CASSANDRA-17280 and CASSANDRA-17281 were opened to cover the work. Thank you
On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 at 11:46, Joshua McKenzie wrote:
> Lazy consensus seems like a safe path here.
>
> https://community.apache.org/committers/lazyConsensus.html
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 4:24 PM Ekaterina Dimitrova
Lazy consensus seems like a safe path here.
https://community.apache.org/committers/lazyConsensus.html
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 4:24 PM Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thank you for responding to my email.
>
> Looking at the responses, I guess I should directly open tickets - one
Hi everyone,
Thank you for responding to my email.
Looking at the responses, I guess I should directly open tickets - one for
deprecating in 4.0.2 (just warning and documenting it) and one for the
removal/providing interface for trunk?
Do we need more formal voting or anything else that I might
+1
Best Regards,
Aleksei Zotov.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 11:52 AM Marcus Eriksson wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:30:01AM -0500, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > With the work to add Java 17 support for Cassandra, a new question around
> > the future of UDF was ra
+1
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:30:01AM -0500, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> With the work to add Java 17 support for Cassandra, a new question around
> the future of UDF was raised. The scripted UDF was using Nashorn which is
> no longer packaged with the JDK. There are options to
+1 to deprecate, drop, add hooks.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 2:22 PM Brandon Williams wrote:
> Yes, just javascript.
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 1:20 PM Yifan Cai wrote:
> >>
> >> I think we should deprecate scripted UDFs now and drop them from the
> next major, but possibly provide hooks for pe
Yes, just javascript.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 1:20 PM Yifan Cai wrote:
>>
>> I think we should deprecate scripted UDFs now and drop them from the next
>> major, but possibly provide hooks for people to write their own UDF
>> "engines" and break out the current javascript implementation in to it
>
> I think we should deprecate scripted UDFs now and drop them from the next
> major, but possibly provide hooks for people to write their own UDF
> "engines" and break out the current javascript implementation in to its own
> repository (but not ship it with Cassandra).
+1
Just want to clarify
+1 (nb)
On 2022/01/19 15:10:20 Brandon Williams wrote:
> We can for completeness, but even with twice as much usage reported as the
> other methods, I don't think it will affect the outcome of the vote.
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022, 7:25 AM Paulo Motta wrote:
>
> > This proposal looks good to me, +
We can for completeness, but even with twice as much usage reported as the
other methods, I don't think it will affect the outcome of the vote.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022, 7:25 AM Paulo Motta wrote:
> This proposal looks good to me, +1. I was wondering if we should not run
> this proposal on the user@
This proposal looks good to me, +1. I was wondering if we should not run
this proposal on the user@ list to check if there's any additional feedback
in addition to the informal Twitter and Linkedin channels?
Em qua., 19 de jan. de 2022 às 10:18, Sylwester Lachiewicz <
slachiew...@gmail.com> escrev
+1 (Nb)
śr., 19 sty 2022, 12:31 użytkownik Brandon Williams
napisał:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:30 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > With the work to add Java 17 support for Cassandra, a new question
> around the future of UDF was raised. The scripted UDF was
+1
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:30 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> With the work to add Java 17 support for Cassandra, a new question around the
> future of UDF was raised. The scripted UDF was using Nashorn which is no
> longer packaged with the JDK. There are options to add n
+1
> On Jan 18, 2022, at 8:38 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:34 AM C. Scott Andreas
>> wrote:
>> I also (+1nb) support a proposal to deprecate JavaScript UDFs; to offer an
>> interface for those who would like to supply a UDF implementation; and to
>>
+1
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:34 AM C. Scott Andreas
wrote:
> I also (+1nb) support a proposal to deprecate JavaScript UDFs; to offer an
> interface for those who would like to supply a UDF implementation; and to
> extract/remove our current implementation.
>
> JDK17 support seems like a much hi
I also (+1nb) support a proposal to deprecate JavaScript UDFs; to offer an
interface for those who would like to supply a UDF implementation; and to
extract/remove our current implementation.
JDK17 support seems like a much higher priority than in-tree JS UDFs.
— Scott
> On Jan 18, 2022, at 8:
16 matches
Mail list logo
