+1 (nb)
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:01 PM Dinesh Joshi wrote:
> +1
>
> > On Apr 24, 2020, at 5:37 PM, Joshua McKenzie
> wrote:
> >
> > Updated. Thanks for the feedback.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:08 PM sankalp kohli
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:07 AM Andrés d
+1
> On Apr 24, 2020, at 5:37 PM, Joshua McKenzie wrote:
>
> Updated. Thanks for the feedback.
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:08 PM sankalp kohli
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:07 AM Andrés de la Peña <
>> a.penya.gar...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (nb)
>>>
>>> On Thu,
I'm in favor of encouraging low friction / easy doc contributions by using
generally accepted simple formats (i.e. markdown). Also, if any change in
doc framework or tooling would ease adoption of donation + prevent re-work,
that'd be an obvious benefit to deciding on that prior.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2
Updated. Thanks for the feedback.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:08 PM sankalp kohli
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:07 AM Andrés de la Peña <
> a.penya.gar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (nb)
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 13:09, Aleksey Yeshchenko
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> >
+1
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:07 AM Andrés de la Peña
wrote:
> +1 (nb)
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 13:09, Aleksey Yeshchenko >
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > > On 23 Apr 2020, at 12:58, Benjamin Lerer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 for both
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 3:49 AM Jordan We
> Are there any questions or concerns about this donation?
Getting substantial contributions to the documentation is a great thing to
me
in principle.
My main question was around the exact form this donation would take since
the
project has already lots of documentation. And I was about to sugges
Thanks for coordinating this Josh. Having professional doc writers
contributing regularly to the official docs will be an awesome improvement
to the project. I am definitely looking forward to working with everyone
on this!
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:28 PM Joshua McKenzie
wrote:
> >
> > could
>
> could be some duplication.
Absolutely. I was unclear in my original email: this is offered as a
contribution in whatever form best works for the project, and there's
plenty of exceptionally good documentation and work that's already been
done in-tree. The path forward would likely look like ta
Joshua,
That sounds good. But could be some duplication.
regards,Deepak
On Friday, April 24, 2020, 04:17:07 p.m. UTC, Joshua McKenzie
wrote:
To clarify intent Deepak, we're only talking about donating the Apache
Cassandra portion of the documentation, nothing else. There is no
intention
As a stopgap, Sphinx can generate docs based on markdown (and possibly even
asciidoc but I haven't checked). Probably easiest to do the conversion to
markdown incrementally that way, then we can flip everything over to Hugo.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 9:17 AM Manish G
wrote:
> I would like to cont
I would like to contribute here.
Please let me know.
Manish
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 9:03 PM Deepak Vohra wrote:
>
>
> While the DataStax documentation could supplement the Apache Cassandra
> documentation, DataStax is a commercial product based on open source Apache
> Cassandra with enhancemen
To clarify intent Deepak, we're only talking about donating the Apache
Cassandra portion of the documentation, nothing else. There is no
intention whatsoever for anything DataStax branded or related to merge into
the in-tree project documentation.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:33 AM Deepak Vohra
wro
While the DataStax documentation could supplement the Apache Cassandra
documentation, DataStax is a commercial product based on open source Apache
Cassandra with enhancements made to the open source Cassandra. Moreover,
DataStax documentation requires to be maintained and updated and as it is
I'd like to get the docs out of Sphinx. I hate it. The syntax is crap and
almost nobody knows it.
I'm fine with markdown (it makes it easy for most people) and have a
personal preference for asciidoc, since it makes it easier to generate PDFs
and is a bit richer / better for documentation. I'd
All,
A few of us have the opportunity to offer a large portion of documentation
to the apache foundation and specifically the Apache Cassandra project as
well as dedicate a good portion of time to maintaining this going forward.
For those of you familiar, this is the DataStax sponsored / authored
The Cassandra team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Cassandra
version 4.0-alpha4.
Apache Cassandra is a fully distributed database. It is the right choice
when you need scalability and high availability without compromising
performance.
http://cassandra.apache.org/
Downloads of sourc
My strongest apologies, this was not intended for the dev list.
There goes my habit of clearing the `to:` field to prevent accidental
sending of drafts :-(
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additi
> I'd like to add one thing - we should probably start off with a [DISCUSS]
> thread before starting a [VOTE] to avoid noise in the voting (and make
> counting votes easier)
Having either a DISCUSS thread or an initial Consensus Approval vote,
are both ways to push for consensus. The approach to
18 matches
Mail list logo
