripts run.sh restarts the java process if > it determines that > for some reason the _run.sh has exited. If the origi

Re: Unable to deploy systemvms

Hi Yitao, xenbr0 : acting as Management network and no VLAN is assigned to it xenbr1 : acting as public, guest storage network. All of this are in same VLAN. Also I have given same "name-label" as here in Cloudstack network configuraion. I don't know much about xen VLAN networking..if anything wr

Re: ALARM - ACS reboots host servers!!!

Coming back to this issue. This time to perform the maintenance of the nfs primary storage I've plated the storage in question in the Maintenance mode. After about 20 minutes ACS showed the nfs storage is in Maintenance. However, none of the virtual machines with volumes on that storage were st

Re: Unable to deploy systemvms

Can you post your network configuration here, and do u able make operation on xenseever through xencenter? May be something wrong with ur storage On Apr 2, 2014 6:47 PM, "Tejas Gadaria" wrote: > Hi Punith, > > Thanks for reply, > > I have already uploaded systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.

Re: [Reminder]Review Request 19779: Fixed[CLOUDSTACK-5150]:-Creating template from a VM in Simulator results in incorrect size

Hi Prasanna, Can you please review the fix? If Prasanna is not available, can someone please have a look into it. Thanks On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Girish Chaudhari wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To rep

Re: Unable to deploy systemvms

Hi Punith, Thanks for reply, I have already uploaded systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2 in secondary . [root@con-xen ~]# ls -lR /vol/ /vol/: total 8 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Apr 2 12:46 primary drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 2 12:14 secondary /vol/primary: total 4 -rw-r--r--

Re: Unable to deploy systemvms

hi, check whether you have seeded the vdh util for sysytem vms in secondary storage. http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/installation.html#prepare-the-system-vm-template thanks. On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Tejas Gadaria wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying

Unable to deploy systemvms

Hi, I am trying to create system vms, in CS 4.3 with Xenserver 6.2 I am trying to create advance zone. I have 2nics. 1 for management network & second is trunk. I am getting below error 2014-04-02 15:18:28,827 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.i.TemplateDataFactoryImpl] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-774da64a) template 1 is

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Hi Alena, I think you have mistaken this with something else :) The bug I have raised below (CLOUDSTACK-6320) is for OVS. OVS network provider was introduced in 4.3.0 and when upgrading from older versions it should be inserted in the existing physical networks. To make it work I had to manually

Review Request 19912: [CLOUDSTACK-6322] Fixed Contrail: Params validation is missing while launching a service instance thru cloudmonkey

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19912/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Review Request 19907: CLOUDSTACK-6325 : fixed cleaning of bin and obj directories when building hyper-v agent with mono

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19907/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Rajesh Battala. Bugs: CLOUDSTA

Review Request 19906: CLOUDSTACK-6289: fixed storage migration failing in case of hyper-v if there are multiple disks attached to VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19906/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Rajesh Battala. Bugs: CLOUDSTA

Re: [PROPOSAL] Simulator enhancements

There are commands based on which agent state is determined. These commands can be mocked appropriately to simulate agent status 'Down' which will then trigger HA on VMs. Is this what you are asking? On 02-Apr-2014, at 12:55 PM, Murali Reddy wrote: > > Can we explictly control the agent stat

Re: [PROPOSAL] Simulator enhancements

Can we explictly control the agent state as well? Say I want to test VM HA, Can I be able to set the host status to be disconnected and then verify that VM's on the host gets migrated? On 01/04/14 5:47 PM, "Koushik Das" wrote: >The current simulator provides a way to test various Cloudstack fea