Jenkins build is back to normal : bookkeeper-master #1735

See

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1008) Move to netty4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15994121#comment-15994121 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1008: Github user merlimat comment

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #116: BOOKKEEPER-1008 Move to Netty4.1

Github user merlimat commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/116 @kishorekasi @eolivelli @revans2 Addressed Bobby comments in a new commit on top of this PR. https://github.com/merlimat/bookkeeper/commits/netty-4.1 --- If your project is set up for

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1019) Support for reading entries after LAC (causal consistency driven by out-of-band communications)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15994117#comment-15994117 ] Hudson commented on BOOKKEEPER-1019: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build bookkee

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-552) 64 Bits Ledger ID Generation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15994118#comment-15994118 ] Hudson commented on BOOKKEEPER-552: --- FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build bookkeeper

Build failed in Jenkins: bookkeeper-master #1734

See Changes: [eolivelli] BOOKKEEPER-1019: Support for reading entries after LAC [mmerli] BOOKKEEPER-552: 64 Bits Ledger ID Generation -- [...truncated 95.13 KB...] Runni

Re: [GitHub] bookkeeper issue #108: BOOKKEEPER-944: LowWaterMark Storage Threshold

@Sijie can we push this in??? Please let me know if anyone has concerns on this patch. On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:26 PM, reddycharan wrote: > Github user reddycharan commented on the issue: > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/108 > > @sijie its been quite long, can you please mer

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1008) Move to netty4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15993925#comment-15993925 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1008: Github user merlimat comment

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #116: BOOKKEEPER-1008 Move to Netty4.1

Github user merlimat commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/116 I think there was a socket leak in the original commit. The leak was fixed in a subsequent commit in the `yahoo-4.3` branch: yahoo/bookkeeper@f19c1d8c67caec2006962574adcf483d40fe6dc7 I

[jira] [Resolved] (BOOKKEEPER-552) 64 Bits Ledger ID Generation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matteo Merli resolved BOOKKEEPER-552. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.5.0 {noformat} commit 057af8dbce6c08794eb8

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-552) 64 Bits Ledger ID Generation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15993751#comment-15993751 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-552: --- Github user asfgit closed the p

[GitHub] bookkeeper pull request #114: BOOKKEEPER-552: 64 Bits Ledger ID Generation

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/114 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-944) Multiple issues and improvements to BK Compaction.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15993668#comment-15993668 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-944: --- Github user reddycharan comment

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #108: BOOKKEEPER-944: LowWaterMark Storage Threshold

Github user reddycharan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/108 @sijie its been quite long, can you please merge this commit. There are multiple commits from our side which depend on this change and we are holding them. @jvrao @dlg99 --- If yo

Re: Issue with entryLogger.leastUnflushedLogId, when preallocatedLogId rolls over Int.MAX

"The question is - is this really an issue? When roll over happen, it might cause an entry log file won't be garbage collected or compacted in this lifecycle of the bookie. But it doesn't actually impact correctness, right?" Yes it is not correctness issue. But the chances of those entrylogs getti

[GitHub] bookkeeper pull request #121: BOOKKEEPER-1019 Support for reading entries af...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/121 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1019) Support for reading entries after LAC (causal consistency driven by out-of-band communications)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15993631#comment-15993631 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1019: Github user asfgit closed th

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-552) 64 Bits Ledger ID Generation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15993462#comment-15993462 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-552: --- Github user eolivelli commented

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #114: BOOKKEEPER-552: 64 Bits Ledger ID Generation

Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/114 @knusbaum this looks great! now all the test pass on my laptop I will run through the code once again --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1042) Deploy SNAPSHOTS of master to public Apache Repository

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15992906#comment-15992906 ] Hudson commented on BOOKKEEPER-1042: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build bookkee

Build failed in Jenkins: bookkeeper-master #1733

See Changes: [eolivelli] BOOKKEEPER-1042: Deploy SNAPSHOTS of master to public Apache Repository -- [...truncated 23.30 KB...] Running org.apache.bookkeeper.test.CloseTe

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #121: BOOKKEEPER-1019 Support for reading entries after LAC

Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/121 @jiazhai thank you for your review we decided not to add a configuration option, but a brand new method readUnconfirmedEntries, this way it is more explicit that the client is reading entri

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1008) Move to netty4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15992838#comment-15992838 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1008: Github user eolivelli commen

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #116: BOOKKEEPER-1008 Move to Netty4.1

Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/116 Thank you @kishorekasi now running the full suite I get sometimes this error ``` Caused by: java.io.IOException: Too many open files at sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.makePipe(Native

Re: Publish SNAPSHOT artifacts on Maven Central

2017-05-02 3:27 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo : > Enrico, > > Let me check it out. But I think you can apply for permissions to access > apache jenkins. Probably an INFRA ticket? > I'm sorry I cannot edit the configuration. According to this guide https://wiki.apache.org/general/Jenkins you (only the PMC