I think we should avoid the long representation and interpretation in the
new code, basically -1 should be looked as MSB of the lsb-ledgerIDset to 1.
Also, we should be able to provide BC without special cases. Branching
should be based on if msb-ledgerId(scopeID) is 0 or not.
Maybe we should trea
Il sab 18 ago 2018, 18:43 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 9:28 AM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > Il sab 18 ago 2018, 17:26 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
> >
> > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 2:12 AM Enrico Olivelli
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Nice work Sijie,
> > > > Some comments after the
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 9:28 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il sab 18 ago 2018, 17:26 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 2:12 AM Enrico Olivelli
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Nice work Sijie,
> > > Some comments after the first read, just thinking out loud...
> > > Overall looks a good ide
Il sab 18 ago 2018, 17:26 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 2:12 AM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > Nice work Sijie,
> > Some comments after the first read, just thinking out loud...
> > Overall looks a good idea and implementable.
> >
> > We should cite somewhere the case of scope=
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 2:12 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Nice work Sijie,
> Some comments after the first read, just thinking out loud...
> Overall looks a good idea and implementable.
>
> We should cite somewhere the case of scope=0 and ledgerId = -1 which is a
> very special case for usthe.
>
Nice work Sijie,
Some comments after the first read, just thinking out loud...
Overall looks a good idea and implementable.
We should cite somewhere the case of scope=0 and ledgerId = -1 which is a
very special case for usthe.
We should also state that scopeid and ledgerid < 0 is not supported or
Thanks a lot, Sijie for the awesome doc.
Let's pool some more thoughts into this and size the work.
Thanks,
JV
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As promised in last community meeting, I put up all the thoughts and
> discussion with JV I had into a BP for supporting
Hi all,
As promised in last community meeting, I put up all the thoughts and
discussion with JV I had into a BP for supporting 128-bit ledger id. I
tried my best to cover all the aspects that I can think of. There can be
places that I miss. so please take a look and let me know what you think.
BP
