Re: Resource Management/Allocation for CS

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:17:53PM +, Edison Su wrote: > > Haven't read the whole paper yet, but the above problem statement > resonates with me. Our current centralized allocation algorithm may > have problem in case of a large of concurrent VMs allocation. > Speaking of which CLOUDSTACK-2

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need code review process for code changes related to storage subsystem?

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 07:53:21PM +, Edison Su wrote: > > Edison, > > > > My understanding of our process is that the merges of significant changes > > should be proposed to the mailing list with the "[MERGE]" tag and wait up to > > 72 hours for feedback. I consider interface changes to meet

Re: Advanced Network Question

Great -- Thank you for the prompt response. - Maurice On 6/21/2013 8:50 PM, kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote: No sir, 2 separate architectures. You can download your templates or transfer then to the new zone however. Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: "Maurice L." To: Sub

Re: Advanced Network Question

No sir, 2 separate architectures. You can download your templates or transfer then to the new zone however. Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: "Maurice L." To: Subject: Advanced Network Question Date: Fri, Jun 21, 2013 6:44 PM Hello, Is it possible to convert a basic network to

Advanced Network Question

Hello, Is it possible to convert a basic network to an advanced network without jeopardizing the current instances? - Maurice

RE: NFS Cache storage query - an UI change where you can create a NFS Cache Storage independently

Sanjeev, I've made an UI change where you can create a NFS Cache Storage independently. After getting latest code from master branch, you'll see a new dropdown "Select view" in Infrastructure menu > Secondary Storage. Change "Select view" to "Cache Storage", then you'll see "Add NFS Cache Stor

RE: Resource Management/Allocation for CS

Found this paper sounds interesting: http://www.sigmetrics.org/sigmetrics2013/pdfs/p67.pdf "The physical infrastructure is divided into a large pool of compute and storage servers. The former are organized into clusters consisting of tens of servers (typically 32 or so). A public cloud may cont

Re: Resource Management/Allocation for CS

HiPrachi, Thank you for your reply. Surely, this helps. I will work on these implementations, and then report my ideas back to the community. Thanks, Pouya From: Prachi Damle To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" ; Linux TUX Sent: Saturday, 22 June 2013, 1:28 S

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2304 [ZWPS]NPE while migrating volume from one zone wide primary to another

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12025/#review22276 --- engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeVO.java

RE: Resource Management/Allocation for CS

Hi Pouya, All of CloudStack's RA heuristics are applied by deployment planner modules and host/storagepool allocators to decide the order in which resource(pods,clusters,hosts,storage pools) will be considered for a VM deployment/migration. Following are the existing flavors of these modules:

RE: [DISCUSS] Do we need code review process for code changes related to storage subsystem?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 1:22 PM > To: > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need code review process for code changes > related to storage subsystem? > > On Jun 21, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > > Ho

[ACS 42] Defect Metrics

Below is summary of defect status [1] - Unassigned and unresolved should be picked up by community members. Pl review if you can take them up (atleast blockers and critical on priority) Un Assigned and Un resolved Blocker 8 Critical 21 Major

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need code review process for code changes related to storage subsystem?

On Jun 21, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Edison Su wrote: > How about, for all the interfaces, DB schema changes, related to storage > subsystem, need to send out a merge request and push the patches into review > board? It's not only for feature development, but also for bug fixes. > I am not sure how man

RE: [DISCUSS] Do we need code review process for code changes related to storage subsystem?

How about, for all the interfaces, DB schema changes, related to storage subsystem, need to send out a merge request and push the patches into review board? It's not only for feature development, but also for bug fixes. I am not sure how many people want to review the changes related to storage

[ACS 42] Status of Features

Hi, Animesh mentioned that he is offline this week, so I am sending the report Current status of new features and Improvements [1]. -Some cleanup is required as there are 54 tickets in resolved status. Once Dev / QA and Doc activity is done, we can close these. If those respective owners can t

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need code review process for code changes related to storage subsystem?

Edison, The person pushing the merge request should highlight that it includes interface changes (regardless of whether or not it is a storage patch). I also think that we should be pushing all patches that rise to merge requests into Review Board to allow potential reviewers a place to cleanl

RE: [DISCUSS] Do we need code review process for code changes related to storage subsystem?

> -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 11:43 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: 'Chip Childers' > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need code review process for code changes > related to storage subsystem? > > Edison, > > My

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need code review process for code changes related to storage subsystem?

Edison, My understanding of our process is that the merges of significant changes should be proposed to the mailing list with the "[MERGE]" tag and wait up to 72 hours for feedback. I consider interface changes to meet that criteria given the potential to break other folks work. It sounds lik

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need code review process for code changes related to storage subsystem?

Just as an FYI, the code I sent off to John Burwell for review "accepts" the fact that we require a hypervisor type when creating primary storage now and expects the admin to pass in the type of "Any". I then made a small change elsewhere in the codebase so this would work in my situation. It mig

RE: [DISCUSS] Do we need code review process for code changes related to storage subsystem?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 5:42 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Edison Su > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need code review process for code changes > related to storage subsystem? > > On Thu, Jun 2

Re: Query String Request Authentication(QSRA) support by S3 providers

John, For S3, the api call createEntityExtractUrl is done on management server side; while for NFS secondary storage, if the implementation of createEntityExtractUrl will involve some code be executed in ssvm to copy template from the install location to a public accessible web server loca

Re: Error while update cloudstack from version 3.0.2 to 4.0.1

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 05:59:36PM +0800, Livio Lv wrote: > Hi all: > There is an error when i upgrade the version of cloudstack from 3.0.2 to > 4.0.1.The following are my steps: > 1. Use CloudStack-oss-3.0.2-1-rhel6.2.tar.gz. Execute ./install choose M > and D. > 2. Create zone and creat an instan

Re: ACS 4.1.1 release - bugfixes to backport

My fix involves mysql change, so I have to create schema-410to411.sql. The fix is already in master. Thanks -min On 6/21/13 9:59 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >Min is right. We should never change existing upgrade paths as it will >affect users who updated to 4.1.0. >Instead as Min suggesting,

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-702: Tests for Multiple IP Ranges

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11026/#review22259 --- Commit a6a49490fbcc344f8a37d8c2ef0254da3ae39d89 in branch refs/heads

Re: ACS 4.1.1 release - bugfixes to backport

Min is right. We should never change existing upgrade paths as it will affect users who updated to 4.1.0. Instead as Min suggesting, we should add a new upgrade path from 4.1.0 to 4.1.1. We should do it even when there are no changes. Min, we don't need schema-410to411.sql if there were no mysql c

Re: [Review Request] Re-enabling baremetal on master

Thank you all! I would commit the change to MASTER soon. --Sheng On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:22 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Yes > Happy to +1. Sheng, thanks for stepping up and getting this done. > > --David > On Jun 20, 2013 7:19 PM, "Chip Childers" > wrote: > > > Nice! I'm glad the feature ha

Re: ACS 4.1.1 release - bugfixes to backport

I don't get this. Based on my previous question on the dev list, we should create a new schema-410to411.sql and Upgrade410to411 to handle any upgrade from 4.1.0 to 4.1.1, that is how I made the commit in 4.1 for CLOUDSTACK-3015 (https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=1

Re: Review Request: SolidFire storage plug-in and enhancements to the storage framework and GUI

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11479/ --- (Updated June 21, 2013, 4:35 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su and

Early for CCC13

Hi, I'm an hour and a half(LAX) from Santa Clara. Anyone else in town early? Send me your numbers... Sent from my HTC

Re: HA Question

Great - thanks, Chip! On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:19:51AM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a quick question about VM HA. > > > > Does CloudStack depend on the HA features of the hypervisor or does it > > handle VM HA itse

Re: HA Question

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:19:51AM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I have a quick question about VM HA. > > Does CloudStack depend on the HA features of the hypervisor or does it > handle VM HA itself? The "CloudStack" HA feature is outside of the HV. You really have 3 choices - implemen

HA Question

Hi, I have a quick question about VM HA. Does CloudStack depend on the HA features of the hypervisor or does it handle VM HA itself? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cl

ha-handler

LS, Who is the goto-guy for the ha-handler (and will he be at ccc)? regards,

Re: Query String Request Authentication(QSRA) support by S3 providers

Min, (I apologize for my belated reply -- I lost track of this draft in the chaos of the last couple of days.) Upon further review, I think I feel into the confusion between management server and ssvm. This code is executing on the management server side, correct? Based on my "corrected" und

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-3064: Able to create VM from different account of the same domain without using Affinity group even the Zone is dedicated to an Account.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12028/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh. Description --- When a zo

Re: Resource Management/Allocation for CS

Dear John, More specifically, I'd been working on RA in distributed systems awhile, and also, I've presented a prototype for it. The most important thing that I've learnt is: talking about RA without regarding to workloads (e.g., HTC, MTC, BoT, Scientific, Data-Intensive, etc.) is not optimal a

Re: NFS Cache storage query

Edison, As I understand Chip's concern, if we can't safely disassociate a staging area from a zone, we will break zone deletion. My understanding of your 4.2 proposal is that the system administrator/operation can place the staging area in maintenance mod How would this address disassociatin

Re: Review Request: format codegenerator.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12027/#review22247 --- Ship it! applied to master 1c50f1c75665524857f7410f1b3525717dcfcd03

Re: VMWare changing the default vSwitch Name

Hi Sebastien No problem at all, I am blogging about it internally, so will share it. Cheers, Noel On 21 June 2013 14:18, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Noel King wrote: > > > Thanks for you assistance Sateesh certainly got my understanding further. > > I had an o

Re: easy bug to fix for new comer

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 03:28:48PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > five files to go. I may finish it on the plane or else next week. Very productive week for you! Thanks Daan.

Re: fixPath (was: committer wanted for review)

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 09:38:56AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > > > To my mind, we overuse String throughout the codebase when we > > > should either be using richer types provided by the Java runtime > > > (e.g. java.net.URI) or def

Re: easy bug to fix for new comer

five files to go. I may finish it on the plane or else next week. On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I submitted a biggy. please review this and consider whether pep8 is > beating the purpose of formatting. Espacially line length of 80 seems not > what you want. You'll want

Review Request: format codegenerator.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12027/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen. Description --- form

Re: VMWare changing the default vSwitch Name

On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Noel King wrote: > Thanks for you assistance Sateesh certainly got my understanding further. > I had an offline chat with Paul Angus about this and he advised to create a > brand new zone which picked up the correct switch. > > On this switch I learned that I cannot

Re: VMWare changing the default vSwitch Name

Thanks for you assistance Sateesh certainly got my understanding further. I had an offline chat with Paul Angus about this and he advised to create a brand new zone which picked up the correct switch. On this switch I learned that I cannot use the portgroup we created, but just let cloudstack use

Re: Resource Management/Allocation for CS

Pouya, What problem/issue/enhancements do you have in mind? If you are attending CloudStack Collab 2013, I will speaking on this topic on Monday @ 2:30 (How to Run from a Zombie: CloudStack Distributed Process Management). My slides will be available online after the talk as well. Thanks, -

Re: Review Request: format configGenerator

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12026/#review22246 --- Ship it! applied to master f0ab05dc041ddf48ba1584e7dcec16622b2004e0

Resource Management/Allocation for CS

Hi All, Does anybody can tell me which parts of CloudStack's source code are related to its Resource Allocation (RA) process? By RA, I mean the part of code that is responsible for VM migration or process migration, if there is any. As you know, there are two kinds of RA, to wit: 1) server side

Review Request: format configGenerator

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12026/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen. Description --- form

Re: Review Request: format dbConnection.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12024/#review22245 --- Ship it! applied to master 3e5937e01d7dd490309e5e9fb2122fbcdb77266b

Re: Review Request: format deployAndRun.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12023/#review22244 --- Ship it! applied to master 16e4f2ff7221bfbd4ac171aae4702e62f43574d3

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2304 [ZWPS]NPE while migrating volume from one zone wide primary to another

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12025/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Sateesh Chodapuneedi, edison su, Alex Huang, and

Re: Review Request: deployDataCentrer formatted

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12022/#review22243 --- Ship it! applied to master a65d2153f1a31b12cbb123109f4b4b128c26731a

Unable to add kvm host on latest master

Hi All, Am not able to add the kvm host in mgmt. server. I suspect something related to deserialization of json . Below is the exception log am getting. : 462-3878-9dfe-376b05a1bdfe-LibvirtComputingResource","name":"kvm56","id":5,"version":"4.2.0-SNAPSHOT","resourceName":"LibvirtComputingResource

Review Request: format dbConnection.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12024/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen. Description --- form

Review Request: format deployAndRun.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12023/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen. Description --- form

[GSoC] Encrypted passwords on LDAP.

Hi Guys, I'm using JNDI to connect to LDAP for user authentication. At the moment I'm just testing against an OpenLDAP server. I have my Context.SECURITY_AUTHENTICATION set to simple, however when some password encryption are used within LDAP it fails. Any idea how to solve this? clear - works b

Review Request: deployDataCentrer formatted

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12022/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen. Description --- depl

Re: easy bug to fix for new comer

I submitted a biggy. please review this and consider whether pep8 is beating the purpose of formatting. Espacially line length of 80 seems not what you want. You'll want your terminals show more character then that in this century. On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Y

Re: easy bug to fix for new comer

Yup - please skip that too. On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 09:56:47AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > how about sandbox? It doesn't sound like really long term strategic code > either. > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > > One other thing: You can skip pep8-ing the inte

Re: fixPath (was: committer wanted for review)

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 09:38:56AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > > > To my mind, we overuse String throughout the codebase when we > > > should either be using richer types provided by the Java runtime > > > (e.g. java.net.URI) or def

Re: easy bug to fix for new comer

how about sandbox? It doesn't sound like really long term strategic code either. On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > One other thing: You can skip pep8-ing the integration module since > that will be deprecated in the future. There's a lot of classes in > there so it'll

Re: fixPath (was: committer wanted for review)

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > To my mind, we overuse String throughout the codebase when we > > should either be using richer types provided by the Java runtime > > (e.g. java.net.URI) or defining custom value objects. In addition > > to better levering the type