Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/#review24701 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jayapal Reddy On Aug. 6, 2013, 4:38 a.m., As

Re: Review Request 13237: Unable to resize disk with Zone wide storage

> On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:17 p.m., edison su wrote: > > engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDaoImpl.java, line 77 > > > > > > why not just use "select s.scope from storage_pool s, volumes v where > > s.id = v.pool

Review Request 13312: Add help docs for S3 secondary storage configuration.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13312/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

RE: [Doc] Dedicated Resources: Public IPs and VLANs per Account is Ready

Looks good to me Radhika. Thank you! From: Radhika Puthiyetath Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:04 AM To: Likitha Shetty; us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Abhinav Roy Subject: RE: [Doc] Dedicated Resources: Public IPs and VLANs per Account is Ready Hi, Thanks for the re

RE: [Doc] Dedicated Resources: Public IPs and VLANs per Account is Ready

Hi, Thanks for the review, Likitha. I have incorporated them. The latest doc is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-817. Abhinav, let me know if you have further comments. Thanks -Radhika From: Likitha Shetty Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 11:42 AM To: Radhika Puthiye

Re: Issue with deleting a volume that's never been attached to a VM

Thanks, everyone! On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Sailaja Mada wrote: > Hi Rajesh, > > I have created the issue some time back @ CLOUDSTACK-4038) State of the > DATA volumes remains in Allocated state if they are deleted before using > them (Attach/Detach) > > Thanks, > Sailaja.M > > -Origi

RE: Issue with deleting a volume that's never been attached to a VM

Hi Rajesh, I have created the issue some time back @ CLOUDSTACK-4038) State of the DATA volumes remains in Allocated state if they are deleted before using them (Attach/Detach) Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday,

Re: Issue with deleting a volume that's never been attached to a VM

Already in the JIRA reports - CLOUDSTACK-4038 On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:51:31AM +, Rajesh Battala wrote: > I able to reproduce it. > Deleting unattached volume is coming back again. > The removed column is not update in the db for this volume. > > Will create a major bug. > > **

RE: Issue with deleting a volume that's never been attached to a VM

I able to reproduce it. Deleting unattached volume is coming back again. The removed column is not update in the db for this volume. Will create a major bug. *** 6. row *** id: 6 account_id: 2

[ACS42] Closure of Resolved Defects - 8/5

Below defects are resolved for 4.2 - can you pl review, validate and close the defects. If the fix is not done as per the defect logged, pl reopen the defect so developer who fixed would get a chance to review the fix before product goes to GA. Reporter Total Grand Total51

RE: Issue with deleting a volume that's never been attached to a VM

I will try on my setup -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 4:48 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Issue with deleting a volume that's never been attached to a VM Hi, I've noticed in 4.2 when I try to delete

Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 4:38 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamk

Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

> On Aug. 5, 2013, 9:55 a.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py, line 27 > > > > > > remove the white space (red colour). > > Please apply the patch in your local and make s

RE: Breaking docs out

Make perfect sense. + 1 -Radhika -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 3:13 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Breaking docs out Hi folks: I'd like to propose breaking out a nuymber of our documents into their own repos. My

RE: IP Address Allocation

One way to achieve this behavior is to have a call out in prepareNic() to the NetworkElements before the call to the NetworkGuru allowing the NetworkElement to update the Nic Profile. In this use case the Network Element would suggest an IP Address. In the use case below the IP Address would be

RE: unable to view content of cwiki

Am still not able to access any pages. Ex : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/users/viewmyprofile.action even a publicly accessable page, when I login am getting error Not Permitted You are not permitted to perform this operation. Please do the needful. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original M

Re: 4.1.x KVM cloudVirBr to br-

Cloudstack will create the old bridges as it used to, you just need to have a single 'cloudVirBr' device to trigger the behavior. On Aug 5, 2013 6:35 PM, "Simon Weller" wrote: > Thanks Marcus. We already thought of creating the old bridge, but we were > hoping we had better options ;-) > > > > --

Re: 4.1.x KVM cloudVirBr to br-

Thanks Marcus. We already thought of creating the old bridge, but we were hoping we had better options ;-) - Original Message - From: "Marcus Sorensen" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 5:42:38 PM Subject: Re: 4.1.x

Issue with deleting a volume that's never been attached to a VM

Hi, I've noticed in 4.2 when I try to delete a volume that's never been attached to a VM that CloudStack says the operation was successful and the GUI removes the volume from the table, but when I refresh the table, the volume comes back. Has anyone else noticed this behavior as of late? If I at

Re: 4.1.x KVM cloudVirBr to br-

Yes, the vm definition already has the bridge name chosen (on initial startup), and that definition is migrated between hosts. This is further exacerbated by the fact that the bridges are created on the destination host prior to migration (so they'll be ready), rather than somehow being able to see

4.1.x KVM cloudVirBr to br-

All, As most know, the upgrade from 4.0 to 4.1 changed the interface naming schema. When a host in a cluster is rebooted, the interface naming changes. When this occurs, live migration breaks to that host. Example config: All Management and hosts running CS 4.1.1 Hypervisor: KVM on RHEL 6.3

Breaking docs out

Hi folks: I'd like to propose breaking out a nuymber of our documents into their own repos. My thinking is that specifically; the release notes, midonet, and niciranvp documentation shares very little with the rest of the documentation, and should be broken out akin to how the QIG is currently br

[VOTE] Update by-laws: non-technical decisions and other minor changes

Hi dev, I have some more by-law changes to propose. This is essentially round 2 for these changes. I incorporated feedback from the last thread. Per the by-laws, we're using a lazy majority for this vote. Please cast your vote now. I will tally the results in 72 hours. Here's my changelog: * Re

IP Address Allocation

I am trying to figure out what would be the proper way for a Plugin to interact with the CloudStack VM deployment and provide an authoritative IP Address from its database versus the local CloudStack database. It looks like the NetworkElements are not presented an opportunity to provide an IP Ad

Re: Review Request 13008: Fix usage of vm.instancename.flag when generating VM names on ESX hypervisor

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 9:30 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, Ch

[RESULTS] (Was: Re: [VOTE] Whitespace changes to bylaws.mdtext)

We got 4 +1 votes, so the vote was successful. I'll make the changes now. Thanks peeps! On 29 July 2013 22:55, Noah Slater wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to make several changes to our by-laws, but before I continue, > I've prepared a changset that tidies up whitespace and hard wraps. This > will ma

Review Request 13298: Put in upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13298/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharchyk, Chip Childers, and Min Chen.

Re: Not getting GUI

Not exactly true. OpenJDK / IcedTea etc should work also. On 8/5/13 11:19 AM, "Jessica Tomechak" wrote: >I have not heard that Java requirement before. Is that really true? > >Jessica T. > >From: Prashant Sreedharan [prashant.sreedha...@citrix.com] >Sent:

RE: Cannot deploy db on latest 4.1 branch

Thanks Alena! I've put in the fix, will submit the patch for review in a short while. Cheers! Regards, Vijay From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 4:51 PM To: Vijayendra Bhamidipati; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Cannot deploy db on latest 4.1 branch Happens because the

Re: [Discuss] Using XenServer 6.2's Clone-on-Boot feature on CloudStack

Is this the Intellicache feature? What changes does it require from CloudStack. Would just using service offering tags work? On 8/5/13 12:23 AM, "Nguyen Anh Tu" wrote: >Hi guys, > >Is anyone concerned about using XenServer 6.2's clone-on-boot feature on >CloudStack? With it, we can quickly deplo

Re: Review Request 13252: SHA256 timing attack and brute force attack fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 7:06 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and John Burwel

Re: Review Request 13252: SHA256 timing attack and brute force attack fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 6:57 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and John Burwel

Re: Back-port awsapi installation fixes to 4.1 branch

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 06:29:25PM +, Prachi Damle wrote: > Hi, > > Seems like the awsapi installation is broken for 4.1 and 4.1.1 releases. Most > of the issues have been identified and fixed in 4.2. > Here is the list to start with: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2777

Re: Review Request 11858: CLOUDSTACK-2340 [AWS Style Health Checks] Response of the API listLoadBalancerRuleInstances should show the service state of a VM if health check is configured for it

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11858/#review24663 --- Commit d1ede5430c052de5215dc1e7819d0d94752ede52 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 11858: CLOUDSTACK-2340 [AWS Style Health Checks] Response of the API listLoadBalancerRuleInstances should show the service state of a VM if health check is configured for it

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11858/#review24664 --- Commit 554c8b7ac110099cf93310660490e62ba2337f53 in branch refs/heads

Review Request 13252: SHA256 timing attack and brute force attack fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/ --- Review request for cloudstack and John Burwell. Bugs: https://issues.apache.org

Re: Review Request 13240: dealt with some warnings in NetworkServiceImpl

> On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:19 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! Pushed to 4.2 and MASTER. - Sheng --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13240/#review24654 -

Back-port awsapi installation fixes to 4.1 branch

Hi, Seems like the awsapi installation is broken for 4.1 and 4.1.1 releases. Most of the issues have been identified and fixed in 4.2. Here is the list to start with: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2777 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3295 https://issues.apache

Re: database upgrade

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 08:23:48PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > :) meaning now, i suppose. > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:32:19PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > >> H, > >> > >> What is the policy for adding upgrade paths? > >> > >> I am

Re: [ACS411] 4.1.1 status

Just fixing a typo... your missing the d in cloud http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ On 5 August 2013 19:01, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's where we are: > > DEBs (oss) are loaded into the cloustack.apt-get.eu repo. > RPMs (nonoss) are being built now and will be pushed as soon as complete

Re: Review Request 13237: Unable to resize disk with Zone wide storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/#review24653 --- engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDaoImpl.java

Re: api calls in 4.1.1

Ilya, listVirtualMachines (as user) for one, but I got a second report that wasn't very precise yet, so I will be working on reproducing next days and report back (wit test case or patch) regards, On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:42:53AM +0200, D

4.1.1 Build issue for CentOS - errors on AWSAPI depenencies

Hi all, Trying to build 4.1.1 into the appropriate RPMs, and I'm hitting the following error during the process. Any clues / ideas? I've cleaned our ~/.m2/repository and tried again, but same issue. [INFO] Apache CloudStack AWS API Bridge .. FAILURE [55.762s] [INFO] --

Re: database upgrade

:) meaning now, i suppose. On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:32:19PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> H, >> >> What is the policy for adding upgrade paths? >> >> I am working on upgrade from 4.1.1 already. >> So when do we add >> _upgradeMap.p

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24659 --- Commit 1e4ff7f4532a39355ef5e5bfaa8dbfbc1f1c27e4 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24657 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m., Wei Zh

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24656 --- Commit 0f539b4ce1b07c672a776ffa806dabb70c528afe in branch refs/heads

RE: Not getting GUI

I have not heard that Java requirement before. Is that really true? Jessica T. From: Prashant Sreedharan [prashant.sreedha...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 10:36 AM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: karthik.c...@gmail.com Subject: RE: Not gett

Re: Review Request 13240: dealt with some warnings in NetworkServiceImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13240/#review24654 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sheng Yang On Aug. 5, 2013, 9:59 a.m., daan

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4012) [UPGRADE]System VMs and VRs failed to start using KVM host after upgrading from 3.0.6 to 4.2.

org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock' I've been waiting to hear what platforms will be supported in 4.2 before committing '0fa108f03895e83ccc5d4c81e058ea8f424663b9' to 4.2. We eventually want this code, as it's a critical fix for system vm clocks, but specifica

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su and

Re: db.properties

Ah, OK, thanks. It has been a long time since I first installed MySQL for CloudStack development and I don't recall exactly how I set it up back then, but it must have been without a password. On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Vijayendra Bhamidipati < vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com> wrote: >

RE: db.properties

Hi Mike, If when installing your mysql server, you set a password for the mysql root user, you will need to specify that here. If you haven't encountered errors in your deploydb, you probably haven't set the mysql root user password and so you don't have to change the db.properties file. Typica

[ACS411] 4.1.1 status

Hi all, Here's where we are: DEBs (oss) are loaded into the cloustack.apt-get.eu repo. RPMs (nonoss) are being built now and will be pushed as soon as complete (soon) David is building the docs now. I'll announce once the RPM's and docs are published. -chip

db.properties

Hi, I was looking at my db.properties file and noticed I didn't fill in a value for the db.root.password key. Can someone tell me what filling in this value will change behavior wise in CloudStack? Thanks! Mike # CloudStack database settings db.cloud.username=cloud db.cloud.password=cloud d

Re: database upgrade

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:32:19PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > What is the policy for adding upgrade paths? > > I am working on upgrade from 4.1.1 already. > So when do we add > _upgradeMap.put("4.1.1", new DbUpgrade[] { new > Upgrade410to420(), new Upgrade420to430() }); > to Dat

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24650 --- plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/Libvir

Re: api calls in 4.1.1

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:42:53AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > What is the status of 4.1.1 at this moment. I am getting several > reports of api calls not working as before. I saw the vote passing by > but didn't give them much attention. In jira I don't see much mention > of such issues.

RE: api calls in 4.1.1

Daan, Please be more specific as to which APIs don't work - and if you know what commit could have caused it. Thanks ilya > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 4:43 AM > To: dev > Subject: api calls in 4.1.1 > > H, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

On 05.08.2013 16:48, Daan Hoogland wrote: the 4.1 build for rhel63 says: Apache Cloudstack RHEL 6.3 packages This project is currently disabled this one didn't happen to be the one you where looking for? Anyway look at http://jenkins.cloudstack.org and browse around. I thought you would find the

Review Request 13269: fix bug CLOUDSTACK-4088 cloudstack will stop and delete vm which not belongs to cs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13269/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, edison su, and mice xia. Bug

Re: Review Request 13268: fix bug CLOUDSTACK-4088 cloudstack will stop and delete vm which not belongs to cs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13268/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 3:59 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pra

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4088) cloudstack will stop and delete vm which not belongs to cs

I agree, I think this is by design. On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Rajesh Battala (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13729580#comment-13729580 > ] > > Rajesh Batt

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

the 4.1 build for rhel63 says: Apache Cloudstack RHEL 6.3 packages This project is currently disabled this one didn't happen to be the one you where looking for? Anyway look at http://jenkins.cloudstack.org and browse around. I thought you would find them there. On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:40 PM, D

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

think was the keyword there, ... but I am looking for ya. moment On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 05.08.2013 16:09, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> >> For this the jenkins builds might be suitable. I think if those are >> running on all active release branches. > > > Some URLs could be re

Re: Unable to start domR(VR) in devcloud using laster 4.1/master.

2013/8/3 Chiradeep Vittal > On 4.1? It's on my local branch, cloned from master but I haven't merged for several weeks. However I concern about the reason. After re-deploying Zone, everything is ok. Problem maybe comes from id_rsa.cloud key, which was not patched to systemvm because of an unkno

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

On 05.08.2013 16:09, Daan Hoogland wrote: For this the jenkins builds might be suitable. I think if those are running on all active release branches. Some URLs could be real handy now. :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

Review Request 13268: fix bug CLOUDSTACK-4088 cloudstack will stop and delete vm which not belongs to cs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13268/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, edison su, and mice xia. Bug

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

For this the jenkins builds might be suitable. I think if those are running on all active release branches. On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 31.07.2013 16:30, Chip Childers wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:04:50AM +0100, Nux! wrote: >>> >>> On 14.05.2013 15:41, Chip Childer

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

On 31.07.2013 16:30, Chip Childers wrote: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:04:50AM +0100, Nux! wrote: On 14.05.2013 15:41, Chip Childers wrote: As a way to get more user feedback on our major feature releases, what does everyone think about releasing one or two -beta releases for each major feature

Re: Review Request 13267: CLOUDSTACK-4075: User unable to archive events.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13267/#review24648 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 5, 2013, 12:54 p.m., S

Re: Review Request 13267: CLOUDSTACK-4075: User unable to archive events.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13267/#review24647 --- Commit 8845aae0bc10474bf7dd59aea7be8a50ac40f9f5 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13267: CLOUDSTACK-4075: User unable to archive events.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13267/#review24646 --- Commit e0c6073a80ef5c1c8cff19b86289dc872b1b36f7 in branch refs/heads

Re: unable to view content of cwiki

Yes, I able to access them too. Rajesh, are you still can't access cwiki page? if yes, please share some example link. On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I've able to access the wiki all day so far. > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Rajesh Battala > wrote: > > Hi All, >

Re: unable to view content of cwiki

I've able to access the wiki all day so far. On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Rajesh Battala wrote: > Hi All, > > Am not able to view any link of cwiki. > Am getting permission denied to view any content. > Please let me know how to resolve this issue. > > Thanks > Rajesh Battala

Review Request 13267: CLOUDSTACK-4075: User unable to archive events.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13267/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4075 Reposi

Re: Review Request 12358: CLOUDSTACK-3228: system vms are not comming up in zone with two cluster xen and kvm

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/#review24644 --- Commit 40e7502bcb02a3301347f2debfb09a920306e796 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12358: CLOUDSTACK-3228: system vms are not comming up in zone with two cluster xen and kvm

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/#review24643 --- Commit 506f2a4b94299e626b19c17c444b2d4b3bbcc49f in branch refs/heads

RE: [Discuss] Making CloudMonkey simpler to use for admin tasks

> -Original Message- > From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Rohit Yadav > Sent: 02 August 2013 22:43 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Making CloudMonkey simpler to use for admin tasks > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Dona

RE: Reverting 17267794adb2bab923fb20515a7b943780d61921

+1, Although I did not add/edit/remove any sql statements in this file, it was a blank line that got removed in my patch. Enforcing it would prevent such slips to happen. Saksham -Original Message- From: Koushik Das Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 12:49 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; S

Re: Review Request 12358: CLOUDSTACK-3228: system vms are not comming up in zone with two cluster xen and kvm

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 11:12 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meht

Re: Review Request 13266: CLOUDSTACK-3925: Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Zone dedicated to any domain/account

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13266/#review24641 --- Review 13266 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

Review Request 13266: CLOUDSTACK-3925: Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Zone dedicated to any domain/account

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13266/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Prachi Damle. Bugs: 3925 Rep

Re: 4.1.1 released yet? RPMs?

Hi, No, it's not out there yet. The RPM and Deb packages will come online when the source has been released. It will be a minor upgrade, so it will just be a matter of installing the new packages and restarting the services. Wido On 08/05/2013 12:20 PM, France wrote: Hi All, is 4.1.1 offi

unable to view content of cwiki

Hi All, Am not able to view any link of cwiki. Am getting permission denied to view any content. Please let me know how to resolve this issue. Thanks Rajesh Battala

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 10:38 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su and

database upgrade

H, What is the policy for adding upgrade paths? I am working on upgrade from 4.1.1 already. So when do we add _upgradeMap.put("4.1.1", new DbUpgrade[] { new Upgrade410to420(), new Upgrade420to430() }); to DatabaseUpgradeChecker? thanks, Daan

4.1.1 released yet? RPMs?

Hi All, is 4.1.1 officially released? Where are / will be the RPMs and documentation for upgrading form 4.1.0? Regards, F.

Re: Review Request 13240: dealt with some warnings in NetworkServiceImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13240/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 9:59 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vitt

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 9:57 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vitt

Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/#review24640 --- test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py

Re: Review Request 13240: dealt with some warnings in NetworkServiceImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13240/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 9:36 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Sheng Yang.

Re: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.....

+1. It would be good to have a default field probably as well ? I would also want to have the fixVersion having default field and the release manager accordingly triaging it. I recently saw some of my bugs missed this information and the UI team didn't notice it. On 05/08/13 12:57 PM, "Ram Ganesh

RE: [Doc] PVLAN Doc is Ready for Review

The comments are incorporated. Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850 -Radhika -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 1:54 AM To: Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; Sudha Ponnaganti Subject: Re: [Doc] PVLAN D

api calls in 4.1.1

H, What is the status of 4.1.1 at this moment. I am getting several reports of api calls not working as before. I saw the vote passing by but didn't give them much attention. In jira I don't see much mention of such issues. Is this noticed by anybosy else? regards, Daan

Deleting affinity group while it's still in use

Hi all, Suppose I create affinity group and deploy vm which obeys this affinity rule. Now If I delete the affinity group even when it's in use by the vm, it gets deleted , and then I can't see that affinity group in vm's affinity group list. Is this a valid behavior? One of the test cases tries t

Re: is jira down. ?

Jira is down again. Thanks, Jayapal On 05-Aug-2013, at 12:25 PM, Rajesh Battala mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com>> wrote: Jira is up now. Looks like there was an issue with plugin and somebody Fixed it. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.ba

RE: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.....

> -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: 02 August 2013 23:36 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory. > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 11:06:53AM +, Ram Ganesh wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Wh

[Discuss] Using XenServer 6.2's Clone-on-Boot feature on CloudStack

Hi guys, Is anyone concerned about using XenServer 6.2's clone-on-boot feature on CloudStack? With it, we can quickly deploy a huge of VMs from a single golden template. This is amazing for some scenarios. For example: we can allocate a special/dedicated cluster with only one golden template. And

RE: Reverting 17267794adb2bab923fb20515a7b943780d61921

+1. Provided git allows to make a specific file as read-only. > -Original Message- > From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 12:01 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Saksham Srivastava > Subject: Re: Reverting 17267794adb2bab923fb20515a7b943780d61

  1   2   >