Thanks for the preliminary testing.
Questions:
1. More for the community: should the C# code be in a separate repo?
According to the merge request, mono and maven can be used to build the
agent.
2. Packaging: how is the C# agent installed?
3. What does minimal mean? What works? What doesn't? Local
Thanks Edison, the meeting notes were helpful.
I am implementing a storage plugin for CloudByte & am using *_details table
for storing the plugin related info.
Can anyone explain what kind/type of plugin data is not suitable in
*_details table (referring to point 5).
Regards,
Amit
*CloudByte Inc
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 5:15 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth
> round)
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > Fr
The Nicira NVP plugin is also depending on gson. If we make any changes we need
to validate against their api to ensure that the interface still works.
If we put the changes in a separate branch i'd be happy to run the changes
against the api.
Cheers,
Hugo
On Sep 20, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Darr
After much searching I found the two lines of code I needed to get it to
serialize right. I'll keep looking and see if I find other snags. Maybe we
can just move to jackson we'll see, haven't tried to deserialize yet.
Darren
> On Sep 19, 2013, at 4:25 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>
> Darren,
Hi guys,
Could anyone share some tips or GUI tool for making git rebase easier? I
have to rebase my working branch with master but get many many conflicts
which I have no idea about these pieces of code.
Thanks for any help,
--
N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 4:46 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth
> round)
>
> I prefer a respin, as painful as that seems. VPC is a
Meeting notes:
Date: Sep 17, 2013
Attendees:
NetApp: Chris, David
Citrix: Alex, Animesh, Edison, Srinivas
1. TakeSnapshot method on storage plugin.
Chris: TakeSnapshot method is implemented, but backup snapshot is failed on
the hypervisor side, as the default backup snapshot procedure
I prefer a respin, as painful as that seems. VPC is a major feature,
do we really want to release something that we know will break anyone
who tries to upgrade? I could deal with #1 if we are able to include
the hotfix script in the packaging, such that the release notes can
provide dead simple in
Can we do option (1) please? Many users, including myself, have been
waiting for 4.2 to be released for months.
On 20 Sep 2013 05:59, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 1
Darren,
When I looked into updating to the latest gson, the problem, IIRC, is things
that weren't considered cyclical dependencies are suddenly considered cyclical
with the latest. I don't recall where though.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph
Hi黑洞,
CloudStack has a few properties files with tokens within them. These tokens
are usually replace during installation of cloudstack. For developers,
replace.properties contains replacement values files for these tokens so that
after you build, cloudstack already have the proper values for
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth
> round)
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > F
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14218/
---
(Updated Sept. 19, 2013, 9:41 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14218/
---
(Updated Sept. 19, 2013, 9:31 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang a
Probably a victim of not doing a "clean compile." Maven works completely
on timestamps of source and dest and does not check dependencies of code.
So if you build juniper code once, then changed IpAddressTO, and then did
compile, maven won't detect that JuniperSrxResource should be rebuilt.
Maven'
Alright, I looked into this and it will take a bit more work to switch to
Jackson. The snag I hit was how we serialize commands for the agents. We
use a customer typeadatper in gson to produce a format like { "org.MyClass"
: {...} }. In jackson I don't see producing a similar format as being so
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Darren Shepherd
wrote:
> Only to test builds before commit. mvn is too slow.
That's probably it. I run from eclipse but usually do a build first.
That is going to change one minute ago, thanks. i'll keep an eye on
the dbupgradechecker
We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix that was mentioned on
the other thread, otherwise people going from 4.1 to 4.2 will have their
VPCs break. Looks like we are waiting on a script. It sounds like the plan
will be to provide instructions in the release notes. Really wish we would
h
Before cloudstack was donated to apache, it had an open source version and a
non-open source portion (which included vmware, f5, and juniper). Now,
everything is open source but that division is sometimes still in the files.
You can basically merge those files now.
As for jdk version, that's
On 9/19/13 5:16 AM, "SuichII, Christopher" wrote:
>John - any chance we can get your input on the original topic. Mikes
>comment was a kind of unrelated (but a completely valid topic that I'd
>like to be a part of discussing anyway!).
>
>Mike - are you planning on implementing the snapshotting
Yeah, that would be a great idea...it would drastically reduce initial load
time for the UI.
OK, I've created a new branch called ui-css-framework. Right now all it does is
rename cloudstack3.css -> cloudstack3.scss. This of course will make the UI
have no style if running right now, but once a
Ah...got it. Makes sense.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:38 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DatabaseUpgradeChecker and running from eclipse
>
> Its getting the JDK version
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:49 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth
> round)
>
> We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix t
I think one of the issues is that practically all the community testing is
based on new installs. Since we didn't appear to have a published upgrade
procedure available for 4.x to 4.2, it made it very hard to test in a reliable
way.
I did try a couple of upgrades from 4.02 and 4.1 in my lab, an
Its getting the JDK version because of
this.getClass().getSuperclass().getPackage().getImplementationVersion();
which it only check if
this.getClass().getPackage().getImplementationVersion() is null. So parent
is java.lang.Object, so it gets the JDK version. I understand your really
looking for 4
So I just looked at DatabaseCreator and noticed it calls
PremiumDatabaseUpgradeChecker, but on startup we call
DatabaseUpgradeChecker. What is this madness? Why are there two db
upgrade classes?
Darren
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Around 4.1 timeframe, Rohit added Da
Around 4.1 timeframe, Rohit added DatabaseCreator to call
DatabaseUpgradeChecker to create and upgrade the database but forgot to remove
it from the server configuration. We should simply add a DatabaseVesionChecker
for the server configuration to check if the database is at the version
expect
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14231/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang and daan Hoogland.
Repository: clouds
I just created https://reviews.apache.org/r/14231/ to remove the version
check that finds the JDK version. I can't see why we would ever want to
find the JDK version, so might as well just not check and fall through to
the existing logic that does "if (currentVersion==null) return"
Darren
On Th
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14226/#review26269
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- daan Hoogland
On Sept. 19, 2013, 9:45 a.m.,
Its has to do with my maven setup in Eclipse really. So import all the
projects then create a new Maven Build Debug Configuration with
Base Directory: ${workspace_loc:/cloudstack}
Goals: -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run
Check "Resolve Workspace Artifacts"
So the issue comes from "Resolve Workspace
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth
> round)
>
>
>
> On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> On Sept. 19, 2013, 3:03 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
> > Ship It!
3650f12e9b284d16f28131ba6cafecacb2d03fdc
- daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14228/#review26270
--
http://markmail.org/message/6ag3r6mtjhvqsytc ConsoleProxy RPM by Rayees
Namathponnan
http://markmail.org/message/xkf2heruwa6umc4d No running ssvm is found, so
command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint by Punith s
http://markmail.org/message/2ql3xrzbndgbapz4 How to modify cloudstack ui by 鄢洞
http:
> On Sept. 19, 2013, 2:59 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
> > Ship It!
88954053c344232189c130684c8dd3a495570045
- daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14226/#review26269
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14228/#review26270
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- daan Hoogland
On Sept. 19, 2013, 9:49 a.m.,
Darren, what is your scenario to run into this? I had some upgrade
paths to run through but didn't encounter this.
regards,
Daan
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Darren Shepherd
wrote:
> So I run ACS from eclipse for development, but DatabaseUpgradeChecker does
> the following
>
> String current
I'm not sure on a release for when I'll implement snapshot functionality.
Maybe 4.4.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:16 AM, SuichII, Christopher <
chris.su...@netapp.com> wrote:
> John - any chance we can get your input on the original topic. Mikes
> comment was a kind of unrelated (but a completely v
Something like this for 4.2... for 4.1 it would be pretty much the
same, just that in 4.1 the code was in StorageManagerImpl.java
iff --git a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java
b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeManagerImpl.java
index 1d6b44f..4ef57ed 100644
--- a/server/src/com
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14230/#review26268
---
Ship it!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Sept. 19, 2013, 1:20 p.m., Giris
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9539/#review26267
---
Commit 5aee73b1a59f02c7853892d13afc58ad01f40c88 in branch refs/heads/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14230/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Harikrishna Patnala and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repo
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
> Do file a big to track.
does not compute&%$&^$@
Oh wait, you have a spellchecker active ;)
yes, if someone can tell me if we can include gpl'd binaries in our
git/distro I think we should. In that case I will file a bug.
regards,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14229/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository: cloudstack-gi
John - any chance we can get your input on the original topic. Mikes comment
was a kind of unrelated (but a completely valid topic that I'd like to be a
part of discussing anyway!).
Mike - are you planning on implementing the snapshotting methods of the storage
subsystem API anytime in the near
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14227/
---
(Updated Sept. 19, 2013, 10:25 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan K
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14228/
---
Review request for cloudstack and mice xia.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Descri
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14227/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Kishan Kavala.
Bugs: CLOU
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14226/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Alex Huang.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Desc
Sorry, it was mee,
Don't know how I missed it as I did do the nonoss build. Probably had
some build leftovers on my system.
Does someone know if there are configurations possible where juniper
works with something else then vlan?
if so
if (ip.getBroadcastUri() != null &&
!ip.getBroadcastUr
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:26 PM, La Motta, David
wrote:
> Hey everybody, I think I saw something about hotels not being decided for
> CCC in Amsterdam this November. Has that been squared out?
yes, I hear at Schuberg Philis there are three hotels. Nagotiations on
prices are going on, hence they
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14225/
---
Review request for cloudstack and venkata swamy babu budumuru.
Repository: clo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13559/
---
(Updated Sept. 19, 2013, 12:57 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Murali Redd
54 matches
Mail list logo
