SGTM On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, I've thought a bit more about it and I'm +1 on doing a 0.4.0. There's > enough meaningful new features and improvements since 0.3.0 already (almost > 50 patches) to merit a small announcement blog. I will plan to cut the RC > on Tuesday to give enough time to get in some last minute cleanup patches. > > - Wes > > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I would also be in favour of a bugfix release. Although, as we had quite > > some API changes in https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/680, I would > > vote for a 0.4.0 release. > > > > Uwe > > > > -- > > Uwe L. Korn > > uw...@xhochy.com > > > > On Sun, May 14, 2017, at 06:02 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: > > > hi folks, > > > > > > I just fixed a quite serious memory leak in the Arrow Python bindings: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/685 > > > > > > There have been some other bugs fixed since 0.3.0, and since I don't > > > think we have any API changes, I think we could release master as is. > > > We could also do a major version bump to 0.4.0. > > > > > > Let me know what others think. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Wes > > > -- Julien
