> On Feb. 21, 2014, 6:54 p.m., Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
> > Hi Miguel,
> > 
> > I started working on verification and I ran into some dependency problem. 
> > hamcrest-library is needed as dependency and junit 4.10 needs to be 
> > upgraded to 4.11
> > 
> >

Hi Laszio,

Good catch! I did not run the tets from maven, only from Eclipse and there I 
had no dependency problem.
I applied your patch on my code base and it fixes the errors for me.

In addition to that I've added a variable for the version of hamcrest, just 
like it is done for the other dependencies.

I will update the patch with my changes and yours together. Please let me know 
if that is not the best way to go and I'll make a new patch with just my 
changes.


- Miguel


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18358/#review35179
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 21, 2014, 4:43 p.m., Miguel Ferreira wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18358/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 21, 2014, 4:43 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Hugo Trippaers.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - Refactor tests:
>       - Upgrade tests to use jUnit4
>       - Break big tests in small unit tests
>       - Replace assertTrue/False with complex conditions by assertThat with
>     specific matchers
>     - Remove dead code:
>       - Private static method never called locally
>     - Add test for method that validates CIDRs
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   utils/src/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java c22e39a 
>   utils/test/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtilsTest.java d3e283c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18358/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran all the tests in the test class before and after refactoring.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Miguel Ferreira
> 
>

Reply via email to