The document states, create cloudbr0 and cloudbr1 without IPs, I did as it told me which didn't seem right to begin with.

DEVICE=eth0
HWADDR=00:04:xx:xx:xx:xx
ONBOOT=yes
HOTPLUG=no
BOOTPROTO=none
TYPE=Ethernet


DEVICE=cloudbr0
TYPE=Bridge
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
IPV6INIT=no
IPV6_AUTOCONF=no
DELAY=5
STP=yes

DEVICE=cloudbr1
TYPE=Bridge
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
IPV6INIT=no
IPV6_AUTOCONF=no
DELAY=5
STP=yes




On 1/24/14, 3:23 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
so...

eth0 -> cloudbr0 ? And that's the management interface? If so, where is the ip for the server? I don't see any ip on cloudbr0, that might be why you have no access.


On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Maurice Lawler <maur...@daoenix.com <mailto:maur...@daoenix.com>> wrote:

    Marcus,

    So I have gone through the docs and set it up as discussed. I am
    now unable to gain access to the server:

    The screen shot I have here:



    That shows you cloud0 which was setup automatically, cloudbr0 and
    cloudbr1 which I setup both, of course both without IP address, as
    it states to do in the docs. Along with that, I have eth0 setup as
    bridge, eth0.100 - eth0.300 setup according to the docs. The
    eth0.100 has the public facing IP address, however, my connection
    times out; I saw other examples where the public IP address was
    attached to cloudbr0, can you please tell me what I am missing?

    - Maurice


    On 1/24/14, 12:04 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
    I've always setup cloudbr0 (pub/mgt/guest br) per the documented examples,
    and never cloud0 (link local bridge). You can look at the devcloud-kvm doc
    for an example of an all-in-one. The traffic labels reference bridges, so
    you have to have a bridge to enter as a traffic label in the first place.
    If you don't provide traffic labels, it by default looks for cloudbr0 for
    public and cloudbr1 for guest and private.

    Looking through the code, it looks as though if you stick with an
    'untagged' public network (enter no vlan id in your public range), then
    you're required to create the bridge yourself, matcing the traffic label
    you enter. If you enter a vlan id, then it will create the public bridge
    for you, but you still have to identify where you want the bridge to be
    created via traffic label. e.g. say you have only cloudbr0, which is your
    mgmt bridge, and you want vlan 460 on that same eth device to be public
    traffic. You'd enter 460 as the vlan id when entering the public traffic
    range, and set the traffic label to 'cloudbr0', to identify where the vlan
    460 bridge should be created. it then looks up the physical interface that
    cloudbr0 is bridged to (eth0), creates a tagged interface (eth0.460), and a
    bridge (breth0-460).

    For private traffic (mgmt), it expects you to have already created the
    bridge. I believe this is most likely because they expect this to be how
    you're reaching the server in the first place (via ssh on mgmt net). Guest
    networks are always dynamically created.
    On Jan 23, 2014 9:11 PM, "Maurice Lawler"<maur...@daoenix.com>  
<mailto:maur...@daoenix.com>  wrote:

    Hello,

    I am setting up KVM / Cloudstack all under one server. I have done this
    countless of other times, however, this time on a new server I have noticed
    it did not provision cloudbr0 / cloud0 as it has done in the past.

    I saw a few tutorials where it says to setup VLANS ifcfg-eth0.100-300
    which I understand. However, right now I am not sure if this is the normal
    for 4.2 to not have those two previously mentioned interfaces already setup
    when you issue the command setup-management / setup-databases as it has
    done before.

    Can someone explain this to me?

    - Maurice




Reply via email to