Awesome.

I have created another important task for the new metadaserviceuri
configuration

https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/1897

We can release 4.9 without such docs by if someone in the community has
some cycle it will be a great step forward for the adoption of this new
features

Cheers


Enrico



Il mar 15 gen 2019, 03:19 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> As discussed in the pull request, the ExplicitLAC related change will go to
> 4.10.
>
> I have cleaned up all the 4.9.0 issues. The pending issue for 4.9.0 is the
> binary metadata format.
> Once that is merged, I will start the release for 4.9.0.
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 5:43 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to include transparent support for ExplicitLAC on the reader
> > side.
> > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1572
> >
> > I have to finalize the patch by cleaning up (re-adding) tests but
> > before spending time in a hurry I would like to know if the idea as
> > enough consensus to get on 4.9, otherwise I can work on it for 4.10.
> > It is a client side change, no read protocol changes, which I would
> > like to postpone to future releases.
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il giorno gio 27 dic 2018 alle ore 11:04 Enrico Olivelli
> > <eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > >
> > > Sijie,
> > > If you prefer I can take this.
> > > Most of the work is from you and Ivan
> > >
> > > No problem for me.
> > > Thank you
> > > Enrico
> > >
> > > Il gio 27 dic 2018, 10:53 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > >>
> > >> Since no one volunteers for being release manager, I will take this
> > round
> > >> then.
> > >>
> > >> - Sijie
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 2:13 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi Bookkeepers !
> > >> > Any plan to volunteer for being release manager of 4.9 ?
> > >> >
> > >> > I will be happy to help any one who wants to try for the first
> time...
> > >> >
> > >> > Cheers
> > >> > Enrico
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > >> >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >
>
-- 


-- Enrico Olivelli

Reply via email to