Re: Review Request: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-3004 [script] ssvm_check remove the duplicate file from consoleproxy and include the script from secondary storage folder while packing iso

> On June 15, 2013, 5:53 a.m., ASF Subversion and Git Services wrote: > > Commit 6d140538c5efc394fda8a4ddc7cb72832470d0b3 in branch refs/heads/master > > from Rajesh Battala > > [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=6d14053 ] > > > > CLOUDSTACK-3004: remove duplicate ssvm

Re: Review Request: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-3004 [script] ssvm_check remove the duplicate file from consoleproxy and include the script from secondary storage folder while packing iso

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11874/#review21937 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Prasanna Santhanam On June 14, 2013, 10:09 a

Re: Review Request: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-3004 [script] ssvm_check remove the duplicate file from consoleproxy and include the script from secondary storage folder while packing iso

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11874/#review21936 --- Commit 6d140538c5efc394fda8a4ddc7cb72832470d0b3 in branch refs/heads

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master [Second round]

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 03:07:39AM +, Edison Su wrote: > Hi all, > The second round, call for merge object_store branch into master, is > coming! > The issues fixed: >1. All the major issues addressed by John are fixed: > 1.1 A cache storage replacement

Re: Summary of IRC meeting in #cloudstack-meeting, Wed Jun 12 17:08:56 2013

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:24:11AM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > While we're talking about bot etiquette... ;) If people used #info and > #action, important takeaway points would be included at the top of the > email. As it is, it's a bit hard to read through the logs if you just want > to get a jist

Infra Issues from the IRC meeting (Wed, Jun 12)

Saw a few infra topics being discussed in the meeting and there was talk of bringing it to the list so I'm taking this opportunity to explain some things behind it. > 17:22:44 [Animesh]: I will send out my weekly reminder today on status and > include Sudha's test results > 17:23:28 [topcloud]:

Re: Automation analysis improvement

Indeed - expunge, storage, account cleanups are set to 60s on all automated test environments I've setup. The cleanup process works as below: setUpClass() -> creates user account, creates user resources testXxx() -> test steps and verify within the account tearDownClass() -> cleanup resources acq

Re: Bugs on Master

I will check and see how the API is handled now that the UI is fixed. Thanks, will On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Now that the UI works, just use Firebug to figure out the API. > And file a doc bug on the API docs. > (and submit a fix

[MERGE]object_store branch into master [Second round]

Hi all, The second round, call for merge object_store branch into master, is coming! The issues fixed: 1. All the major issues addressed by John are fixed: 1.1 A cache storage replacement algorithm is added: StorageCacheReplacementAlgorithmLRU, based on the

Re: Bugs on Master

Now that the UI works, just use Firebug to figure out the API. And file a doc bug on the API docs. (and submit a fix for the said bug :)) On 6/14/13 5:43 PM, "Will Stevens" wrote: >Thanks Sheng, that fixed the problem with the UI. > > >On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Will Stevens >wrote: > >>

Re: Bugs on Master

Thanks Sheng, that fixed the problem with the UI. On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Yes, I am building nonoss. I actually have written my own network service > provider plugin, so I was just using junipersrx as an example. I will > actually be using my own. > > My problem

Re: Bugs on Master

Yes, I am building nonoss. I actually have written my own network service provider plugin, so I was just using junipersrx as an example. I will actually be using my own. My problem is that the API docs for createNetworkOffering ( http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/root_admin/create

Re: Bugs on Master

Could you check if following commit fixed your problem? It's checked in 3 hours ago. commit 4b2eb18cfc82093640b2cb6c47c0378e69b9f8a2 Author: Jessica Wang Date: Fri Jun 14 14:17:50 2013 -0700 CLOUDSTACK-2981: UI - create network offering - fix a bug that provider dropdown always bounced bac

Re: Bugs on Master

Did you build the nonoss build? You have to add the SRX provider using addNetworkServiceProvider api, enable it and then the drop down for network offering should work. On 6/14/13 12:09 PM, "Will Stevens" wrote: >BTW, I am using cloudmonkey 4.1.0... Thx > > >On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Wi

Re: SRX Integration Issues.

I am going to enter a bug for this and submit a patch.. v/r Sean On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > Oh yes, that explain the thing... > > --Sheng > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Sean Truman wrote: > > > SOLVED: My password had a $ in it.. which has to be escaped.. I a

Re: SRX Integration Issues.

Oh yes, that explain the thing... --Sheng On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Sean Truman wrote: > SOLVED: My password had a $ in it.. which has to be escaped.. I added more > logging to the SRX source to track it down. > > v/r > Sean > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Sean Truman wrote: > >

Re: SRX Integration Issues.

I meant, this looks like mgmt server Java error rather than SRX error. This is from your log: 1. 2013-06-14 09:26:29,327 WARN [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-37:job-65) class com.cloud.api.ServerApiException : Illegal group reference See also: http://stackoverflow.com/question

Re: SRX Integration Issues.

SOLVED: My password had a $ in it.. which has to be escaped.. I added more logging to the SRX source to track it down. v/r Sean On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Sean Truman wrote: > Looking through the source their isn't much logging, plus it's all over > SSL so I cannot see the traffic being

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Simon, I completely agree with you regarding SAN complexities and their associated performance guarantees. To that end, I am encouraging that we start out with a very simple approach -- let the operator tell us how many IOPS we can commit to the device rather than trying to somehow devise it f

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

John, I'm not arguing that CloudStack's job isn't to provide resource management. The challenge here is we're talking about managing a resource that is extremely complex in a very 'one size fits all' manner. For example, lets say you have a SAN that supports storage tiering, and can dynamica

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

I am OK with that approach, John. So, let me review to make sure I follow you correctly: We introduce two new parameters to the plug-in: Number of Total IOPS for the SAN and an overcommit ratio. (On a side note, if we are just multiplying the two numbers, why don't we have the user just input the

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, I apologize for not being clear -- this conversation has been admittedly disjoint. I think we should allow the maximum IOPS and overcommitment values to be updated though I would recommend restricting updates to to be an increasing value for 4.2 (e.g. users can increase the number of tot

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Also, as far as I remember, we just introduced overcommit ratios (for CPU and memory) when creating/editing clusters in 4.2, so we did survive as a product before that (albeit great) feature was introduced. On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: >

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

"the administrator/operator simply needs to tell us the total number of IOPS that can be committed to it and an overcommitment factor." Are you thinking when we create a plug-in as primary storage that we say - up front - how many IOPS the SAN can handle? That is not a good move, in my opinion. O

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Simon, Yes, it is CloudStack's job to protect, as best it can, from oversubscribing resources. I would argue that resource management is one, if not the most, important functions of the system. It is no different than the allocation/planning performed for hosts relative to cores and memory.

Re: Bugs on Master

BTW, I am using cloudmonkey 4.1.0... Thx On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Chiradeep, can you send me the format of the cloudmonkey call for the api > request 'createNetworkOffering' with 'supportedservices' of > 'dhcp:virtualrouter', 'dns:virtualrouter', 'firewall:juniper

Re: Bugs on Master

Chiradeep, can you send me the format of the cloudmonkey call for the api request 'createNetworkOffering' with 'supportedservices' of 'dhcp:virtualrouter', 'dns:virtualrouter', 'firewall:junipersrx'. I can not figure out the format of this call. I have confirmed that I can reproduce the issue of

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

That is the route I was trying to go with this, Simon. I agree with what you're saying. We cannot assume the SAN is dedicated to CS. That is why - if we have to do this for 4.2 - I need to have a dedicated timer thread (or something) that updates the total and consumed IOPS. If we just use the vo

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

I'd like to comment on this briefly. I think an assumption is being made that the SAN is being dedicated to a CS instance. My person opinion that this whole IOPS calculation is getting rather complicated, and could probably be much simpler than this. Over subscription is a fact of life on

Re: Automation analysis improvement

I'm +1 on this. I feel global setting (relating to expunge and cleanup) should be set to aggressively expunge deleted resources, then delete the user resources... before deleting the account. That way we can verify garbage collection of resources is working properly. Ahmad On Jun 14, 2013, at

Re: SRX Integration Issues.

Looking through the source their isn't much logging, plus it's all over SSL so I cannot see the traffic being passed using tcpdump. Sean On Jun 14, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > It looks like a string issue of Java itself. What exactly failed on > test.xml? > > --Sheng > > > On Fri

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

1) We want number of IOPS currently supported by the SAN. 2) We want the number of IOPS that are committed (sum of min IOPS for each volume). We could do the following to keep track of IOPS: The plug-in could have a timer thread that goes off every, say, 1 minute. It could query the SAN for the

Re: Test halting build every now and then

I actually opened an issue for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2863 I've seen the failure using both wireless and ether on Mac OS X (10.8.4) from Terminal. Thanks, Shane On Friday, June 14, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > localhost

Re: SRX Integration Issues.

Looking up the trust group, I am not seeing any exceptions in the log files. Sean On Jun 14, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > It looks like a string issue of Java itself. What exactly failed on > test.xml? > > --Sheng > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sean Truman wrote: > >> I a

Re: Bugs on Master

I will try that. I am doing some testing right now. I am compiling and running just master now to validate everything. I will be in touch when I have more details... ws On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Are you able to use CloudMonkey?

Re: SRX Integration Issues.

It looks like a string issue of Java itself. What exactly failed on test.xml? --Sheng On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sean Truman wrote: > I am using untagged VLAN on my public side. It's failing on the test.xml > looking for trust group! > > Sean > > On Jun 14, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Jayapal Red

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

"As I mentioned previously, I am very reluctant for any feature to come into master that can exhaust resources." Just wanted to mention that, worst case, the SAN would fail creation of the volume before allowing a new volume to break the system. On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Mike Tutkowski <

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Hi John, Are you thinking we add a column on to the storage pool table, IOPS_Count, where we add and subtract committed IOPS? That is easy enough. How do you want to determine what the SAN is capable of supporting IOPS wise? Remember we're dealing with a dynamic SAN here...as you add storage nod

Re: Master Branch problem cannot login

The column is added by the upgrade script setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql Since 4.1 the schema is always 4.0 + upgrade scripts, I believe. On 6/13/13 11:36 PM, "Soheil Eizadi" wrote: >I synced today, initialized the database and built image and found that I >could not login to the CS UI. Not sur

Re: Hack Day at CloudStack Collaboration Conference

Sounds good I will update the Wiki. On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hi Mike, > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013, at 03:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > I was wondering if we have the following documentation (below). If not, I > > was thinking it might be a good session to discu

Re: Automation analysis improvement

+1 On 6/14/13 8:54 AM, "Rayees Namathponnan" wrote: >Many of the automation test cases are not tearing down the account >properly; due to this resources are not getting released and followed >test cases getting failed during VM deployment itself. > >During automation run accounts are created wi

Re: Bugs on Master

Are you able to use CloudMonkey? Perhaps it is a UI issue? On 6/14/13 9:50 AM, "Will Stevens" wrote: >11 days ago I pulled the master code into my branch. Master was at: >48913679e80e50228b1bd4b3d17fe5245461626a > >When I pulled, I had Egress firewall rules working perfectly. After the >pull I

Re: tests involving deploying a vm fail

Unfortunately, attachments are dropped on this list. You'll need to use paste bin or something and provide a URL. On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Shane Witbeck wrote: > HI Prachi, > > I've attached the management server log file. > > Thanks, > Shane > > On Thursday, June 13, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Pr

Re: tests involving deploying a vm fail

HI Prachi, I've attached the management server log file. Thanks, Shane On Thursday, June 13, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Prachi Damle wrote: > Shane, > > Can you share the management server log file? > > Prachi > > -Original Message- > From: Shane Witbeck [mailto:sh...@digitalsanctum.com]

Re: Hack Day at CloudStack Collaboration Conference

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013, at 03:46 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I added 'secondary storage maintenance mode' > as a session. I don't mind to take ideas in advance! Thanks Daan! Look forward to meeting you at the conference! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissoc

Re: Git question about applying patch files

Well, base on your situation, seems only thing you can do is use git-merge to merge your branch back to master. But since you're not a committer, so you cannot push (merged) master directly. Some time people would create another remote repo and ask for pull. But that's for very big changes mostly.

Re: Hack Day at CloudStack Collaboration Conference

Hi Mike, On Thu, Jun 13, 2013, at 03:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > I was wondering if we have the following documentation (below). If not, I > was thinking it might be a good session to discuss and start in (at a > high level) on developing such documentation. > > 1) Class diagrams highlighting

Re: Object based Secondary storage.

HI Tom, You can file JIRA ticket for object_store branch by prefixing your bug with "Object_Store_Refactor" and mentioning that it is using build from object_store. Here is an example bug filed from Sangeetha against object_store branch build: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTA

Re: SRX Integration Issues.

I am using untagged VLAN on my public side. It's failing on the test.xml looking for trust group! Sean On Jun 14, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi, > > I am not sure about the error but please see the below example configuration > and correct your configuration. > > > E

Re: SRX Integration Issues.

Hi, I am not sure about the error but please see the below example configuration and correct your configuration. Example confirmation: > Public Interface: fe-0/0/4.52 > Private Interface: fe-0/0/1 fe-0/0/1 - private interface fe-0/0/4.52 - public interface where my public network vlan id is

Bugs on Master

11 days ago I pulled the master code into my branch. Master was at: 48913679e80e50228b1bd4b3d17fe5245461626a When I pulled, I had Egress firewall rules working perfectly. After the pull I now get the following error when trying to create Egress firewall rules: ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (178414

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, Querying the SAN only indicates the number of IOPS currently in use. The allocator needs to check the number of IOPS committed which is tracked by CloudStack. For 4.2, we should be able to query the number of IOPS committed to a DataStore, and determine whether or not the number request

Re: Object_Store storage refactor Meeting Notes

One comment regarding upgrade path: due to internal DB schema change documented in our FS: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Storage+Backup+Objec t+Store+Plugin+Framework, we do need to handle upgrade cases in 4.2, which are mainly related to data migration in DB level. I am wo

Re: NFS Cache storage query

Hi Sanjeev, In 4.2 release, we require that a NFS cache storage has to be added if you choose S3 as the storage provider since we haven't refactored hypervisor side code to handle s3 directly by bypassing NFS caching, which is the goal for 4.3 release. I see an issue with current UI, where

SRX Integration Issues.

All, I am trying to add an SRX 100 to Cloud Stack and keep getting a "Illegal Group Reference" Here is how I am trying to add the config. IP Address: 10.0.2.1 Username: root Password: password Type: Juniper SRX Firewall Public Interface: fe-0/0/0.0 Private Interface: fe-0/0/1.0 Usage interface: N

Re: committer wanted for review

Daan, Since a WARN indicates a condition that could lead to system instability, many folks configure their log analysis to trigger notifications on WARN and INFO. Does escaping a character in a path warrant meet that criteria? Thanks, -John On Jun 14, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:

Automation analysis improvement

Many of the automation test cases are not tearing down the account properly; due to this resources are not getting released and followed test cases getting failed during VM deployment itself. During automation run accounts are created with random number without any reference for test case (eg

Re: committer wanted for review

H John, I browsed through your comments and most I will apply. There is one where you contradict Hiroaki. This is about the logging level for reporting a changed path. I am going to follow my heart at this unless there is a project directive on it. regards, Daan On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:25 PM,

RE: Review Request: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-3004 [script] ssvm_check remove the duplicate file from consoleproxy and include the script from secondary storage folder while packing iso

Is it because the patch contains removing file ? > -Original Message- > From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Nitin > Mehta > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 8:24 PM > To: Chip Childers > Cc: Rajesh Battala; cloudstack; Nitin Mehta > Subject: Re: Review Request: Fi

Re: committer wanted for review

Daan, I just looked through the review request, and published my comments. Thanks, -John On Jun 14, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Hiroaki, > > - auto-fix may happen where it is really required >> > I do not have a clear view on this, so I took the approach of better safe > then s

Re: Review Request: double slash fix for windows based nfs servers [CLOUDSTACK-2968]

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11861/#review21907 --- api/src/com/cloud/storage/template/TemplateInfo.java

Re: Review Request: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-3004 [script] ssvm_check remove the duplicate file from consoleproxy and include the script from secondary storage folder while packing iso

> On June 14, 2013, 2:44 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > Ship It! Hi Rajesh - I get the error below while trying to apply your fix. Could you please correct and resubmit ? Nitins-MacBook-Air:cloudstack nitinmehta$ git apply --whitespace=fix ../0001-CLOUDSTACK-3004-\[script\]-ssvm_check-remove-t

enableStorageMaintenance

…works great for putting down the storage into maintenance mode (looking forward seeing this for secondary storage as well!). Now the question is, after I've run it… how do I know when it is done so I can operate on the volume? Poll using updateStoragePool and query the state for "Maintenance"?

Re: Review Request: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-3004 [script] ssvm_check remove the duplicate file from consoleproxy and include the script from secondary storage folder while packing iso

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11874/#review21905 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Nitin Mehta On June 14, 2013, 10:09 a.m., Ra

Re: Test halting build every now and then

I just did the same after it failed, I took my laptop to work yesterday, no problem. Today at devopsdays it wouldn't goo past the NioTest again. I checked localhost (with autodomains of different kinds) it didn't matter if it resolved to 127.0.0.1 or to a public ip adres. still looking, Daan On

Re: committer wanted for review

Hiroaki, - auto-fix may happen where it is really required > I do not have a clear view on this, so I took the approach of better safe then sorry. The submitted is what works. I don't see how the auto-fix should ever be needed if the source is fixed. Hope you can live with this. > - and if auto-f

Re: Review Request: double slash fix for windows based nfs servers [CLOUDSTACK-2968]

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11861/ --- (Updated June 14, 2013, 2:18 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes ---

Re: Object_Store storage refactor Meeting Notes

Nitin, Please see my comments in-line below. Thanks, -John On Jun 14, 2013, at 4:16 AM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > > > On 13/06/13 10:08 PM, "John Burwell" wrote: > >> All, >> >> Edison Su, Min Chen, Animesh Chaturvedi, and myself met via >> teleconference on 11 June 2013 @ 1:30 PM EDT. The go

Re: Using "In Progress" status in JIRA

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:00:33AM +, Koushik Das wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 6:32 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Using "In Progress" status in JIRA > > > > Folks

Re: NFS Cache storage query

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:06:30PM +, Sanjeev Neelarapu wrote: > Hi, > > I have a query on how to add NFS Cache storage. > Before creating a zone if we create a secondary storage with s3 as the > storage provider and don't select NFS Cache Storage then we treat it as S3 at > region level. >

Re: Object_Store storage refactor Meeting Notes

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:13:37AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] I was not sure if we have an open slot in Collab for design > session on storage discussed above but now that Joe mentioned the HackDay > being an open collaborative day in other email it's probably best to have > t

RE: instance is not coming on the vmware deployment

The issue would be ssh keys or the VR is not up > -Original Message- > From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 6:55 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: instance is not coming on the vmware deployment > > I am enco

instance is not coming on the vmware deployment

I am encountering the following error while deploying VM . Has anyone observed this issue? (DirectAgent-207:10.147.40.24) Failed to authentication SSH user root on host 10.147.40.168 2013-06-14 21:27:01,711 ERROR [vmware.resource.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-207:10.147.40.24) Unable to execute

NFS Cache storage query

Hi, I have a query on how to add NFS Cache storage. Before creating a zone if we create a secondary storage with s3 as the storage provider and don't select NFS Cache Storage then we treat it as S3 at region level. Later I create a zone and at "add secondary storage" creation wizard in UI if I

Re: Summary of IRC meeting in #cloudstack-meeting, Wed Jun 12 17:08:56 2013

While we're talking about bot etiquette... ;) If people used #info and #action, important takeaway points would be included at the top of the email. As it is, it's a bit hard to read through the logs if you just want to get a jist. On 13 June 2013 15:56, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13,

RE: Regarding ssvm-check script

I had fixed the issue and posted the patch for the review @https://reviews.apache.org/r/11874/ Thanks Rajesh Battala > -Original Message- > From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 1:38 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: Regar

Review Request: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-3004 [script] ssvm_check remove the duplicate file from consoleproxy and include the script from secondary storage folder while packing iso

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11874/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- Issue: .T

Re: Object based Secondary storage.

Edison, I've got devcloud running along with the object_store branch and I've finally been able to test a bit today. I found some issues (or things that I think are bugs) and would like to file a few issues. I know where the bug database is and I have an account but what is the best way to file b

Re: Hack Day at CloudStack Collaboration Conference

I added 'secondary storage maintenance mode' as a session. I don't mind to take ideas in advance! Daan On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if we have the following documentation (below). If not, I > was thinking it m

Re: committer wanted for review

Thanks Hiroaki, On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Hiroaki KAWAI wrote: > I'd suggest: > - fix the generation of double slash itself > Is in the patch > - auto-fix may happen where it is really required > - and if auto-fix happens, it should log it with > WARN level. Good point, I will up the lev

Re: Object_Store storage refactor Meeting Notes

On 13/06/13 10:08 PM, "John Burwell" wrote: >All, > >Edison Su, Min Chen, Animesh Chaturvedi, and myself met via >teleconference on 11 June 2013 @ 1:30 PM EDT. The goal of the meeting >was determine the path forward for merging the object_store branch by the >4.2 freeze date, 30 June 2013. Th

RE: Regarding ssvm-check script

I had created a ticket for the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3004 Will work on it and send the patch for the review. Fix would be, remove the script from console proxy folder, modify the systemvm-description.xml to include the ssvm_check file from the proper location

RE: Using "In Progress" status in JIRA

> -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 6:32 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Using "In Progress" status in JIRA > > Folks > > It seems that we do not use "In Progress" status in JIRA as often as we

RE: Regarding ssvm-check script

Nitin, Yes, the ssvm under console proxy should be removed. It make more sense for the script to be coming from secondary-storage folder path. If you are removing the script under consoleproxy, make the change in the systemvm-description.xml to pick the ssvm script from the secondary storage s