Hi guys,
I had trouble while I was creating a new VLAN and now I can't delete it
anymore, because it's stuck in implementing state.
I guess that happened after the VR did not came up and I restarted the
management server so I could delete the VR and all addresses.
If I would spin up a guest, the
Hi Francois,
In current Cloud Stack versions there is no way to tell management servers that
wait/reconnect for some time without fencing the management server if it sees a
Db Connection failure.
Also the default connection-timeout parameters for a mysql database is lying
with mysql configurat
Yeah, an SR has metadata that knows things like its UUID, name,
description, etc. Then the VDI (a template, in this case) is laid down
inside of the SR. As far as I know, there is no way to have a VDI outside
of an SR.
It appears the UUID of an SR is immutable (unlike its name and
description). Yo
So if you create a volume and register it as an SR, there is metadata
written to the volume, in addition to simply copying the template?
What happens if you don't like that SR? Are you stuck destroying the
volume, because you can never delete the SR metadata? I assumed you
could create SR, copy te
Good job fellas. I see a number of commits 20+ into 4.3-forward branch. Are
their specific commits you want me to pick up out of these?
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 2:41 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Findbugs r
It's already committed :)
> commit 002c2b22f43f7ace0ade652e92c2d46b92c3136f in 4.3
--
Toshiaki
2014-01-24 Radhika Puthiyetath
> Please apply this patch to 4.3 branch as well.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Toshiaki Hatano [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of
> Toshiaki Hat
The ACS build avoids proprietary tools by building with Mono.
One option is to generate an MSI using WiX + Wine, see
https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GTK%2B/Win32/WiX
DL
> -Original Message-
> From: Anshul Gangwar
> Sent: 24 January 2014 10:39
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Donal Laff
Congratulations Mark. Well deserved!
On 26 January 2014 10:51, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I realize you should be the one welcoming me into this mark, but
> welcome anyway and steady as she goes.
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:27 AM, sebgoa wrote:
> > Congrats Mark,
> >
> >
> > On Jan 25, 2014, at
To be clear, the cloned SAN volume will have a unique name and IQN;
however, the problem is that the data the cloned volume contains (the SR)
includes metadata for an SR that is supposed to be unique (the UUID), but
is immutable.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@s
So, this is my thinking on how this cloning would work (and why it would be
a problem for an SR):
1) An SR is created on a SAN volume. The SR is essentially a clustered file
system. The VDI on the SR represents a template we downloaded from
secondary storage. The SR itself contains metadata like a
In fact I'd recommend removing the SR of the template from anything
XenServer knows of. It just needs to exist on the SAN so it can be
cloned for new SR root volumes.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Hm, well I guest that's dependent on how your SAN clone works. Ours
> al
But you'd be registering a new SR. It doesn't matter that the original
volume is read-only (in fact it should be, both in name and data),
because your clones will be new SRs.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Here's a pic that shows some of the properties of an SR:
>
> http
Hm, well I guest that's dependent on how your SAN clone works. Ours
allows you to have a unique name for each clone, so we just name the
clone with the new root volume UUID.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Hey Marcus,
>
> One thing I thought of late last night was that an
Here's a pic that shows some of the properties of an SR:
http://i.imgur.com/iq6NQ1a.png
According to some Citrix docs I read, it appears the UUID is a read-only
field.
Unless there is some workaround for this, I may have to resort to copying
the template to a new SR each time.
On Sun, Jan 26,
Hey Marcus,
One thing I thought of late last night was that an SR has a UUID associated
with it.
If I clone the SAN volume that houses the SR each time, I'll be giving
XenServer SRs that have the same UUID.
I guess I'll need to look into if there is some way to assign a new UUID to
an existing S
Animesh,
You can cherry-pick the following.
I made a little goof so the next three as one:
43ba36f97950aa8d09399a28bb50c6a22209f15e
f3529a19a9aad36dbd92e311018643629f19c748
437ff438af23f7ff499200e212966f275a309a75
next
9a1b882d0eb871c64fe0f0f3fbafbabae89188fa
and
9aced41d708acd22b43ef0e512fa2
I realize you should be the one welcoming me into this mark, but
welcome anyway and steady as she goes.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:27 AM, sebgoa wrote:
> Congrats Mark,
>
>
> On Jan 25, 2014, at 10:36 PM, Paul Angus wrote:
>
>> Congratulations Mark, well deserved.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Paul An
I didn't get very far last night and will be looking at the server
package again this afternoon.
bon appétit,
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Ian Duffy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fixed the issues highlighted in the ldap user authentication package.
>
> Have pushed to 4.3-forward.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
>
>
Congrats Mark,
On Jan 25, 2014, at 10:36 PM, Paul Angus wrote:
> Congratulations Mark, well deserved.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul Angus
> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M:
> +447711418784
> T: @CloudyAngus
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>
>
> Original message
> From: Chip Childers
> Date
19 matches
Mail list logo
