RE: Ping to shared network gateway failing

1.I believe we already have sharednetwork created with gateway ip configured along with other parameters through API in your testing. This IP( gateway IP ) need to be already assigned to a gateway device and reachable. 2. During the VM creation, this ip of gateway is available to VM as part of

Re: Review Request 15264: Fix for cv_1125389 RV: Bad use of return value

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15264/ --- (Updated Nov. 7, 2013, 7:37 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippa

Re: Review Request 15298: Fix for issues on Coverity related to IDs cv_1125383 [82, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74]

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15298/ --- (Updated Nov. 7, 2013, 7:35 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippa

Re: Review Request 15298: Fix for issues on Coverity related to IDs 1125383 [82, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74]

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15298/#review28357 --- plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/org/apache/cloudstack

Re: Review Request 15298: Fix for issues on Coverity related to IDs 1125383 [82, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74]

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15298/ --- (Updated Nov. 7, 2013, 7:24 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippa

Review Request 15298: Fix for issues on Coverity related to IDs 1125383 [82, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74]

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15298/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippaers. Bugs: 1125374, 1125375, 11253

Re: Review Request 15173: Dynamic compute offering.

> On Nov. 7, 2013, 7:17 a.m., Koushik Das wrote: > > Ship It! commit 7095ea2b5e497620c8c879517565046e3b46e493 - Koushik --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/#review28355

Re: Review Request 15173: Dynamic compute offering.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/#review28355 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Koushik Das On Nov. 7, 2013, 6:24 a.m., bhar

Re: Ping to shared network gateway failing

Hi Santosh, Do you mean creating gateway through API or is this a physical setup requirement to be served before running the test case? Regards, Gaurav On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Santhosh Edukulla < santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com> wrote: > In shared network, we need to explicitly create the

RE: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

Jayapal, I have gone through the FS posted @ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Monitoring+VR+services Following are the few review comments: 1. First line in the Introduction section says "Virtual router has running services which needs to run always until cloudsack d

Re: Review Request 15173: Dynamic compute offering.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/ --- (Updated Nov. 7, 2013, 6:24 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala

Re: Marvin deploy failed on master

Ran into this as well. Is it something we need to put into the mvn install of the tools? On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > I also ran into this issue on a clean install. #2 fixed my issue... > > Thanks, > > Will > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Min Chen wrote: > >> Than

Re: S3 as secondary storage is broken in master

Hi Marcus, I am not sure that my last commit 99ead3419c80fc7135a95f34ced7650eda3572fd will cause this, since it is just checking srcTO is an Image or an ImageCache store. In your case, it is Image store, so the same old code will kick in. But I do see an issue in current code compared to

Ask for help with the "snapshot of volume" feature

Hello,everyone, I'm a coder from Beijing in China,and it is the first time that I ask for help here. I'm learning cs4.0.2,and I found the "snapshot of volume" feature has 2 parts:creating snapshot and backupping snapshot.In backupping snapshot parts,I'm confused of the "-s $snapshotN

Re: S3 as secondary storage is broken in master

nevermind, I was pointing the test at the wrong revision On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Min, >I ran my basic regression test for KVM, and the original bug I > fixed in the commit you mention seems to be back. I'm not sure if > it's related to your check-in, and I d

Re: Review Request 15173: Dynamic compute offering.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/ --- (Updated Nov. 7, 2013, 5:50 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala

Re: Review Request 15173: Dynamic compute offering.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/ --- (Updated Nov. 7, 2013, 5:22 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala

Re: S3 as secondary storage is broken in master

Min, I ran my basic regression test for KVM, and the original bug I fixed in the commit you mention seems to be back. I'm not sure if it's related to your check-in, and I don't see any currently obvious reason why it would be so, but I'm investigating. Here's the log from latest master, you can

Re: Review Request 15296: CLOUDSTACK-5067 Bugfix: two NICs connected to Public network exist in VR

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15296/#review28353 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Marcus Sorensen On Nov. 7, 2013, 1:11 a.m.,

RE: write access on cwiki

Edison helped me on this, Thanks. -Original Message- From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 8:35 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: write access on cwiki On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:54:42PM +, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > Hi Al

[ASF4.2.1] BVT automation results

Thanks Rayees, It appears that pass rate is more than 98%. Rayees, any analysis on failed test cases ? On 07/11/13 4:37 am, "Rayees Namathponnan" wrote: >Hi All, > >4.2.1 BVT automation results published to cwiki; you can see the results >below > >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CL

Re: [JENKINS] Preparing for the 4.3 branch

Animesh, I've included a short link to a jenkins tutorial on creating and cloning jobs and also on basic administration. Is there anything specific you were looking for? Typically, the master-view jobs are cloned into the targeted release branch view eg: 4.3 will have jobs cloned from master one-b

Re: Edit access to ASF Jira

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:09:44PM +, Manasa Veloori (3P) wrote: > Hi, > > Please provide me the edit access to ASF jira .I am not having > option to close the bugs in ASF jira which are not assigned to me. you now have access. > > Thanks, > Manasa -- Prasanna.,

Re: Need edit access to Apache Jira

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 06:29:28PM +0100, Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > I also need write access, at least to be able to assign issues to myself. > My username is kocka. > > Thx! Given. you don't seem to have an account on cwiki.a.o though > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Pavan Bandarupally < >

Re: write access on cwiki

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:54:42PM +, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > Hi All, > > I need to upload 4.2.1 BVT result on cwiki,; but I don't have edit > access, someone please provide me the write access on cwiki ? looks like you already have access. > > Regards, > Rayees -- Prasanna.,

Re: Bug? Should we allow detaching volumes when VMs have snapshots

We should dis-allow detaching volume from VM when it has VM snapshots. VMware keeps VM snapshot meta information at VM basis, disk membership change behind its back will cause problem and it does not provide official API to manipulate at volume level for a VM snapshot. This is a bug Kelven On 11

Re: Review Request 15296: CLOUDSTACK-5067 Bugfix: two NICs connected to Public network exist in VR

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15296/ --- (Updated Nov. 7, 2013, 1:11 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland,

Review Request 15296: CLOUDSTACK-5067 Bugfix: two NICs connected to Public network exist in VR

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15296/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5067 https://issues.apache.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

Thx for putting this together, Jayapal. A few comments: I'd really like to have a config flag to specify if things should be restarted automatically or not. Worst case, track the restarts - if a service is restarted more than X times in Y seconds, something's obviously wrong so stop tail-chasin

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

While I appreciate the confidence, there are weekly calls to attend. The particularly interesting one (MANO WG) happens on Wednesdays at 6am PST. I've tried but there's very little chance that I can attend these meetings. Anybody in a more agreeable timezone? On 11/6/13 3:34 PM, "John Kinsella"

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

+1 On Nov 5, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > I volunteer you. > > We need to do this. > > -Sebastien > > On 5 Nov 2013, at 20:28, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > >> Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) is an effort to utilize server >> virtualization in conjunction with industry

RE: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

Darren, Murali Can you review the final patch and if acceptable merge into master. Syed the deadline is hard. I will cut the branch on 11/08 late night or early morning next day Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Syed Ahmed [mailto:sah...@cloudops.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06,

4.2.1 BVT automation results

Hi All, 4.2.1 BVT automation results published to cwiki; you can see the results below https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2.1+Automation+Result Regards, Rayees

write access on cwiki

Hi All, I need to upload 4.2.1 BVT result on cwiki,; but I don't have edit access, someone please provide me the write access on cwiki ? Regards, Rayees

Re: JavaScript Question - $isCustomizedIops.is(':checked')

Thanks, Jessica! That did the trick. :) On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Jessica Wang wrote: > Mike, > > Your $isCustomizedIops is something like: > > > > Custom disk iops > > > > > > > So, if you want to know whether the checkbox is checked or not, you should > use > "($is

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

Yes, the certificates are managed separately from the Netscaler on cloudstack and get passed to the resource. Any other LB can implement the termination feature and use the certificates. On Wed 06 Nov 2013 12:36:26 PM EST, Marcus Sorensen wrote: Just want to mention that if certificates are

RE: JavaScript Question - $isCustomizedIops.is(':checked')

Mike, Your $isCustomizedIops is something like: Custom disk iops So, if you want to know whether the checkbox is checked or not, you should use "($isCustomizedIops.find('input[type=checkbox]').is(':checked')" instead of "($isCustomizedIops.is(':checked')" Jessica

Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

I'm having a difficulty finding documents about how to develop a plug-in. Anyone to help me find one? Thanks in advance. Alex Ough On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Alex Ough wrote: > OK. > > 1) Do you mean the plug-in? If so, let me find out how to develop a > plug-in and work on this. > 2) Sur

RE: ComponentContext :: getComponent() ?

But in general, is there a way to get hold of a particular bean by name or type? -Original Message- From: Prachi Damle Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 1:19 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: ComponentContext :: getComponent() ? I used to call getComponent() to get the curre

RE: ComponentContext :: getComponent() ?

I used to call getComponent() to get the current list of AffinityGroupProcessors enabled by the admin. The injected processor list was added later to the class, I think I can use that for this purpose. Thanks, Prachi -Original Message- From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmai

RE: the plea to openstack

The Conway Law reference is a good to keep in mind as we enter the next collab conference. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway's_law) > -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: 06 November 2013 20:02 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: t

RE: Master : Automation result on KVM and vmware

Thanks Likitha for fixing VMware blocker https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5051 Automation executed in vmware, below issues observed with vmware run. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5047 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5045 https://issues.apac

Re: Review Request 14976: [SSL Termination support] Part2 : Assign certificates to LBs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14976/ --- (Updated Nov. 6, 2013, 8:15 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Darren Shepher

Re: the plea to openstack

Agreed it's a very good read. -Sebastien On 6 Nov 2013, at 17:34, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > http://stochasticresonance.wordpress.com/2013/11/04/openstack-a-plea/ > > I thought this was an interesting read. There might be some things > CloudStack could learn or issues it could avoid by keeping

Re: mshost table after upgrade from 4.1.0 to 4.1.1

I got impatient waiting and decided to go ahead and edit the DB. Things really couldn't get any worse than they already were. I am happy to report that I am back up and running and things look fine. I made the following changes: 1) Set removed in the mshost table for the 4.1.0 management server:

RE: [JENKINS] Preparing for the 4.3 branch

Prasanna I have added a link to your newly added wiki page, but need more information for a beginner to clone the build jobs for a new release > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 11:41 AM > To: dev@clo

RE: [JENKINS] Preparing for the 4.3 branch

Thanks Hugo for taking care of these. Do you mind taking a moment to update Release Management wiki page [1] on what it takes to set up Jenkins build jobs for a new release. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+Management > -Original Message- > From: Trippie

Review Request 15280: CLOUDSTACK-5062: Deleting Load Balancing Rule fails when generating usage events are enabled

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15280/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5062 https://issues.apache.

Re: Review Request 15181: CLOUSTACK-5023: Deleting Port Forwarding Rule fails when generating usage events are enabled

> On Nov. 3, 2013, 7:45 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > can you test and submit for master as well? > > > > d6420cd91ebb493e8b9d4220e95b7a3250272db3 > > David Grizzanti wrote: > do you want me to submit a separate review for the master fix? master seems a bit different in terms of the simul

Re: Review Request 14976: [SSL Termination support] Part2 : Assign certificates to LBs

On 13-11-06 12:18 PM, Murali Reddy wrote: On 06/11/13 12:40 AM, "Syed Ahmed" wrote: On Nov. 5, 2013, 9:43 a.m., Murali Reddy wrote: api/src/com/cloud/network/lb/LoadBalancingRule.java, lines 42-43 can you plea

Re: [Merge] Palo Alto Networks firewall integration to master

Great! Thank you Sheng... On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > Looks good to me. > > Applied to MASTER branch. Thanks! > > --Sheng > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Will Stevens > wrote: > > > @Sheng: This should be ready to go now. I built the patch from > tonight's > >

Re: JavaScript Question

This is just a guess, but I'm thinking if the checkbox is not visible, then ":checked" always returns false (which would be weird). I do make the checkbox visible before using ":checked", but it's possible this visibility change doesn't take effect until after the event handler finishes. Any thou

Re: [Merge] Palo Alto Networks firewall integration to master

Looks good to me. Applied to MASTER branch. Thanks! --Sheng On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > @Sheng: This should be ready to go now. I built the patch from tonight's > master and I included a more detailed commit message as you requested. Let > me know if you have any

Re: Review Request 15050: Add Palo Alto Networks Firewall Integration

> On Nov. 6, 2013, 6:08 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! Committed to MASTER. Thank you Will! - Sheng --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15050/#review28280 -

Re: Review Request 15050: Add Palo Alto Networks Firewall Integration

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15050/#review28280 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sheng Yang On Nov. 6, 2013, 3:42 a.m., Will

Re: Review Request 15181: CLOUSTACK-5023: Deleting Port Forwarding Rule fails when generating usage events are enabled

> On Nov. 3, 2013, 7:45 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > can you test and submit for master as well? > > > > d6420cd91ebb493e8b9d4220e95b7a3250272db3 do you want me to submit a separate review for the master fix? - David --- This is an a

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

Just want to mention that if certificates are managed, this would be fairly simple to add to VPC routers as well. The haproxy loadbalancer config would just need to be passed the cert and a slightly different config. So hopefully it has been implemented in such a way that it's easy to reuse for VPC

Re: What is the cloudstack branch that has same codes with CloudPlatform-4.2.0-2-rhel6.4?

OK, thanks! On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > 4.2 but specifically the 4.2.0 tag > > > On Nov 6, 2013, at 9:18 AM, Alex Ough wrote: > > > > Is it master or any other branch? > > > > Thanks > > Alex Ough > >

Re: Need edit access to Apache Jira

I also need write access, at least to be able to assign issues to myself. My username is kocka. Thx! On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Pavan Bandarupally < pavan.bandarupa...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi , > > I am not able to close issues that I have verified in issues.apache.org . My > user name is

Re: What is the cloudstack branch that has same codes with CloudPlatform-4.2.0-2-rhel6.4?

4.2 but specifically the 4.2.0 tag > On Nov 6, 2013, at 9:18 AM, Alex Ough wrote: > > Is it master or any other branch? > > Thanks > Alex Ough

Re: Review Request 14976: [SSL Termination support] Part2 : Assign certificates to LBs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14976/#review28273 --- patch does not apply on master. please rebase with latest master and

Re: Review Request 14976: [SSL Termination support] Part2 : Assign certificates to LBs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14976/#review28272 --- patch does not apply on master. please rebase with latest master and

Re: Review Request 14976: [SSL Termination support] Part2 : Assign certificates to LBs

On 06/11/13 12:40 AM, "Syed Ahmed" wrote: > > >> On Nov. 5, 2013, 9:43 a.m., Murali Reddy wrote: >> > api/src/com/cloud/network/lb/LoadBalancingRule.java, lines 42-43 >> > >> >> > >> > can you please add new constructor

What is the cloudstack branch that has same codes with CloudPlatform-4.2.0-2-rhel6.4?

Is it master or any other branch? Thanks Alex Ough

Re: Review Request 15173: Dynamic compute offering.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/ --- (Updated Nov. 6, 2013, 4:57 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala

the plea to openstack

http://stochasticresonance.wordpress.com/2013/11/04/openstack-a-plea/ I thought this was an interesting read. There might be some things CloudStack could learn or issues it could avoid by keeping some of his points in mind.

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

Hi All, Many thanks to Darren and Murali for reviewing my code. I feel that the code is in a good condition to be merged into the master. I see that the code freeze is at the end of this week. Is it possible for my patch to be merged by then? Is it a hard deadline? Thanks, -Syed On Mon 04 N

Re: Review Request 15173: Dynamic compute offering.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/ --- (Updated Nov. 6, 2013, 4:19 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala

Re: Review Request 15173: Dynamic compute offering.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/ --- (Updated Nov. 6, 2013, 4:17 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

Please find below update FS https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Monitoring+VR+services Thanks, Jayapal On 05-Oct-2013, at 6:54 PM, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > A shell script can be used. Few thoughts below: > > 1. Collect the process id of all daemons you wanted to monitor u

Review Request 15268: Fix for 1125376 NP: Null pointer dereference - make sure the equals implementation is compliant with the contract.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15268/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippaers. Bugs: 1125376, NP:, Null, der

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4550) [DOC] When upgrading KVM agents to 4.2(.1?) perform bridge renaming to have migration work

The guest.network.device and private.network.device should be something like cloudbr0 or cloudbr1 Please follow the official documents. 2013/11/6 hayou (JIRA) > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel

Re: Review Request 15241: Renamed two modules with same name to avoid confusion while reporting test results

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15241/ --- (Updated Nov. 6, 2013, 2:37 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shil

Re: Review Request 15264: Fix for 1125389 RV: Bad use of return value

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15264/#review28264 --- Ship it! commit 56070c644b026003b155bdb69b356a286e122a46 Author: wi

Re: Review Request 15264: Fix for 1125389 RV: Bad use of return value

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15264/ --- (Updated Nov. 6, 2013, 2:08 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippa

Re: Bug? Should we allow detaching volumes when VMs have snapshots

Bumping this. I believe we need the imput of a VMWare expert, please. -Chris -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Nov 5, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > OK, well, depending on if we can or ca

Re: Review Request 15263: Added fix for bug 5056.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15263/ --- (Updated Nov. 6, 2013, 1:44 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shil

Edit access to ASF Jira

Hi, Please provide me the edit access to ASF jira .I am not having option to close the bugs in ASF jira which are not assigned to me. Thanks, Manasa

Need edit access to Apache Jira

Hi , I am not able to close issues that I have verified in issues.apache.org . My user name is pavanb. Can you please give those permissions to my id. Regards, Pavan

Re: Error adding host to cluster - cloudstack 4.2

Aakash, attached files get trunked…can you post on something like pastebin.com Are you using virtual box on windows and running the mgt server on windows itself ? How about moving to linux ? ;) On Nov 5, 2013, at 8:13 PM, Aakash Kumar wrote: > > > Got Below Exception , > com.cloud.utils.e

Review Request 15263: Added fix for bug 5056.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15263/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5056 h

Review Request 15262: CLOUDSTACK-5057: Fixed test_06_recover_instance_in_network, removed dependency on test case ordering

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15262/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. B

RE: Ping to shared network gateway failing

In shared network, we need to explicitly create the gateway. The ip available to vm as gateway need to be physically existing as gateway device. Santhosh From: Gaurav Aradhye [gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 5:55 AM To: dev@c

Re: [ACS4.2.1] Code complete

On 06/11/13 2:02 pm, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >Abhi, > >Can we test first and get the results from BVT before cutting the RC ? >I will do a check on BVTs and publish the report before creating the RC >build. I know people are busy testing it, will get a formal take on that >by tomorrow, then

Ping to shared network gateway failing

HI all, I am facing an issue while running few test cases involving shared network test cases. Virtual Machine is deployed in shared network and isolated network. One of the test case step is to check whether the network gateway is reachable from the virtual machine. Although the "ping" to gateway

Re: [JENKINS] Preparing for the 4.3 branch

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:15:33AM +0100, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > I?ve setup all the jenkins jobs for the release branch and a pipeline view. > > When the branch is cut we only need to enable the jobs. > > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/ > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-4

[JENKINS] Preparing for the 4.3 branch

I’ve setup all the jenkins jobs for the release branch and a pipeline view. When the branch is cut we only need to enable the jobs. http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/ http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-4.3-pipeline/ Cheers, Hugo

Re: Review Request 15173: Dynamic compute offering.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/ --- (Updated Nov. 6, 2013, 9:08 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala

template inheritance from domains to subdomains, new feature?

Hi, Have a look at the following structure: BASE_DOMAIN \_ CHILD_1 \_ CHILD_2 Assuming I'm using an account created in BASE_DOMAIN, I'm trying to find a way to publish templates from that account so that they're also accessible to

Re: [ACS4.2.1] Code complete

Abhi, Can we test first and get the results from BVT before cutting the RC ? -sebastien On Nov 6, 2013, at 1:46 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > ACS 4.2.1 has now very few open tickets. These are expected to be closed this > week. The docs are also getting updated. > I am planning to creat