Hi Michael,

Changing this interface is rather difficult. It is composed of other interfaces that are the core interfaces for the client and server implementations. Changing the interfaces would break a lot in the OpenCMIS code and would break applications currently using these interfaces.

What we could do is introducing a new additional low-level interface for the Browser binding (and the AtomPub binding), which contains the methods in question with a slightly different name and a new return data type.

On the client side, you would then have the choice of calling the old or the new method. On the server side, the OpenCMIS code could check if the new interface is implemented and if so, calls the new instead of the old method.

But that's a lot of work. Could you explain your problem with the current approach?

I understand that testing with the TCK is restricted - but not really. The OpenCMIS server calls getObject after it created the object and testing getObject is possible with the TCK. This is only an issue if the server returns different data when getObject is called twice for the same object. On the client side, you may save one getObject call after a create call - but not reliably. Servers may not return all data. They are only forced to return the cmis:objectId property. Everything else is voluntary and beyond the control of the client. To be save, the client must call getObject.

From a generic client of view, I don't see much value in introducing this new interface.

- Florian


Hi,

Can the CmisService interface be changed to be more in line with the
browser binding?

For example, the create methods could return ObjectData instead of String.
Or, alternatively, they could return an ObjectId and the server
implementation can choose to return only an id or a full object; similar to
what was done with PropertyDataWithDefinition.

In general the service methods could return all the needed information to
construct the browser binding response.

This could also help solve the client side issue that the java client
cannot access the response from services, and thus that they cannot be
tested (e.g. in the TCK).

Michael

Reply via email to