Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2180: restoreVirtualMachine returns no password if the template is password enabled

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10772/#review19996 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On April 25, 2013, 9:05 a

Re: Review Request: Source NAT on private gateway feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10833/#review19995 --- In general looks good. Will wait for a review from Murali or Chirade

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-741: Granular Global Parameters

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10548/#review19994 --- Commit 10b6c1c6c8f8c2ec49145a901fb083e7f362f3a1 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-741 global granular parameters and CLOUDSTACK-2036 router template Id

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10862/#review19993 --- Commit 10b6c1c6c8f8c2ec49145a901fb083e7f362f3a1 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-741 global granular parameters and CLOUDSTACK-2036 router template Id

> On May 1, 2013, 6:21 a.m., Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > Ship It! Waiting for nitin's review. - Abhinandan --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10862/#review19991 ---

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-741 global granular parameters and CLOUDSTACK-2036 router template Id

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10862/#review19990 --- Ship it! server/src/com/cloud/configuration/Config.java

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-741 global granular parameters and CLOUDSTACK-2036 router template Id

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10862/#review19991 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On April 30, 2013, 1:42 p

Re: Virtual Router: DHCP and 2-second DNS outages

that's strange, because the dnsmasq man page explicitly calls out the SIGHUP as a way to reconfigure DHCP hosts entries from a --dhcp-hostsfile parameter. Or are these not the same thing? On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > On 4/30/13 3:2

Re: Renaming updateVMAffinityGroup -> updateAffinityGroup

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:31:46AM -0700, Prachi Damle wrote: > Hi Prasanna, > > The API is to update a VirtualMachine's affinity group associations > - it's not really an update operation on an affinity group - hence > the odd naming. The resource the API is acting on is a VM. > Please suggest a

Re: New Committer: Clayton Weise

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:53:24PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack > has asked Clayton Weise to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce that he has accepted. > > Clayton is exceptionally active on the #cloudstack IRC channel,

Re: Why was this reverted?

Hi Alex, I looked back to understand why I made that change and it seems like a side-effect that came from when I merged the simulator branch. Not just your checkin, I seem to have overwritten some of the changes to the pom that I made post-graduation. I've reverted my checkin now and checked the

Re: New Committer: Clayton Weise

Congratulations :) On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Go Chiba wrote: > Congrats Clayton! > > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Clayton Weise wrote: > > > You know what this mean. Now I no longer have an excuse as to why the > > documentation we've put on the wiki can't be added to the official

Re: New Committer: Clayton Weise

Congrats Clayton! On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Clayton Weise wrote: > You know what this mean. Now I no longer have an excuse as to why the > documentation we've put on the wiki can't be added to the official > documentation for CS :) > > -Original Message- > From: Kelcey Damage (BT

RE: New Committer: Clayton Weise

Congrats Clayton! -Original Message- From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cwe...@iswest.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 8:06 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: New Committer: Clayton Weise You know what this mean. Now I no longer have an excuse as to why the documentation we've pu

Re: SSVM network throttling

On 04/30/2013 10:59 PM, Jeronimo Garcia wrote: Apparently it might be an issue with the BL460C g6 we're using ... it could be firmware . I'll update. I've seen odd "throttling" style issues originate from hardware acceleration in the host network cards for TCP connections. if you have receiv

RE: New Committer: Clayton Weise

Oh snap, you opened that can of worms... I had worked hard to sweep it under the rug lol >-Original Message- >From: Clayton Weise [mailto:cwe...@iswest.net] >Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 5:06 PM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: RE: New Committer: Clayton Weise > >You know wh

RE: New Committer: Clayton Weise

You know what this mean. Now I no longer have an excuse as to why the documentation we've put on the wiki can't be added to the official documentation for CS :) -Original Message- From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:55 AM To:

Re: Virtual Router: DHCP and 2-second DNS outages

On 4/30/13 3:26 PM, "Dennis Lawler" wrote: >Every time a new VM is started up, there is a 2 second outage in DNS >services that can cause problems in guest VMs that use the router VM for >DNS. > > > >For Cloudstack configurations using both DHCP and DNS services on the >router >VM (both implem

Network Resource Certificate Management

Hi, What is the deployment model for how the SSL Certificate for a Network Resource that is managed by CloudStack will get into the CloudStack KeyStore? For Dev/Test I can ignore the Certificate for now but would like to know how this will work for a real deployment. Are there CloudStack APIs to c

Virtual Router: DHCP and 2-second DNS outages

Every time a new VM is started up, there is a 2 second outage in DNS services that can cause problems in guest VMs that use the router VM for DNS. For Cloudstack configurations using both DHCP and DNS services on the router VM (both implemented with dnsmasq), there is currently a 2 second DNS s

Re: New Committer: Clayton Weise

Good show. On 4/30/13 1:29 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: >Congratulations Clayton > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:53 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Cc: cwe...@iswest.net >> Subject: New Commit

Re: [Docs] Questions on baremetal feature (CLOUDSTACK-774)

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Frank Zhang wrote: > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, April 29, 2013 10:02 PM > *To:* dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Frank Zhang > *Subject:* [Docs] Questions on baremetal feature (CLOUDSTACK-774) >

Re: SSVM network throttling

Apparently it might be an issue with the BL460C g6 we're using ... it could be firmware . I'll update. On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > There is one generic KVM system template that you should use; nothing > specific to Ubuntu. > > -Ale

Re: [GSoC][Proposal] Integration project to deploy and use Mesos on a CloudStack based cloud

On 4/30/13 5:01 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >Dharmesh, see in-line > >On Apr 30, 2013, at 5:34 AM, Dharmesh Kakadia wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am Dharmesh Kakdia and interested in project "Integration project to >> deploy and use Mesos on a CloudStack based cloud" ( >> https://issues.apache.

RE: [Docs] Questions on baremetal feature (CLOUDSTACK-774)

From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 10:02 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Frank Zhang Subject: [Docs] Questions on baremetal feature (CLOUDSTACK-774) I was finishing up a doc draft for this feature today, and generated the following technica

RE: New Committer: Clayton Weise

Congratulations Clayton > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:53 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: cwe...@iswest.net > Subject: New Committer: Clayton Weise > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apac

Re: SSVM network throttling

There is one generic KVM system template that you should use; nothing specific to Ubuntu. -Alena. On 4/30/13 12:31 PM, "Jeronimo Garcia" wrote: >Alena , one question more ... is there an specific SSVM that i should >download if I'm using ubuntu 12.10 as host? > >Thanks > > >On Tue, Apr 30, 2013

Re: New Committer: Clayton Weise

Well done Clayton, On Apr 30, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > Clayton, congratulations! > > On 4/30/13 9:53 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack >> has asked Clayton Weise to become a committer and we are pleased to >> ann

Re: SSVM network throttling

Alena , one question more ... is there an specific SSVM that i should download if I'm using ubuntu 12.10 as host? Thanks On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jeronimo Garcia wrote: > "networkRateMbps":-1, ... it is unlimited. > > We don't know what could be causing this ... scp transfers seem faste

Re: [GSoC] Discussion on "Create a cloud in a box using devcloud"

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Pulkit Singhal wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm interested in the project "Create a cloud in a box using DevCloud". > > I'm a MS student at IIIT-Hyderabad. I've good experience with Python, Bash, > openstack, Xen/KVM and automation(chef/puppet). > > As per my discussi

RE: [MERGE] Add/remove NICs UI support

This is now ready in master. Thanks, Brian -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 9:55 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Sonny Chhen; Animesh Chaturvedi Subject: Re: [MERGE] Add/remove NICs UI support On Fri, Apr 26, 201

Re: SSVM network throttling

"networkRateMbps":-1, ... it is unlimited. We don't know what could be causing this ... scp transfers seem faster than anything else.. On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > Sorry, read it from the management server log file. > > On 4/30/13 1

Re: SSVM network throttling

Sorry, read it from the management server log file. On 4/30/13 11:29 AM, "Jeronimo Garcia" wrote: >Hi there. >Thanks for your help > >is vmops.log in the SSVM or in the host running SSVM , i can't seem to >find >the file. > >Thanks > > >On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < >alena

Re: SSVM network throttling

Hi there. Thanks for your help is vmops.log in the SSVM or in the host running SSVM , i can't seem to find the file. Thanks On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi Jeronimo, > > The throttling rate for SSVM can either be taken from the sys

Re: Update on 4.1 blockers ?

Chip, Thanks Kelven On 4/30/13 10:54 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:58:17AM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: >> I'll pick up this one >> >> Kelven > >Your patch was pushed to the 4.1 branch Kelven. > >Let's see if we get a positive re-test result! > >-chip

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2194 fix ApiServer intialization sequence

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10864/#review19972 --- Commit ce7dc70b1dd8c86b3e2de223eb0f09e23172d1a0 in branch refs/heads

Re: SSVM network throttling

Hi Jeronimo, The throttling rate for SSVM can either be taken from the system network offering (for Control/Public/Storage traffic types); or if its set to NULL on the network offering, it gets taken from the global config. By default, on the system network offerings the rate is set to 0 - unlimit

Re: Review Request: Volume snapshot enhancements for vmware

> On April 30, 2013, 5:42 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > This can be discarded in favour of the new patch? This patch needs to be in first, before the newer patch. . the newer patch contains only the changed files. this patch has the 4 new files. These four new files are not included in

RE: [DISCUSS] UI automation using Python/Selenium

We need to come up with a naming scheme. And what elements to include. Any suggestions for that? Thanks, .. Parth -Original Message- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 7:45 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] U

Re: Review Request: Selenium Headless configuration using PhantomJS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10846/ --- (Updated April 30, 2013, 5:56 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley

Re: Update on 4.1 blockers ?

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:58:17AM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: > I'll pick up this one > > Kelven Your patch was pushed to the 4.1 branch Kelven. Let's see if we get a positive re-test result! -chip

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2194 fix ApiServer intialization sequence

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10864/#review19966 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chip Childers On April 30, 2013, 5:38 p.m.,

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2194 fix ApiServer intialization sequence

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10864/#review19965 --- Commit c2457b52889928afa906b3f634c4fd54f879b878 in branch refs/heads

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2194 fix ApiServer intialization sequence

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10864/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- Initializ

RE: Renaming updateVMAffinityGroup -> updateAffinityGroup

Hi Prasanna, The API is to update a VirtualMachine's affinity group associations - it's not really an update operation on an affinity group - hence the odd naming. The resource the API is acting on is a VM. Please suggest any other name that seems meaningful and fits the conventions... -Prachi

Re: Update on 4.1 blockers ?

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:58:17AM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: > I'll pick up this one > > Kelven Thanks Kelven! -chip

Re: New Committer: Clayton Weise

Clayton, congratulations! On 4/30/13 9:53 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack >has asked Clayton Weise to become a committer and we are pleased to >announce that he has accepted. > >Clayton is exceptionally active on the #cloudstack IRC channe

Re: Update on 4.1 blockers ?

I'll pick up this one Kelven On 4/30/13 5:53 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >Nicolas also added a new comment: > >"Same bug with another component. >Before database upgrade process, CS try to read configuration for the >ApiServer initialization. And all entries which have category=hidden >aren

Re: New Committer: Clayton Weise

Congrats Clayton! On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack > has asked Clayton Weise to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce that he has accepted. > > Clayton is exceptionally active on the #cloudstack IRC

RE: New Committer: Clayton Weise

It's about time! Lol. Now I have an official partner in crime >-Original Message- >From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:53 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Cc: cwe...@iswest.net >Subject: New Committer: Clayton Weise > >The Project

New Committer: Clayton Weise

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Clayton Weise to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Clayton is exceptionally active on the #cloudstack IRC channel, helping users with all sorts of questions and support topics. He's also

Why was this reverted?

Hi Prasanna, I come back from vacation and find that a special configuration I put into the pom.xml to avoid eclipse and maven build to conflict with each other has been reverted. I checked the commit comments and there's nothing in the comments why this is reverted. Please let me know why it

Re: [MERGE] CS-2163

Min - Thanks for your questions. I have updated the FS with the list Apis. I also updated the FS with the DB view changes. This was already done while submitting the merge request.Thanks for pointing this out. Thanks, -Nitin On 29/04/13 11:07 PM, "Min Chen" wrote: >Nitin, > > I have sever

Re: [MERGE] CS-2163

+1 to Prasanna's argument. Tags provide more flexibility and extensibility than adding column to existing db schema. What happens if later on we want to add finer control to these resources not specific to end user? Adding another column? Also, I haven't seen your answer to my questions in this t

Re: [MERGE] CS-2163

Also - tags supports many more resources in CloudStack already as compared to the resources you are adding for meta-information. All the more reason to enhance existing APIs? On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:21:39PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:25:40AM +, Nitin Mehta

Re: Review Request: When associating an IP to a VPC allow admin's to specify what IP they want to associate. (CLOUDSTACK-1942)

Sorry - I never got to this in time. +1 to merge and I'll take a look at the marvin test post-merge. On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 02:48:23PM -, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > htt

Re: [MERGE] CS-2163

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:25:40AM +, Nitin Mehta wrote: > Prasanna - Thanks for your question. The reasons for not using createTags > are as follows :- > > - tags functionality is for grouping resources than adding meta > information and is allowed to all users. What I am proposing is for the

Re: Review Request: Fix NPE in the planner, in the case that pool ID cannot be looked up in database when deploying a VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10842/#review19952 --- Ship it! committed commit 75832c893b342c905d692e893a46af3dfd838943

Re: Review Request: When associating an IP to a VPC allow admin's to specify what IP they want to associate. (CLOUDSTACK-1942)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10423/#review19951 --- The crickets have it. This patch doesn't apply cleanly. If you coul

Re: [DOCS] Rebuilding Docs this weekend + adding draft docs

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:56:01AM -0700, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > By this I assume you mean putting them up on the site, > http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/, is that correct? Yes > btw, I don't think I have permissions on the infrastructure, so I can't > help with uploading new doc versions.

Renaming updateVMAffinityGroup -> updateAffinityGroup

Hi Prachi, Sorry for bringing this up so late - Since the feature is not yet released and the API not out in the wild I thought perhaps the name updateVmAffinityGroup makes more sense as updateAffinityGroup. This will make it conform with the rest of the APIs associated with AffinityGroups(creat

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-741 global granular parameters and CLOUDSTACK-2036 router template Id

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10862/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Nitin Mehta. Description

VM with wrong Service Offering avec host went into maintenance mode ?

Hi to the list, A customer notified us that one of its VM is wrongly displayed in CS. This VM shows up using a service offering of 1 vCPU and 1 GB of RAM when it is a 4vCPU and 8GB VM in vCenter, which is confirmed in the OS itself. Context : - CloudStack 2.2.13 - VMware ESXi 5.0 - VM is a "class

Re: Update on 4.1 blockers ?

Nicolas also added a new comment: "Same bug with another component. Before database upgrade process, CS try to read configuration for the ApiServer initialization. And all entries which have category=hidden aren't encrypted. It is possible to force DatabaseUpgrade process to be the first componen

[EVENTS] Linux Tag Berlin May 22-25

Hi, [BCC users@] I managed to get an Apache CloudStack booth at Linux Tag Berlin, May 22-25. I need help to man the booth and talk about CloudStack. If you are interested please let me know asap so that I request an exhibitor badge for you. thanks, -Sebastien

Re: [GSoC][Proposal] Integration project to deploy and use Mesos on a CloudStack based cloud

Dharmesh, see in-line On Apr 30, 2013, at 5:34 AM, Dharmesh Kakadia wrote: > Hi, > > I am Dharmesh Kakdia and interested in project "Integration project to > deploy and use Mesos on a CloudStack based cloud" ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1784) > > I am working on proposa

[GSoC] Discussion on "Create a cloud in a box using devcloud"

Hi everyone, I'm interested in the project "Create a cloud in a box using DevCloud". I'm a MS student at IIIT-Hyderabad. I've good experience with Python, Bash, openstack, Xen/KVM and automation(chef/puppet). As per my discussion with Sebastien, my understanding is that the project aims to exten

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-702: Tests for Multiple IP Ranges

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10861/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santhanam and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.

Re: [DOCS][TRANSLATIONS] Upate

On Apr 30, 2013, at 5:26 AM, Isaac Chiang wrote: > Hi Sebastien: > > We're hosting a blog for CloudStack in Taiwan. I've write an article for > sharing the translation experience with Transifex. Hope it does help :) > > http://www.cloudstack-tw.org/2013/04/translation-with-transifex.html > >

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2087: Destroying the instance is not decrementing the primary storage usage [Resource Count table - No of volumes is not got decremented]

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10725/ --- (Updated April 30, 2013, 10:15 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Sin

[GSoC][Proposal] Integration project to deploy and use Mesos on a CloudStack based cloud

Hi, I am Dharmesh Kakdia and interested in project "Integration project to deploy and use Mesos on a CloudStack based cloud" ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1784) I am working on proposal and want to get feedback. Please provide suggestions :) * Abstract: The project aims to

Re: [DOCS] Rebuilding Docs this weekend + adding draft docs

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Jessica Tomechak < jessica.tomec...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Chip Childers > wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:15:42AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> > >> > On Apr 26, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> > >> > > H

Re: Update on 4.1 blockers ?

Hi, i merge this patch https://reviews.apache.org/r/10802/ in the 4.1 code. i try another upgrade. I put a comment on the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2194#comment-13645407 Le 29/04/2013 22:18, Chip Childers a écrit : On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 08:56:11AM -0400, Sebastien

Re: [DOCS][TRANSLATIONS] Upate

Hi Sebastien: We're hosting a blog for CloudStack in Taiwan. I've write an article for sharing the translation experience with Transifex. Hope it does help :) http://www.cloudstack-tw.org/2013/04/translation-with-transifex.html Let me know if I have to fix some wording, I'm really not good at th

Re: [MERGE] CS-2163

Prasanna - Thanks for your question. The reasons for not using createTags are as follows :- - tags functionality is for grouping resources than adding meta information and is allowed to all users. What I am proposing is for the admin to have better control over the first class objects in CS. This

Re: [DOCS] Rebuilding Docs this weekend + adding draft docs

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:15:42AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > > > On Apr 26, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > FYI - I'm planning on re-building the docs this weekend with Publican > > > 3.x and

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1748: IP Reservation results in reserving the broadcast IP of the network as well

> On April 18, 2013, 5:18 p.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: > > Since we are not creating subnets for guest CIDR, there is no need for a separate broadcast IP. The guest Broadcast will be same as the Network Broadcast. Currently this is the behaviour : CIDR 10.1.1.0/26 Network CIDR 10.1.1.0/2

Re: Review Request: Add docs for MidoNet networking plugin [CLOUDSTACK-996]

> On April 30, 2013, 8:01 a.m., Jessica Tomechak wrote: > > docs/en-US/plugin-midonet-preparations.xml, line 40 > > > > > > Believe the DTD requires a tag within each entry tag. Like > > Setting Name. The same comment

Re: Review Request: Add docs for MidoNet networking plugin [CLOUDSTACK-996]

> On April 30, 2013, 8:01 a.m., Jessica Tomechak wrote: > > docs/en-US/plugin-midonet-preparations.xml, line 40 > > > > > > Believe the DTD requires a tag within each entry tag. Like > > Setting Name. The same comment

[ACS42]Clarifications regarding VM Scaleup

Hi, 1) When I tried scaleVirtualMachine API to scale to Medium offering from small I get the response as Sync request. But Its calling an query AsyncJob with undefined as the jobId after sclaeup. Why ? API log : 2013-04-30 13:17:31,569 INFO [cloud.api.ApiServer] (ApiServer-7:null) (u

Re: Review Request: Add docs for MidoNet networking plugin [CLOUDSTACK-996]

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10136/#review19943 --- docs/en-US/plugin-midonet-preparations.xml

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2274 : The detail view doesn't recover from loading status when trying to delete a zone with physical network on it

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10860/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Saxena. Description --- According