Re: Root-disk support for managed storage

Just wanted to throw this out there before I went to bed: Since each root volume that belongs to managed storage will get its own copy of some template (assuming we're dealing with templates here and not an ISO), it is possible I may be able to circumvent a new table (or any existing table like te

Root-disk support for managed storage

Hi Edison and Marcus (and anyone else this may be of interest to), So, as of 4.3 I have added support for data disks for managed storage for XenServer, VMware, and KVM (a 1:1 mapping between a CloudStack volume and a volume on a storage system). One of the most useful abilities this enables is sup

Re: Feature request: scale up for KVM

There are some issues with it. Last I checked, you can hotplug CPUs, but you can't take them away (at least not for Linux guest os). Also, you can scale memory, but it relies on balloon driver, which can simply be unloaded by the guest to have access to all memory as the driver inside the guest han

Feature request: scale up for KVM

Hi, I'd like to see this feature available for KVM, ie live changing offering. Any chance someone can make it come true? Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5945 for it. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

Re: Useless egress in SG zone?

On 25.01.2014 01:12, Marcus Sorensen wrote: Are you talking about the rules that ensure an instance can't bring up and use IP addresses that are not assigned to it? I'm not sure. Here's a pic: http://img.nux.ro/jC4b-Selection_015.png The anti-spoofing is working ok, supposedly, but I was expe

Review Request 17348: VPC support for contrail plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17348/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: Useless egress in SG zone?

Are you talking about the rules that ensure an instance can't bring up and use IP addresses that are not assigned to it? On Jan 24, 2014 4:10 PM, "Nux!" wrote: > Hi, > > I'm testing ACS 4.2 + XS 6.2 with Basic Zone and it kind of works great, > but the Egress rules seem to be useless. Since all o

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Mark Hinkle

b! Not Mark Hinkle! :P awesome news man, congrats! On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has > asked Mark Hinkle to become a committer and we are pleased to announce > that they have accepted. > > Being a committe

[ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Mark Hinkle

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Mark Hinkle to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and elim

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

Marcus, I have noticed when rebooting, cloudbr0 does not come on-line automatically, even though it states onboot=yes. On 1/24/14, 6:02 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: Haven't used it. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: I am slowly wrapping my head around this, since I do n

Review Request 17337: Contrail Event Interceptor fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17337/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

RE: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (first round)

-Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 11:31 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (first round) Animesh, the latest build_asf.sh should create a branch. I didn't commit it

RE: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (first round)

Cool thanks for your response. Animesh -Original Message- From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 3:10 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (first round) Animesh, I'

Useless egress in SG zone?

Hi, I'm testing ACS 4.2 + XS 6.2 with Basic Zone and it kind of works great, but the Egress rules seem to be useless. Since all outgoing traffic is accepted by default, what is their purpose? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (first round)

Animesh, I'll put the fixes in tomorrow. I was traveling to the European CloudStack usergroup and didn't have enough opportunity to do all the fixes. I'll also try and get a findbugs report in Jenkins about the 4.3 branch. Cheers, Hugo Sent from my iPhone > On 24 jan. 2014, at 20:15, Animesh

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

Ah, so I will assume, it would not be necessary, as long as the network is tagged and go from there. On 1/24/14, 6:02 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: Haven't used it. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: I am slowly wrapping my head around this, since I do not have a hardware s

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

Haven't used it. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > I am slowly wrapping my head around this, since I do not have a hardware > switch; I see docs about utilizing OpevSwitch, would you suggest this; as I > mentioned in the start of this thread ALL things are under one server

Review Request 17335: cleanup around seemingly impossible cast

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17335/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang and Min Chen. Repository: cloudstack-

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

I am slowly wrapping my head around this, since I do not have a hardware switch; I see docs about utilizing OpevSwitch, would you suggest this; as I mentioned in the start of this thread ALL things are under one server and one nic. On 1/24/14, 5:37 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: Let's say you ha

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

Saurav, Not sure how this happens now, but it is definateluy something we want. For the static conf files it won't be much of a problem. The firewall/loadbalences won't be much of a problem, they are fire and forget configurations of the ms that can just be sent to both. The dhcp is a challange. I

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

Let's say you have eth0. You've configured your switch to share the following vlans: vlan default = management vlan 200 = public vlan 300-500 = guest create your cloudbr0 with eth0, this has your management ip. Point all traffic types to cloubr0 via traffic label. you should be done. Cloudstack w

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

Ah, so I would revert to what I said previously; create eth0.100 etc, and then create cloudbr0 for all communication, correct? On 1/24/14, 5:15 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: tagged network is when you send multiple vlans to the same interface, e.g. eth0.100 On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Maurice

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

tagged network is when you send multiple vlans to the same interface, e.g. eth0.100 On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Tagged network, I am not sure what you mean by that; is that what Cloudstack > will do once I populate everything within the UI? > > Along with that, making

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

Tagged network, I am not sure what you mean by that; is that what Cloudstack will do once I populate everything within the UI? Along with that, making the bridges will also be done via the cloudstack code, as you mentioned. On 1/24/14, 4:21 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: Yes, assuming you have

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

Yes, assuming you have tagged networks. Just create a cloubr0 ONLY, and use that as the traffic label for everything. cloudbr0 should be on your 10.x network, assuming that it is the internal mgmt network, with an ip. Then when you fill out your public network info, provide the vlan tag. The code s

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

This may be a rather ridiculous question. I have two subnets: 96.x public and 10.x private - What I am trying to accomplish on one NIC / KVM / CentOS, this can be done right? On 1/24/14, 3:41 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: You could also try these: This would just be an example setup to use

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

You could also try these: This would just be an example setup to use, with management on cloubr0 and public on cloubr1: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Creating+the+devcloud-kvm+environment+from+scratch See bottom of page for graphic depicting layout: https://cwiki.apache.o

Re: Tags on storagePool

This is the approach we’ll have to take if we can’t fix this in 4.3. It certainly works, but it isn’t ideal. Does anyone else have any thoughts on the impact this might have to 4.3? -Chris -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Cit

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

Okay, going to try this again; I have 18 public facing IPs and endless subnets on the private side, so i would assume this would be the same thing as you mentioned without an issue. As i've done this before, without issue; I just cannot figure out what the hell I am doing wrong. - Maurice On

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #2160

See

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

They don't technically need ips just for VM traffic, it totally depends on your setup. You need to decide where your management network is connected and add the ip there, whether it's cloubr0, cloudbr1, or some other interface. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > The document

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

All you should need is: eth0 bridged to cloubr0, with cloubr0 being your 'management' ip eth1 bridged to cloubr1, with cloudbr1 being your public bridge (no ip, or ip optional but discouraged in production, however, the network that eth1/cloudbr1 is on should have some gateway that is reachable, y

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

The document states, create cloudbr0 and cloudbr1 without IPs, I did as it told me which didn't seem right to begin with. DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=00:04:xx:xx:xx:xx ONBOOT=yes HOTPLUG=no BOOTPROTO=none TYPE=Ethernet DEVICE=cloudbr0 TYPE=Bridge ONBOOT=yes BOOTPROTO=none IPV6INIT=no IPV6_AUTOCONF=no D

Re: CentOS 6.5 | KVM | Cloudstack 4.2

so... eth0 -> cloudbr0 ? And that's the management interface? If so, where is the ip for the server? I don't see any ip on cloudbr0, that might be why you have no access. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Marcus, > > So I have gone through the docs and set it up as disc

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (first round)

Animesh, the latest build_asf.sh should create a branch. I didn't commit it to the 4.3 branch so you'd have to use it from master or cherry pick it.. gues it's for the next rc. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Formally canceling this VOTE > > - Hugo need your fixes in

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (first round)

Formally canceling this VOTE - Hugo need your fixes in 4.3-forward branch that you called out as -1 - Release Notes have been updated with filters for known and fixed issues JIRA filter - It still need more work. Seeking volunteers - Feature documentation: If you have not added documentat

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (first round)

Animesh, I will test the simulator, devcloud and awsapi over the week-end. -I know of one potential issue in Devcloud, which is that the console did not seem to work. That was a week ago when I tried the release procedure. -Santhosh patched the simulator yesterday but I have not had time to test

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (first round)

Hugo Pinging again. Can you put the needed on 4.3-forward branch? Animesh -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 7:38 PM To: Cc: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (first round) Hugo can you pu

Re: 403Forbidden System VM

Found one: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2//systemvmtemplate/-/2013-06-12/-/master/-kvm./qcow2/./bz2/ Is the other one down for good or? On 1/24/14, 12:48 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: # /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt -m /storage/secondary

403Forbidden System VM

# /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt -m /storage/secondary/ -u http://d21ifhcun6b1t2.cloudfront.net/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kv.qcow2.bz2 -h kvm -F --2014-01-24 12:47:02-- http://d21ifhcun6b1t2.cloudfront.net/templates/4.2/sys

Re: Jenkins bacd: Simulator-build Job Failing

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 02:50:54PM +, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > Team, > > Simulator-build Job failing with log @ > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/simulator-build/lastBuild/console > as below. Please let us know if we can do something to bring this job up. > > CATALINA_H

Re: DB timeouts on failover

Anyone? :S On 1/23/2014, 10:33 AM, Francois Gaudreault wrote: Hi, There was a thread on the users mailing list around the DB connection timeouts when the underlaying MySQL active/passive cluster changes master. The solution so far is to use a crontab to monitor if the server is crashed. I'

Re: Tags on storagePool

This isn't a great solution, but you could also change the value for your plug-in from true or false to something like t or f. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Edison could confirm this perhaps, but I doubt any current installation > would

Re: Tags on storagePool

Edison could confirm this perhaps, but I doubt any current installation would have true for the value unless it was for a storage tag (the plug-in framework just came out in 4.2). On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > I think your idea would be

Re: Tags on storagePool

I think your idea would be acceptable risk for 4.3. The upgrade logic would have to perform this true-to-storage_tag conversion, too, though. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:00 AM, SuichII, Christopher < chris.su...@netapp.com> wrote: > I think the quickest, easiest change would be to keep using the t

Re: Tags on storagePool

I think the quickest, easiest change would be to keep using the tag name as the key in the details table, but use a unique value like ‘storage_tag’ instead of ‘true’. This wouldn’t require any major logic changes, just the value used to check whether something is a storage tag. It is quite risk

Jenkins bacd: Simulator-build Job Failing

Team, Simulator-build Job failing with log @ http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/simulator-build/lastBuild/console as below. Please let us know if we can do something to bring this job up. CATALINA_HOME=/usr/share/apache-tomcat-6.0.33 ++ export M2_HOME=/usr/share/apache-maven-3.0

Re: Tags on storagePool

I think at some point we need to use a key/value for storage tags such as the following: storageTags=value1,value2,value3 The problem with that is you have to parse the value cell each time you pull it out of the DB. That might be too risky of a change, though, for 4.3 at this point. On Fri, J

Re: Working on CloudStack Jira-764:nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC email 2 of 2

Daan, I was wondering if you had not shared your thoughts, but looks like I had missed your mail. I agree that redundant dhcp or dns would be good to have. What I meant was, it appears that by just enabling RVR there is no way to auto sync configuration between the master and slave nodes with

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #381

See -- [...truncated 18869 lines...] Configure log4j with default properties 2014-01-24 08:50:30,248 INFO [cloud.utils.TestProfiler] (main:) testProfiler() started 2014-01-24 08

Re: XS master handling in 4.3.0

Ok, thanks for the heads-up! Francois On 1/23/2014, 6:56 PM, Anthony Xu wrote: The patch will be in next release, XS HA can be enabled only after upgrading to the CS release including this patch. We will provide document in the next CS release. Anthony -Original Message- From: Anime

Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for cloudstack

FYI Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: scan-ad...@coverity.com > Date: 24 januari 2014 13:22:59 CET > Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for cloudstack > > > Hi, > > > Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found > with Coverity

Re: Tags on storagePool

I have found an additional issue related to this. The allocators do properly ignore any storage pool details whose value is true that is not actually a storage pool. However, the list storage pools API does NOT. When creating the StoragePoolResponse, it is still assumed that any storage pool det

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2159

See -- [...truncated 5499 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resou

RE: [DISCUSS] HyperV msi

Hi I started working on packaging (making msi) the HyperV agent code at Github - https://github.com/anshul1886/CloudStackAgentSetup. It does the following - packages all the needed files - Prompts for user\password the HyperV agent should run under - Option to create and install an SSL certifica

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2158

See Changes: [Devdeep Singh] CLOUDSTACK-5942: The agent at places logs the password of the user. It should mask the -- [...truncated 22944 lines...] 982/1332 KB 986/1332 KB 990/

CLOUDSTACK-5942

Hi Animesh, Can I cherry-pick commit 6d997bd6893f0ab649899f88456d6e80b23bb873 from 4.3-forward to 4.3 branch? This commit addresses issue CLOUDSTACK-5942 where the hyper-v agent was logging the password at few places. Regards, Devdeep

Doc Build Reflects No Recent Changes !

Hello doc infra team, I am unable to find the latest changes in the doc builds at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/. Kindly check and please let me know what could be the issue. -Radhika

RE: [DISCUSS] HyperV msi

+1 -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 2:37 PM To: Donal Lafferty; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Rajesh Battala Cc: Paul Angus; Wido den Hollander Subject: [DISCUSS] HyperV msi Hi, In passing I saw some new docs from Radhika on Hyper-V.

[DISCUSS] HyperV msi

Hi, In passing I saw some new docs from Radhika on Hyper-V. A first version pointed to a cloudplatform.msi, Radhika modified it to point to the wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Creating+Hyperv+Agent+Installer Reading the wiki, it explains how to build the agent.exe fi

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (first round)

On Jan 24, 2014, at 4:38 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Hugo can you put needed commits in 4.3-forward and I will rebuild the RC. > > Animesh, I will test the simulator, devcloud and awsapi over the week-end. -I know of one potential issue in Devcloud, which is that the console did not se

Re: [ACS 4.3] Release Notes

On Jan 24, 2014, at 8:27 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Folks > > I have updated the Release Notes in 4.3 with a link to Known Issues and Fixed > Issues in 4.3 release and kicked off the build. We need a volunteer to fix up > the release notes. > > Here are the JIRA filters if someone is i

Re: Master build failing with LICENSE error

Hey guys, I’ve absolutely no clue what might be causing this. For me and Jenkins the build works without any problems. To make sure i’ve cleaned my entire tree and maven repository, but still the master build works. Which command,settings or profiles are you guys using to build master? The myc

Review Request 17307: Juniper Contrail Plugin fixes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17307/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---