RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

+1 -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 4:18 PM To: Jessica Wang; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (t...@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advan

Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Then its a DB upgrade bug. If the GRE isolation is supported on the network in 4.1.1, DB upgrade should have inserted the provider to physical network. On 3/21/14, 3:51 PM, "Jessica Wang" wrote: >> [Alena] Not exactly like that. >> [Alena] None of the providers are added to the physical network

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

> [Alena] Not exactly like that. > [Alena] None of the providers are added to the physical network by default if > execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API. > [Alena] Our CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the network - for > you by calling addNetworkServiceProvider call. Actuall

Review Request 19553: CLOUDSTACK-6015: Add tests for adding/deleting new user account, adding/deleting user.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19553/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen. Repository: cloudstack-gi

Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

On 3/21/14, 2:34 PM, "Florin Dumitrascu" wrote: >Hi, > >Alena, my assumption is that the Ovs provider is created when you create >the physical network with GRE isolation (if someone can confirm ...). >When I configured CS RC8 from scratch, I could see the provider and >enable it in the GUI. No

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Hi, Alena, my assumption is that the Ovs provider is created when you create the physical network with GRE isolation (if someone can confirm ...). When I configured CS RC8 from scratch, I could see the provider and enable it in the GUI. But when I have upgraded from CS 4.1.1 to 4.3.0 RC9, I have

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

Hi John, I used simple apache benchmark with a random selected css. ab -n 2000 -H "Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate" http://172.17.10.10/client/css/cloudstack3.css This looks big enough, it is about 200 K uncompressed. I used the configuration you published in your blog and I disabled the static r

Re: Simulator Component under Jira

done On Mar 21, 2014, at 1:18 AM, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > Team, > > Currently, it seems we don't have a component by name Simulator under jira, > This component can be used for any changes we do and issues raised against > simulator. > > Please, some body with permissions can add it. >

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

Canya tell us a little more about the test you’re doing? What URL are you fetching, how many times etc. Just curious to tinker myself this weekend if I have some time. :) On Mar 21, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Laszlo Hornyak mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com>> wrote: -

Re: Review Request 17504: Fix the response names in assign and remove cert from LB

Closed On Fri 21 Mar 2014 02:35:52 PM EDT, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: On March 21, 2014, 6:35 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote: Failed to apply the patch, please recreate alena@alenas-air: [4.4]~/repos/dr/cloudstack$ git am --signoff < ~/Desktop/respname.patch Patch does not have a valid e-ma

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

Florin, UI doesn't show OVS service provider because database doesn't have OVS service provider. The reasons might be: (1) You are using oss build (should be using noredist build). (2) Your zone is a Basic zone (OVS service provider is only supported in Advanced zone) Murali, Is there other p

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?

Florin, Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? Jessica -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (t...@apache.org); Murali Reddy Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/#review38181 --- https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApMkIX1Ygx8zdHhqV2RETy0

[VOTE] [RESULTS] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a "*" next to their name: +1 : Animesh*, Edison*, Ilya*, Amogh, Wilder +0 : Daan * -1 : Tanner (The issue CLOUDSTACK-6266 could not be reproduced ) I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribut

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

+ 1 (binding) verified the release artifacts and tested with devcloud > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 12:06 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round) > >

Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)

Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first, and then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use updateNetworkServiceProvider . Not sure why our UI doesn¹t have this functionality enabled. Jessica, can you check ou

GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)

Hi, I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed from scratch on a minimal setup. I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS 4.1.1 to CS 4.3.0 RC9. I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade: http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.r

Re: Review Request 19467: Added version info to command and response parameters introduced in 4.4.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19467/#review38157 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alena Prokharchyk On March 20, 2014, 4:06 p.

Re: Review Request 17504: Fix the response names in assign and remove cert from LB

> On March 21, 2014, 6:35 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > > Failed to apply the patch, please recreate > > > > alena@alenas-air: [4.4]~/repos/dr/cloudstack$ git am --signoff < > > ~/Desktop/respname.patch > > Patch does not have a valid e-mail address. Syed, please just go ahead and close thi

Re: Review Request 17504: Fix the response names in assign and remove cert from LB

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17504/#review38151 --- Failed to apply the patch, please recreate alena@alenas-air: [4.4]~

Re: Review Request 19468: Renamed static fields to comply with coding conventions.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19468/#review38149 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alena Prokharchyk On March 20, 2014, 3:55 p.

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

> On March 21, 2014, 5:08 a.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote: > > Looks good for the most part, however due to the major changes in > > LibvirtStorageAdaptor I'd like to run through some testing (particularly on > > LVM). It may take me a few days to get to that. Mike may also want to chime > > in si

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

+1 Tested using release procedure on DevCloud Thanks, Amogh On 3/20/14 2:32 PM, "Edison Su" wrote: >+1(binding) After fixed the serious bugs in security group in the last >round. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Tuesday

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/#review38122 --- engine/orchestration/pom.xml

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/ --- (Updated March 21, 2014, 5:02 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Mike Tutkows

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: fixed internal links, tables, ...

GitHub user pdion891 reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/3 fixed internal links, tables, CLOUDSTACK-5954 Fixed internal links, forgotten tables and update-ssl.png file : CLOUDSTACK-5954 add default OS in .gitignore file. ```

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: fixed internal links, tables, ...

Github user pdion891 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/3 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: fixed internal links, tables, ...

Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/3#issuecomment-38286292 I've resync cloudops fork and commit changes. Should be working now. Thanks, --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and

RE: Quickest Build Profile

Thanks Ian, that looks exciting, I'm giving it a go! Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie] Sent: 21 March 2014 15:02 To: CloudStack Dev Subject: Re:

Re: Quickest Build Profile

You can use the -T parameter to build in parallel. It sometimes fails and your usage may vary. Discussed before on the mailing list over here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.cloudstack.devel/32545 On 21 March 2014 14:30, Alex Hitchins wrote: > I was just wondering if anyone had any

Quickest Build Profile

I was just wondering if anyone had any tips for speeding up mvn builds for CloudStack? Mine take at least 30 minutes to complete, I'm wondering if there are any parameters I'm missing. I noticed Mike's post where he mentions a parameter that will skip running tests which made me think there coul

Re: Review Request 19399: CLOUDSTACK-6257: Resolving issue in template creation from user VM volume, added method to check the state of VM before template creation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19399/ --- (Updated March 21, 2014, 2:28 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh

Re: [GSOC 2014]Create GUI to add primary storage based on plug-ins

Thanks for the code, Punith! Seif is someone I met about a year ago. I plan to mentor his work for GSoC, but we'd definitely be happy for any input you or others have. On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Seif Eddine Jemli < seifeddineje...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Punith! > > > 2014-03-21 10:38

Re: ACS and KVM uses /tmp for volumes migration and templates

Wido, i would be happy to try the custom ACS build unless 4.3 comes out soon. It has been overdue for sometime now )). Has this feature been addressed in the 4.3 release? I can leave with this feature for the time being, but i do see a longer term issue when my volumes become large as i'v

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

On 21.03.2014 12:35, Daan Hoogland wrote: Lucian, I recall something about this not being high prio, am I correct? If this is not a regression in comparison to 4.2.1 I would suggest to those who use it to roll their own and to continue with this RC. Ack. This is not a regression, it never work

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

Lucian, I recall something about this not being high prio, am I correct? If this is not a regression in comparison to 4.2.1 I would suggest to those who use it to roll their own and to continue with this RC. regards, Daan On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 18.03.2014 19:05, Anime

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

On 18.03.2014 19:05, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Animesh, can we include fix for ipset? Jayapal seems to have revised it after Alena's suggestions: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cloudstack.apache.org/msg254

Re: CloudStack implementations

Hi Wido, On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 03/18/2014 02:06 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > >> Cool idea, we can also have a monkey-brag ACS plugin which gives users an >> API which can be triggered via cloudmonkey cli tool or by some gui/button >> on the frontend to s

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Change of Apache CloudStack PMC Chair

Congrats Hugo! Thanks Chip for your contributions and leadership. Regards. On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:53 PM, SuichII, Christopher < chris.su...@netapp.com> wrote: > Thanks for everything, Chip and thanks to Hugo for stepping up! > > -Chris > -- > Chris Suich > chris.su...@netapp.com > NetApp Sof

Re: [PROPOSAL] Bridge functionality

What is the structure of the bridge URI? I might be interested in specifying the split of IP addresses across the bridge (e.g., 10.1.1.2-10.1.1.100 on the overlay, 10.1.1.101-10.1.1.254 on the VLAN). Will there be separate DHCP providers for the 2 segments? How about multiple bridged segments?

Re: Review Request 18971: CLOUDSTACK-6216: Skip the test if run on already existing setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18971/#review38083 --- test/integration/smoke/test_secondary_storage.py

RE: [MASTER] SQL error due to unknown column

Yep... it works! Thanks. :) Cheers, Wilder -Original Message- From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:24 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [MASTER] SQL error due to unknown column Sorry my mistake. I forgot to merge a commit that

Re: [MASTER] SQL error due to unknown column

Sorry my mistake. I forgot to merge a commit that has necessary schema change. Can you please try now. On 21/03/14 3:41 PM, "Wilder Rodrigues" wrote: >Hi all, > >Got an error on latest Master and cannot even login via the UI... is >anyone working on this? > >ERROR [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkAppli

[MASTER] SQL error due to unknown column

Hi all, Got an error on latest Master and cannot even login via the UI... is anyone working on this? ERROR [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-b82e43b9) Fail to complete the CheckRouterTask! com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB Exception on: c

Re: Review Request 18677: CLOUDSTACK-3272

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18677/#review38080 --- change look good. But patch does not apply on master. Could you plea

Re: [GSOC 2014]Create GUI to add primary storage based on plug-ins

Thanks Punith! 2014-03-21 10:38 GMT+01:00 Punith S : > hi seif, > > its cool you took this up, this would make admins to create primary > storage pool with respect to different storage vendors plugin using > cloudstack UI. > > you can start off by looking at the createStoragepool api's parameter

Re: [GSOC 2014]Create GUI to add primary storage based on plug-ins

On Mar 21, 2014, at 4:53 AM, Seif Eddine Jemli wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am Seif Eddine Jemli, a Tunisian student in a french computer science > engineergin college (the ENSEIRB-MATMECA grande ecole). > > For GSOC 2014, I'm interested in looking at the JIRA Ticket CLOUDSTACK-6045 > :CreateG

[GSOC 2014]Create GUI to add primary storage based on plug-ins

Hi everyone, I am Seif Eddine Jemli, a Tunisian student in a french computer science engineergin college (the ENSEIRB-MATMECA grande ecole). For GSOC 2014, I'm interested in looking at the JIRA Ticket CLOUDSTACK-6045 :CreateGUI to add primary storage based on plug-in. https://issues.apache.org/ji

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

Hi all, Just finished my [manual] tests here: * Environment - Management Server: Debian 7 VM under VirtualBox - 2 DevCloud: XenServer 6.2 - 1 DevCloud with "xe-switch-network-backend bridge" - MySQL: running on 1 of the DevCloud - System VM: Latest from http://jenkins.buildaclou

Re: [REQUEST] Using prefixes for ML discussions

you are very right Sudha, sorry On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Hi, > > We have been using release tags as prefixes i.e ACS43, ACS44 etc for mailing > list discussions. These days these prefixes are missing for some of the > discussions. If community can use those pr

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

retracting my (thread of) -1 (binding) will leave it to +0 for now. On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Can you clear up browser cache and try again? > >> -Original Message- >> From: Animesh Chaturvedi >> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 4:54 PM >> To: dev@cloudsta

Need Information and Doc Update

1. Is there any documentation about what these options mean and any examples for them? If not, some body aware of this can update the documentation. I couldnt find much. direct.attach.network.externalIpAllocator.enabled direct.attach.network.externalIpAllocator.url 2. Iam assuming that these tw

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: fixed internal links, tables, ...

On Mar 20, 2014, at 9:43 PM, pdion891 wrote: > GitHub user pdion891 opened a pull request: > >https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/3 > >fixed internal links, tables, CLOUDSTACK-5954 > >Fixed internal links, forgotten tables and update-ssl.png file : > CLOUDSTACK-

Re: concole proxy in 4.3RC9

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Amogh Vasekar wrote: > The URL you see in the browser is for the MS, the console URL can be seen > in the log. > > I am not sure about copying the systemvm iso to machine - there is a > change in the conf file for console proxy which needs the updated systemvm > i

RE: Simulator : Error while creating a snapshot from a VM

Meghna, Please check the code from master or 4.4, there were few fixes added to simulator code, few cases failing in earlier versions were now working. Also, not all cases are possible with simulator i believe, few cases still has dependencies inbuilt. first check simulator code from master\4.4

Re: Simulator : Error while creating a snapshot from a VM

David, I tried applying the changes from the commit mentioned by you and re-build the code. But still the problem is not solved. Need help. Thanks Meghna. On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:22 PM, David Grizzanti < david.grizza...@sungard.com> wrote: > Meghna, > > I realized one thing that is missin

Simulator Component under Jira

Team, Currently, it seems we don't have a component by name Simulator under jira, This component can be used for any changes we do and issues raised against simulator. Please, some body with permissions can add it. Thanks! Santhosh

RE: Anybody saw this error on master?

I have filed a bug to track this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6268. Will fix it soon. --Sanjay -Original Message- From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 1:20 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Anybody saw t

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: fixed internal links, tables, ...

On Mar 20, 2014, at 10:33 PM, David Nalley wrote: > So originally 'concepts' appeared in almost every document. I didn't > personally like that, so it's now in the root docs repo: > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/concepts.html > > That may not be the right location, but duplication