[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15993925#comment-15993925
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1008:
--------------------------------------------
Github user merlimat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/116
I think there was a socket leak in the original commit. The leak was fixed
in a subsequent commit in the `yahoo-4.3` branch:
yahoo/bookkeeper@f19c1d8c67caec2006962574adcf483d40fe6dc7
I have rebased that commit on this PR at
https://github.com/merlimat/bookkeeper/commit/68a711577fe8121f5179462a0c5ee0fa61ddb86d
@kishorekasi Can you apply this commit to your branch?
> Move to netty4
> --------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-1008
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: bookkeeper-client, bookkeeper-server
> Affects Versions: 4.5.0
> Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
> Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans
>
> As part of the Yahoo push back and in general we would like to move to netty
> 4, preferably netty 4.1.x for the client and server communication.
> This lays the ground work for zero copy, or very nearly zero copy handling on
> the server side.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
