Re: Review Request 15833: CLOUDSTACK-5257: Fixed Network ACL issue related to Egress traffic

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15833/#review29425 --- Commit b2dc2db269c405b6c65b8d00b74e4c84c7abeff2 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15647: Fixing coverity issues related to resource leak on FileInputStream being created anonymously.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15647/#review29424 --- awsapi/src/com/cloud/bridge/service/EC2RestServlet.java

Re: Review Request 15508: Make sure that if the file does not exist an Exception is thrown and that once it exists it is also closed after the properties are loaded.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15508/#review29423 --- Ship it! commit 7a6751aa770eaf8065864f497bff401012f553ae Author: wi

Re: Review Request 15833: CLOUDSTACK-5257: Fixed Network ACL issue related to Egress traffic

Ok, I will merge it to 4.2 as well. Regards, Girish On 26-Nov-2013, at 12:33 PM, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > But, its better to merge when tests are run in future for that branch as > well. > > Santhosh > > From: Girish Shilamkar [gir...@clogeny.com]

RE: Review Request 15833: CLOUDSTACK-5257: Fixed Network ACL issue related to Egress traffic

But, its better to merge when tests are run in future for that branch as well. Santhosh From: Girish Shilamkar [gir...@clogeny.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:01 AM To: Santhosh Edukulla Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Srikanteswararao Talluri; Ashu

Re: Review Request 15833: CLOUDSTACK-5257: Fixed Network ACL issue related to Egress traffic

Santhosh, I am not sure if we will be running tests against 4.2.1 so I did not merge it to 4.2 branch. Regards, Girish On 26-Nov-2013, at 12:19 PM, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > Does this applies to 4,.2 and if possible prior versions as well? > > Santhosh > ___

Re: Review Request 15833: CLOUDSTACK-5257: Fixed Network ACL issue related to Egress traffic

Yes, this a generic fix and would apply to all branches. On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Santhosh Edukulla < santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com> wrote: > Does this applies to 4,.2 and if possible prior versions as well? > > Santhosh > > From: Girish Shilamk

Re: edit access to cwiki

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Shweta Agarwal wrote: > 'shweta.agar...@citrix.com added, sorry it took so long

[Responsiveness report] dev 2013w46

http://markmail.org/message/ro7ahmfcj4pqppqo Snapshot file extension on nfs by Gaurav Aradhye http://markmail.org/message/zbcewsuysyvwj4ob [DISCUSS] (CLOUDSTACK-1889) by Saurav Lahiri http://markmail.org/message/rgv6vmvyjvwx67g7 help need error launching jetty by Juan Barrio http://markmail.org/mes

RE: Review Request 15833: CLOUDSTACK-5257: Fixed Network ACL issue related to Egress traffic

Does this applies to 4,.2 and if possible prior versions as well? Santhosh From: Girish Shilamkar [nore...@reviews.apache.org] on behalf of Girish Shilamkar [gir...@clogeny.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 1:41 AM To: Girish Shilamkar; Srikanteswarara

[Responsiveness report] users 2013w46

http://markmail.org/message/gha6ezktv7mpfgsh Create primary storage entry via API by Lisa B. http://markmail.org/message/l47ztbzzohqxs36h Multiple simultaneous tasks in vCenter by Sean Hamilton http://markmail.org/message/65nouxpzfbhxtjrb Major stability problems lately by Timothy Ehlers http://mar

Re: Review Request 15833: CLOUDSTACK-5257: Fixed Network ACL issue related to Egress traffic

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15833/#review29422 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.3 and master. - Girish Shilamkar On Nov.

Re: Review Request 15833: CLOUDSTACK-5257: Fixed Network ACL issue related to Egress traffic

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15833/#review29421 --- Commit 5b37d38ed0b156268132ade1856032102723c36e in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15833: CLOUDSTACK-5257: Fixed Network ACL issue related to Egress traffic

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15833/#review29420 --- Commit d6298302a1872eea1be52ccf5922174e469ed807 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15834: CLOUDSTACK-4737: handling usage events for dynamic compute offering

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15834/ --- (Updated Nov. 26, 2013, 5:57 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Da

Re: Review Request 15505: Usage details are not getting populated when using dynamic offerings.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15505/ --- (Updated Nov. 26, 2013, 5:57 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala

Re: Review Request 15834: CLOUDSTACK-4737: Root volume metering

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15834/ --- (Updated Nov. 26, 2013, 5:39 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Da

RE: [Doc] Validation Issue in Release Notes

Hi, I managed to use the --novalid option to create the file. Hope, it should work to generate the online version. -Original Message- From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:00 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [D

RE: [Discuss] AutoScaling.next in CloudStack

Hi Chiradeep, The monitoring service seems to be collecting statistics using polling and triggers actions during threshold breach. This seems to be very tasking. Can it be designed to listen for events on threshold breach as well? For ex. a configuration "respon

RE: [Doc] Validation Issue in Release Notes

That issue has been resolved. This is about a CDATA, which is still hidden to my eyes.. -Original Message- From: kel...@backbonetechnology.com [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:37 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [Doc] Validation Issue

Re: Need help in creating/posting Cloudstack plugin for Juniper's network devices

Thanks Rayees -Pradeep On Monday, November 25, 2013 11:15 PM, Pradeep HK wrote: Hi, my name is Pradeep HK and I am a Tech Lead in Juniper Networks, Bangalore. I am leading the effort to develop Cloudstack Plugin(ie Network Guru) for Juniper's networking devices. I have developed Network

Re: [Discuss] AutoScaling.next in CloudStack

2013/11/26 Chiradeep Vittal > Hi Tuna, > > I boldly diagrammed out what we talked about here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/M6YTAg > > The idea is to keep the monitoring part separate from the autoscale > decision. > So, the monitoring can be SNMP/RRD/whatever. > > Scale-up using reco

Re: [Discuss] AutoScaling.next in CloudStack

Hi Tuna, I boldly diagrammed out what we talked about here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/M6YTAg The idea is to keep the monitoring part separate from the autoscale decision. So, the monitoring can be SNMP/RRD/whatever. Scale-up using reconfiguration then becomes a mere matter of modif

Re: [Doc] Validation Issue in Release Notes

Hi we had a similar issue at the conf with a nested list not contained in a listitem. It's worth a shot. I am not yet near reliable internet to look myself. -Kelcey Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: "Sebastien Goasguen" To: Subject: [Doc] Validation Issue in Release Notes Date

RE: persistence layer

Has anyone actually tried dropping in a different jdbc driver and see if CS can use another DB? I don't think the current CS DB layer prevents anyone from doing that. This is different from MariaDB which, as othes have pointed out, is drop-in replacement for MySQL. I'm talking about stuff lik

Re: Router requires upgrade. Unable to send command to router Error

Thanks Hugo, that was the cause of my 'fsck' issue. NTP was broken on my dev XenServer due to a misconfigured resolv.conf. I can confirm that the recent System VM Templates are working. Thank you... On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Will, > > What is the error reported

Re: Router requires upgrade. Unable to send command to router Error

Will, What is the error reported by the OS before the fsck is needed? I ran into a similar issue a while back and it was caused by a wrong date/time setting on the hypervisor. If the systemvm spins up with a time that is earlier than when the image was created the system will force an fsck beca

Re: Resource Management/Locking [was: Re: What would be your ideal solution?]

Okay, I'll have to stew over this for a bit. My one general comment is that it seems complicated. Such a system seems like it would take a good amount of effort to construct properly and as such it's a risky endeavour. Darren On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:10 PM, John Burwell wrote: > Darren, >

Re: Router requires upgrade. Unable to send command to router Error

I just used: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvmtemplate-2013-11-24-master-xen.vhd.bz2 I ran into the same issue with this template as all the others I have been trying. Basically, the vm comes up with a r

[PROPOSAL] Alert publishing via API

Third party systems integrating with CloudStack should be able to publish custom alerts to the CS. Existing alerts might not be enough for a particular application purposes, and adding new one while utilizing the existing CS Alert notification system, can be quite useful. Currently there is no

Progress on GlusterFS support from the CCCEU Hackathon

Hi folks: Just bringing some things from the hackathon back to the mailing list. One of the things worked on there was GlusterFS support. Wido and Niels began work on this, and you can see the blog post[1] from Niels, which might be helpful to others as well for things like Sheepdog. There's als

Re: Router requires upgrade. Unable to send command to router Error

The images should be downloadable from jenkins.buildacloud.org The 4.2 images are here: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.2/job/build-systemvm-4.2/ There was something wrong with this build, but i’m working on it. Expect the images soon. Cheers, Hugo On 25 nov. 2013, at 21:14, Travis Gra

Re: Router requires upgrade. Unable to send command to router Error

Use the links from the Install Guide instead. http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#prepare-system-vm-template Travis On Nov 25, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > In trying to troubleshoot I think I hav

Re: Router requires upgrade. Unable to send command to router Error

In trying to troubleshoot I think I have found another issue. I went looking for a 'more official' source for the system templates. I found this: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Release_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html#upgrade-from-3.0.x-to-4.0 Which gives a s

RE: what's the procedure for committing to 4.3?

Darren 4.3 is open for bug fixes for everyone. No new features are allowed though. We have a code freeze on 12/06 which means that we will only allow blockers and critical fixes after that. Once we cut our first RC in beginning of January I will create a staging branch 4.3-forward and cherry-

Re: Resource Management/Locking [was: Re: What would be your ideal solution?]

Edison, The CAP theorem applies to all distributed systems. One “master” controlling a bunch of a hypervisors being directed by orchestration engine + Zookeeper is a distributed system. In this case, a consistent system. In my very brief reading of it, CloudStack would need multiple Mesos ma

RE: Unable to add NetScaler in 4.3 branch builds - Automation blocker

Thanks Darren, I can see your check-in in 4.3 and master branch; I will test this. Regards, Rayees From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 10:32 AM To: Rayees Namathponnan Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Unable to add NetScaler in 4.3

Re: Resource Management/Locking [was: Re: What would be your ideal solution?]

Darren, In a peer-to-peer model such as I describe, active-active is and is not a concept. The supervision tree is responsible for identifying failure, and initiating process re-allocation for failed resources. For example, if a pod’s management process crashed, it would also crash all of the

RE: Resource Management/Locking [was: Re: What would be your ideal solution?]

Won't the architecture used by Mesos/Omega solve the resource management/locking issue: http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/mesos-architecture/ http://eurosys2013.tudos.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/paper/Schwarzkopf.pdf Basically, one server holds all the resource information in memory (c

Review Request 15840: CLOUDSTACK-5206: Ability to control the external id of first class objects

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15840/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5206 https://issues.apache.

Re: what's the procedure for committing to 4.3?

As far as I know, we are NOT yet at the point where the Release Manager does the cherry picking for us (upon our request). Thanks On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hey Darren, > > For 4.2 we just committed to master and then cherry picked

Re: what's the procedure for committing to 4.3?

Hey Darren, For 4.2 we just committed to master and then cherry picked it to 4.2 ourselves. We tended to require a JIRA ticket to be associated with the commit(s). As the release went on, the Release Manager took over cherry picking and would typically do so on our behalves, if we requested such

Re: Unable to add NetScaler in 4.3 branch builds - Automation blocker

It appears that I didn't commit any of the noredist spring configuration for network-elements. I will get that added in a bit once I just do some quick validation. Darren On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Rayees Namathponnan < rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com> wrote: > Created below defect, EIP /

what's the procedure for committing to 4.3?

What's the procedure for making changes to 4.3? Obviously commit to master and then cherry-pick but at this point is there any other control around it? If I need to commit something in 4.3 do I just do it myself? Darren

RE: Need help in creating/posting Cloudstack plugin for Juniper's network devices

Hi Pradeep, This may help you https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Plug-ins%2C+Modules%2C+and+Extensions https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Extensions Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Pradeep HK [mailto:pradeep...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monda

Re: Enabling AMQP/RabbitMQ Events on master

Just create a file on the classpath META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-event-bus-context.xml with the below contents (change server, port, username, etc) http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xmlns:context="http://www.spring

Need help in creating/posting Cloudstack plugin for Juniper's network devices

Hi, my name is Pradeep HK and I am a Tech Lead in Juniper Networks, Bangalore. I am leading the effort to develop Cloudstack Plugin(ie Network Guru) for Juniper's networking devices. I have developed Network Plugin for orchestration of L2 services on Juniper's Networking devices.  I need some

Re: Resource Management/Locking [was: Re: What would be your ideal solution?]

I will ask one basic question. How do you forsee managing one mailbox per resource. If I have multiple servers running in an active-active mode, how do you determine which server has the mailbox? Do you create actors on demand? How do you synchronize that operation? Darren On Mon, Nov 25, 20

Re: Resource Management/Locking [was: Re: What would be your ideal solution?]

You bring up some interesting points. I really need to digest this further. From a high level I think I agree, but there are a lot of implied details of what you've said. Darren On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:39 AM, John Burwell wrote: > Darren, > > I originally presented my thoughts on this subj

[Discuss] AutoScaling.next in CloudStack

Hi guys, At CCCEU13 I talked about the AutoScale without NetScaler feature working with XenServer & XCP. For anyone don’t know about this feature, take a look into my slide here: http://www.slideshare.net/tuna20073882/autoscale-without-netscalerccceu13. Chiradeep and I had a short talk after t

NullPointerException when invalid zone is passed into UsageEventUtils (CLOUDSTACK-5220)

Hi All, I submitted a bug for null pointer exceptions I'm seeing when certain types of Usage Events are generated (when you have the event notification bus enabled).   Initially I had submitted two separate bugs for individual events causing null pointer exceptions (CLOUDSTACK-5023 and CLOUDSTAC

Resource Management/Locking [was: Re: What would be your ideal solution?]

Darren, I originally presented my thoughts on this subject at CCC13 [1]. Fundamentally, I see CloudStack as having two distinct tiers — orchestration management and automation control. The orchestration tier coordinates the automation control layer to fulfill user goals (e.g. create a VM inst

Re: Review Request 15508: Make sure that if the file does not exist an Exception is thrown and that once it exists it is also closed after the properties are loaded.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15508/ --- (Updated Nov. 25, 2013, 3:32 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Tripp

Re: Enabling AMQP/RabbitMQ Events on master

Murali, Would you be able to comment on how to enable the event message bus notifications on master? Thanks! --  David Grizzanti Software Engineer Sungard Availability Services e: david.grizza...@sungard.com w: 215.446.1431 c: 570.575.0315 On November 21, 2013 at 12:35:31 PM, Alena Prokharchy

Re: Review Request 15647: Fixing coverity issues related to resource leak on FileInputStream being created anonymously.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15647/ --- (Updated Nov. 25, 2013, 3:15 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Tripp

Review Request 15834: CLOUDSTACK-4737: Root volume metering

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15834/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4737 http

Review Request 15833: CLOUDSTACK-5257: Fixed Network ACL issue related to Egress traffic

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15833/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. B

Re: Review Request 15455: Fixing all Coverity bugs on file Upgrade2214to30 related to resource leak. Now the statements closed and nullified before a new assignment.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15455/ --- (Updated Nov. 25, 2013, 2:32 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Tripp

Re: Review Request 15455: Fixing all Coverity bugs on file Upgrade2214to30 related to resource leak. Now the statements closed and nullified before a new assignment.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15455/ --- (Updated Nov. 25, 2013, 2:26 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Tripp

Review Request 15832: enable custom offering support for scalevm

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15832/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5161 https:

Re: persistence layer

MariaDB is a drop in replacement for MySQL, so it can be used with or without the JOOQ changes. Travis On Nov 25, 2013, at 5:20 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Nov 23, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > >> Wouldn't it be a lot of work to move to JOOQ? All queries will have to be

RE: Unable add instance after update on CS4.2

Good to hear that Diego!! If you think you followed the steps correctly then you can file a bug for this issue here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK --Sanjay From: Diego Spinola Castro [mailto:spinolacas...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 5:28 PM To: Sanjay Tripathi

Re: Review Request 15351: Fixing bugs from Coverity related to Dereferenced Null after check and as return value.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15351/ --- (Updated Nov. 25, 2013, 11:02 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trip

Re: [Doc] Validation Issue in Release Notes

On Nov 25, 2013, at 5:40 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > There are some issues with the 4.2/master docs. 4.2 is a priority. > > Anyone who fixes the build gets a special mention in the release notes ! > Now can we have someone fix this. > I can't even locate: en-US/Revision_History.xml > -

Re: [Doc] Validation Issue in Release Notes

There are some issues with the 4.2/master docs. 4.2 is a priority. Anyone who fixes the build gets a special mention in the release notes ! Now can we have someone fix this. -abhi On 23/11/13 4:20 pm, "Radhika Puthiyetath" wrote: >Hi, > >Sorry for cross-posting. > >While validating the Release

Re: [PROPOSAL] User VM HA using native XS HA capabilities

Thanks for the comments David. See inline. -Koushik On 22-Nov-2013, at 7:31 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Hi Koushik: > > In general I like the idea. A couple of comments: > > The upgrade section has a manual step for enabling HA manually per > instance. Why a manual step? Why is CloudStack not c

Re: [DISCUSS] Reporting tool for feeding back zone, pod and cluster information

On Nov 23, 2013, at 5:01 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > I discussed this during CCCEU13 with David, Chip and Hugo and I promised I > put it on the ml. > > My idea is to come up with a reporting tool which users can run daily which > feeds us back information about how they are using

Re: persistence layer

On Nov 23, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > Wouldn't it be a lot of work to move to JOOQ? All queries will have to be > rewritten. > > An a non-java developer question: Will that help support different databases ? like moving to MariaDB ? > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Darr

Re: Review Request 15418: Fixes about: Code quality, checkstyle and cloudstack conventions

> On Nov. 18, 2013, 6:30 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > Ship It! > > Hugo Trippaers wrote: > commit 876b7e492f15154591ba132ddbfe6a8e7a4c4c3f > Author: afornie > Date: Mon Nov 18 12:12:07 2013 +0100 > > Checkstyle adjustments in code and configuration Daan committed t

Re: Review Request 15418: Fixes about: Code quality, checkstyle and cloudstack conventions

> On Nov. 18, 2013, 6:30 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > Ship It! commit 876b7e492f15154591ba132ddbfe6a8e7a4c4c3f Author: afornie Date: Mon Nov 18 12:12:07 2013 +0100 Checkstyle adjustments in code and configuration - Hugo --- Th

Re: Review Request 15667: Fix for Coverity issues CID_1116744, CID_1116718 and CID_1116682, all related to resource leak.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15667/#review29368 --- Can you rebase this patch against latest master? A lot of whitespace

JIRA 285

Hi all, I could not reproduce this issue with vesion 4.0.2. I tried creating hourly snapshot schedule with a keep value of 4. I could see 4 snapshots retained. Then as mentioned in the bug I deleted the schedule and recreated with same parameters except changing the keep value to 3. After this

Re: Review Request 15825: Added unit tests for Juniper Contrail Virtual Network (VN) and Virtual Machine (VM) Model classes.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15825/#review29367 --- plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/org/apache/cloudstack

JIRA 3061

Hi all, Problem: JIRA says list hosts API response didn't return CPU used parameter value. This bug is reported against version 4.0.2. I could not reproduce this problem with CS version 4.2. I used CloudMonkey CLI to fire API commands to the management server. With a basic zone created that has