Re: CmisService interface

2016-09-05 Thread Florian Müller
ary and beyond the control of the client. To be save, the client must call getObject. From a generic client of view, I don't see much value in introducing this new interface. - Florian Hi, Can the CmisService interface be changed to be more in line with the browser binding? For ex

Re: CmisService interface

2016-09-02 Thread Michael Brackx
t return all data. They are only forced to > return the cmis:objectId property. Everything else is voluntary and beyond > the control of the client. To be save, the client must call getObject. > > From a generic client of view, I don't see much value in introducing this > new i

Re: CmisService interface

2016-08-23 Thread Florian Müller
h value in introducing this new interface. - Florian Hi, Can the CmisService interface be changed to be more in line with the browser binding? For example, the create methods could return ObjectData instead of String. Or, alternatively, they could return an ObjectId and the server implemen

CmisService interface

2016-08-23 Thread Michael Brackx
Hi, Can the CmisService interface be changed to be more in line with the browser binding? For example, the create methods could return ObjectData instead of String. Or, alternatively, they could return an ObjectId and the server implementation can choose to return only an id or a full object