Re: [DISCUSS] Introduce CREATE TABLE LIKE grammer

2024-10-15 Thread guo Maxwell
Hi yifan, Thanks for bringing this up. The SELECT permission on the original table is needed. Mysql and PG all have mentioned this, and I also specifically noticed this in my code. I probably missed this in the cep documentation. 😅 Yifan Cai 于2024年10月16日周三 07:46写道: > Thanks for creating the CEP

Re: [DISCUSS] Introduce CREATE TABLE LIKE grammer

2024-10-15 Thread Yifan Cai
Thanks for creating the CEP! I think it is missing Bernardo's comment on "the need for read permissions on the source table". CreateTableStatement does not check the permissions outside of the enclosing keyspace. Having the SELECT permission on the original table is a requirement for CREATE TABLE

Re: [VOTE] CEP-43: Apache Cassandra CREATE TABLE LIKE

2024-10-15 Thread Bernardo Botella
Fair point. I will move my feedback there. > On Oct 15, 2024, at 4:19 PM, Yifan Cai wrote: > > For further discussions, should we use the discussion thread? This thread is > for voting. > > - Yifan > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 3:31 PM Bernardo Botella > mailto:conta...@bernardobotella.com>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Introduce CREATE TABLE LIKE grammer

2024-10-15 Thread Bernardo Botella
Hi Guo, Do you think it would make sense to add a fourth keyword to add after the WITH for Constraints? (See CEP-42) Copying a table without the defined constraints may be useful. Bernardo > On Sep 29, 2024, at 11:00 PM, guo Maxwell wrote: > > Hello, everyone , > I have finished the doc for

Re: [VOTE] CEP-43: Apache Cassandra CREATE TABLE LIKE

2024-10-15 Thread Yifan Cai
For further discussions, should we use the discussion thread? This thread is for voting. - Yifan On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 3:31 PM Bernardo Botella < conta...@bernardobotella.com> wrote: > Hi Guo, > > Do you think it would make sense to add a fourth keyword to add after the > WITH for Constraints?

Re: [VOTE] CEP-43: Apache Cassandra CREATE TABLE LIKE

2024-10-15 Thread Bernardo Botella
Hi Guo, Do you think it would make sense to add a fourth keyword to add after the WITH for Constraints? (See CEP-42) Copying a table without the defined constraints may be useful. Bernardo > On Oct 9, 2024, at 9:32 PM, guo Maxwell wrote: > > ok, I think the time can be two weeks . > > Loo

Re: Status of CEP-1

2024-10-15 Thread Patrick McFadin
I have moved the original CEP-1 to the Archived section of Confluence: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/gImzBQ You can go ahead a create v2 of CEP-1 using the CEP template. Patrick On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 10:12 AM Josh McKenzie wrote: > Should make sure we snapshot it and/or history reten

Re: Status of CEP-1

2024-10-15 Thread Josh McKenzie
Should make sure we snapshot it and/or history retention is sufficient for us to preserve the effort that went into the original. To Joey's point, there's a lot of hard work that went into it as it stands it'd be a shame to lose. On Tue, Oct 15, 2024, at 1:07 PM, Dinesh Joshi wrote: > My prefere

Re: Status of CEP-1

2024-10-15 Thread Francisco Guerrero
That's a reasonable approach. I'm +1 with updating CEP-1 and closing it when we release Sidecar. On 2024/10/15 17:07:58 Dinesh Joshi wrote: > My preference would be to simply update CEP-1 instead of starting a new > one. It achieves the same end goal and we can create new CEPs for the scope > that

Re: Status of CEP-1

2024-10-15 Thread Dinesh Joshi
My preference would be to simply update CEP-1 instead of starting a new one. It achieves the same end goal and we can create new CEPs for the scope that is deferred. Dinesh On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 4:51 PM Patrick McFadin wrote: > I think that all sounds good. Let's get that new CEP started then

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-44: Kafka integration for Cassandra CDC using Sidecar

2024-10-15 Thread Bernardo Botella
Hi everyone, I’d like to make one final round of feedback request for this CEP-44: Kafka integration for Cassandra CDC using Sidecar before calling in a vote. We’ll leave it open for a few more days, and if nothing else comes in, we will call in a vote. Bernardo > On Oct 1, 2024, at 6:58 AM,

Re: GoCQL module name change and next release

2024-10-15 Thread João Reis
I'm not sure if it's feasible to make a review/triage of all existing PRs (77) and issues (158) a "requirement" for a 2.0 release. We definitely want to look at the issues with the label "semver-major" at the very least. I'm leaning towards not considering issues that don't require a breaking chang

Re: [DISCUSS] Donating easy-cass-stress to the project

2024-10-15 Thread Josh McKenzie
> IIUC there's no subproject involved here. To elaborate a touch: this isn't a subproject in terms of governance. i.e. no 3 dedicated PMC sponsors required, no "pmc must legally vote on releasing an artifact" (unless of course we start independently releasing artifacts for it as opposed to just

Re: [DISCUSS] Donating easy-cass-stress to the project

2024-10-15 Thread Mick Semb Wever
IIUC there's no subproject involved here. This is a separate repository coming in, akin to cassandra-dtest (plus releases). The question wrt replacing cassandra-stress was only thinking about something down the road, to help smoke out stuff like compaction-stress. No suggestion implied that easy-