RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

2014-02-22 Thread Rayees Namathponnan
Hi David, One doubt, while building cloudstack we are using "mysql-connector-java version 5.1.29"; is it not mandatory we should supposed to use same version of mysql-connector during run time? Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Satur

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

2014-02-22 Thread David Nalley
Hi folks: I think this issue is resolved in the 4.3 branch. The default build system no longer seems to grab the mysql jar, and I've adjusted tomcat to load the mysql jar from the system library. Commit 0c2ad0338e34f6117cecc24ec00c7746dd481465 should have the necessary changes. I did some quick

RE: [DOCS][DISCUSS] heads-up main docs repo refactor

2014-02-22 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath
Thanks Sebastien. Let me cross-verify all my 4.3 feature docs are submitted. Once 4.3 is out, I can spend some time on learning RST. -Radhika -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 8:48 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Animesh Chat

Re: Review Request 18310: dnsmasq fix for bridged networks

2014-02-22 Thread Joris van Lieshout
Hi Sheng, First of thanks you for reviewing my first attempt to contribute :) and sorry for my late response. I want to gadder a bit more info because I've seen it hand out adresses. Besides that this setting should at least provide an extra failsafe. Regards, Joris Sent from my iPhone On 21

Re: Review Request 18310: dnsmasq fix for bridged networks

2014-02-22 Thread Joris van Lieshout
Hi Sheng, First of thank you for reviewing my first attempt to contribu Sent from my iPhone On 21 feb. 2014, at 20:00, "Sheng Yang" mailto:sh...@yasker.org>> wrote: Hi Joris, This patch hasn't been applied yet, sorry for my second thought. Could you comment on it? --Sheng On Thu, Feb 20,

Re: Review Request 15932: Add support for Primary Storage on Gluster using the libvirt backend

2014-02-22 Thread Niels de Vos
> On Feb. 19, 2014, 2:35 p.m., Wido den Hollander wrote: > > It seems good to me. Applies cleanly to master and builds just fine. > > > > Code-wise it's simple but effective, should allow us to support Gluster. > > Wido den Hollander wrote: > I just merged it into master and pushed. >

Re: Review Request 18358: NetUtils unit testing

2014-02-22 Thread Miguel Ferreira
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18358/ --- (Updated Feb. 22, 2014, 1:41 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland

Re: Review Request 18358: NetUtils unit testing

2014-02-22 Thread Miguel Ferreira
> On Feb. 21, 2014, 6:54 p.m., Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > > Hi Miguel, > > > > I started working on verification and I ran into some dependency problem. > > hamcrest-library is needed as dependency and junit 4.10 needs to be > > upgraded to 4.11 > > > > Hi Laszio, Good catch! I did not run the

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

2014-02-22 Thread David Nalley
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Feb 21, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: > >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >>> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 4:13 PM >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>> Subject:

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

2014-02-22 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
On Feb 21, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 4:13 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker? >> LEGAL - when I talk about legal