>
>
>
> 901 practitioners were interviewed. I analyzed the data and summarized in a
> document here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aM8muvbldPhSJdgrsM0OiLGvb5wfjwc5uutSCNfGup8/edit?usp=sharing
>
> If this seems broadly useful, I’m proposing that we publish to the C* blog.
> New graphics wi
Considering the project currently follows the trunk-based development
workflow, I am +1 for trunk
In general I am fine also with main, but trunk sounds more accurate to me
personally.
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 4:03, Benjamin Lerer
wrote:
> +1 for trunk or main (slight preference for trunk)
>
>
>
>
No qualms with that here; it'll be a bit before GA so this has time to soak.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 8:21 PM Blake Eggleston
wrote:
> Caleb is currently working through his second round of review, and Marcus
> said he's about halfway through his review as of this morning. So I'd
> expect it to b
Caleb is currently working through his second round of review, and Marcus said
he's about halfway through his review as of this morning. So I'd expect it to
be committed within a week or so.
> On Aug 27, 2020, at 5:09 PM, Joshua McKenzie wrote:
>
> Is there an ETA on them landing? The later, t
Is there an ETA on them landing? The later, the more risk to stability of
GA due to lack of time soaking.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:01 PM Blake Eggleston
wrote:
> Hi dev@,
>
> Mick asked that I check in w/ the dev list about CASSANDRA-15393. There's
> some concern regarding the patch and it's su
+1 to the blog post
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:53 AM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> I don't have any questions, but datastax folks: thanks for funding stuff
> like this.
>
> (I'd love to see it as a blog post, I'd also love to see people internalize
> the negative feedback and assumed features and determin
Hi dev@,
Mick asked that I check in w/ the dev list about CASSANDRA-15393. There's some
concern regarding the patch and it's suitability for inclusion in 4.0-beta.
CASSANDRA-15393 reduces garbage created by compaction and the read paths by
about 25%. It's part of CASSANDRA-15387, which, includi
After discussing with a few stakeholders it sounds like folks agree that
optimizing dtest speed is a worthy endeavor. What is less clear are
concrete things that should be done. Since a brainstorming session failed
to materialize on CASSANDRA-13701, we thought it would make sense to start
with an o
+1
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 04:52, Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 16:48, Caleb Rackliffe
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020, 3:45 PM Patrick McFadin
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > This is related to the discussion Jordan and I had about the
> contribut
I don't have any questions, but datastax folks: thanks for funding stuff
like this.
(I'd love to see it as a blog post, I'd also love to see people internalize
the negative feedback and assumed features and determine whether or not
people are working on the right things)
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 1
Hi everyone,
Several open source projects conduct regular user surveys to understand
current usage and adoption trends, e.g. OpenStack, Kubernetes, Cloud
Foundry, etc. They can be informative to the community and other end users.
It looks like the C* community may have conducted these in the past
11 matches
Mail list logo
