Re: Managed storage with KVM

2013-09-15 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Yes, see my previous email from the 13th. You can create your own KVMStoragePool class, and StorageAdaptor class, like the libvirt ones have. The previous email outlines how to add your own StorageAdaptor alongside LibvirtStorageAdaptor to take over all of the calls (createStoragePool, getStoragePo

Re: Review Request 14079: marvin tests for IP Address reservation within a network

2013-09-15 Thread Saksham Srivastava
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14079/#review26130 --- Ship it! Looks good. Can a committer have a look and apply the patc

Re: Managed storage with KVM

2013-09-15 Thread Mike Tutkowski
I see right now LibvirtComputingResource.java has the following method that I might be able to leverage (it's probably not called at present and would need to be implemented in my case to discover my iSCSI target and log in to it): protected Answer execute(CreateStoragePoolCommand cmd) {

Re: [GSoC] Pencil down on Sept 16th

2013-09-15 Thread Nguyen Anh Tu
@Sebgoa: could you please apply my pending patch? So I can upload another patches, because they use files from that pending patch 2013/9/16 Abhinandan Prateek > Though the heading says code sample the google-melange site specifically > asks you to upload the full work even it partially includes

Re: Managed storage with KVM

2013-09-15 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hey Marcus, When I implemented support in the XenServer and VMware plug-ins for "managed" storage, I started at the execute(AttachVolumeCommand) methods in both plug-ins. The code there was changed to check the AttachVolumeCommand instance for a "managed" property. If managed was false, the norm

Re: Q's about UserAuthenticators and getName()

2013-09-15 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
On 13/09/13 10:04 pm, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >On 09/13/2013 03:48 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: >> The code already has the name set to ³LDAP² in 4.2. What branch are you >>on >> ? >> Will also prefer if we can use getClass().getSimpleName() to get the >> classname, but we should check the poss

Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)

2013-09-15 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
+1 Tested VM life cycle with Xen in advanced zone. On 16/09/13 7:48 am, "Chip Childers" wrote: >+1 (binding) > >Tested with simulator. > > > >On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: >> create advanced zone >> create VPC

Re: [GSoC] Pencil down on Sept 16th

2013-09-15 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
Though the heading says code sample the google-melange site specifically asks you to upload the full work even it partially includes bits and pieces of other code as in a big project. -abhi On 16/09/13 8:49 am, "Nguyen Anh Tu" wrote: >Hi guys, > >Today is the deadline of uploading code template

Re: com.cloud.ha.RecreatableFencer used?

2013-09-15 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
It is/was used in baremetal setup where to HA a VM it has to be recreated. On 13/09/13 2:13 pm, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >com.cloud.ha.RecreatableFencer is registered in applicationContext.xml >but never in a componentContext.xml. So it appears that fencer is never >used. Is there a specific

Re: [GSoC] Pencil down on Sept 16th

2013-09-15 Thread Nguyen Anh Tu
Hi guys, Today is the deadline of uploading code template. What parts of code do you decide to upload to code template? only patches/diffs or whole of source tree? Thanks, 2013/9/6 Sebastien Goasguen > > On Sep 3, 2013, at 6:08 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > > > Cool, I don't have any more code to s

Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)

2013-09-15 Thread Chip Childers
+1 (binding) Tested with simulator. On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: > create advanced zone > create VPC > register template > create VPC tier > create VM on tier w/NFS > create VM on tier w/CLM > create VM on tier w/

Re: [PROPOSAL][SIMPLIFY] Future ACS RC testing

2013-09-15 Thread Daan Hoogland
Sebastien, Are you thinking november in Amsterdam, or before? On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:06 AM, sebgoa wrote: > > On Sep 11, 2013, at 5:25 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: > >> As mentioned on private, I think the reason we have so few responders when >> it comes to voting - is because it takes consi

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 (first round)

2013-09-15 Thread Marcus Sorensen
+1 (binding) Downloaded release artifacts, installed in ubuntu devcloud-kvm, tested various sync, async calls and cloudmonkey scripts. Seems to work as well or better than previous releases. On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > +1 > > Build with cache, checked readme etc. files

Re: Which DevCloud2 Usage Mode is good for Development and Debugging ????

2013-09-15 Thread Rohit Yadav
#3 is best and also since devcloud2 was created to provide host-only mode so that it could be used a throw away appliance for a faster CloudStack development. #3: CloudStack will run on your host OS so debugging becomes easier. HTH. On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Punith s wrote: > hi folks,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 (first round)

2013-09-15 Thread Rohit Yadav
+1 Build with cache, checked readme etc. files and installed: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BUM97ZjCQAAOM5v.png:large Since the build cache was created from/against ACS 4.2, as long as the APIs were compatible so will cloudmonkey be for 4.2 and previous releases including 4.x, 3.x ones. Thanks Chi