+1 (nb)
On 2022/01/19 15:10:20 Brandon Williams wrote: > We can for completeness, but even with twice as much usage reported as the > other methods, I don't think it will affect the outcome of the vote. > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022, 7:25 AM Paulo Motta <pauloricard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This proposal looks good to me, +1. I was wondering if we should not run > > this proposal on the user@ list to check if there's any additional > > feedback in addition to the informal Twitter and Linkedin channels? > > > > Em qua., 19 de jan. de 2022 às 10:18, Sylwester Lachiewicz < > > slachiew...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > > >> +1 (Nb) > >> > >> śr., 19 sty 2022, 12:31 użytkownik Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> > >> napisał: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:30 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova > >>> <e.dimitr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > Hi everyone, > >>> > > >>> > With the work to add Java 17 support for Cassandra, a new question > >>> around the future of UDF was raised. The scripted UDF was using Nashorn > >>> which is no longer packaged with the JDK. There are options to add new > >>> dependencies to Graal JS for example but it seems people are not sure that > >>> it is worth it. Please check the discussion on CASSANDRA-16895. > >>> > > >>> > The following suggestion was made by Marcus and supported by other PMC > >>> members - "I think we should deprecate scripted UDFs now and drop them > >>> from > >>> the next major, but possibly provide hooks for people to write their own > >>> UDF "engines" and break out the current javascript implementation in to > >>> its > >>> own repository (but not ship it with Cassandra)." > >>> > > >>> > As a result we decided to engage with our users and created a Twitter > >>> survey. Results below: > >>> > > >>> > We would love to understand how you use ApacheCassandra UDFs and UDAs. > >>> > > >>> > 32 people responded as follows: > >>> > > >>> > We do not use them - 75% > >>> > We only use Java UDFs - 22% > >>> > We only use JS UDFs - 0% > >>> > We use Java and JS UDFs - 3% > >>> > > >>> > We also received feedback on LinkedIN on the topic - > >>> https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6886728406742970369?commentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28activity%3A6886728406742970369%2C6886793921020608512%29&replyUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A%28activity%3A6886728406742970369%2C6887421509485248512%29 > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Thoughts? > >>> > > >>> > Best regards, > >>> > Ekaterina > >>> > >> >
