Re: Error starting management server

What's your python command on the command line? And the json file that you passed in to run it. Put it up on apaste.info? -- Prasanna., On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 06:04:14PM +0530, Dharmesh Kakadia wrote: > Hi, > > I was able to only run management server. Now stuck at step-8. I tried > running it

Re: Error starting management server

Anyone ? I am not able to figure it out. On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Dharmesh Kakadia wrote: > Hi, > > I was able to only run management server. Now stuck at step-8. I tried > running it both way (mvn and python). > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "../marvin/marvin/deployDataC

Re: Review Request: Merging changes to marvin after ipclearance from cloudstack-qa

Sorry - failed to push this last night. Here's the actual commit: commit 2f40a90c53067c3901cf9e5c9a33309907e48aab Author: Ashutosh Kelkar Date: Wed Apr 24 15:03:10 2013 +0530 Multiple fixes to marvin framework 1. adding hypervisor information to configs TODO: support for m

Review Request: Multiple IP Ranges Support in CloudStack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10792/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Description --- Addi

RE: Trouble running CS MS from Eclipse

Mike, If you're using the default eclipse, it's very likely that your eclipse is using a much lower memory requirement. I'm not sure when you run within eclipse, if it's the same jvm or a different jvm. If it's the same jvm, you need to change eclipse to have more memory. You should be abl

Re: Review Request: updated cloud-early-config to copy iptables-* config files to rules file to work old templates

> On April 25, 2013, 4:54 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > patches/systemvm/debian/config/etc/init.d/cloud-early-config, line 770 > > > > > > Is this file for ipv6? I see a rules.v4? iptables-router (iptables-*) file is i

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2201 - Blocker

Hi, Created new build from 4.2 branch and installed, but management server failed start with below error 2013-04-25 22:01:06,015 INFO [utils.component.ComponentContext] (Timer-1:null) Running SystemIntegrityChecker premiumDatabaseUpgradeChecker 2013-04-25 22:01:06,015 INFO [cloud.upgrade.Dat

Re: Review Request: Adding more Granular Global Parameters

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 04:54:45AM -, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: > api/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationService.java > > > Need to avoid * imports per coding guidelines. Likely coming from the IDE auto importing. I had to fix thi

Re: Review Request: Adding more Granular Global Parameters

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10740/ --- (Updated April 26, 2013, 5:31 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

RE: [DOC][Review] Document ability to delete events and alerts

Thanks Parth. Sanjay, can I assume that the document is correct and close this defect ? Or should I wait for the changes you are planning to do on the UI ? -Original Message- From: Parth Jagirdar [mailto:parth.jagir...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 3:21 AM To: dev@cloudstack

Re: [ACS41] new critical bug

Ok, review request in. I applied it to master, but I think there's a whitespace issue or something that keeps it from applying to 4.1. It's basically Edison's patch plus a logger message in VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java that tells the admin why stopping the VM failed (unable to connect to agent).

Re: Review Request: Adding more Granular Global Parameters

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10740/#review19752 --- api/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationService.java

[ACS41][Patch Request]

CLOUDSTACK-2195 https://reviews.apache.org/r/10791/

Review Request: Don't return a UserVM object if we fail to stop vm

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10791/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers and edison su. Description ---

Re: Review Request: Adding more Granular Global Parameters

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10740/ --- (Updated April 26, 2013, 4:33 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: [ACS41] new critical bug

argh, that version of stopVirtualMachine (the one returning boolean) isn't even used! On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Actually it's that your patch is for the 'forced' stop. Still doesn't > apply to 4.1, but the code I'm looking at for the moment is the non-forced > st

Re: Password Enabled Templates

Thanks for the reply, the output is:[root@CentOS63 ~]#  chkconfig --list | grep cloud-set-guest-passwordcloud-set-guest-password    0:off    1:off    2:off    3:on    4:on    5:on    6:off[root@CentOS63 ~]# On Apr 25, 2013, at 11:58 PM, David Nalley wrote:On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Maurice

Re: [ACS41] new critical bug

Actually it's that your patch is for the 'forced' stop. Still doesn't apply to 4.1, but the code I'm looking at for the moment is the non-forced stop, which returns a boolean. On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Uh, nevermind, of course I can't return null there because it

Re: [ACS41] new critical bug

Uh, nevermind, of course I can't return null there because it requires a boolean in 4.1. I'll play with this a bit and get back with you. On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Thanks, Edison. That doesn't apply to 4.1, but it's basically the same as > the first hunk of my pa

Re: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

On 26 April 2013 05:32, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Let me attempt to summarize this thread, if I missed any glaring points feel > free to bring them up > > 4 months: > Proponents (9): Chip, Alex, David, Noah, Hugo, Joe, Sebastian, Prasanna, > Rohit > Reasoning: > * We have not given prop

Re: [ACS41] new critical bug

Thanks, Edison. That doesn't apply to 4.1, but it's basically the same as the first hunk of my patch above, just that it returns null instead of throwing an exception. I'm going to test that now. I didn't see why that CloudRuntimeException in the first hunk would be squelched, but the finally clau

Re: Password Enabled Templates

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Greetings: > > Try as I might, I cannot seem to get the password reset tool to work with > the instances created from a password enabled template. > > From what I read all that is required is: > > > Use the following steps to begin the Linu

Cluster Heartbeat

Greetings,Within my log of /var/log/cloud/management/management-cloud.log I am seeing the following: 2013-04-25 22:50:11,081 DEBUG [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl] (Cluster-Heartbeat-1:null) Detected management node left, id:1, nodeIP:MYIPADDRESS2013-04-25 22:50:11,081 INFO  [cloud.cluster.Cluste

Password Enabled Templates

Greetings:Try as I might, I cannot seem to get the password reset tool to work with the instances created from a password enabled template.From what I read all that is required is: Use the following steps to begin the Linux OS installation: Download the script file cloud-set-guest-password

Re: Review Request: Adding more Granular Global Parameters

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10740/ --- (Updated April 26, 2013, 3:37 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: Trouble running CS MS from Eclipse

Hi Alex, This file is not present on my computer. Eclipse must be using defaults for whatever values would have been in this file. Thanks, On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > What's your eclipse settings in eclipse.ini? > > --Alex > > > -Original Message- > > From: M

RE: Trouble running CS MS from Eclipse

What's your eclipse settings in eclipse.ini? --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 12:35 AM > To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Trouble running CS MS from Eclipse > > Hi, > > I'm getting a

Re: MS Run issue

-XX:MaxPermSize=800m is too luxury, according to memory-profiling result that I did before, for current CloudStack code base, permanent heap needs is a little more than 100 MB, I think -XX:MaxPermSize=128m should be okay, 256m would be a very safe bet. Kelven On 4/25/13 5:04 PM, "Parth Jagirdar"

Re: [ACS41]Patch Request

Thanks. Applied to master. -min On 4/25/13 4:59 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 04:24:06PM -0700, Min Chen wrote: >> Hi Chip, >> >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10789 is the patch for CLOUDSTACK-2196 >>and CLOUDSTACK-2126: fix missing async job status in listXXX api and >>

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2196 and CLOUDSTACK-2126: fix missing async job status in listXXX api and incorrect async job status in other async api.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10789/#review19747 --- Commit efb4471dc9b8204fd97e2f053fca0dfe1e9d922b in branch refs/heads

RE: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 5:11 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 05:02:05PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > Let

Re: [ACS41] New blocker for 4.1 - CLOUDSTACK-2194 - Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to encryption error

How's it looking Edison? On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Edison Su wrote: > I can take a look at it. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:49 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: [ACS41] New block

Re: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed!

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 02:51:10PM -0700, Prachi Damle wrote: > Chip, > > I just added the fix for CLOUDSTACK-2158 to master. Here is the commit info > to cherry-pick: > > > Commit hash: 232d44bf6e31898887b324bcdebbc659423917e4 > > In the applicationContext .xml , the context of the > '

Re: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 05:02:05PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Let me attempt to summarize this thread, if I missed any glaring points feel > free to bring them up > > 4 months: > Proponents (9): Chip, Alex, David, Noah, Hugo, Joe, Sebastian, Prasanna, > Rohit > Reasoning: > * We hav

RE: [ACS41] new critical bug

This code will do the magic: } finally { if (!stopped) { if (!forced) { s_logger.warn("Unable to stop vm " + vm); try { stateTransitTo(vm, Event.OperationFailed, vm.getHostId()); } catch (NoTransiti

Re: [ACS41]Patch Request

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 04:24:06PM -0700, Min Chen wrote: > Hi Chip, > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10789 is the patch for CLOUDSTACK-2196 and > CLOUDSTACK-2126: fix missing async job status in listXXX api and incorrect > async job status in other async api. Can you please commit it to 4.1? >

RE: MS Run issue

Well resolved... Change - Xmx runtime param on control panel didn't help. Used Chiradeep's one liner for rescue.. export MAVEN_OPTS="-Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=800m -Xmx2g -Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8787,server=y,suspend=n" Updated Cwiki's https://cwiki.apache.org

RE: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

Let me attempt to summarize this thread, if I missed any glaring points feel free to bring them up 4 months: Proponents (9): Chip, Alex, David, Noah, Hugo, Joe, Sebastian, Prasanna, Rohit Reasoning: * We have not given proper shot to 4 month cycle, this was just the first time. Level of a

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2196 and CLOUDSTACK-2126: fix missing async job status in listXXX api and incorrect async job status in other async api.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10789/#review19743 --- Ship it! Applied to 4.1. Please be sure to move to master. commit

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2196 and CLOUDSTACK-2126: fix missing async job status in listXXX api and incorrect async job status in other async api.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10789/#review19744 --- Commit 6dbf3e7b35f92eadbe6f47a8df9e465a8373d7ac in branch refs/heads

Re: [ACS41] new critical bug

I tried a few things, including throwing a CloudRuntimeException in several places where I thought it made sense, such as an empty AgentUnavailableException catch block, but it doesn't seem to do anything at all, I don't see it in the logs, even though I do see the debug code that I placed next to

[ACS41]Patch Request

Hi Chip, https://reviews.apache.org/r/10789 is the patch for CLOUDSTACK-2196 and CLOUDSTACK-2126: fix missing async job status in listXXX api and incorrect async job status in other async api. Can you please commit it to 4.1? Thanks -min

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2196 and CLOUDSTACK-2126: fix missing async job status in listXXX api and incorrect async job status in other async api.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10789/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- This patc

RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 Cent OS 6.3 OVS support in KVM

OpenVswitch is not formally supported in Centos 6.4, why we need to support it in CloudStack? Not formally support, I mean, without compile/install openvswitch source code, you can't get it work. > -Original Message- > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > Sent: Thursday, April 25

RE: Out of Memory while attempting a Run

Page edited at .. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Setting+Up+a+CloudStack+Development+Environment+on+Mac+OS+X Thanks, .. Parth -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 3:39 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subje

Re: Out of Memory while attempting a Run

Please use Apache CloudStack's wiki at https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK I've purged the DNS entries for wiki and bugs.cs.o, the domain is being migrated to the ASF soon anyway. --David On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Parth Jagirdar wrote: > Logged a comment on following page.. > > http://wi

Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 Cent OS 6.3 OVS support in KVM

I think CentOS 6.4 or Ubuntu based are OK. You can ask Manan for confirm. --Sheng On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Angeline Shen wrote: > Sheng : > > 1. > This implies testing environment for ASC 4.2 isolation PVLAN feature > KVM hypervisor will beCentOS 6.4 based > instead of CentOS

RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 Cent OS 6.3 OVS support in KVM

Sheng : 1. This implies testing environment for ASC 4.2 isolation PVLAN feature KVM hypervisor will beCentOS 6.4 based instead of CentOS 6.3 based for Xen, vmware . Is this acceptable? 2. Hugo: if we must have CentOS 6.3 test environment for above feature, what parts of this p

RE: Out of Memory while attempting a Run

And another Run issue on Windows this time... pl,vMSnapshotManagerImpl,volumeManagerImpl,ClassicalPrimaryDataStoreProvider,AffinityGroupServiceImpl,DeploymentPlanningManager,AffinityGroupJoinDaoImpl,AffinityGroupDaoImpl,AffinityGroupVMMapDaoImpl,databaseUpgradeChecker,configurationDaoImpl,GlobalLo

RE: Out of Memory while attempting a Run

Logged a comment on following page.. http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/dev/Setting+up+a+CloudStack+development+environment+on+Mac+OSX?focusedCommentId=17273515#comment-17273515 Thanks, .. Parth -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: Thur

Re: Out of Memory while attempting a Run

export MAVEN_OPTS="-Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=800m -Xmx2g -Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8787,server=y,suspend=n" It should be there on the wiki, if not, please update On 4/25/13 2:28 PM, "Parth Jagirdar" wrote: >mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run > >Hangs at following.. With out

Re: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

I did further analysis on the issue (CLOUDSTACK-2126) and checked the code back in 3.0.x and 4.0 branch, and found the following: 1. Showing pending job information for ListXXX api has been broken since 3.0.6. Based on ML discussion, this feature is requested by customers, so we should fix this in

RE: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed!

Chip, I just added the fix for CLOUDSTACK-2158 to master. Here is the commit info to cherry-pick: Commit hash:232d44bf6e31898887b324bcdebbc659423917e4 In the applicationContext .xml , the context of the 'UserConcentratedPodPlanner' needs to include the list of allocators. This will e

RE: [DOC][Review] Document ability to delete events and alerts

Looks good to me. Thanks, .. Parth -Original Message- From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 11:02 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sanjay Tripathi Subject: [DOC][Review] Document ability to delete events and alerts Hi, Docum

RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 Cent OS 6.3 OVS support in KVM

Hey Angeline, > -Original Message- > From: Angeline Shen [mailto:angeline.s...@citrix.com] > Sent: donderdag 25 april 2013 23:07 > To: Hugo Trippaers; ''; Sheng Yang; Edison Su > Subject: RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 Cent > OS 6.3 OVS support in KVM > > Hugo: >

Out of Memory while attempting a Run

mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run Hangs at following.. With out of memory. Suggestions? System…Info Running OS X, Tomcat 6.0.33, java version "1.6.0_45" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_45-b06-451-11M4406) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.45-b01-451, mixed mode) (One hicc

Re: [DOCS][TRANSLATIONS] Upate

Le 25/04/2013 20:18, Sebastien Goasguen a ecrit : On Apr 25, 2013, at 1:54 PM, David Nalley wrote: On Thursday, April 25, 2013, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: On Apr 25, 2013, at 4:48 AM, Milamber > wrote: Le 25/04/2013 08:05, Gavin Lee a ecrit : Done for zh_CN translation on transifex for m

RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 Cent OS 6.3 OVS support in KVM

Hugo: 1. Your instructions here are for CentOS 6.4 environment. However, ASF 4.2 Cloudstack is currently only supported on CentOS 6.3, ** NOT CentOS 6.4 ** Since ASF 4.2 Cloudstack has product features requiring openvswitch support , That is why we need to have openvswitch

Re: [DOCS][TRANSLATIONS] Upate

On Apr 25, 2013, at 1:54 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Thursday, April 25, 2013, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > >> >> On Apr 25, 2013, at 4:48 AM, Milamber > >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Le 25/04/2013 08:05, Gavin Lee a ecrit : Done for zh_CN translation on transifex for master branch. >>> >>

Re: [ACS41] new critical bug

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 02:01:56PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I didn't mark this one as a blocker, but it's still pretty bad for someone > managing VMs in an automated fashion. Trying to stop a VM when the KVM > agent is disconnected reports success. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/

[ACS41] new critical bug

I didn't mark this one as a blocker, but it's still pretty bad for someone managing VMs in an automated fashion. Trying to stop a VM when the KVM agent is disconnected reports success. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2195

Trouble running CS MS from Eclipse

Hi, I'm getting an out of memory error when trying to run the management server from Eclipse. In my Debug Configuration, for my Goal I use the following: -pl client jetty:run Under the Environment tab, I have MAVEN_OPTS set to the following: -XX:MaxPermSize=1024m -Xmx1024m -Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:tr

Re: [DISCUSS] Making simple installs easier.

On Thursday, April 25, 2013, Jörgen Maas wrote: > As a new user (as of today) i can say the following from my personal > experience: > > Welcome - and thanks for pushing the feedback. > The biggest hurdle (in an enterprise setting) is getting the packages for > your platform.Building packages fr

RE: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed!

Found the issue, in the applicationContext .xml , the context of the 'UserConcentratedPodPlanner' needs to include the list of allocators. This will ensure that when this component is loaded by Spring, the allocators gets initialized. Will put in the fix now. Thanks, Prachi -Original Messa

RE: [MERGE] UI support for VM affinity/anti-affinity groups

Affinity/anti-affinity UI is now ready in master. -Brian -Original Message- From: Brian Federle [mailto:brian.fede...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 2:08 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Prachi Damle Cc: Sonny Chhen; Animesh Chaturvedi; Jessica Wang Subject: [MERGE] UI support

RE: DISCUSS

Hi, Comments Inline. Thanks, -Prachi -Original Message- From: MEHDI ALI SOLTANI [mailto:mehdi_alisolt...@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:34 AM To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: DISCUSS Hi I am new in Devcloud and I want to push my algorithm in Devcloud. I hav

RE: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed!

It should be set by Spring by looking at the applicationContext or componentContext -Prachi -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:58 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed! I looked

Re: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed!

I looked at it a bit, still beyond me, but the actual null pointer is: for(HostAllocator allocator : _hostAllocators) { _hostAllocators is locally defined in this file, but empty. I'm not sure what should be calling 'setHostAllocators'. protected List _hostAllocators; public List g

RE: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed!

thanks > -Original Message- > From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:56 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed! > > Looking at it. > > -Prachi > > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers

RE: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed!

Looking at it. -Prachi -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:50 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed! CLOUDSTACK-2158 is a blocker bug for 4.1.0, and I need an allocator expert to

RE: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

I will take a look at CLOUDSTACK-2158 -Prachi -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 6:55 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1 Hi al

Re: [DOCS][TRANSLATIONS] Upate

On Thursday, April 25, 2013, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Apr 25, 2013, at 4:48 AM, Milamber > > wrote: > > > > > > > Le 25/04/2013 08:05, Gavin Lee a ecrit : > >> Done for zh_CN translation on transifex for master branch. > > > > Thanks. I just update the master branch. > > > >> > >> For 2.2.

RE: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

Alena is right. They were introduced eons ago for customers to figure out which objects still had pending jobs on them without having the need to know the async job ID in the first place. I'm not sure who's using that now but if you remove it, it may cause existing customers that do rely on th

Re: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:48:02AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > JobId/JobStatus were introduced to the list* responses on purpose. Some of > the CS customers wanted to see what async jobs that are currently being > executed on the object, just by looking at the result of list* command. > > So

[ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed!

CLOUDSTACK-2158 is a blocker bug for 4.1.0, and I need an allocator expert to review and fix if required. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2158 'userconcentratedpod_firstfit failed to find alternate host to run VM Marcus laid out the situation in the bug itself. Help please! -c

Re: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

JobId/JobStatus were introduced to the list* responses on purpose. Some of the CS customers wanted to see what async jobs that are currently being executed on the object, just by looking at the result of list* command. So removing async job params from the list response is not a good idea as custo

Re: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:32:15AM -0700, Min Chen wrote: > Totally agree. > > Chip and others, Prasanna and I exchanged ideas about CLOUDSTACK--2126, > and we both agree that we should only return async job Id and job status > in queryAsyncJob and listAsyncJob commands, not in any other APIs so

Re: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

Thanks Chip, will do that. -min On 4/25/13 10:37 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:32:15AM -0700, Min Chen wrote: >> Totally agree. >> >> Chip and others, Prasanna and I exchanged ideas about CLOUDSTACK--2126, >> and we both agree that we should only return async job Id a

Re: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:32:15AM -0700, Min Chen wrote: > Totally agree. > > Chip and others, Prasanna and I exchanged ideas about CLOUDSTACK--2126, > and we both agree that we should only return async job Id and job status > in queryAsyncJob and listAsyncJob commands, not in any other APIs so

Re: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

Totally agree. Chip and others, Prasanna and I exchanged ideas about CLOUDSTACK--2126, and we both agree that we should only return async job Id and job status in queryAsyncJob and listAsyncJob commands, not in any other APIs so that we can have consistent response return in various scenarios. I

Re: [ACS41] New blocker for 4.1 - CLOUDSTACK-2194 - Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to encryption error

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:55:43AM -0700, Edison Su wrote: > I can take a look at it. Thanks for stepping up Edison! > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:49 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subjec

Re: Potential problem with IP ownership of a commit. WAS: Re: Review Request: Merging changes to marvin after ipclearance from cloudstack-qa

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:25:12PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Not quite : I emailed Ashutosh about the controversial subject earlier > today. We marked off 'ipclearance' as a point-in-time. This was when > (January?) the tests were contributed to ASF and went into some legal > issues. It is

Re: [DISCUSS] Making simple installs easier.

As a new user (as of today) i can say the following from my personal experience: The biggest hurdle (in an enterprise setting) is getting the packages for your platform.Building packages from source is nice and all, but in my case i don't have Internet access in the datacenter. So the whole maven

Re: Google Summer of Code 2013 Mentor Registration

This would make a good blog post and tweet! On 9 April 2013 21:25, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Folks, [BCC: users@] > > Apache Software Foundation (ASF) has been accepted has a mentoring > organization for the 2013 Google Summer of Code. > > If you wish to be a mentor for a student to work on a

Re: Xen Hackathon Dublin May 16/17th

Give me a shout if you'rein town and I'll come for drinks and meet some of you folks. On 25 April 2013 15:34, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Folks, > > The Xen hackathon is being held in Dublin, Ireland on May 16/17th. > > Is anyone interested to go there and actually work on improving Xen/XCP > s

Re: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

That's odd - listXxx commands don't do async at all and shouldn't be generating jobstatus,jobid etc. So I'm not sure why that was added in (prior?) 4.0. I'd like to take that out too if there's no real reason behind it. -- Prasanna., On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:57:02AM -0700, Min Chen wrote: > In

Re: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

In 4.0, CS has special code to return job status for a VM returned from listVMsCmd. During API performance refactoring, I have a created a DB view user_vm_view that joins async_job table just for that purpose and used that view to uniformly generate UserVmResponse. So the same code will be applied

RE: [ACS41] New blocker for 4.1 - CLOUDSTACK-2194 - Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to encryption error

I can take a look at it. > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:49 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ACS41] New blocker for 4.1 - CLOUDSTACK-2194 - Upgrade from > 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to encryption

Re: Potential problem with IP ownership of a commit. WAS: Re: Review Request: Merging changes to marvin after ipclearance from cloudstack-qa

Not quite : I emailed Ashutosh about the controversial subject earlier today. We marked off 'ipclearance' as a point-in-time. This was when (January?) the tests were contributed to ASF and went into some legal issues. It is the point-in-time that is referred to in the request not the code itself. T

Re: Review Request: updated cloud-early-config to copy iptables-* config files to rules file to work old templates

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10774/#review19706 --- Did not test your patch but saw the diff. Mostly looks good, we'll w

Re: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:30:08AM -0700, Min Chen wrote: > Prasanna, I updated CLOUDSTACK-2126 with my comment. That is the intended > change done in list API performance improvement work, and I don't see any > issues by having the consistent UserVmResponse for both deployVMCmd and > listVMsCmd. E

Re: Exposing APIs that carry POST data

REST based service is postponed, no active progress from mysids either. Thanks -min On 4/25/13 1:10 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Prasanna Santhanam >wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:08:49AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> > >> > On Apr 24, 2013, at 4:38

Potential problem with IP ownership of a commit. WAS: Re: Review Request: Merging changes to marvin after ipclearance from cloudstack-qa

Did we actually process IP Clearance for these? The summary of the review board record implies that we did. I do *not* see it listed on the official IP Clearance page [1]. Is this the code that was under discussion to be granted by Citrix to ASF (but was developed by Clogeny)? AFAIK, this was

Re: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

Prasanna, I updated CLOUDSTACK-2126 with my comment. That is the intended change done in list API performance improvement work, and I don't see any issues by having the consistent UserVmResponse for both deployVMCmd and listVMsCmd. Every BaseResponse class has jobId and jobStatus as serialized fiel

Re: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:22:58PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > I see where David is coming from. > > The longer you leave a release branch, the harder it becomes to QA, the > harder it comes to test, and the harder it becomes to release. As has been > mentioned already, you can think of this as a

Re: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:18:52AM -0700, Min Chen wrote: > I can take a look at CLOUDSTACK-2126. Thank you Min! I still need someone to look at the allocator bug (2158) and the DB upgrade issue (2194). > > Thanks > -min > > On 4/25/13 6:54 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >The

Re: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a new RC for 4.1

I can take a look at CLOUDSTACK-2126. Thanks -min On 4/25/13 6:54 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi all, > >The following bugs are currently blocking me from starting another 4.1.0 >voting round. Help please! > >CLOUDSTACK-2158 'userconcentratedpod_firstfit failed to find alternate >host to run V

[ACS41] New blocker for 4.1 - CLOUDSTACK-2194 - Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to encryption error

Hi, Can someone please review / triage and help resolve CLOUDSTACK-2194? -chip

DISCUSS

Hi I am new in Devcloud and I want to push my algorithm in Devcloud. I have two questions :   1) From where I should start, my mean is developing requirements.  2) I study on VMs scheduling and provisioning Algorithms please tell me which package is for scheduling and provisioning in Cloud Stack

Re: Review Request: FIX https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2172, by adding database upgrade to 4.1.0 in PremiumDatabaseUpgradeChecker.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10773/#review19704 --- Commit 099677a1244cd55fb98d3c40ee7881223dd9ac7c in branch refs/heads

  1   2   >