Re: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called

2013/10/3 Min Chen > Can you check ssvm log to see if it can connect back to MS? I ran into > this today and found the reason that in global setting variable 'host' is > set to 'localhost' instead of my laptop IP address, and thus when SSVM is > up, it cannot connect back to MS to set the entry i

RE: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0

Indra, The steps are correct. Please follow the steps and let me know if you need any help. This issue got fixed in 4.2-forward branch with this commit: 38bbfdc89a50bbb9464700d202d1cfa7b7955953 --Sanjay > -Original Message- > From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id] > Sent: Thursday

Re: Review Request 14060: CLOUDSTACK-4634 - CPU Limits/ test_maximum_limits.py - -Fixed issues arising due to wrong indentation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14060/#review26644 --- Commit 7d15b50704b3b177d2b39fe55e30a9bba0f7b40a in branch refs/heads

RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

I believe both can exist independently. The framework should have more flexibility and facilitation to run features\test cases based upon a given release and version on a given test bed. It should be intelligent enough to run those cases and only those cases pertaining to that release with few

Re: Hi

Hi Steve, Welcome to CloudStack. Looking forward to working with you. On 02-Oct-2013, at 6:10 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Welcome Steve! > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Steve Wilson wrote: > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I just wanted to take a second and introduce myself. I recently joined

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

congrats rajesh :) On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath < radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com> wrote: > Now, party time...:-) > > -Original Message- > From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 8:50 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apa

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

I switched the test infrastructure on jenkins.buildacloud.org to run the bvts [1] against master last week. Couple of weeks before that the simulator [2] tests were switched to run against master. Both are broken unfortunately and the bvt and checkin tests aren't running. I've filed a bug here: ht

Re: [MERGE] marvin-refactor to master

Copying folks that this change will affect for review. On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:12:40PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Once upon a time [1] I had propagated the idea of refactoring marvin to > make test case writing simpler. At the time, there weren't enough > people writing tests using marv

Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0

Hi Alena, Good day to you, and thank you for your confirmation! Can I confirm that this is what I need to do: (1) Before upgrade, run the script to insert the records into resource_count table for existing accounts/domains. (2) Perform the upgrade (from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0); (3) After the upgrade, ru

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

Now, party time...:-) -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 8:50 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala Thanks a lot Everybody for your Kind wishes. :) Thanks Rajesh B

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

It is already a global setting in 4.2. The name of the setting is "execute.in.sequence.hypervisor.commands". Check out Config.java ExecuteInSequence("Advanced", ManagementServer.class, Boolean.class, "execute.in.sequence.hypervisor.commands", "true", "If set to true, StartCommand, StopComm

Re: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called

Can you check ssvm log to see if it can connect back to MS? I ran into this today and found the reason that in global setting variable 'host' is set to 'localhost' instead of my laptop IP address, and thus when SSVM is up, it cannot connect back to MS to set the entry in Host table as Up. What is t

Re: marvin over https

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 04:21:38PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > I have some trouble getting marvin to connect to cloudstack over https. > I am supposing the following should work > conn = cloudConnection(mgmtip, apiKey=apikey, > securityKey=secretkey, logging=log, port=443, scheme="htt

Re: contrail virtual network controller

On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:18:29AM -0700, Pedro Roque Marques wrote: > > We have an integration test which requires spawning a "mysql" db, > initialize it and then go through the process of creating a zone, > etc. This allows us to test the plugin against the API. The > drawback is that this test

Re: Wiki access

Thanks David. On Wed 02 Oct 2013 07:23:28 PM EDT, David Nalley wrote: You should be able to edit/add pages now. --David On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Syed Mushtaq wrote: my confluence id is sahmed . Thanks, -Syed On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Chip Childers wrote: Not all committers

Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0

Hi Indra, Please see inline. -alena. On 10/2/13 8:21 PM, "Indra Pramana" wrote: >Hi Alena, > > >Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail. > > >Does it mean that later after the upgrade, for every newly created >accounts/domains, I will need to apply the temporary fix all the time? No. Y

Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0

Hi Alena, Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail. Does it mean that later after the upgrade, for every newly created accounts/domains, I will need to apply the temporary fix all the time? Will it cause any issues if I run the MySQL script again later, e.g. will it cause duplicate entries

Re: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called

2013/9/27 Daan Hoogland > INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No > running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint > INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No > running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHost

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

On 10/2/13 5:52 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >Kelvin, > >Also since I'm using dynamic proxies for AOP, spring is suppose to expose >all interface of the target. But I'll still dig in and make sure 100% >this is all good. > >Darren > >> On Oct 2, 2013, at 5:40 PM, Darren Shepherd >> wrote: >>

RE: Connection Refused

After changing the global variable , can you see if restarting the SSVM helps? -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Maurice Lawler [mailto:maurice.law...@me.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 5:58 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sangeetha Hariharan Subject: Re: Connection Re

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

It's actually really easy to turn this off. If you look at the last commit of the branch you'll see what changes to turn it on. So you can just reverse that one commit to disable it. I'd rather merge this and then do the BVTs on master if possible. I really want to get this committed. Ev

Re: Connection Refused

Thank you Sangeetha, I was able to register the ISO via IP address. However, adding the CDIR/s for it still did not permit me to register the ISO via hostname. Along with that, the default template didn't download either for this same issue. On 10/2/13, 8:39 PM, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: Yo

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

Kelvin, Also since I'm using dynamic proxies for AOP, spring is suppose to expose all interface of the target. But I'll still dig in and make sure 100% this is all good. Darren > On Oct 2, 2013, at 5:40 PM, Darren Shepherd > wrote: > > I know the majority of the polymorphic stuff is work

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

Yes agreed. I've extensively tested this, but that is never enough. How do I get the BVTs ran against this. Due to the cross cutting nature of this I want to get this merged as fast as possible. Darren > On Oct 2, 2013, at 4:43 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > > +1 on running the BVT on it. We'v

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

I know the majority of the polymorphic stuff is working fine right now. But now that you bring it up I'm kinda wondering why. It very we'll be possible that the way in which I'm discovering extensible types precludes it from AOP matching the beans. (Which isn't bad. We should only use AOP

RE: Connection Refused

You can try setting this global parameter- secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to allow for "mirrors.liquidweb.com" . Or , If you register the iso using the Ip address instead of mirrors.liquidweb.com , it should work as well. -Thanks Sangeetha -Original Message- From: Maurice Lawler [m

Connection Refused

Sorry to bother again, What would cause this... --2013-10-03 00:28:07-- http://mirrors.liquidweb.com/CentOS/6.4/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.4-x86_64-minimal.iso Resolving mirrors.liquidweb.com (mirrors.liquidweb.com)... 69.167.187.144 Connecting to mirrors.liquidweb.com (mirrors.liquidweb.com)|69.16

Re: Docs have moved

I'll annoy some of the root@ folks about that tomorrow. --David On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Oct 2, 2013, at 3:15 PM, David Nalley wrote: > >> Per our earlier discussion, now that 4.2 has released, I moved the >> docs for 4.2 to their own repo, and will be do

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > No update on this. I mentally got blocked on the emailing legal@ > about it. Should I go ahead and email them? Whats the full email > address? From a technical perspective I know this will work, I did > some bytecode analysis and we can

RE: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

+1 on running the BVT on it. We've been through this one once before. Should be careful. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 4:39 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [MERGE] spring-modularizati

Re: HA is broken on master

I'm now rebasing the VMsync work to master, will send a merge request once I'm done Kelven On 10/2/13 4:31 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >My bad. I thought this was merged into master, but it isn't. > >On 10/2/13 4:24 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: > >>Why is the work happening in master? >> >> >>O

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

Darren, This looks really nice. A few questions on Spring AOP replacement. 1) Spring AOP is proxy-based, the reason we ended up of using customized AOP is mainly due to that inside existing CloudStack codebase, we have many places that are doing run-time type-casting, the code in these places ass

Re: System VM

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Travis Graham wrote: > Hey Marcus, > > The docs were split out today to make them easier to work on. I'll be going > through them later tonight to fix things like this and sending out a diff > to get them corrected as soon as possible. > > Travis Hi Travis: Lets t

Re: System VM

Hey Marcus, The docs were split out today to make them easier to work on. I'll be going through them later tonight to fix things like this and sending out a diff to get them corrected as soon as possible. Travis On Wednesday, October 2, 2013, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > For 4.2 that doesn't work.

Re: System VM

I enabled cloudfront on this so that folks in S.America/Africa/Europe/Asia/Oceania can have better speeds. Just substitute d21ifhcun6b1t2.cloudfront.net for download.cloud.com On 10/2/13 4:21 PM, "Travis Graham" wrote: >Here are the correct links for 4.2.0: > >Xenserver : >http://download.cl

Re: HA is broken on master

My bad. I thought this was merged into master, but it isn't. On 10/2/13 4:24 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >Why is the work happening in master? > > >On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: >> Perhaps as a result of this work: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/tYvlAQ >> I th

Re: System VM

For 4.2 that doesn't work. If the docs say that, we need to fix it. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Hello, > > Going through the install, I noticed the system VM template hasnt changed > URL. Is it safe to assume to utilize this one: > > # /usr/lib64/cloud/common/scripts/s

Re: HA is broken on master

Why is the work happening in master? On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Perhaps as a result of this work: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/tYvlAQ > I think Kelven is trying to separate the job state (starting, stopping) > from the actual VM state. > > On 10/2/13 3:3

Re: Wiki access

You should be able to edit/add pages now. --David On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Syed Mushtaq wrote: > my confluence id is sahmed . > > Thanks, > -Syed > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > >> Not all committers were easy to find, but those that I did should be all >>

Re: System VM

Thank you! - Maurice On 10/2/13, 7:21 PM, Travis Graham wrote: Here are the correct links for 4.2.0: Xenserver : http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2 KVM : http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-mast

Re: System VM

Here are the correct links for 4.2.0: Xenserver : http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2 KVM : http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 VMware : http://download.cloud.com/templates

Re: HA is broken on master

Perhaps as a result of this work: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/tYvlAQ I think Kelven is trying to separate the job state (starting, stopping) from the actual VM state. On 10/2/13 3:36 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >Alex, > >In scheduleRestart() when it calls _itMgr.advanceStop() it used

System VM

Hello, Going through the install, I noticed the system VM template hasnt changed URL. Is it safe to assume to utilize this one: # /usr/lib64/cloud/common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt -m /mnt/secondary -u http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.q

[MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

Not sure how this works... I would like to merge in the new modularized Spring setup to master. There is info on the wiki about it [1] [2] [3]. The primary change is to break apart the monolithic applicationContext.xml and componentContext.xml files such that each plugin can maintain and contribu

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

> -Original Message- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 3:15 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment > > I would like to separate this thread on tickets assignments in JIRA. > > Prev

HA is broken on master

Alex, In scheduleRestart() when it calls _itMgr.advanceStop() it used to pass the VO. Now it passes a UUID. So the VO the HA manager holds is out of sync with the DB and the recorded previous state and update count are wrong, so HA will just stop the VM in the worker. I really think the update

Re: Wiki access

Sorry, I'm not seeing the ability to change space permissions. On 10/2/13 2:01 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Not all committers were easy to find, but those that I did should be all >set. > >So committers / contributors = provide your confluence ID's if you can't >add / edit pages. PMC folks - he

[DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

I would like to separate this thread on tickets assignments in JIRA. Previously it was mentioned that we can add additional components into JIRA CLOUDSTACK project and have ticket default to maintainer of the component - who can then assign it to a proper developer. What do you think? Any othe

RE: [DISCUSS] Release Managers for future ACS releases - enhacement

And we need to hash out the JIRA ticket assignments and component breakdown - so it's going to be 2 threads. > -Original Message- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 5:50 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release

RE: [DISCUSS] Release Managers for future ACS releases - enhacement

Thank you all for responding. So I guess, to move forward, I will kick off another thread asking for volunteers to join this effort. We then review @ PMC and finalize. Does it sound like plan? > -Original Message- > From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] > Sent:

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Managers for future ACS releases - enhacement

On 9/26/13 2:58 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 10:22 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Managers for future ACS releases - >> enhacement >

RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

Agree to keep tests with main repo as suggested as tests are tied to releases. Backward compatibility of framework need to be considered when breaking it apart as we still use the framework on older branches for validation of patches. -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto

Review Request 14451: Some test for NetUtils

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14451/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: Wiki access

my confluence id is sahmed . Thanks, -Syed On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Not all committers were easy to find, but those that I did should be all > set. > > So committers / contributors = provide your confluence ID's if you can't > add / edit pages. PMC folks - help ad

RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 1:10 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:38:33PM +, Alex Huang wrote: > > I don't

Re: Wiki access

Not all committers were easy to find, but those that I did should be all set. So committers / contributors = provide your confluence ID's if you can't add / edit pages. PMC folks - help add them please. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > There were major issues with Spam on

Re: Wiki access

There were major issues with Spam on the wiki, so infra changed the permissions. I've just gone and added all PMC members to the space as space admins. That means all PMC members can help deal with this issue (or at least those that I could find in the wiki user list). I'm going to deal with com

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

Chip, that makes perfect sense to me. On 10/2/13 1:10 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:38:33PM +, Alex Huang wrote: >> I don't really understand what purpose would this serve. Would we ever >>use newer marvin against older CloudStack or vice versa? What's the >>benefi

RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

Yeah...I'm more amendable to this proposal. I just don't see tests being separated from the source release. In fact, I see a lot of problems with matching versions and releases. I still question the value of separating out a framework where both ends (tests and the server it tests) stay in th

Re: Wiki access

I need access to the wiki too. I am planning to add an FS for implementing SSL offloading for netscaler. On Wed 02 Oct 2013 04:35:12 PM EDT, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Apparently, edit access has been revoked for all. Who do we contact for edit permissions? TIA

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

On Oct 2, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Edison Su wrote: > any user can just simply "pip install marvin", without download/build > cloudstack source code. > yes, but you have the same issue as we had with cloudmonkey. When can we release a new marvin ? breaking it up allows to have a different releas

Wiki access

Apparently, edit access has been revoked for all. Who do we contact for edit permissions? TIA

Re: Docs have moved

On Oct 2, 2013, at 3:15 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Per our earlier discussion, now that 4.2 has released, I moved the > docs for 4.2 to their own repo, and will be doing the same for master > in the next day or so as I clean things up. > > The new repo is: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repo

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

No update on this. I mentally got blocked on the emailing legal@ about it. Should I go ahead and email them? Whats the full email address? From a technical perspective I know this will work, I did some bytecode analysis and we can produce basically the exact same thing as what's in the jar toda

Re: System offerings mixed in with Disk Offerings

Mike, can you check what Api call the UI makes (use firebug for that). If all it does – call listDiskOfferings, then its an API bug. If the UI does 2 calls – listServiceOfferings and listDiskOfferings, then its a UI bug. -alena. From: Mike Tutkowski mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>> Reply-

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:38:33PM +, Alex Huang wrote: > I don't really understand what purpose would this serve. Would we ever use > newer marvin against older CloudStack or vice versa? What's the benefit? > > I can understand it for cloudmonkey because cloudmonkey is an admin cli tool

RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

any user can just simply "pip install marvin", without download/build cloudstack source code. > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 12:39 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin f

VolumeApiServiceImpl Question

Hi, I'm trying to create a volume from a Disk Offering that specifies a 10 GB disk. When attempting to create a volume from this Disk Offering, I'm told the maximum size I can create for a volume is 0 GB. In VolumeApiServiceImpl, I see a private instance variable called _maxVolumeSizeInGb, which

RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

I don't really understand what purpose would this serve. Would we ever use newer marvin against older CloudStack or vice versa? What's the benefit? I can understand it for cloudmonkey because cloudmonkey is an admin cli tool and reving it differently is not a bad idea. I just don't see it f

System offerings mixed in with Disk Offerings

Hi, I assume this is a mistake: http://imgur.com/XVBeNRf System offerings are mixed in with Disk Offerings (in master). -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud

Docs have moved

Per our earlier discussion, now that 4.2 has released, I moved the docs for 4.2 to their own repo, and will be doing the same for master in the next day or so as I clean things up. The new repo is: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-docs.git The master branch is pretty desolate u

RE: Post-release work

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 7:22 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Post-release work > > As previously discussed, now that 4.2 is released, I moving docs to > their own repo. > > https://git-wip-us.apac

RE: [MERGE] marvin-refactor to master

Currently we are running automation cloudstack repo , please don't remove marvin from cloudstack unless new repo is working seamlessly. In new marvin specific repo there will be same branch similar to cloudstack repo branches ? Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goas

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

> After separating marvin > 0. we will have a separate release cycle for marvin > 1. we will have a new home for marvin's docs using Sphinx > 2. if possible, a different criteria for providing commit access to > marvin's repos. > 3. all tests of cloudstack will also move to marvin's repository > I

RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

I assume changes are being done on a separate branch. We are currently going to run automation on Master for 4.3. Just want to make sure that this would not impact current runs. -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 11:2

RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

+1. All libraries of marvin and tests using them will now be at single place. Though marvin and tests under it are used to test cloudstack, segregating it from main cloudstack product code is good. Going ahead, few more changes will be required to make tests run automatically based upon the cl

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

+1 On Oct 2, 2013, at 1:58 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Seems Marvin won't depend on commands.xml any more, thus won't depend on any > artifacts build from cloudstack. So I am +1. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 201

Re: [MERGE] marvin-refactor to master

On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:51:18PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:12:40PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >>> I've also tried to disconnect marvin from depending on CloudStack's >>> build and repo. This will hel

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

Isn't there marvin code that's specific to the cloudstack API calls? I just remember having to go in and add to marvin python code when we wanted to test certain new cloudstack functionality. I suppose if the tests themselves are moving as well then it might not be a big deal, presumably the tests

Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0

Indra, the issue would impact only existing accounts/domains. For all newly created accounts/domains, you won't see it. By "temporary" Wei meant that in the future the problem should be fixed in the CloudStack upgrade code; so before the fix is in, this temporary solution should be applied by t

RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

Seems Marvin won't depend on commands.xml any more, thus won't depend on any artifacts build from cloudstack. So I am +1. > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 10:14 AM > To: CloudStack Dev > Subject: [DISCUSS] Breakin

Re: Review Request 14197: CLOUDSTACK-4696 Handle Netscaler provider enable for multiple zones

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14197/#review26611 --- Commit a5ede3af7f5837f9e8a1fb80e2a1f20f24ecb870 in branch refs/heads

[DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

I would like to seperate marvin from the main cloudstack repo. Much of marvin's development has little coupling with CloudStack. Similar to CloudMonkey, marvin undergoes rapid changes and it is essential to provide a smooth workflow and faster releases for those working with it. There are also

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

Thanks for the reply, Marcus. What about the option #3, which is to make it as a global setting? I think it can prevent side effects if exist. Alex Ough On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Not sure. I don't know the history well enough to know if there were > issues in th

Re: [MERGE] marvin-refactor to master

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:51:18PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:12:40PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > I've also tried to disconnect marvin from depending on CloudStack's > > build and repo. This will help split marvin from CloudStack which I > > will discuss in a

Re: [MERGE] marvin-refactor to master

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:12:40PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I've also tried to disconnect marvin from depending on CloudStack's > build and repo. This will help split marvin from CloudStack which I > will discuss in a seperate thread. Should we just use this branch as the source for a ne

[MERGE] marvin-refactor to master

Once upon a time [1] I had propagated the idea of refactoring marvin to make test case writing simpler. At the time, there weren't enough people writing tests using marvin however. Now as focus on testing has become much more important for the stability of our releases I would like to bring back th

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

Not sure. I don't know the history well enough to know if there were issues in the past, it might be that some hypervisors were fine and others weren't. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Alex Ough wrote: > Marcus/Kelven, > > Any thoughts on my suggestions? > > Thanks > Alex Ough > > > On Tue, Sep 2

Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0

Hi Wei Zhou, Thank you for the temporary solution, I tried to execute the scripts and I can see that the records are being inserted into the resource_count table! :) mysql> select * from resource_count where account_id=2; +--++---+---+---+ | id | acco

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

Marcus/Kelven, Any thoughts on my suggestions? Thanks Alex Ough On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Alex Ough wrote: > Oh, sorry for the confusion. I must have reversed the flags. > As Kelven pointed, it is set as 'TRUE', which makes the process as > sequential. > > So my questions are > 1. If

RE: [PROPOSAL] Revert to VM disk Snapshot

This sounds like a great idea. > From: chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Revert to VM disk Snapshot > Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:53:35 + > > +1. > > On 9/30/13 2:31 PM, "SuichII, Christopher" wrote: > > >The storage subsystem API currentl

RE: Hypervisor Questions

AFAIK, no, but it's a great RFE that I would vote for. -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 9:26 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Hypervisor Questions Oh, and, yes, when I referred to HA, it was (as you

Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0

For a temporary solution, log in the database, try again after run insert into resource_count(domain_id,type) select id,"cpu" from domain; insert into resource_count(domain_id,type) select id,"memory" from domain; insert into resource_count(domain_id,type) select id,"primary_storage" from domain; i

Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0

Hi Wei Zhou, Thanks for your e-mail. Do you have any recommendation or suggestion on how we can resolve the problem? I am not a CloudStack developer (just a normal user) so we are at loss on how we can resolve this issue. We are not able to upgrade to 4.2.0 because of this new problem, after we m

Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0

Hi Indra, It is a java file, not a script. ./server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java

Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0

Hi Wei Zhou, Thank you for your e-mail. May I know where is this script "ConfigurationServerImpl" located? Can we run this script manually? Is there a way we can run the script so that it will insert the records without having to check for any conditions? Looking forward to your reply, thank yo

Re: ovirt/RHEV-M support

I would be very interested in porting over ovirt's Gluster management capabilities and could fund that development. If anyone's interested in tackling it, ping me off-list and give me an estimated price. Thanks! JM - Original Message - > Hi Jithin, > > What is the key advantage of th

Post-release work

As previously discussed, now that 4.2 is released, I moving docs to their own repo. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/cloudstack-docs.git For present, I am pushing the 4.2 docs into a 4.2 branch, and will deal with master in a bit. We also need to merge anything in 4.2-forward into 4.2 and pu

Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

As an alternative to removing the code, Christopher - would you be willing / able to consider fixing it up / updating it's dependencies / finding a way to help get support for maintaining it? On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 05:42:03PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > If you remove it, it will break the fo

[SOLVED] Re: Access denied; you need (at least one of) the SUPER privilege(s) for this operation

Hi Rafael, I managed to resolve the problem by removing all the DEFINER statements from the dump .sql file. sed '/^\/\*\!50013 DEFINER/d' cloudstack-backup-2013100201-fix.sql > cloudstack-backup-2013100201-fix-without-definer.sql I then restored the cloudstack-backup-2013100201-fix-without-defin

  1   2   >