SGTM
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> OK, I've thought a bit more about it and I'm +1 on doing a 0.4.0. There's
> enough meaningful new features and improvements since 0.3.0 already (almost
> 50 patches) to merit a small announcement blog. I will plan to cut the RC
> on Tu
OK, I've thought a bit more about it and I'm +1 on doing a 0.4.0. There's
enough meaningful new features and improvements since 0.3.0 already (almost
50 patches) to merit a small announcement blog. I will plan to cut the RC
on Tuesday to give enough time to get in some last minute cleanup patches.
Hello,
I would also be in favour of a bugfix release. Although, as we had quite
some API changes in https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/680, I would
vote for a 0.4.0 release.
Uwe
--
Uwe L. Korn
uw...@xhochy.com
On Sun, May 14, 2017, at 06:02 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> I just
hi folks,
I just fixed a quite serious memory leak in the Arrow Python bindings:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/685
There have been some other bugs fixed since 0.3.0, and since I don't
think we have any API changes, I think we could release master as is.
We could also do a major version bu
