Hi Alena, Good day to you, and thank you for your confirmation!
Can I confirm that this is what I need to do: (1) Before upgrade, run the script to insert the records into resource_count table for existing accounts/domains. (2) Perform the upgrade (from 4.1.1 to 4.2.0); (3) After the upgrade, run the API script to populate the records. The above will fix the issues on the existing accounts/domains, and future accounts/domains will not be affected and will run as per normal after the upgrade. Can I confirm that my above understanding is correct? Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Alena Prokharchyk < alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi Indra, > > Please see inline. > > -alena. > > On 10/2/13 8:21 PM, "Indra Pramana" <in...@sg.or.id> wrote: > > >Hi Alena, > > > > > >Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail. > > > > > >Does it mean that later after the upgrade, for every newly created > >accounts/domains, I will need to apply the temporary fix all the time? > > No. You should do it just for the accounts/domains existing before the > upgrade. For new accounts, the code should do it automatically as a part > of account creation. > > > > Will it cause any issues if I run the MySQL script again later, e.g. > >will it cause duplicate entries for existing accounts/domains? > > There is a constraint in resource_type table on type/account_id and > type/domain_id, so before running the script, you have to make sure that > the entry doesn't exist already. > > > > > > >Looking forward to your reply, thank you. > > > >Cheers. > > > > > > > > > >On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Alena Prokharchyk > ><alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > >Indra, > > > > > >the issue would impact only existing accounts/domains. For all newly > >created accounts/domains, you won't see it. By "temporary" Wei meant that > >in the future the problem should be fixed in the CloudStack upgrade code; > >so before the fix is in, this temporary > > solution should be applied by the customer manually. > > > > > >Answering your other question how to fix the count. For that, you have > >to execute the API updateResourceCount. Here is the example: > > > > > > > http://localhost:8096/?command=updateResourceCount&account=admin&domainId= > >1 > > > > > >-Alena. > > > > > >From: Indra Pramana <in...@sg.or.id> > >Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > >Date: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 9:05 AM > >To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > > > >Subject: Re: Unable to create instance after upgrading to CloudStack 4.2.0 > > > > > > > > > >Hi Wei Zhou, > > > > > >Thank you for the temporary solution, I tried to execute the scripts and I > >can see that the records are being inserted into the resource_count table! > >:) > > > > > >mysql> select * from resource_count where account_id=2; > >+------+------------+-----------+-------------------+-------+ > >| id | account_id | domain_id | type | count | > >+------+------------+-----------+-------------------+-------+ > >| 17 | 2 | NULL | user_vm | 33 | > >| 18 | 2 | NULL | public_ip | 4 | > >| 19 | 2 | NULL | volume | 51 | > >| 20 | 2 | NULL | snapshot | 0 | > >| 21 | 2 | NULL | template | 39 | > >| 22 | 2 | NULL | project | 0 | > >| 23 | 2 | NULL | network | 1 | > >| 24 | 2 | NULL | vpc | 0 | > >| 6342 | 2 | NULL | cpu | 0 | > >| 6597 | 2 | NULL | memory | 0 | > >| 6852 | 2 | NULL | primary_storage | 0 | > >| 7107 | 2 | NULL | secondary_storage | 0 | > >+------+------------+-----------+-------------------+-------+ > >12 rows in set (0.00 sec) > > > > > >When you're saying temporary solution, what do you mean by that and how > >will that impact us? Do we need to run the temporary solution regularly in > >the future, or only during upgrade? > > > > > >I also noted that the count value of the newly created records are all 0. > >How would that impact us, and how it can be updated with the actual value? > >Will the data/value be updated over time? > > > > > >Any other things we need to take note of? > > > > > >If this solution works for us, then I will schedule another upgrade > >attempt > >(the fourth one!) tomorrow. > > > > > >Looking forward to your reply, thank you. > > > > > >Cheers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >For a temporary solution, log in the database, try again after run > >insert into resource_count(domain_id,type) select id,"cpu" from domain; > >insert into resource_count(domain_id,type) select id,"memory" from domain; > >insert into resource_count(domain_id,type) select id,"primary_storage" > >from > >domain; > >insert into resource_count(domain_id,type) select id,"secondary_storage" > >from domain; > >insert into resource_count(account_id,type) select id,"cpu" from account; > >insert into resource_count(account_id,type) select id,"memory" from > >account; > >insert into resource_count(account_id,type) select id,"primary_storage" > >from account; > >insert into resource_count(account_id,type) select id,"secondary_storage" > >from account; > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2013/10/2 Valery Ciareszka (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> > > > > > >> > >> [ > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4627 > ><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4627>? > >> page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel& > >> focusedCommentId=13784006#comment-13784006 ] > >> > >> Valery Ciareszka commented on CLOUDSTACK-4627: > >> ---------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Was it really commited to 4.2.0 branch ? I see old version in latest > >> source package: > >> > >> wget > >http://www.eu.apache.org/dist/cloudstack/releases/4.2.0/ > ><http://www.eu.apache.org/dist/cloudstack/releases/4.2.0/> > >> apache-cloudstack-4.2.0-src.tar.bz2 > >> tar jxfv apache-cloudstack-4.2.0-src.tar.bz2 > >> > >> [root@ad011d apache-cloudstack-4.2.0-src]# grep -A9 > >> canVmRestartOnAnotherServer > >> server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java > >> public boolean canVmRestartOnAnotherServer(long vmId) { > >> List<VolumeVO> vols = _volsDao.findCreatedByInstance(vmId); > >> for (VolumeVO vol : vols) { > >> if (!vol.isRecreatable() && !vol.getPoolType().isShared()) { > >> return false; > >> } > >> } > >> return true; > >> } > >> > >> > >> > HA not working, User VM wasn't Migrated > >> > --------------------------------------- > >> > > >> > Key: CLOUDSTACK-4627 > >> > URL: > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4627 > ><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4627> > >> > Project: CloudStack > >> > Issue Type: Bug > >> > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > >default.) > >> > Components: Hypervisor Controller, KVM, Management Server > >> > Affects Versions: 4.2.0 > >> > Environment: CentOS 6.3 64bit > >> > Reporter: Naoki Sakamoto > >> > Assignee: edison su > >> > Attachments: 20130906_HA_SystemVM_Migration_OK_But_UserVM_NG.zip, > >> 20130909_HA_UserVM_Migration_NG.zip > >> > > >> > > >> > 1. We made one of KVM Host Power OFF by push power button of hardware > >> for High Availability Test. > >> > 2. Vritual Router / Secodary Storage VM / Console Proxy VM is > >>Migrated. > >> > But User VM wasn't Migrated. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > >> (v6.1#6144) > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2013/10/2 Indra Pramana <in...@sg.or.id> > > > > > >> Hi Wei Zhou, > >> > >> Thanks for your e-mail. > >> > >> Do you have any recommendation or suggestion on how we can resolve the > >> problem? I am not a CloudStack developer (just a normal user) so we are > >at > >> loss on how we can resolve this issue. We are not able to upgrade to > >4.2.0 > >> because of this new problem, after we managed to get around quite a lot > >of > >> bumps on our road to 4.2.0. > >> > >> Looking forward to your reply, thank you. > >> > >> Cheers. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Indra, > >> > > >> > It is a java file, not a script. > >> > ./server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
