Sure. We can do the documentation and release in parallel.
Sijie
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 2:30 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Awesome.
>
>
> I have created another important task for the new metadaserviceuri
> configuration
>
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/1897
>
> We can release 4.9
Awesome.
I have created another important task for the new metadaserviceuri
configuration
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/1897
We can release 4.9 without such docs by if someone in the community has
some cycle it will be a great step forward for the adoption of this new
features
Ch
As discussed in the pull request, the ExplicitLAC related change will go to
4.10.
I have cleaned up all the 4.9.0 issues. The pending issue for 4.9.0 is the
binary metadata format.
Once that is merged, I will start the release for 4.9.0.
- Sijie
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 5:43 PM Enrico Olivelli w
I would like to include transparent support for ExplicitLAC on the reader side.
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1572
I have to finalize the patch by cleaning up (re-adding) tests but
before spending time in a hurry I would like to know if the idea as
enough consensus to get on 4.9, other
Sijie,
If you prefer I can take this.
Most of the work is from you and Ivan
No problem for me.
Thank you
Enrico
Il gio 27 dic 2018, 10:53 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
> Since no one volunteers for being release manager, I will take this round
> then.
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 2:13 PM Enr
Since no one volunteers for being release manager, I will take this round
then.
- Sijie
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 2:13 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Hi Bookkeepers !
> Any plan to volunteer for being release manager of 4.9 ?
>
> I will be happy to help any one who wants to try for the first time...
Hi Bookkeepers !
Any plan to volunteer for being release manager of 4.9 ?
I will be happy to help any one who wants to try for the first time...
Cheers
Enrico
--
-- Enrico Olivelli