ssues/44353 Java
I think that other changes listed in
https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/44574#issuecomment-2445701214
aren't included in binaries.
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: 18.0.1 release manager" on Fri, 8 Nov 2024 01:42:01 +0100,
Jacob Wujciak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> S
Thanks!
In
"Re: 18.0.1 release manager" on Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:59:10 -0800,
Bryce Mecum wrote:
> That plan sounds good to me, Kou. I'll let Jacob reply in the
> affirmative and then we'll get started ASAP.
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:27 PM Sutou Kouhei
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: 18.0.1 release manager" on Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:31:22 +0100,
Raúl Cumplido wrote:
> Thanks Kou for following this up.
>
> I'll be available to support too if needed.
>
> Regards,
> Raúl
>
> El jue, 7 nov 2024, 8:27, Sutou Kouh
ll do
> > these tasks.
> >
> > Jacob, could you focus on managing release process instead
> > of working on release tasks as a release manager? For
> > example, deciding which PRs should be merged or not with
> > discussion, scheduling the next release, starting a vote
ample, deciding which PRs should be merged or not with
> discussion, scheduling the next release, starting a vote and
> so on.
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>
> In
> "Re: 18.0.1 release manager" on Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:09:24 -0800,
> Bryce Mecum wrote:
>
>
ould be merged or not with
> discussion, scheduling the next release, starting a vote and
> so on.
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>
> In
> "Re: 18.0.1 release manager" on Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:09:24 -0800,
> Bryce Mecum wrote:
>
> >> > We're
ks as a release manager? For
example, deciding which PRs should be merged or not with
discussion, scheduling the next release, starting a vote and
so on.
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: 18.0.1 release manager" on Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:09:24 -0800,
Bryce Mecum wrote:
>> > We're s
; > something like
> > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/releases/tag/apache-arrow-18.0.0
> > > from
> > > https://apache.jfrog.io/ui/native/arrow/r/X.Y.Z/
> > > something like
> > > https://apache.jfrog.io/ui/native/arrow/r/18.0.0/ ?
> > >
> > &g
hing like
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/releases/tag/apache-arrow-18.0.0
> from
> https://apache.jfrog.io/ui/native/arrow/r/X.Y.Z/
> something like
> https://apache.jfrog.io/ui/native/arrow/r/18.0.0/ ?
>
> Our Artifactory space uses 75% of quota. So it sends
> notificat
scuss this at
https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/40760 .
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: 18.0.1 release manager" on Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:57:40 +0100,
Jacob Wujciak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kou I am not sure what you mean with changing location of the binaries in
> the links you
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/releases/tag/apache-arrow-18.0.0
> > from
> > https://apache.jfrog.io/ui/native/arrow/r/X.Y.Z/
> > something like
> > https://apache.jfrog.io/ui/native/arrow/r/18.0.0/ ?
> >
> > Our Artifactory space uses 75% of quota. So
pache/arrow/releases/tag/apache-arrow-X.Y.Z
> something like
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/releases/tag/apache-arrow-18.0.0
> from
> https://apache.jfrog.io/ui/native/arrow/r/X.Y.Z/
> something like
> https://apache.jfrog.io/ui/native/arrow/r/18.0.0/ ?
>
> Our Artifacto
unteers for release
manager.
The first step may be to increase the number of people with
experience as release managers.
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: 18.0.1 release manager" on Fri, 1 Nov 2024 15:01:19 +0100,
Jacob Wujciak-Jens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree that we should do anot
frog.io/ui/native/arrow/r/18.0.0/ ?
Our Artifactory space uses 75% of quota. So it sends
notification e-mails periodically...
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: 18.0.1 release manager" on Fri, 1 Nov 2024 06:11:26 +,
Nic Crane wrote:
> Hi Kou,
>
> The Arrow R package is still
Hi,
I agree that we should do another release. We just found an issue with the
thrift urls when doing the R release that should also be fixed as it can
cause issues on CRAN #44607.
There is at least one other PR that just missed the RC (#43535) but would
be nice to add. As it makes a new API publi
Hi Kou,
The Arrow R package is still in the process of being submitted to CRAN, so
if it helps and could reduce the work needed for 18.0.1 could we replace
the C++ binaries with the correct ones?
Thanks,
Nic
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024, 00:26 Sutou Kouhei, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We built 18.0.0 RC0 binaries
16 matches
Mail list logo
