Re: [VOTE] Release 4.17.2, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - built and ran tests on JDK11, Ubuntu - signatures. RAT, checksums ok Thank you Enrico Olivelli Il giorno mer 2 lug 2025 alle ore 04:12 Wenbing Shen < oliver.shen...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > +1 (non-binding) > > - signatures ok > - checksums ok > > Thanks!

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.16.7, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - Built from sources (JDK11, Ubuntu) and all tests passed - Checked RAT, signatures, sha512sum Thank you ! Enrico Olivelli Il giorno mer 25 giu 2025 alle ore 03:42 lushiji(apache) ha scritto: > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the v

[ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Steven Lu

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache BookKeeper has invited Steven Lu to become a committer and a PMC member and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Please join us in welcoming Steven to their new role and responsibility in our project community. Enrico Olivelli On

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading BookKeeper to RocksDB 9.9.3 in 4.18.0 release

+1 Thanks Enrico Il Gio 17 Apr 2025, 10:22 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > Hello BookKeeper community, > > I'd like to propose upgrading our RocksDB dependency from the current > 7.10.2 version to 9.9.3. > Among all 9.x versions, I specifically chose 9.9.3 since it's > currently the most recent vers

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.18.0 release

+1 Great idea Enrico Il giorno mer 2 apr 2025 alle ore 13:31 Yong Zhang ha scritto: > Hi all, > > The 4.17.0 has been released for 6 months, we have some > new improvements such as [1], and dependency updates such > as [2]. I want to start to discuss releasing 4.18.0 to include > them. > > Do

Many patches pending review !

Hello BookKeepers, I am preparing the report for the ASF Board and I have noticed that we have a growing backlog of PRs. https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pulls Please take some time to review the pending PRs, any help is appreciated. You don't need to be a committer to review a PR, all the

Re: [VOTE] Change Default Value of readOnlyModeOnAnyDiskFullEnabled

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mar 19 nov 2024 alle ore 14:21 ZhangJian He ha scritto: > +1(binding) > > Thanks > ZhangJian He > Twitter: shoothzj > Wechat: shoothzj > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 8:28 PM lushiji(apache) > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 6:15 PM xiangyi

Re: [DISCUSS] Change Default Value of readOnlyModeOnAnyDiskFullEnabled

I agree. We should enable it in the next release Enrico Il Dom 17 Nov 2024, 04:16 houxiaoyu ha scritto: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > houxiaoyu > > xiangying meng 于2024年11月16日周六 23:56写道： > > > > Dear Bookkeeper Community, > > > > I hope this message finds you well. I would like to bring to

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.16.7 release

+1 Enrico Il giorno mar 15 ott 2024 alle ore 05:34 Wenbing Shen < oliver.shen...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > +1 > > Best, > Wenbing > > Hang Chen 于2024年9月29日周日 15:21写道： > > > +1 > > > > Best, > > Hang > > > > ZhangJian He 于2024年9月27日周五 15:51写道： > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Thanks > > > ZhangJian He

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.17.2 release

+1 Enrico Il giorno mar 15 ott 2024 alle ore 05:34 Wenbing Shen < shenwenb...@apache.org> ha scritto: > +1 > > Best, > Wenbing > > Aloys Zhang 于2024年10月14日周一 17:27写道： > > > +1 > > > > ZhangJian He 于2024年9月29日周日 15:28写道： > > > > > +1(binding) > > > > > > Thanks > > > ZhangJian He > > > > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.17.1, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - verified checksums and signatures - built from sources (Ubuntu, JDK11), ran tests - HerdDB tests are passing https://github.com/diennea/herddb/pull/830 Thanks for driving the release ! Enrico Olivelli Il giorno dom 16 giu 2024 alle ore 11:40 zhiheng123 <903292...@qq.com.inva

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 4.17.0, release candidate #0

orov 于2024年4月10日周三 01:19写道： > >>> > >>> +1 (binding) > >>> > >>> - built from tag > >>> - built from archived sources > >>> - ran small subset of unit tests > >>> - ran standalone andlocalbookie from package

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.16.6, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - Verified checksums and signatures - Ran unit test on Ubuntu, JDK11 - HerdDB tests are passing https://github.com/diennea/herddb/pull/831 Thanks for driving the release ! Enrico Olivelli Il giorno dom 16 giu 2024 alle ore 11:41 zhiheng123 <903292...@qq.com.invalid> ha s

[ACCOUNT] ZhangJian He added to the PMC of Apache BookKeeper

your contributions to the project ! Enrico Olivelli

[ANNOUNCE] Lari Hotari as committer in BookKeeper

foundation/how-it-works/#roles Best regards Enrico Olivelli

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.16.6 release

etty dependency updates. > Is this valid? > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4400 > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4395 Yes you can but please not squash them Enrico > > > Thanks > ZhangJian He > Twitter: shoothzj > Wechat: shoothzj > > &

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.16.6 release

+1 thanks Enrico Il Lun 27 Mag 2024, 08:52 Nicolò Boschi ha scritto: > +1 > There are important bug fixes to release > > Thanks for taking care of the release > Nicolò Boschi > > Il giorno sab 25 mag 2024 alle ore 04:37 ZhangJian He > ha scritto: > > > > Hi all, > > > > BookKeeper 4.16.5 was r

Re: [DISCUSS] Introducing Typo CI Check to Apache BookKeeper

+1 Enrico Il giorno dom 26 mag 2024 alle ore 01:53 Hang Chen ha scritto: > +1 > > We need to keep an eye on the public methods and configurations. > > Best, > Hang > > Andrey Yegorov 于2024年5月22日周三 02:15写道： > > > > > > Awesome idea, thank you for tackling this. > > > > We need to keep an eye on

Re: Discussion on Default Implementation for isDriverMetadataServiceAvailable

ZhangJian, Il giorno mer 8 mag 2024 alle ore 01:34 ZhangJian He ha scritto: > Hi, bookKeepers > > I've reviewed the PR that introduces `isDriverMetadataServiceAvailable`. I > have concerns about providing a default implementation that returns a > constant value like true, it's not a default inte

The 'news' section is not up-to-date

Hello, I noticed that the News section is not up to date https://bookkeeper.apache.org/releases Any volunteers to fix it ? Cheers Enrico

Re: [VOTE] BP-66: support throttling for zookeeper read of rereplication

+1 (binding) Thanks Enrico Olivelli Il Mar 30 Apr 2024, 05:17 ZhangJian He ha scritto: > +1(no-binding) > > > Thanks > ZhangJian He > > > thetumbled 于2024年4月30日 周二11:06写道： > > > Hi, everyone.I would like to start voting thread for BP-66: support >

Re: [discuss] Proposal to Gradually Migrate from JUnit 4 to JUnit 5

ZhangJian Il giorno mer 24 apr 2024 alle ore 18:58 ZhangJian He ha scritto: > I am reaching out to propose a gradual migration of our testing framework > from JUnit 4 to JUnit 5 across the BookKeeper. JUnit 5 offers significant > improvements over JUnit 4, including more powerful and flexible te

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release 4.17.0, release candidate #0

I found one PR listed as a "fix" while > actually the PR was closed without the merge. The rest lgtm. > > > > Thank you. > > -- > > Andrey > > > > On 2024/04/02 08:33:56 Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > Please review

Re: [discuss] Change scheduleAtFixedRate to scheduleWithFixedDelay in GarbageCollectorThread

Il giorno mar 16 apr 2024 alle ore 11:06 ZhangJian He ha scritto: > > Hi teams. Current scheduling mechanism for garbage collection uses > scheduleAtFixedRate. This approach schedules the next execution without > considering whether the current task has finished, potentially leading to > overlappi

Re: Adding me to the dockerhub org

As you have committed karma I think it is fine to add you to the group on dockerhub who is able to trigger builds and see the logs. Please open an INFRA ticket, and ask to add them to add you to the "bookkeeper" group More context here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21985 Thanks E

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.17.0, release candidate #0

nch runs fine with staged maven artifacts > - https://github.com/lhotari/pulsar/pull/177 > - ran simpletest with bookkeeper-all-4.17.0 binaries > ("bookkeeper localbookie 3" and "bookkeeper shell simpletest") > - source package compilation succeeds > > -Lari

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.16.5, release candidate #1

+1 (binding) - Veriified signatures and checksums - HerdDB tests are passing https://github.com/diennea/herddb/pull/828 - built locally from sources and tests local binaries Thanks for driving the release Enrico Il giorno ven 5 apr 2024 alle ore 15:03 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > > +1 (non-bindin

Re: Docker build is broken for 4.16.4

not have a Release file." > In the PR, I replaced it with ubuntu-22.04 (LTS version, support > continues). > With your patch the docker images should work. Maybe we should add an integration test that uses the docker images in CI Enrico > -Lari > > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2024

Docker build is broken for 4.16.4

Hello Bookkeepers, it seems that docker hub is no more able to build our docker images You can find below the error Any ideas? Enrico Link to the build https://hub.docker.com/repository/registry-1.docker.io/apache/bookkeeper/builds/114a5d41-f061-47d4-b9f4-744aafaaa665 Full logs 2024-04-02T12:

[VOTE] Release 4.17.0, release candidate #0

proval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. Thanks, Enrico Olivelli [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4260/files#diff-d361215d5d5abaa96ac3362e70a1d2f80f92d369a59c866e1976ff41ec435f53 [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.17.0-rc0/ [3] https://repository.apa

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.16.5 release

Good idea Thanks Enrico Il Gio 21 Mar 2024, 09:54 Nicolò Boschi ha scritto: > Hi all, > > BookKeeper 4.16.4 was released two months ago, and I would > like to discuss the starting 4.16.5 release to include some critical > security and bug fixes. > > Here are the PRs for 4.16.5: > > https://gith

Re: Error while starting the release procedure

Hello A quick update. I have created branch-4.17 and now master is 4.18 There is a problem in the release process due to some update to the pom file, we are executing the source plugin twice. I haven't dug yet I will keep you updated Enrico Il Mer 6 Mar 2024, 16:13 Enrico Olivelli ha sc

Error while starting the release procedure

Hello, it seems that I cannot perform the usual release procedure, we change the rules on the GH repo How did we do in the previous releases ? Below you can find the error Enrico ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:3.0.0-M5:branch (default-cli) on project

Re: [DISCUSS] Bookkeeper 4.17.0 release

on my machine. Enrico Il giorno mar 5 mar 2024 alle ore 08:14 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > Hi Enrico, > Thank you for volunteering to take on the role of release manager > for this cycle. Your willingness to contribute in this capacity is > greatly appreciated. > > Best, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Bookkeeper 4.17.0 release

Hello Hang, Thanks for bringing this up I would be happy to be the release manager for this cycle Enrico Il Mer 21 Feb 2024, 07:37 Hang Chen ha scritto: > Hi Community, >Bookkeeper 4.16.0 has been released for more than 9 months, and we > have introduced batch read support [1] for entry re

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.16.4, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - Verified checksums and signatures - Passed all the HerdDB tests (https://github.com/diennea/herddb/pull/819) - Built locally on Mac, JDK11 Thanks Enrico Il giorno ven 19 gen 2024 alle ore 03:08 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candida

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.16.4 release

+1 If you want I can drive the release, it has been quite some time I haven't prepared an RC Enrico Il Gio 18 Gen 2024, 06:22 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > +1 > > It would be great to have 4.16.4 released to get the fix for the > Java9IntHash checksum bug https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull

Docker image missing for 4.15.5

Hello, a user reported that the docker image for 4.15.5 was missing. https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/4170 I have fixed the problem by creating a git tag git checkout release-4.15.5 git tag -s release-4.15.5-docker git push origin release-4.15.5-docker Is there any volunteer to updat

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.15.5, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) Built on Mac with JDK11 Run smoke tests on the compiled binaries Verified checksums and signatures Enrico Il giorno gio 14 dic 2023 alle ore 05:41 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > +1 (binding) > > Thank Yong for driving this release. Overall it looks good. > > - Verified signatures and c

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.15.5 release

Il giorno gio 30 nov 2023 alle ore 11:20 Yong Zhang ha scritto: > > Hi everyone, > > BookKeeper 4.15.4 was released more than 6 months, and I would like to > discuss the starting 4.15.5 release to fix the wrong native lib caused by > the wrong > platform published. > The docker platform has been f

Re: [DISCUSS] BP-64: Improve the description of 47 commands for bin/bookkeeper

Steven, This is a great idea. I don't think this needs a BP, as you are not changing APIs or touching the internals. In my opinion you can check here if nobody objects, then you can start sending out PRs Thank you very much Enrico On Sun, Oct 8, 2023, 09:58 steven lu wrote: > we will impro

Community Over Code - Halifax

Hello folks, Is there anyone at Halifax from our community? Enrico

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.16.3, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - Built from sources and run all the tests - Tested on HerdDB, all good (this is the PR that verifies that all the tests pass with the new version https://github.com/diennea/herddb/pull/811) Thanks Enrico Il giorno mar 5 set 2023 alle ore 08:03 Jia Zhai ha scritto: > > +1 (binding)

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.16.3 release

+1 thanks Enrico Il giorno mar 29 ago 2023 alle ore 09:14 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > +1 for the new release. > > Please include the following two PRs to 4.16.3, thanks. > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4041 > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4058 > > > Thanks, > Hang > > Yong

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.8, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - checked signatures - run all the tests on JDK8, Mac M1 Thanks for running the release Enrico Il giorno lun 28 ago 2023 alle ore 04:21 Yong Zhang ha scritto: > > +1 (non-binding) > > - Signature and checksum look good > - Built from archived sources (m1, jdk17, maven 3.8.6) > - R

Re: Force to use linux/amd64 to build release

+1 Thanks We should cut a new release as soon as possible Enrico Il Lun 28 Ago 2023, 10:34 Yong Zhang ha scritto: > Hi everyone, > > When releasing the 4.16.2, I did the release with an M1 macbook pro. > That makes the native io lib compile and publish with the arm platform. > So some users ge

Re: Remove UnderReplicatedLedgersChangedCb in Auditor

+1 Enrico Il Gio 17 Ago 2023, 10:06 horizonzy ha scritto: > In https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2805, it introduces > UnderReplicatedLedgersChangedCb to watch the zookeeper `underreplication` > path. After a `underreplication` ledger mark is replicated, the > UnderReplicatedLedgersChan

Re: BP62-New API for batched reads

Hello, The proposal is well written, I have no questions. We have been waiting for this feature for long time. I am supporting it Thanks Enrico Il Mar 15 Ago 2023, 04:28 horizonzy ha scritto: > Hi, everyone: > There is a proposal about batched reading( > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pu

Re: Data loss problem when DefaultEntryLogger switch to DirectEntryLogger, then switch back to DefaultEntryLogger.

e related to > DirectIO. As a result, the user disables DirectIO and restarts. In this case, > data may be lost. You should never do this in production. BTW do you have a possible solution? Enrico > > > > On 2023/07/30 17:40:25 Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > I think that y

Re: Improve DefaultEntryLogger read performance

Il Dom 30 Lug 2023, 09:19 horizonzy ha scritto: > When reading data from an EntryLog file, we create a BufferedReadChannel. > In the size() method of BufferedReadChannel, FileChannelImpl.size() is > called, which is a time-consuming operation. > > If the EntryLog file has been archived, it is unn

Re: Data loss problem when DefaultEntryLogger switch to DirectEntryLogger, then switch back to DefaultEntryLogger.

I think that you should not do this kind of things. You should start a new bookie with the new configuration. It is not generally possible to guarantee compatibility between different implementations. I tend to close the case as 'won't fix' Enrico Il Dom 30 Lug 2023, 13:00 horizonzy ha scrit

[ANNOUNCE] New committer Wenbing Shen

submission process. This should enable better productivity. For more information about the ASF works you can follow this link https://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html Please join me and congratulate Wenbing Shen ! Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.16.2, release candidate #1

+1 (binding) - verified checksums and sigs - run all the tests locally (JDK11 on Mac M1) Enrico Il giorno mer 28 giu 2023 alle ore 20:22 Andrey Yegorov ha scritto: > > +1 (binding) > > * localbookie and standalone bookie start ok > * built from archived sources (mac intel, jdk 11) > * built fr

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade RocksDB version to 6.29.4.1 for branch-4.14

Hang, Il giorno dom 25 giu 2023 alle ore 09:47 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > Hi guys, > > More than one year ago, we had a discussion[1] about reverting the > RocksDB version for branch-4.14, and the main concern is that RocksDB > 6.17.3 breaks runtime compatibility with older versions and it > requi

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.16.2 release

+1 Enrico Il Mer 14 Giu 2023, 09:35 Wenbing Shen ha scritto: > +10 > > I noticed https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3979 that issue was > introduced in bookkeeper-4.16.0 by > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3847, > and in pulsar-3.0. 0 version introduced bk-4.16.1. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.14.8 release

+1 thanks Enrico Il giorno mar 30 mag 2023 alle ore 11:09 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > Hi everyone, > > BookKeeper 4.14.7 was released more than 3 months, and I would like to > discuss the starting 4.14.8 release to include some critical bug fixes > and improvements, such as [1] and [2] > > Here ar

Re: Introduce cold ledger storage layer.

Gavin, This idea looks promising, as Dave mentioned, it could anticipate adding support for moving cold data to cheaper cloud storage Enrico Il giorno ven 26 mag 2023 alle ore 06:17 Dave Fisher ha scritto: > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On May 25, 2023, at 7:37 PM, Gavin gao wrote: > > > > 

Re: 回复：[Discuss] Bookie may lose data even though we turn on fsync for the journal

Il giorno lun 15 mag 2023 alle ore 10:50 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > > When flushing, only the lastMark value will be persisted to the file, but > > the lastMark value will not be updated. > > The lastMark value is updated only when the ForceWriteRequest completes. So > > when the flush is trigger

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.16.0 released

Congratulations ! This is a great step forward ! Looking forward to using DirectIO and Embedded Bookie ! Enrico Il giorno mar 2 mag 2023 alle ore 09:22 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper > version 4.16.0. > > Apache BookKeeper is a scala

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.16.1, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) Built locally Verified that with the only commit added in respect to 4.16.0 the regression discovered in Pulsar is fixed Thanks for the quick release Enrico Il Sab 15 Apr 2023, 06:18 Hang Chen ha scritto: > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for th

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.16.0, release candidate #2

+1 (binding) - Built and run tests locally on jdk11 on M1 - Run smoke tests - Verified checksum and signatures Enrico Il Sab 1 Apr 2023, 08:35 Andrey Yegorov ha scritto: > > Have you ever run `mvn clean insteall -DskipTests` before > running the tests > > of course. > > as listed above: > $ g

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.16.0, release candidate #1

+1 (binding) - Built from sources and run all the tests (it is the first time I see all tests passing the first time I launch them !!) - Verified signatures and checksums - Run some smoke tests on JDK11/Mac M1 Enrico Il giorno lun 27 mar 2023 alle ore 03:41 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > I have cre

[ANNOUNCE] Hang Chen on the Apache BookKeeper PMC

enable better productivity. A PMC member helps manage and guide the direction of the project. More information about how the ASF works can be found here https://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html Please join me and celebrate ! Congratulations Hang ! Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.15.4, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - Checked signatures/checksums - Built locally from sources, run some tests Enrico There is one test that always fails on my machine: [ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] org.apache.bookkeeper.test.BookieZKExpireTest.testBookieServerZKSessionExpireBehaviour [ERROR] Run 1: BookieZKExpireTes

Re: [VOTE] BP-61: Revert BP-59 to release ByteBuf using ReferenceCountUtil.release() instead of ReferenceCountUtil.safeRelease()

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mar 21 feb 2023 alle ore 05:38 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > Hi, All > > After a fascinating discussion, I would start the vote for BP-61. > > We will replace the `ReferenceCountUtil.safeRelease()` with > `ReferenceCountUtil.release()`. > > Please leave +1/-1 in this th

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.14.7 released

Congrats ! Enrico Il giorno lun 20 feb 2023 alle ore 09:53 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper > version 4.14.7. > > Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency > storage service optimized for real-time workloads. It has

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.15.4 release

erry-picked into the branch-4.15. > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/commits/branch-4.15 > Because that PIP is still in discussion, I will revert them from branch-4.15 Good idea ! Enrico > first. > > Yong > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 15:21, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > &

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.7, release candidate #1

+1 (binding) - run tests locally - built from sources - verified signatures and checksums - run Apache RAT for headers - verified LICENSE using the script that we have in dev/ Thanks for driving the release Enrico Il giorno mar 14 feb 2023 alle ore 05:39 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > I opened one P

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.15.4 release

Good idea +1 Enrico Il Mar 14 Feb 2023, 02:23 Hang Chen ha scritto: > +1 > > - As we discussed in [2], For the PRs list in [1], I think we can > skip cherry-pick first. > - For PR [3], I removed label `release/4.15.4` due to [4] > > Thanks, > Hang > > [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/

Re: Prometheus metrics provider > upgrade dataskeches lib

Diego, Il giorno lun 13 feb 2023 alle ore 11:37 Diego Salvi ha scritto: > > Hi, > I was looking into prometheus-metrics-provider dependencies and I found a > dependency to com.yahoo.datasketches:sketches-core:0.8.3. > This is really a very old implementation pre apache incubating. Currently > it

Re: [Discuss] BookKeeper upgrade the RocksDB version to 7.9.x

+1 Enrico Il giorno mer 8 feb 2023 alle ore 17:44 Andrey Yegorov ha scritto: > > +1 to the plan. > We can configure RocksDb to not use kXXH3 in all branches and provide a > config option for the user to enable it when needed. > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 2:54 AM Hang Chen wrote: > > > Hi guys, >

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.14.7 release

+1 thanks Enrico Il giorno mer 8 feb 2023 alle ore 08:16 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > Hi everyone, > > One core dump issue[1] related to RocksDB was introduced by [2] and > released in BookKeeper 4.14.6. To fix the RocksDB core dump issue, I > pushed one PR [3] to revert the [2] to make branch-4.14

Re: [DISCUSS] BP-61: Revert BP-59 to release ByteBuf using ByteBuf.release() instead of ReferenceCountUtil.safeRelease()

Il giorno gio 2 feb 2023 alle ore 10:57 Yan Zhao ha scritto: > > > I think that we must do something, current master branch is not stable. > > > > My colleague Massimiliano opened this issue > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3751 > > > > Basically in the current master there is some

Re: [DISCUSS] BP-61: Revert BP-59 to release ByteBuf using ByteBuf.release() instead of ReferenceCountUtil.safeRelease()

to run this kind of tests, but that we should provide a reference load test. Enrico > > > 2023年1月30日 16:04，Enrico Olivelli 写道： > > > > I think that we must do something, current master branch is not stable. > > > > My colleague Massimiliano opened this

Re: [DISCUSS] BP-61: Revert BP-59 to release ByteBuf using ByteBuf.release() instead of ReferenceCountUtil.safeRelease()

I think that we must do something, current master branch is not stable. My colleague Massimiliano opened this issue https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3751 Basically in the current master there is some problem that leads to Netty BytBuf corruption. The problem is solved by reverting thi

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.6, release candidate #0

d by [1] and fixed by [2]. I will close this vote and create > a new candidate soon. > > Thanks, > Hang > > [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3252 > [2] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3677 > > Enrico Olivelli 于2022年12月19日周一 05:20写道： > > > >

Re: BookKeeper CI heads up

Thank you Nicolò, it is very helpful Enrico Il giorno mar 17 gen 2023 alle ore 10:44 Nicolò Boschi ha scritto: > > Hi folks, > > I just merged this pull request that refactors the current CI GIthub > Actions. > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3735 > > We now have one main workflow that

Re: [VOTE] BP-60 Change PCBC limitStatsLogging default value to true

Hello, the PR has already been merged. I am not sure if it makes sense to run the VOTE, in any case this is my +1 +1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mer 11 gen 2023 alle ore 09:23 Wenbing Shen ha scritto: > > Hi Bookkeeper Community, > I would like to start a VOTE on " Change PCBC limitStatsLogging

Re: BP-60:Change PCBC limitStatsLogging default value to true

Hello, someone merged the PR https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3719 this is a BP, so it needs a formal VOTE Please hold off from committing PRs related to open BPs Enrico Il giorno mer 11 gen 2023 alle ore 08:43 steven lu ha scritto: > > +1 > Thanks for your great work! > > Wenbing She

Re: BP-60:Change PCBC limitStatsLogging default value to true

I agree with the change. I have never used those metrics Enrico Il giorno lun 26 dic 2022 alle ore 10:29 Wenbing Shen ha scritto: > > Hi BookKeepers, I've changed the limitStatsLogging default value to true > from false: > BP-60 > > Motivation

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.6, release candidate #1

+1 (binding) - verified checksums, RAT, signatures - run some smoke tests with the staged binaries I couldn't build the sources on M1, but this is already known on branch 4.14.x, so not a problem Enrico Il giorno ven 23 dic 2022 alle ore 14:15 Nicolò Boschi ha scritto: > > +1 non binding > * S

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.6, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno gio 1 dic 2022 alle ore 07:30 Yong Zhang ha scritto: > > okay. Make sense. > > -- > Yong > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 07:52, Andrey Yegorov > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > * ran bookkeeper standalone > > * ran bookkeeper localbookie > > * built from sources (mac,

CVE-2022-32531: Apache BookKeeper: Java Client Uses Connection to Host that Failed Hostname Verification

Severity: Moderate Description: The Apache Bookkeeper Java Client (up to 4.14.5 and also 4.15.0) does not close the connection to the bookkeeper server when TLS hostname verification fails. This leaves the bookkeeper client vulnerable to a man in the middle attack. The problem affects BookKeeper

[ANNONCE] Apache BookKeeper releases prior to 4.14 end-of-life

After discussing within the community we decided to declare EOL all the release lines before 4.14. This means that all the release lines up to 4.13 won't see any more releases, even for security issues. Current active branches are: - 4.14.x - 4.15.x - 4.16.x (no release has been cut yet) - master

Re: [DISCUSS] End-Of-Life for some release lines

has breaking API changes so we'll need to keep 4.14 alive for a > while. > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:43 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hello, > > I propose to declare end-of-life on all the release lines prior to 4.14. > > > > We wanted to fo

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.15.3, release candidate #1

+1 (binding) - RAT, checksums, signatures, all good - built on Mac on JDK11 - tested localbookie from the results of the build Thanks Enrico Il giorno ven 11 nov 2022 alle ore 06:11 Yong Zhang ha scritto: > > The maven repo link should be > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/org

Re: Release 4.15.3, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - Built from sources (JDK11, MacOs) - Run some smoke tests with localbookie - Built and run smoke tests with Pulsar 2.11-SNAPSHOT - Signatures/checksums look good Thanks for driving the release Enrico Il giorno ven 4 nov 2022 alle ore 03:43 Yong Zhang ha scritto: > > Hi everyone,

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.14.6 release

+1 Enrico Il giorno lun 7 nov 2022 alle ore 05:24 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > Hi everyone, > > BookKeeper 4.14.5 has been released for 6 months and I would like to > discuss the starting 4.14.6 release to include some bug fixes and > improvements. > > Here are the PRs for 4.14.6: > https://github.

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper 4.15.3 release

+1 thanks FYI I am still working with Raul on this "Missing ledgers when inducing network packet loss in Bookkeeper 4.15" https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3466 But it will take more time, too much to block a release. Enrico Il giorno gio 3 nov 2022 alle ore 11:06 wenbing shen ha sc

Re: [DISCUSS] Add RegistrationSessionExpiredPolicy for session expired event

I have approved the PR Enrico Il Mer 19 Ott 2022, 10:51 wenbing shen ha scritto: > Hi, does anyone have any thoughts on this? > > best! > Wenbing > > wenbing shen 于2022年10月17日周一 15:48写道： > > > Hi, Bookkeeper Community > > > > At present, when the bookie registered session expired, the > > Regi

[ANNOUNCE] New Committer Steven Lu

Hello BookKeepers, I am happy to announce that Steven Lu has been invited to join the Apache BookKeeper project as committer and he accepted the invitation. Congratulations Steven ! Best regards Enrico

Re: Direct memory leak issue

Yan, thanks for sharing your case This is your PR https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3528 please anyone review the patch we should cherry-pick to the 4.14 branch at least Enrico Il giorno gio 13 ott 2022 alle ore 15:05 horizonzy ha scritto: > > Hi all. > Recently, in our customer produ

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper RocksDB configuration changed default blockCacheSize since 4.15.0

back-support the existing configuration, > > otherwise, the pulsar helm chart also need to be changed when upgrade > > BookKeeper 4.14.x to 4.15.x > > > > Thanks, > > Hang > > > > Enrico Olivelli 于2022年10月10日周一 16:07写道： > > > > > > Il Lu

Re: [VOTE] BP-57 Add a public API for creating embeddable servers

Up We need 1 more binding vote from a PMC member Enrico Il Mar 27 Set 2022, 11:36 Nicolò Boschi ha scritto: > +1 (non binding) > Nicolò Boschi > > > Il giorno mar 27 set 2022 alle ore 11:25 Enrico Olivelli < > eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > I think tha

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper RocksDB configuration changed default blockCacheSize since 4.15.0

Great idea Enrico > Yong > > > > > On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 at 23:20, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > Il Dom 9 Ott 2022, 17:03 Hang Chen ha scritto: > > > > > I found the PR https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3056 has > > > changed the rocksDB d

Re: [DISCUSS] BookKeeper RocksDB configuration changed default blockCacheSize since 4.15.0

Il Dom 9 Ott 2022, 17:03 Hang Chen ha scritto: > I found the PR https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3056 has > changed the rocksDB default cache size from 10% of direct memory to > 206150041(196MB), which will lead to entry read performance decrease > when there are huge number of entries s

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.15.2, release candidate #0

Il Mer 5 Ott 2022, 03:25 steven lu ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > Sorry, but binding votes are only from PMC members Enrico deployed and verified in our own test environment, no problems were found > > Yong Zhang 于2022年9月23日周五 15:32写道： > > > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the releas

Re: [DISCUSS] BP-51: BookKeeper client memory limits

en > >> the bookie is starting to exceed its memory consumption, it'd be > >> beneficial to stop reading from the connection and to let the TCP > >> connection propagate back pressure to the server. In this case, we > >> would need a reactive solution si

Re: [DISCUSS] BP-51: BookKeeper client memory limits

Yong, Il giorno mer 28 set 2022 alle ore 10:23 Yong Zhang ha scritto: > > We have improved the memory issue with backpressure with PR > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3324 > > The backpressure way can prevent there have too many Add requests > pending to the client and waiting for the

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.15.2, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - verified checksums and signatures - built from sources on Mac, JDK8, tests are passing (a few flakes) - tested local bookie Thank you! Enrico Il giorno ven 23 set 2022 alle ore 09:32 Yong Zhang ha scritto: > > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >