ary and
beyond
the control of the client. To be save, the client must call getObject.
From a generic client of view, I don't see much value in introducing
this
new interface.
- Florian
Hi,
Can the CmisService interface be changed to be more in line with the
browser binding?
For ex
t return all data. They are only forced to
> return the cmis:objectId property. Everything else is voluntary and beyond
> the control of the client. To be save, the client must call getObject.
>
> From a generic client of view, I don't see much value in introducing this
> new i
h value in introducing
this new interface.
- Florian
Hi,
Can the CmisService interface be changed to be more in line with the
browser binding?
For example, the create methods could return ObjectData instead of
String.
Or, alternatively, they could return an ObjectId and the server
implemen
Hi,
Can the CmisService interface be changed to be more in line with the
browser binding?
For example, the create methods could return ObjectData instead of String.
Or, alternatively, they could return an ObjectId and the server
implementation can choose to return only an id or a full object